Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Final Drive Gear - 3.5 vs 3.9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 07:44 AM
  #41  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
trey.hutcheson
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
you'd have to change the individual transmission gears non-proportinally to actually create a rpm change from gear to gear compared to the stock tranny gearing. The final drive only multiplies everything one final time as a whole

the change in gap you're talking about doesn't change when you change the final drive. the only thing that changes is the accelleration, theoretical top speed in each gear, and the frequency you will shift during a given distance
I understand that the gap between the gears is unchanged. The gap in the power to the ground, in absolute numbers, is. Proportionally, it's the same.

I think you misunderstood my point.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 07:52 AM
  #42  
mario60185's Avatar
mario60185
Chicago Realtor
Premier Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 938
Likes: 1
From: chicago
Default

who cares about thes technical mumbo jumbo? It makes the z faster...period. Only time i would think twice is if i was going to go turbo with big horsepower.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #43  
Dave B's Avatar
Dave B
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Shawnee, KS
Default

Originally Posted by mario60185
who cares about thes technical mumbo jumbo? It makes the z faster...period. Only time i would think twice is if i was going to go turbo with big horsepower.
Has anyone actually proven this with a timeslip though? The acceleration through each gear is quicker, but there is more shifting going on and/or the gearing may cause the engine to run through the powerband too quickly in 1st and 2nd. If adding gears was the answer, then why stop at a 3.9? Why not a 5.0? It is very possible to overgear a car. With the VQ35s fat and wide powerband, it's not remotely as dependant on gearing as something like a 3.0 VTEC V6.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #44  
mavtais's Avatar
mavtais
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: CentralCal - Fresno
Default

I think that's why Nismo only went with 3.917 instead of say a 4.1...
Any tighter, and you'd have to rebuild the motor to get the RPM's up. The higher you can rev, the tighter your gearing can be, without loss of top end speed.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 08:47 AM
  #45  
mario60185's Avatar
mario60185
Chicago Realtor
Premier Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 938
Likes: 1
From: chicago
Default

Let me rephrase......its faster through turns, so maybe not for a dragstrip.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 10:06 AM
  #46  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

it definetly helps your top end accelleration. You really feel the difference in 6th gear when cruising on the highway. It's no longer a lazy gear
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 10:10 AM
  #47  
ZPirate's Avatar
ZPirate
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 27
From: Greenville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
it definetly helps your top end accelleration. You really feel the difference in 6th gear when cruising on the highway. It's no longer a lazy gear
+1

Overall I think the 3.9 gears are one of the best bang for the buck mods out there for the 350Z. I really could care less about 1/4 mile times. I got the gears for overall performance. I have had mine for a year now and love them.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 10:39 AM
  #48  
helldorado's Avatar
helldorado
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 814
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Dave B
Has anyone actually proven this with a timeslip though? The acceleration through each gear is quicker, but there is more shifting going on and/or the gearing may cause the engine to run through the powerband too quickly in 1st and 2nd.
I've only had the car back for about a month since getting everything worked out so I haven't had a chance to go to the track yet. I'm hoping to get back to the track before the end of the month so I can do some runs and make some comparisons.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #49  
Nismo 350z's Avatar
Nismo 350z
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 1
From: So.Cali 626-951
Default

Originally Posted by mario60185
Let me rephrase......its faster through turns, so maybe not for a dragstrip.
The 3.9FD will help acceleration through all the gears. It doenst matter if u are on a drag strip or on a track.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 02:10 PM
  #50  
Mathys's Avatar
Mathys
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands/Belgium
Default

There is no cheaper option for a 3.9 FD than going for the Nismo 3.917 for +-1300$?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 12:27 AM
  #51  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Dave B
Has anyone actually proven this with a timeslip though? The acceleration through each gear is quicker, but there is more shifting going on and/or the gearing may cause the engine to run through the powerband too quickly in 1st and 2nd. If adding gears was the answer, then why stop at a 3.9? Why not a 5.0? It is very possible to overgear a car. With the VQ35s fat and wide powerband, it's not remotely as dependant on gearing as something like a 3.0 VTEC V6.
I remember originally reading a year or two ago when the 3.9 gears first came out they were supposed to reduce your 1/4 mile time by like .5 seconds and your 0-60 by like .2 seconds. However, someone later came along and squashed it because he did before/after comparo's and it made little difference because of the extra shifting.

I think its mostly designed for road-racing and auto-xing, for more responsive power bands and such.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 01:16 AM
  #52  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

I suppose that matters if you only drive your car at the drag strip or if you have a magazine journalist reviewing your car's 0-60

otherwise everything else is faster. If you're going to drive up to 165 mph, you have to shift 5 times no matter what. Your rpms are still going to be higher in each gear which puts you higher in the torque/hp band in addition to the 10.6% gearing multiplication punch
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #53  
mario60185's Avatar
mario60185
Chicago Realtor
Premier Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 938
Likes: 1
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Nismo 350z
The 3.9FD will help acceleration through all the gears. It doenst matter if u are on a drag strip or on a track.

unless you have this mod and have tested it why do u think your so smart? people have shown there 1/4 times werent any faster, thats what were discussing genius.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 09:47 AM
  #54  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Mathys
There is no cheaper option for a 3.9 FD than going for the Nismo 3.917 for +-1300$?
Sure there is:


http://z1auto.com/prodmore.asp?model...ne&prodid=1726

16 sets coming end of the month, still have a few sets left
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #55  
quint1's Avatar
quint1
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Owings Mills, Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
Sure there is:


http://z1auto.com/prodmore.asp?model...ne&prodid=1726

16 sets coming end of the month, still have a few sets left

Just ordered the 3.91 gears, great price. Thx for the info
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #56  
quint1's Avatar
quint1
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Owings Mills, Maryland
Default

Final Gear RPM formula: FYI

Tire diameter will also have an effect on a vehicle's final drive ratio. As tire diameter changes, so will engine rpm at a given speed. This can be demonstrated this with the simplified formula: rpm = (mph x final gear ratio x 336*) / tire diameter (*the constants of time, pi and distance have been simplified and replaced with 336). For example, given 65 mph, a tire diameter of 30 inches, and a final gear ratio of 4.10, the engine speed will be approximately 2,984 rpm--(65 mph x 4.10 final gear ratio x 336) / 30-inch diameter tire. If we reduce the tire diameter to 25 inches, the engine speed increases to 3,581 rpm. By installing shorter tires, the vehicle will accelerate as though it has a 4.73 (higher numerically) gear without the expense of gear swapping.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #57  
quint1's Avatar
quint1
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Owings Mills, Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by quint1
Final Gear RPM formula: FYI

Tire diameter will also have an effect on a vehicle's final drive ratio. As tire diameter changes, so will engine rpm at a given speed. This can be demonstrated this with the simplified formula: rpm = (mph x final gear ratio x 336*) / tire diameter (*the constants of time, pi and distance have been simplified and replaced with 336). For example, given 65 mph, a tire diameter of 30 inches, and a final gear ratio of 4.10, the engine speed will be approximately 2,984 rpm--(65 mph x 4.10 final gear ratio x 336) / 30-inch diameter tire. If we reduce the tire diameter to 25 inches, the engine speed increases to 3,581 rpm. By installing shorter tires, the vehicle will accelerate as though it has a 4.73 (higher numerically) gear without the expense of gear swapping.
This assumes a high gear ratio of 1 times the axle's gear ratio

Tire size: 245/40/17 (stock Z)
65mph*3.53 rear end ratio*336 / 24.7 tire diam (17") = 3121 RPM

Tire size: 275/35/20 (mod Z)
65 mph*3.53 rear end ratio*336 / 27.6 tire diam (20") = 2793 RPM

Tire size: 245/40/17 (stock Z tires)
65 mph*3.91 rear end ratio*336 / 24.7 tire diam (17") = 3457 RPM

Tire size: 275/35/20 (mod Z)
65 mph*3.91 rear end ratio*336 / 27.6 tire diam (20") = 3094 RPM
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #58  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

you guys need this site - it's a sticky in this forum

http://www.f-body.org/gears/
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Obadabot
Maintenance & Repair
16
Jun 18, 2023 11:31 PM
sherm
Engine & Drivetrain
15
Apr 11, 2020 05:21 PM
hajwoj
Autocross/Road
27
Nov 1, 2015 05:25 PM
350z82
Exterior & Interior
19
Oct 1, 2015 06:25 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:53 AM.