Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

VQ32de

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 07:01 AM
  #141  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

Originally Posted by doug
Bottom line is if Tilley had 800 whp TT 350z in his sig and he told you the sky was purple, you would soak it up faster than a wet sponge.

The fact that he drives a 4 door car automatically gives you this superdick ego thing going so you don't need what he is talking about.
Sorry i don't respond to ****ing idiots. Tilley makes more sense than you.I think i'm done with this thread.

Just remember that i love you too man, don't be mad. It's just the internet.

Last edited by Zexy; Nov 6, 2005 at 07:07 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 08:21 AM
  #142  
tilleys99's Avatar
tilleys99
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Annville, PA
Default

Originally Posted by taurran

Drive your 'vq32det' for a year and come back when you have some actual track and road experiences with this motor under the hood. I don't think many people are going to be willing to throw out the reliability of having a motor that has been pushed to its limits and tested extensively (vq35de) for a destroked frankenmotor you're building for the first time in your body shop. I also don't think < 1k increased rev limit is worth all of the potential headaches and nightmares that could come from modifying the motor to this extent.

Oh, and I'm surprised the mods haven't said something in this thread if you're tryng to sell your frankenmotor service without a sponsorship...



That's right. I don't need it. You don't even know what rpm your VQ is rev limited at and you're telling us what we need? A reflashed vq35det already redlines at at 7100 rpms, and the new 300hp motors even higher. But, if you're willing to throw down all that cash for a few hundred rpms, then please do. We'd all be intersted in the outcome.

And yes, my original post was a bit tasteless, but I never stooped to name calling. These maxima goons were the ones that perpetuated this whole debacle.
Yes it may be the first 3.2 but theres a first for everything. I have done a few vq's (over 6 yrs experience with them), In the maxima community i am the man too go to for a swap on the east coast. BTW the 300hp 350z has a weaker valve spring (3lbs less pressure) then a VQ35 from a non AE edition, there is nothing internally other then more VTC , different cams, better intake, and a raised rev limit, but what do i know im a maxima guy who has the exact same motor other then the fact mines FWD, i guess the 350z heads on my car wont work since they are so different since it has 4drs. I dont know why its so hard for you too believe the maxima has the same soul as a 350z. BTW 13psi feels real nice on this setup and i had absolutly NO KNOCK....Also unlike you IMHO all nissans are superior too other manufacturers, I dont diss altima guys or sentra guys cause they are down the chain from me, hell i had a boosted sentra se-r running mid 12s consistantly.

Last edited by tilleys99; Nov 6, 2005 at 08:25 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #143  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 1
From: West suburbs of Chi-town
Default

Originally Posted by taurran

Oh, and I'm surprised the mods haven't said something in this thread if you're tryng to sell your frankenmotor service without a sponsorship...
He isn't trying to sell anything. He's simply giving people another option to make a stronger motor.

You're so ignorant that you can't even appreciate someone coming on here with some useful technical information, and you have to bash them.

People like you make it harder for innovation to thrive.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #144  
paranormal's Avatar
paranormal
Evil Boy 4 LIFE
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 0
From: Interwebs
Default

lets say if your re bebuilding your engine but not touching the heads.. would you replace the weak valve springs on the 300hp engine? are the jwt's a good option?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 09:43 AM
  #145  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by BriGuyMax
He isn't trying to sell anything. He's simply giving people another option to make a stronger motor.

You're so ignorant that you can't even appreciate someone coming on here with some useful technical information, and you have to bash them.

People like you make it harder for innovation to thrive.
Me, or the people that run this site? You do realize that's in the agreement you sign when you make an account here. I, for one, didn't write it. He did come accross as wanting to sell this service, giving links to his shop and the like.

Could I ask you nicely to quit perpetuating this with your constant whining and name-calling? I would have stopped posting in this thread long ago if every response hasn't been followed up by someone calling names. That being said, I'd like to let you continue your discussion with tilley, unless you have another objection.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 10:22 AM
  #146  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by taurran

Drive your 'vq32det' for a year and come back when you have some actual track and road experiences with this motor under the hood. I don't think many people are going to be willing to throw out the reliability of having a motor that has been pushed to its limits and tested extensively (vq35de) for a destroked frankenmotor you're building for the first time in your body shop. I also don't think < 1k increased rev limit is worth all of the potential headaches and nightmares that could come from modifying the motor to this extent.

Oh, and I'm surprised the mods haven't said something in this thread if you're tryng to sell your frankenmotor service without a sponsorship...



That's right. I don't need it. You don't even know what rpm your VQ is rev limited at and you're telling us what we need? A reflashed vq35det already redlines at at 7100 rpms, and the new 300hp motors even higher. But, if you're willing to throw down all that cash for a few hundred rpms, then please do. We'd all be intersted in the outcome.

And yes, my original post was a bit tasteless, but I never stooped to name calling. These maxima goons were the ones that perpetuated this whole debacle.
so you don't need it... take your ball and go home.. ignore it.. let others who do need it benefit from it. NO one asked you into this thread or for your negative comments.

We actually know the limits of the rpm for the VQ35.. but if you stopped to listen to tilley.. you might actually learn something.

let me ask you this.. did you do all the mods on your car by yourself?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #147  
tilleys99's Avatar
tilleys99
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Annville, PA
Default

Originally Posted by doug
let me ask you this.. did you do all the mods on your car by yourself?
thats a good ? doug, my guess is no.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 11:43 AM
  #148  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by doug
so you don't need it... take your ball and go home.. ignore it.. let others who do need it benefit from it. NO one asked you into this thread or for your negative comments.

We actually know the limits of the rpm for the VQ35.. but if you stopped to listen to tilley.. you might actually learn something.

let me ask you this.. did you do all the mods on your car by yourself?
Besides being you being a tool and the question being completely irrelevant to the matter at hand, I'm not going to warrant your post with another debate on who has done more work on their car.

It's obvoius your boys over at maxima.org or whatever have been recruited to back you up and stir up these forums with this debate. I don't really have time to follow this any more, nor have I really cared about it for the past 7.5 pages of posts. Looking at this tool's post history, I don't see any posts that aren't related to a maxima in some way. I doubt you even own the Z that you have listed in your sig.

With that, I won't warrant your flame war with another response (or another bump for this thread). It's something that should have been done 8 pages ago, and I just don't have time to continue to run in circles with you. Just goes to prove how arguing on the internet is like the special olympics, and how I can still manage to get sucked into running a retarded foot race from time to time. You can now commence with your "h4h4h4 w3 r teh winz" posts.

Last edited by taurran; Nov 6, 2005 at 11:46 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 11:52 AM
  #149  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Zexy
Dude...Bottom line is we/most of us do not need rev friendlier options. People rev to 7200 RPM w/ chipped ECU's without problems and people do not want to rev to 8500 RPM's. If anything i would feel much more secure revving my sport tuned VQ35de motor to 7200 RPM than any Maxima VQ. Why would we spend even more cash on destroking to make less power? We're not running full out Time Attack or Road Race cars here. It does not matter and it does not play a important factor to do so.
So Tilley, you have no response to my post? I'm willing to be proved wrong. Yet again all of your posts/responses are nice and short. There's many questions you have not answered as well.

I still do not see or understand a couple of things that catch my interest, but have never been explained:
BTW 13psi feels real nice on this setup and i had absolutly NO KNOCK
-How does lower displacement on the VQ actually prevent knock on a boosted motor? What is your explination why guys w/ the VQ35 are likely to get knock while there is not problem on the 3.2 setup.
BTW i eliminated the VTCs too run off VQ30de ecu with JWT program for 555cc inj/boost/cams/low comp/7200 rev/Z32 MAF
- How does "eliminating VTCs" in this situation benefit. So the vq30 ecu is much more beneficial because of the VTC program used? I'm confused here.

-Is it actually proven a lower displacement motor w/ VQ35 camshaft and higher revving RPM makes more horsepower? I understand some of the laws of physics but i'd love to see some dyno sheets.

-Which heads are more beneficial for this frank setup and why?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 12:27 PM
  #150  
tilleys99's Avatar
tilleys99
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Annville, PA
Default

Basicly the VQ32 has a shorter stroke which will make it rev alot smooter and take more rpm which may not be needed, but the 3.2 has a 8.5to1 comp and is alot more boost friendly. I would love too have VTCs but yet they only really help for low end power which a good variable intake will make up for. The z and the maxima heads are identical, hell some years are even the same part #s so either head will show same power. Sorry for not answering its tough too reply too everything with all the flaming i get. If you got any ?s feel free to ask. BTW the vq30de has no VTCs


Originally Posted by Zexy
So Tilley, you have no response to my post? I'm willing to be proved wrong. Yet again all of your posts/responses are nice and short. There's many questions you have not answered as well.

I still do not see or understand a couple of things that catch my interest, but have never been explained:

-How does lower displacement on the VQ actually prevent knock on a boosted motor? What is your explination why guys w/ the VQ35 are likely to get knock while there is not problem on the 3.2 setup.

- How does "eliminating VTCs" in this situation benefit. So the vq30 ecu is much more beneficial because of the VTC program used? I'm confused here.

-Is it actually proven a lower displacement motor w/ VQ35 camshaft and higher revving RPM makes more horsepower? I understand some of the laws of physics but i'd love to see some dyno sheets.

-Which heads are more beneficial for this frank setup and why?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 01:00 PM
  #151  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

I've been doing some extensive research. But when it all comes down.... I have to hand it to Tilley. He is right but i think it could have been explained better!

This setup might be the best of both worlds between the VQ30DET Nissan Gloria/GT series motor and the highly advaced VQ35DE 350z motor.

Besides building a bottom end consisting of the expensive Pauter rods and Arias/CP pistons($2900) the VQ30DET crank and Carillo rods can be purchased for around $800(w/ optional VQ35 forged pistons-additional $800 still being much less than the first setup) May i also mention the rod journals may be additionally thicker and these components are used in the GT series VQ motors. Better revving options too and you still get to keep the VTC function which will get even better because the TurboXS UTEC suposedly in the future will release a VTC control option.

My appologies to you Tilley. Now i understand. Sounds pretty genius.

I have another question/doubt as well: The shorter crank stroke would not affect the piston/deck height in any way?

Last edited by Zexy; Nov 6, 2005 at 01:04 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 02:14 PM
  #152  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 1
From: West suburbs of Chi-town
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
Me, or the people that run this site? You do realize that's in the agreement you sign when you make an account here. I, for one, didn't write it. He did come accross as wanting to sell this service, giving links to his shop and the like.
He never said "I want to sell you something". But that's not the point anyway.

Could I ask you nicely to quit perpetuating this with your constant whining and name-calling? I would have stopped posting in this thread long ago if every response hasn't been followed up by someone calling names. That being said, I'd like to let you continue your discussion with tilley, unless you have another objection.
I don't recall ever calling you "names". I did say your posts are ignorant, but I didn't call you any names. Furthermore you act like you're above this supposed "name calling" when in your NEXT post...you start name calling.

Besides being you being a tool
And finally...if you really don't care..and this thread is a waste of your time then....
WHY DO YOU KEEP POSTING IN IT?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 02:24 PM
  #153  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
Besides being you being a tool and the question being completely irrelevant to the matter at hand, I'm not going to warrant your post with another debate on who has done more work on their car.
Translation: no i have never worked on my car.. i have my mechanic do all the work, so even if you gave me information on how to make my car run higher boost with a better chance for reliability i would have no idea what you are talking about. I probably showed this info to my mechanic and he disagreed with it.. probably said drop a small block crate v8 motor in there to get better power

Originally Posted by taurran
It's obvoius your boys over at maxima.org or whatever have been recruited to back you up and stir up these forums with this debate. I don't really have time to follow this any more, nor have I really cared about it for the past 7.5 pages of posts.
I am sorry.. i have been on this board longer than you have.. did you happen to notice that? i didn't have to be recruited.. matter of fact, Neal, and Brian have been here longer than you have also.

Originally Posted by taurran
Looking at this tool's post history, I don't see any posts that aren't related to a maxima in some way.
It saddens me that you havn't grasped that this post is about VQ's and not maxima's. I guess thats what happens with small minded people, they can't look past their nose.

Originally Posted by taurran
I doubt you even own the Z that you have listed in your sig.
oh.. i have them in 3008 pixels x 2000 pixels if you are looking to make it your wall paper.






Originally Posted by taurran
With that, I won't warrant your flame war with another response (or another bump for this thread). It's something that should have been done 8 pages ago, and I just don't have time to continue to run in circles with you. Just goes to prove how arguing on the internet is like the special olympics, and how I can still manage to get sucked into running a retarded foot race from time to time. You can now commence with your "h4h4h4 w3 r teh winz" posts.
yes yes.. i can see how you would equate your useless bable to special olympics.

Last edited by doug; Nov 6, 2005 at 02:27 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 03:16 PM
  #154  
MardiGrasMax's Avatar
MardiGrasMax
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 638
Likes: 1
From: New Orleans LA
Default

High ladies!
Pulled 11.4 @123 w/1.7-60' today

Now I gotta go on a pickles and ice cream run for my pregnant wifey... I'll be back quickley...

FWIW, my next ride will more than likley be a Z.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 03:57 PM
  #155  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

^ Congrats. That's very impressive.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #156  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Zexy
^ Congrats. That's very impressive.
i don't mean to stick my nose in again.. lol..

but if anyone knows a little more about the VQ motor than tilley its Matt (MardiGrasMax)

the only reason VQ motors got past 400 whp is because Matt did extensive research and tuning to get there. All the high powered Turbomaxima's are there because they listened to Matt. If you have any VQ questions matt can answer it.

The only other person i know as knowledgable about VQ's other than Matt.. is another Matt (SR20DEN on the maxima forums) and when i say know the VQ.. they know it bolt for bolt and know exactly what will happen with the motor.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 06:11 PM
  #157  
RockfordMAX's Avatar
RockfordMAX
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Rockford,IL
Default

lol briguy, counteracting the mood in here, shoot me a PM sometime if you guys get together and head to byron, ill come out and show you what a maxima can do
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #158  
kaos1's Avatar
kaos1
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

im thinkin bout buyin an accord so i can waste money on making a sedan fast just to impress ppl with s2000's
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #159  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 1
From: West suburbs of Chi-town
Default

Originally Posted by kaos1
im thinkin bout buyin an accord so i can waste money on making a sedan fast just to impress ppl with s2000's
You're an idiot.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 11:35 PM
  #160  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 1
From: West suburbs of Chi-town
Default

Originally Posted by RockfordMAX
lol briguy, counteracting the mood in here, shoot me a PM sometime if you guys get together and head to byron, ill come out and show you what a maxima can do
I know what a max can do...I've had 2 97 5-speeds...

Don't know if we'll be heading to Byron again this year..but myself, Nealoc187, I30tMikeD, and a bunch of Z and G35 guys are going to US 41 next Sunday...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 AM.