Is anyone near 700whp yet?
02-19-2006, 09:51 AM
#42
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SAN DIEGO
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gents,
Does anyone have any more data to support their Greddy 700+ or APS 790+ or SGP 800+ or SFR 1000+ WHP claims?
Please provide:
Dynos
Product Lists
Boost Level
A/F and Timing
Fuel Used
Doesn't seem as if any of this is reality without substantiation.
M
Does anyone have any more data to support their Greddy 700+ or APS 790+ or SGP 800+ or SFR 1000+ WHP claims?
Please provide:
Dynos
Product Lists
Boost Level
A/F and Timing
Fuel Used
Doesn't seem as if any of this is reality without substantiation.
M
02-19-2006, 10:38 AM
#44
Originally Posted by Zilvia
why would you want more unusable power what i dont get...............Dyno queens are crap...................
And even 700whp is usable on the street, as long as you are running 315 rear tires, and begin your WOT runs at about 90mph...SOOOO much fun!
02-19-2006, 10:59 AM
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CALI
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by barthelb
Better question for you, was this with the APS TT system that we have and are they the SAME exact Turbos. Including turbine propeller/impellers whatever they are? Meaning, no change to Turbos on the current system!
02-19-2006, 12:29 PM
#46
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Zilvia
but still what are you gonna do with 700whp................
Put it down...there are plenty of RWD street cars out there that can put down 700+whp effectively...With a proper suspension setup and tire it's definitely doable on a Z.
02-19-2006, 12:59 PM
#47
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zilvia
why would you want more unusable power what i dont get...............Dyno queens are crap...................
BTW I got my @ss kick all the way up to 140mph just the other day against a turbo RSX, I had my street trim of 548whp@13lbs.
Anyway back to subject, who knows of a fuel setup good for 700whp.
Sharif give us the secret recipe
02-19-2006, 01:18 PM
#48
Originally Posted by Carlitos
I guess it depends where you live, where I live you get your @ss kick left and right by 500hp Hondas, Subis, Evos, Cobras, etc. if you only have 500 or so whp.
BTW I got my @ss kick all the way up to 140mph just the other day against a turbo RSX, I had my street trim of 548whp@13lbs.
Anyway back to subject, who knows of a fuel setup good for 700whp.
Sharif give us the secret recipe
BTW I got my @ss kick all the way up to 140mph just the other day against a turbo RSX, I had my street trim of 548whp@13lbs.
Anyway back to subject, who knows of a fuel setup good for 700whp.
Sharif give us the secret recipe
The power to weight ratios are so out of wack, that we'd need 800-1000whp to be competitive against the 400-500whp Honda community. Some of those CRX's and Civic hatches weigh 1500lbs....totally stripped down, and even the full interior versions are tipping the scales at a scant 1800lbs.In regards to fuel system, we're fitting the protype AAM Stage II system on our car, but preliminary indications are, that it should support 800whp worth of fuel, but retain all the factory elements of the stock fuel pump assembly. There will also be an option to run a different or secondary pump, in order to boost its flow levels even further than 800whp. And it wont be a noisy distraction, like the large external Weldon or Aeromotive pumps.
Hit me with a PM if you would like to test one out.
Last edited by Sharif@Forged; 02-19-2006 at 01:21 PM.
02-20-2006, 04:09 PM
#50
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I asked that in the suspension forum but haven't gotten the answer I was looking for.
What are the correct suspension mods needed?
...since my wall incident I want to upgrade my suspension first before adding more power and am trying to find the best possible solution here
What are the correct suspension mods needed?
...since my wall incident I want to upgrade my suspension first before adding more power and am trying to find the best possible solution here
02-20-2006, 04:54 PM
#52
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by mrtomcat
I asked that in the suspension forum but haven't gotten the answer I was looking for.
What are the correct suspension mods needed?
...since my wall incident I want to upgrade my suspension first before adding more power and am trying to find the best possible solution here
What are the correct suspension mods needed?
...since my wall incident I want to upgrade my suspension first before adding more power and am trying to find the best possible solution here
The two most important things are to remove negative camber in the rear (it will kill your handling) and to get some traction bars (they will keep the suspension from moving forward and backward. You can also remove your front sway bar for better weight transfer. And lastly you don't want really stiff suspension as it's not condusive to good weight transfer. Obviously setting your car up like this will make it handle like a tank, but it's the price you pay if you want to go fast in a straight line.
02-20-2006, 05:17 PM
#54
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
currently I'm on 100% stock suspension, first thing is obviously the Camber kit.
Is getting a tein flex kit overkill? Do I need it or would it hurt.
The main goal of course is a compromise since I don't want a tank as a daily driver
Also who makes traction bars? That's something new to me
Is getting a tein flex kit overkill? Do I need it or would it hurt.
The main goal of course is a compromise since I don't want a tank as a daily driver
Also who makes traction bars? That's something new to me
02-20-2006, 05:57 PM
#56
Originally Posted by BriGuyMax
The two most important things are to remove negative camber in the rear (it will kill your handling) and to get some traction bars (they will keep the suspension from moving forward and backward. You can also remove your front sway bar for better weight transfer. And lastly you don't want really stiff suspension as it's not condusive to good weight transfer. Obviously setting your car up like this will make it handle like a tank, but it's the price you pay if you want to go fast in a straight line.
02-20-2006, 06:32 PM
#57
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any idea what psi and whp just the ARP studs and Cometic gasket are good too?
Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
With ARP head studs, a Cometic/Cosworth headgasket, and Darton sleeves, there appears to be no issues with head lift or headgasket failure.
02-20-2006, 07:43 PM
#58
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lima, Ohio
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i still dont see the point of 700whp or more....hell id stop at 500whp.........but then again i like to turn my cars more than fly down the road in em.....so whatever
but no doubt, cant wait to you guys hit those high numbers and put the z on the high hp map
but no doubt, cant wait to you guys hit those high numbers and put the z on the high hp map
02-20-2006, 07:49 PM
#60
Originally Posted by Zilvia
i still dont see the point of 700whp or more....hell id stop at 500whp.........but then again i like to turn my cars more than fly down the road in em.....so whatever
but no doubt, cant wait to you guys hit those high numbers and put the z on the high hp map
but no doubt, cant wait to you guys hit those high numbers and put the z on the high hp map