Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Finally Cosworth Heads!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2006, 04:14 AM
  #61  
Q45tech
Registered User
 
Q45tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't confuse STATIC compression ratio as meaningful for anything other than cranking [how much power the starter needs to develop]. All that counts is EFFECTIVE running compression after cam [air flow in/out] is calculated.
Old 06-16-2006, 05:51 AM
  #62  
rednezz
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
rednezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Q45tech
Don't confuse STATIC compression ratio as meaningful for anything other than cranking [how much power the starter needs to develop]. All that counts is EFFECTIVE running compression after cam [air flow in/out] is calculated.
I have always been told that dynamic CR is lower than static CR because of the valves opening. When adding big duration cams you want to add a higher static CR because the valves will stay open longer reducing CR.

Originally Posted by Z350Lover
Congrats Joe! You will love those beautiful heads!!! And with a set of 11.1:1 compression pistons and a set of wild cams (Nismo Spec 2 cans suit your needs), you should be at 320rwHP+!

cheers,

richie
Thanks Richie...I plan on getting some cams with more lift than the Nismo Spec 2 cams. Looking at the Cosworth flow chart I think lift will be just as important as duration. Right now I am trying to get my hands on some cams with more lift than is currently available. If I get them I will post info on them and how well they work.

Last edited by rednezz; 06-16-2006 at 05:56 AM.
Old 06-16-2006, 05:51 AM
  #63  
-EL
Registered User
 
-EL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All over!
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Q45tech
Don't confuse STATIC compression ratio as meaningful for anything other than cranking [how much power the starter needs to develop]. All that counts is EFFECTIVE running compression after cam [air flow in/out] is calculated.
Well, assuming we keep the same cams, increasing the flow through the heads is going to increase the volumetric efficiency, raising the effective running compression? Obviously tough to know what an engineer was thinking when he was working on these heads, but do you think the additional chamber space was meant to compensate for the increase in effective compression due to better volumetric efficiency?

*EDIT*

OK, I sat and thought about this, and is it really accurate to say that there is "effective" versus "static" compression? Certainly the volumetric efficiency of the engine is going to change based on any number of factors, such as air pressure, temperature, forced induction, cam timing, engine speed, etc. But whatever you put into the cylinder is going to get squeezed based on the mechanical compression ratio of the motor, which should just be a ratio of the total volume at BDC vs TDC.

*/EDIT*

I'm seriously considering using these heads for my build, and want to bore to 100mm, so I'd like to understand as much as I can.

-E

Last edited by -EL; 06-16-2006 at 07:29 AM.
Old 06-16-2006, 07:42 AM
  #64  
-EL
Registered User
 
-EL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All over!
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rednezz
I have always been told that dynamic CR is lower than static CR because of the valves opening. When adding big duration cams you want to add a higher static CR because the valves will stay open longer reducing CR.
AHHH! Too much to think about. Ok, that makes sense, long duration cams will be open during compression, gonna get some leakage reducing your CR, etc etc. Now I understand what he meant by effective compression while the engine is running.

-E
Old 06-16-2006, 01:00 PM
  #65  
dscheers
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
dscheers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Panama, Central America
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Waiting for the heads to arrive but my decals arrived



Old 06-16-2006, 01:23 PM
  #66  
rednezz
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
rednezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -EL
AHHH! Too much to think about. Ok, that makes sense, long duration cams will be open during compression, gonna get some leakage reducing your CR, etc etc. Now I understand what he meant by effective compression while the engine is running.

-E
I am not 100%, I am just going by what I have been told be several people.
Old 06-17-2006, 10:22 AM
  #67  
Resolute
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Resolute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: @7000 ft
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -EL
Could, but it's always a tradeoff... his 8.5 pistons would actually be more like 8.3 with the extra chamber size. Non-boost performance is going to suffer more.

-E
If I read correctly, you're running a SC, so that sucks. If it were a turbo, the 8.3 would probably be better for you. I know everyone is on a high C/R kick right now for boosted motors, but with a TT set-up, off boost time should be minimal. With the JWT, I think the boost threshold is like 1500 rpm, and who cares about power before then? With the lower C/R, more energy will go to drive the turbines and the turbos will spool faster and easier throughout their operating range. Of course, for a SC system, this does nothing..
Will
Old 06-17-2006, 10:26 AM
  #68  
Resolute
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Resolute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: @7000 ft
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -EL
Well, assuming we keep the same cams, increasing the flow through the heads is going to increase the volumetric efficiency, raising the effective running compression? Obviously tough to know what an engineer was thinking when he was working on these heads, but do you think the additional chamber space was meant to compensate for the increase in effective compression due to better volumetric efficiency?

*EDIT*

OK, I sat and thought about this, and is it really accurate to say that there is "effective" versus "static" compression? Certainly the volumetric efficiency of the engine is going to change based on any number of factors, such as air pressure, temperature, forced induction, cam timing, engine speed, etc. But whatever you put into the cylinder is going to get squeezed based on the mechanical compression ratio of the motor, which should just be a ratio of the total volume at BDC vs TDC.

*/EDIT*

I'm seriously considering using these heads for my build, and want to bore to 100mm, so I'd like to understand as much as I can.

-E
Were is the diffference coming from in the Cosworth heads? Is it a slightly taller deck height? I wonder if the Cosworth heads will allow for a higher lift cam without the use of interference or dished pistons due to a taller combustion chamber? Just a thought.
Will
Old 07-01-2006, 08:22 PM
  #69  
dscheers
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
dscheers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Panama, Central America
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Got my Cosworth heads in and veryone I show them too is absolutely amazed of the quality and craftmenship.

Bearings are still on hold.... will have to go with OEM. PITA choosing the right ones, and of course there are none to be found locally.

Will be calling you on Monday Sharif for a rush order

Danny
Old 05-04-2007, 05:08 AM
  #70  
streetracer
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
streetracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Juan
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Where can I get a price for Dave's heads for the VQ?
Old 05-04-2007, 08:09 AM
  #71  
TONY2
Registered User
 
TONY2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Richardson
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow...no way. Its Dave from Headgames. I didnt know you messed with VQ heads. Anyways, thanks for helping me with the Honda head a year ago. This guy Dave is super nice. I heard you also do 3RZ heads. Is that right? Let me know. Currently Van is doing those for us and he is doing a fantastic job. I'm on the way to E-town as we speak, hope to see you there this weekend. Anyways...thanks for the hospitality.
Old 05-04-2007, 09:54 AM
  #72  
Philthy
Boost Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
Philthy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Centeral NJ
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by streetracer
Where can I get a price for Dave's heads for the VQ?

Give him a call... phone: (609) 882-3211
Old 05-04-2007, 10:35 AM
  #73  
sentry65
the burninator
iTrader: (11)
 
sentry65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

increasing the displacement of the engine via boring or stroker kit I don't think has an effect on compression ratio. The compression is the same, there's just more volume of it being pushed. If the piston was the diameter of an oil drum, it would still compress the air to the same compression. There's just more air being compressed overall


I'm curious too about if the heads have more volume how that might change the compression ratio.

I've actually been thinking of going with something like 10.5 or 11:1 CR when I do a built engine with my vortech setup considering I run water/meth injection and 96-101 octane gas anyway.
Old 05-04-2007, 01:15 PM
  #74  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
increasing the displacement of the engine via boring or stroker kit I don't think has an effect on compression ratio. The compression is the same, there's just more volume of it being pushed. If the piston was the diameter of an oil drum, it would still compress the air to the same compression. There's just more air being compressed overall


I'm curious too about if the heads have more volume how that might change the compression ratio.

I've actually been thinking of going with something like 10.5 or 11:1 CR when I do a built engine with my vortech setup considering I run water/meth injection and 96-101 octane gas anyway.
1. increasing bore and stroke can affect compression
2. less head chamber cc's = increased compression, more head chamber cc's = lower compression. Cosworth heads slightly drop the stock compression (vs, say NISMO heads, which raise compression)
Old 05-04-2007, 02:53 PM
  #75  
sentry65
the burninator
iTrader: (11)
 
sentry65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I dunno, I can see how the cc's in the heads completely affect compression because the air being compressed has more room to expand into with bigger heads
but for the short block with a larger bore and stroke, more air is naturally going to fill the (larger) cylinder chamber and more gas is obviously called for to balance the A/F

I guess what I'm wondering, is if you proportionately increase everything, why would the compression would change??

Last edited by sentry65; 05-04-2007 at 03:00 PM.
Old 05-04-2007, 02:59 PM
  #76  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...ression_guide/

easier for me to post that article rather than post myself

Both bore and stroke have an effect on compression....stroke moreso than bore
Old 05-04-2007, 03:01 PM
  #77  
sentry65
the burninator
iTrader: (11)
 
sentry65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

thanks for the link

so when you buy a stroker kit with 11 CR that was intended for stock heads and I went and got some huge high flowing heads, that'd then lower the CR by whatever amount. So I guess people just need to factor that into their build

Last edited by sentry65; 05-04-2007 at 03:06 PM.
Old 05-04-2007, 03:04 PM
  #78  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

if coming from a reputable manufacturer, just the opposite..the compression should be EXACTLY what they quote, as they've taken the other variables into account.

Obviously, if you toss that stroker onto an aftermarket head with more or less combustion camber cc's, varying deck heights (can't vary it by much on this motor or it won't bolt together), then compression can be expected to vary slightly
Old 05-04-2007, 08:22 PM
  #79  
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^^Correct^^

For instance, when we make our 100mm Arias ED pistons, this results in a 3.8L displacement, so the CR of the piston is set to 9.0:1, and the piston is constructed to acheive this CR, given the CC of the heads, headgasket thickness, etc..etc..

Like Z1 mentioned, CR can vary ever so slightly with different combinations of HG's, combustion chamber shaping/porting, but usually not in a huge way.

Manufacturers will do these calculations for you, so no worries.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pleask
Maintenance & Repair
22
12-21-2021 03:17 PM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
04-22-2021 09:42 PM
350z82
Exterior & Interior
19
10-01-2015 06:25 PM



Quick Reply: Finally Cosworth Heads!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 AM.