Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Are stock rods suitable for FI VQ engines?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #121  
APS's Avatar
APS
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by nis350ztt
Peter, did you see what 2jzfan said about the baffling? Just wondering what your thoughts on that is.
Imho well designed baffling around the oil pickup is critical to reduce/eliminate oil starvation under high G force conditions.

Thanks

Peter
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 03:02 PM
  #122  
APS's Avatar
APS
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by overZealous1
one thing i have not seen anyone touch on yet is machining. what tolerances or process is the factory using. also aluminum going through that many heat cycles is going to shift, especially on a new block. there is the chance of core shift on the main bearings that would produce uneven bearing wear also. v type motors also do not have as much support on the crank shaft as inline motors and having longer distances between main bearings which can lead to crank flexing for guys putting down good power.
also what tolerances does nissan use for checking crank straightness when they build the motor. surely they have specs, but maybe not quite as tight of specs as would need to build a high hp motor. i have seen uneven bearing wear in quite a few of my v8 motors and most were due to core shift, crankout of tolerance for straightness, not giving a seasoned block a line bore or over rev which lead to crank flexing.
All of this is entirely possible though generally it's best to eliminate the basics first and if the problem persists then work through the more complex machining and clearance issues when the engine is apart and measured up correctly, though your point is well taken.

Thanks

Peter
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 03:12 PM
  #123  
APS's Avatar
APS
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by jeffw

An added bonus is that you get oil pressure before you crank your car. And the secondary oil pickup could be placed in such a way that it's likely to pump oil when the other pickup is starving. Also, oil pressure is much more constant and less dependent on RPM. You could even put in a less powerful mechanical oil pump (if available) and you'd have less parasitic HP loss.
Would be very interesting to try this approach as a secondary back up system against oil starvation. I agree that a well baffled oil pan would be less complex and probably more reliable in the long term.

Originally posted by jeffw
That said, if the simple approach of a better oil pan for baffles and cooling solves any oil-related issues, then there is no point in doing the electric oil boost pump.
Agreed a well designed baffled oil pan is the more practical and cost effective approach to reduce potential oil starvation.

Peter
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 03:26 PM
  #124  
APS's Avatar
APS
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by gq_626
Baffling wll not correct oil stavation issues under normal straight line driving conditions.
Sharif I'm not sure that I understand your post though surely the engine can be starved of engine oil under extreme straight line acceleration? Imho the oil under these conditions can run to the rear of the oil pan (away from the oil pickup) and starve the engine of oil.

Originally posted by gq_626
Believe me Peter, I really like the APS oil pan, and I putting one on my car for sure. .
Thanks and I hope this helps to reduce any potential problem.

Originally posted by gq_626
Assuming your theory on the spun bearing is correct, its highly unlikely that a baffled oil pan will correct the problem for most people.
If I understand your question correcty you are saying that the oil pan won't help to reduce the chance of the bearing spinning, is this correct?

It's my humble opinion if you starve the big end bearings of engine oil for even a short period that the chance of spinning the big end bearing in the con rod is dramatically increased, hence very bad damage to the crankshaft journal and con rod failure (bending or breaking the con rod).

Thanks and hope this helps.

Peter
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #125  
APS's Avatar
APS
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by gq_626
Peter, myself, and my machinist examined my con rod bearings closely, and there were no signs of oil starvation or detonation. I'll try to post some pics later when I get a chance to snap off some good photos. And I had the crappy basic greddy oil pan...first generation version which was a stock pan with fittings welded onto it.
Sharif I can think of a number of different possibilities that can cause oil starvation and damge to the bearings, obviously oil running away from the oil pickup is just one such possibility.

Originally posted by gq_626
What would cause my bearings to be perfect, and others to be ruined? And I ran my car at 8.5psi for about 14,000 miles....pretty aggressively to boot.
This issue is not relevant to just boost pressure imho other than how quickly the car can accelerate in a straight line and through corners which may cause oil starvation under some road conditions.

Originally posted by gq_626
In addition to an upgraded oil pan, I would be looking to add an upgraded radiator, and an oil cooler.
Sounds like a very good idea to me, you can't imho have too much engine protection when generating high power from a FI engine.

Peter
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 04:20 PM
  #126  
turbo-maxima's Avatar
turbo-maxima
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Default

what about designing a one piece upper and lower oil pan and you could probabl have a 7 quart one. Like they do for Chevy Small Blocks.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #127  
APS's Avatar
APS
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by 350zDCalb
peter:
you are definately a good guy...i feel bad if i came across in the wrong way...
Thanks Todd I really appreciate your post and I hope this thread livens up the bearing/rod issue for a healthy debate, if this thread saves one engine then the entire thread has been worthwhile in my view.

Originally posted by 350zDCalb
it's just, finally, i spend a ton of money, plan a build up very carefully, think i have taken the most important safety precautions...anf then..BOOm, another theory comes out..and now i have to shuffle to get another part
I can understand your frustration though to be totally frank I had some holidays last week and I spent some of my time looking into this issue more thoroughly.

Only then did this rod/bearing issue start to make sense to me after viewing a good number of damaged crankshafts and con rods, I'm 99% sure from what I viewed that at least some of the engines have failed due to oil starvation. I certainly did not intend to panic any of the guys to run out and by a hi volume baffled oil pan.

Originally posted by 350zDCalb
...on one side..i am greatful to all of you guys always thinking, always planning for future problems so they can be prevented...and on the other hand..it is frustrating in that now after thinking i could sleep at night with my current setup-not worrying about another failure, this again is not the case...i am just venting in that this is a neverending process...but i knew that when i got into this whole project.
I guess this is the exact reason why I did post my thoughts on the oil starvation issue and it would be a real shame to see one expensive engine broken through oil starvation (in many ways I wish I'm wrong about this oil starvation issue), sorry if my post caused you any stress, no doubt it still early days and more interesting facts may come to light yet about our VQ engines in the future.

Originally posted by 350zDCalb
...so, peter...please continue with your feedback, and like i said, i will be buying an APS oil pan too !
Thanks and I will do though I must admit to being a little gun shy after this thread.

Originally posted by 350zDCalb
you can probably appreciate some of the skepticism though, right? anybody can come on this board and start a scare and get all of us who are doing big rebuild projects to purchase additional products- at this point i get the feeling that you are really just being genuine.

TODD
Of course I can, this thread has taught me a lot and will make me think long and hard before starting a thread like this again...............please be assured that I was not trying to sell oil pans, to the contrary I just got excited about the thought that I had stumbled across the technical possibility of this oil starvation problem.

I don't mind at all if forum guys make their own baffled high volume oil pan and save the $$$ rather than buying a brand name oil pan, promoting oil pans was never in my mind when I started the thread.

Thanks

Peter
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 04:45 PM
  #128  
APS's Avatar
APS
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by jcn30127
Nissan specifications allow from .001 to .0025 inch clearance between the crank journal and rod bearing.

Possibilities:

1. Manufacturing and assembly did not make it that way.
2. Bearing composition might vary.
3. Those engines that have the .001" clearance might be more prone to failure than those at .0025.

All very good points and any one of these issues could cause a problem though I genuinely suspect that lack of oil supply is more likely to be the real cause.

Peter
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #129  
APS's Avatar
APS
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by 35ounces
APS: Do you guys sell that baffled oil pan seperately ?
The answer is yes though please do not rush out and order one now, as this is only my opinion and I don't want you to purchase an APS oil pan without first being sure that you really need one.

Thanks

Peter
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #130  
APS's Avatar
APS
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally posted by turbo-maxima
what about designing a one piece upper and lower oil pan and you could probabl have a 7 quart one. Like they do for Chevy Small Blocks.
No doubt the additional oil capacity is very worthwhile though the baffling around the oil pickup is more critical imho to protect the engine from oil starvation, hence engine wear/failure.

Thanks

Peter
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:13 PM
  #131  
westpak's Avatar
westpak
SFZCC
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2
From: Lake Worth, FL
Default

Man I love the ability of peter to keep his threads alive by answering older posts on the same thread, even ones that were before ones already answered. Nice product promotion, APS keeps popping up, paid sponsor yet?

Oh an we are so sorry for making you gunshy
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #132  
accordfreak's Avatar
accordfreak
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 907
Likes: 1
From: the bay
Default

Originally posted by westpak
Man I love the ability of peter to keep his threads alive by answering older posts on the same thread, even ones that were before ones already answered. Nice product promotion, APS keeps popping up, paid sponsor yet?

Oh an we are so sorry for making you gunshy
The questions that are fully answered are the only questions that are for promoting his products.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:17 PM
  #133  
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Default

It's relevant to the thread...
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #134  
CESAROTORRES's Avatar
CESAROTORRES
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Fl
Default Subscribing

Originally posted by AdamDC
Subscribing
Subscribing
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #135  
S12 driver's Avatar
S12 driver
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Well, if it's a good product and if it really solves the problem, I don't see a problem if he promotes his oil pan. But there are Maxima guys running nitrous and/or sc on their VQ35 for a while now. If it's a oil problem not a weak con rod problem, why didn't they find out about it first. If it's diagnosed by looking at the bearings, I'm sure some knowledgeable Maxima guys or their engine builder would point it out already.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 10:18 PM
  #136  
scubasteve's Avatar
scubasteve
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Sactown, Cali
Default

Would something like an accusump (an oil accumulator) help this issue? They use them on race cars, don't they????
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 10:21 PM
  #137  
palmerwmd's Avatar
palmerwmd
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
From: Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland
Default

I would also like to hear the input of the Maxima community on this.

Anyone know of any good threads on the .org?

Fred..
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 10:45 PM
  #138  
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Default

Is the VQ35 just a VQ30 stroked and/or bored?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:27 AM
  #139  
BrianLG35C's Avatar
BrianLG35C
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
From: NW Ohio
Default

Originally posted by APS

Of course I can, this thread has taught me a lot and will make me think long and hard before starting a thread like this again...............please be assured that I was not trying to sell oil pans, to the contrary I just got excited about the thought that I had stumbled across the technical possibility of this oil starvation problem.

Thanks

Peter [/B]
I hope you don't think long and hard before giving us pertinent information on FI. I for one, appreciate your efforts and expertise. It seems on the this forum, "you're damned if you do and damned if you don't".

Please keep your thoughts and revelations coming!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:33 AM
  #140  
one3502nv's Avatar
one3502nv
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally posted by jeffw
Could there be a problem of increased torque amplifying torsional vibrations and therefore hurting the bearings? The damping provided by the stock pulley may be insufficient. Also, I imagine engine balance might be an issue (and can only be solved with a rebuild).

Here's a crankshaft vibration damping alternative (don't know if the race series pulley can be used for a daily driver):
http://www.fluidampr.com/sport_compact.htm
--
Jeff
Well knock on wood with my car then cause I guess we will see soon if that is the case... I have almost 70,000 miles on my Z, with 8000 of them with the APS Twin Turbo and the infamous UR Crank Pulley... I have had the crank pulley on for about 40,000 miles so far... So I guess if balance, or lack of balance is due to the crank pulley, then I shall be the first to know... !! FYI, I have been running synthetic since 3000 miles, if that matters....
Jason
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 AM.