NWS Avatars
#101
Administrator
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by taurran
UH OH. Here they all come!!!
Of course it's about your DNF "crew" look at your avatars. You all identify yourselves by them, and spend however many hours making them. That's why you REFUSE to turn avatars off. Saying otherwise is just being blind to underlying facts. Your arguments are totally non-objective as they are totally self serving.
And yes, the majority of the off-topic post ***** crew could care less about automotive discussion. A large portion of them don't even own Z's.
Of course it's about your DNF "crew" look at your avatars. You all identify yourselves by them, and spend however many hours making them. That's why you REFUSE to turn avatars off. Saying otherwise is just being blind to underlying facts. Your arguments are totally non-objective as they are totally self serving.
And yes, the majority of the off-topic post ***** crew could care less about automotive discussion. A large portion of them don't even own Z's.
Was this because I was the first PM member with the DNF logo in my avatar to voice his opinion?
Voicing an opinion is a debateful manner is not the same as whining or reporting someone.
VO(needs some clarification)
#102
Banned
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by taurran
UH OH. Here they all come!!!
Of course it's about your DNF "crew" look at your avatars. You all identify yourselves by them, and spend however many hours making them. That's why you REFUSE to turn avatars off. Saying otherwise is just being blind to underlying facts. Your arguments are totally non-objective as they are totally self serving.
And yes, the majority of the off-topic post ***** crew could care less about automotive discussion. A large portion of them don't even own Z's.
I LOVE how people turn their own whining and bitching about rated-PG avatars and being called on it, into "I'm rubber, you're glue". I could care less about my own avatar, but it's the principal of people being overly sensitive, complaining, and getting their way that ticks me off. People like you are a BIG problem with this country today.
I bet you'd try to sue my350z if you got fired for web browsing at work, too...
Of course it's about your DNF "crew" look at your avatars. You all identify yourselves by them, and spend however many hours making them. That's why you REFUSE to turn avatars off. Saying otherwise is just being blind to underlying facts. Your arguments are totally non-objective as they are totally self serving.
And yes, the majority of the off-topic post ***** crew could care less about automotive discussion. A large portion of them don't even own Z's.
I LOVE how people turn their own whining and bitching about rated-PG avatars and being called on it, into "I'm rubber, you're glue". I could care less about my own avatar, but it's the principal of people being overly sensitive, complaining, and getting their way that ticks me off. People like you are a BIG problem with this country today.
I bet you'd try to sue my350z if you got fired for web browsing at work, too...
#103
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Silverstone-Z
What's so hard to understand about that? If you were guilty of such a thing, stop crying and move on. It's not like your avatar made everyone think you're much more of a man anyway
#105
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vo7848
I am failing to see why the DNF crew has any relation to disabling avatars.
Was this because I was the first PM member with the DNF logo in my avatar to voice his opinion?
Voicing an opinion is a debateful manner is not the same as whining or reporting someone.
VO(needs some clarification)
Was this because I was the first PM member with the DNF logo in my avatar to voice his opinion?
Voicing an opinion is a debateful manner is not the same as whining or reporting someone.
VO(needs some clarification)
#107
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by taurran
You and the others' idea of "pornographic" material needs some serious reconsideration. I have yet to see an actual NWS pornographic avatar on this forum.
#108
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by taurran
UH OH. Here they all come!!!
Of course it's about your DNF "crew" look at your avatars. You all identify yourselves by them, and spend however many hours making them. That's why you REFUSE to turn avatars off. Saying otherwise is just being blind to underlying facts. Your arguments are totally non-objective as they are totally self serving.
And yes, the majority of the off-topic post ***** crew could care less about automotive discussion. A large portion of them don't even own Z's.
I LOVE how people turn their own whining and bitching about rated-PG avatars and being called on it, into "I'm rubber, you're glue". I could care less about my own avatar, but it's the principal of people being overly sensitive, complaining, and getting their way that ticks me off. People like you are a BIG problem with this country today.
I bet you'd try to sue my350z if you got fired for web browsing at work, too...
Of course it's about your DNF "crew" look at your avatars. You all identify yourselves by them, and spend however many hours making them. That's why you REFUSE to turn avatars off. Saying otherwise is just being blind to underlying facts. Your arguments are totally non-objective as they are totally self serving.
And yes, the majority of the off-topic post ***** crew could care less about automotive discussion. A large portion of them don't even own Z's.
I LOVE how people turn their own whining and bitching about rated-PG avatars and being called on it, into "I'm rubber, you're glue". I could care less about my own avatar, but it's the principal of people being overly sensitive, complaining, and getting their way that ticks me off. People like you are a BIG problem with this country today.
I bet you'd try to sue my350z if you got fired for web browsing at work, too...
I do help when someone asks a reasonable question but that rarely happens considering the many questions that are repeated.
You're the nicest person on the board
BTW, I have no complaint about the avatars. In reality, I don't think its my350z's responsibly for the risks you take at work. Most companies consider anything and everything that's not work-related to be against the rules regardless.
Last edited by blasian; 03-03-2008 at 09:36 AM.
#109
Banned
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by taurran
It is because you, and the rest of the DNF people here are the ones flat out refusing to disable avatars. A mod already suggested you do it, why else would only this group of individuals refuse? It's pretty obvious if you aren't biased in your view of the situation.
when did anyone in DNF complain about your avatar?
- im lost.
#110
Originally Posted by taurran
You and the others' idea of "pornographic" material needs some serious reconsideration. I have yet to see an actual NWS pornographic avatar on this forum.
#111
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by taurran
Typical reply coming from the normal off-topic post *****. I'm only an "annoying dick" to those who deserve it, and every bit of the bored masses that incessantly post in the off topic section absolutely do.
If you knew anything about cars or were remotely interested in coming to thse forums to discuss automotive topics, you might know that cars are typically a male dominated past time. Go to any meet, any show, any shop, any magazine section, and you'll see nothing but fast cars and scantily clad models on every peice of media you see.
You seem to forget that this is a CAR FORUM, not an OT playground. It's part of the culture. If you want to have a forum to talk about playing xbox video games then perhaps you should make your own with all the other pimple faced goons that have no interest in fast cars and hot women.
In case you haven't bothered to actually view the rules:
What you deem to be PG-rated, and what is actually PG-rated are two totally different things. I can understand nudity, but a picture of a girl in what amounts to a bra or bikini does NOT amount to NSFW.
You're trying to force your own bosses' discretions upon everyone else here in the forum.
My avatar was PG. It had no nudity, no sexual inuendo, and no "non-PG" related content. I could care less that you dislike it based on your job, but it was within guidelines of the TOU.
If you knew anything about cars or were remotely interested in coming to thse forums to discuss automotive topics, you might know that cars are typically a male dominated past time. Go to any meet, any show, any shop, any magazine section, and you'll see nothing but fast cars and scantily clad models on every peice of media you see.
You seem to forget that this is a CAR FORUM, not an OT playground. It's part of the culture. If you want to have a forum to talk about playing xbox video games then perhaps you should make your own with all the other pimple faced goons that have no interest in fast cars and hot women.
In case you haven't bothered to actually view the rules:
What you deem to be PG-rated, and what is actually PG-rated are two totally different things. I can understand nudity, but a picture of a girl in what amounts to a bra or bikini does NOT amount to NSFW.
You're trying to force your own bosses' discretions upon everyone else here in the forum.
My avatar was PG. It had no nudity, no sexual inuendo, and no "non-PG" related content. I could care less that you dislike it based on your job, but it was within guidelines of the TOU.
I know as much about cars than just about anyone on the forum. I have said some stupid stuff in my time, as have you. Don't act like you have more of a right to this forum because you talk more about the 350Z than I do. I like the OT, because I get bored at work. That doesn't make you better than me. Hey, I've never been banned. Does that make me a better forum member than you?
I had never complained about the NSFW avatars. (Of which there are a few...) but it has concerned me. ***** are NSFW. I stay out of the ***** thread, because even bikini-clad ***** are nsfw. Some chicks a$$ in a thong os NSFW. If my boss saw it, he would either be offended or fap, neither of which is good for me.
My $30 is as good as your $30. Just because your office is more lax and you can have pictures of scantily clad boobies does not mean you have the right to deny features of the forums to those of us whose offices are more uptight. It doesn't make a difference to you if your avatar is SFW... You could apparently go to the ***** thread at work and get your fill. But it does make a difference to me if your avatar is NSFW, because I would then either
a) Have to live with it, and run the risk of my boss seeing teh boobies
or
b) Have to turn off all avatars.
So youre saying that I should be punished for being in an office that is more uptight, even though it doesn't make any difference to you if your avatar is SFW.
BTW, thank you for changing your avatar. I dont even know what it was before, but your current one is SFW.
As to text being NSFW, most people arent going to turn thier heads at text, but a picture of boobies grabs thier attention.
#112
Viper Sellout
iTrader: (84)
Originally Posted by taurran
You and the others' idea of "pornographic" material needs some serious reconsideration. I have yet to see an actual NWS pornographic avatar on this forum.
#114
Originally Posted by taurran
It is because you, and the rest of the DNF people here are the ones flat out refusing to disable avatars. A mod already suggested you do it, why else would only this group of individuals refuse? It's pretty obvious if you aren't biased in your view of the situation.
Us turning our avatars off does not make your avatar SFW.
#115
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by ZU L8R
there have been a few but they are taken down immed. w/o warning. One that comes to mind was one with some girl and a horse. You get the idea.
And yeah... that I don't have a problem with being taken down
#116
Banned
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by DomZ
I'm still failing to see why you're tagging DNF here. We did nothing to you. As a matter of fact before this thread I don't think I've ever even spoken to you on here though according to you I go around being a dick to everyone. So you basically lurk in the OT but won't post there for fear of losing some of your lame FI "street cred"?
Us turning our avatars off does not make your avatar SFW.
Us turning our avatars off does not make your avatar SFW.
#117
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZU L8R
there have been a few but they are taken down immed. w/o warning. One that comes to mind was one with some girl and a horse. You get the idea.
Looks like I kicked the pile of horse crap and the flies are swarming out. This thread is going OT quick.
#118
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by DomZ
I'm still failing to see why you're tagging DNF here. We did nothing to you. As a matter of fact before this thread I don't think I've ever even spoken to you on here though according to you I go around being a dick to everyone. So you basically lurk in the OT but won't post there for fear of losing some of your lame FI "street cred"?
Originally Posted by Hraesvelg
That was no girl, that was Fowlman.
#119
Banned
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by taurran
Hey, at least you're making sense here. I missed out on the one with the horse, and of course I would agree that one should go. However...
Looks like I kicked the pile of horse crap and the flies are swarming out. This thread is going OT quick.
Looks like I kicked the pile of horse crap and the flies are swarming out. This thread is going OT quick.
i think were all still talking about NWS avatars.
#120
Originally Posted by taurran
Hey, at least you're making sense here. I missed out on the one with the horse, and of course I would agree that one should go. However...
Looks like I kicked the pile of horse crap and the flies are swarming out. This thread is going OT quick.
Looks like I kicked the pile of horse crap and the flies are swarming out. This thread is going OT quick.