Holly Crap!!!
#62
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by weslutes
I thought Brainstorm uses a load base dyno which produces lower #'s than a dynojet.
Your car may have had the highest stock block #'s.
My friend(has a PE TT 350Z) & I will cruise up there when we're done with our builds.
I'd like to contribute to the Z community,but I have a G35.
Your car may have had the highest stock block #'s.
My friend(has a PE TT 350Z) & I will cruise up there when we're done with our builds.
I'd like to contribute to the Z community,but I have a G35.
just FYI...a stock block APS TT Z made 511rwhp on 12psi...
#63
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by 1 2 NV
No, I didn't mean for it to sound like that. My whole point is the dyno that has been done is pretty pointless. I mean we are talking about the numbers being somewhere between 379 and 445. We are looking at almost 70 whp difference!! And just because other cars have done it doesn't mean a thing. Wait till you go on a dyno that works right. I am sure he is going to have awsome numbers but we will have to wait and see. There was obviously something wrong when you get a reading of 838 ft/lbs. Only time will tell.
ok..that makes sense..we'll just have to see what numbers his car makes on another dyno. My money is well over 400whp though
#66
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boynton Bch FL
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mrtomcat those are good #'s enjoy the car.Now this is the way it should have come from the factory.I have the same kit my #'s were 397/360 RWHP with test pies and stillen exhaust and this is untuned A/F of 10.0/1 from4k to red line.This was dyno jet #'s.I can't wait to see your track times.Happy boosting.
Last edited by captj3; 08-02-2005 at 04:18 AM.
#67
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by captj3
mrtomcat those are good #'s enjoy the car.Now this is the way it should have come from the factory.I have the same kit my #'s were 397/360 RWHP with test pies and stillen exhaust and this is untuned A/F of 10.0/1 from4k to red line.This was dyno jet #'s.I can't wait to see your track times.Happy boosting.
Blueberry or cherry?
#68
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boynton Bch FL
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by weslutes
Test pies huh, damn that must of given you at least 20hp.
Blueberry or cherry?
Blueberry or cherry?
#69
Sponsor
Brainstorm Performance
Brainstorm Performance
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys,
I'll try to shed some light on our dyno, but it's a little weird. Basically our dyno has two different options:
You can read from the wheels, or you can read from the engine with a calculated drivetrain loss. In most cases on our dyno, our horsepower numbers at the engine with drivetrain correction ON have seemed to be the most accurate and consistent when compared to say...a Dynojet.
Either way, we try to focus on our dynos strongest point, which is tuning. Since it is a load based dyno it is a lot more accurate for tuning. For reading horsepower, I would recommend using a Dynojet. I have already mentioned to mrtomcat that we would like to use his car and take it to do some power runs on a Dynojet, for comparison.
Please understand that all dynos are different, have strong points and weak points, and read differently from eachother. To some people, all that matters is dyno numbers. To other all that matters is timeslips from your local strip. To some all that matters is the good ol' butt dyno. In the end, as long as the customer is happy with the way their car performs, we can be happy and we are very satisfied with the results that mrtomcat's car ended up with.
I'll try to shed some light on our dyno, but it's a little weird. Basically our dyno has two different options:
You can read from the wheels, or you can read from the engine with a calculated drivetrain loss. In most cases on our dyno, our horsepower numbers at the engine with drivetrain correction ON have seemed to be the most accurate and consistent when compared to say...a Dynojet.
Either way, we try to focus on our dynos strongest point, which is tuning. Since it is a load based dyno it is a lot more accurate for tuning. For reading horsepower, I would recommend using a Dynojet. I have already mentioned to mrtomcat that we would like to use his car and take it to do some power runs on a Dynojet, for comparison.
Please understand that all dynos are different, have strong points and weak points, and read differently from eachother. To some people, all that matters is dyno numbers. To other all that matters is timeslips from your local strip. To some all that matters is the good ol' butt dyno. In the end, as long as the customer is happy with the way their car performs, we can be happy and we are very satisfied with the results that mrtomcat's car ended up with.
#70
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bsp
Hey guys,
I'll try to shed some light on our dyno, but it's a little weird. Basically our dyno has two different options:
You can read from the wheels, or you can read from the engine with a calculated drivetrain loss. In most cases on our dyno, our horsepower numbers at the engine with drivetrain correction ON have seemed to be the most accurate and consistent when compared to say...a Dynojet.
Either way, we try to focus on our dynos strongest point, which is tuning. Since it is a load based dyno it is a lot more accurate for tuning. For reading horsepower, I would recommend using a Dynojet. I have already mentioned to mrtomcat that we would like to use his car and take it to do some power runs on a Dynojet, for comparison.
Please understand that all dynos are different, have strong points and weak points, and read differently from eachother. To some people, all that matters is dyno numbers. To other all that matters is timeslips from your local strip. To some all that matters is the good ol' butt dyno. In the end, as long as the customer is happy with the way their car performs, we can be happy and we are very satisfied with the results that mrtomcat's car ended up with.
I'll try to shed some light on our dyno, but it's a little weird. Basically our dyno has two different options:
You can read from the wheels, or you can read from the engine with a calculated drivetrain loss. In most cases on our dyno, our horsepower numbers at the engine with drivetrain correction ON have seemed to be the most accurate and consistent when compared to say...a Dynojet.
Either way, we try to focus on our dynos strongest point, which is tuning. Since it is a load based dyno it is a lot more accurate for tuning. For reading horsepower, I would recommend using a Dynojet. I have already mentioned to mrtomcat that we would like to use his car and take it to do some power runs on a Dynojet, for comparison.
Please understand that all dynos are different, have strong points and weak points, and read differently from eachother. To some people, all that matters is dyno numbers. To other all that matters is timeslips from your local strip. To some all that matters is the good ol' butt dyno. In the end, as long as the customer is happy with the way their car performs, we can be happy and we are very satisfied with the results that mrtomcat's car ended up with.
thanks Christian for clearing this up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post