I did a search and was not able to find a single person with this setup. It might not be the lightest setup, but I would think theoretically it should be great for a slight upgrade from stock.

I actually don't mind the heavy stock flywheel, as I can go through stop signs while staying in 2nd gear, even going uphill (due to inertia of flywheel). The Nismo flywheel is a compromise between the lighter JWT (14lbs) and stock (30lbs+?), and being about half the price of the OEM flywheel it's a no brainer.

So what gives?

 

because the JWT flywheel is less expensive and weighs less. Plus it is the perfect match for the JWT clutch.

 

I live in SEATTLE. I go up 70 degree hills with the JWT flywheel.

 

I have no problems with starting off in 2nd gear or going up hills either.

 

I think PFunk124 has this set up. I met him at a meet a few days ago and I thought he said he has it. Hit him up. He car is set up nicely.

 

Well the price difference is negligible, and the lesser weight is a catch 22. Less unsprung mass you get to rev faster, but the revs drop equally as fast.

 

From a 1-2 mph roll w/o burning the clutch?

 

Just a technical note, that's rotational mass.

 

I have the JWT Clutch/Flywheel Combo. car feels much lighter and rev matching is much much easier and smoother although gear engagement is a bit rough at times. Great Combo.

 

my revs dont drop fast and I have had my clutch/flywheel combo for over 40K miles so far and haven't burnt the clutch yet. 20K of those miles have been forced induction pushing over 400whp.

 

Act streetlite would probably be better , and its cheaper than NISMO