Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

~Turbo Systems~

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2006, 07:55 AM
  #101  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WA2GOOD
I would love to, but it is not up to me on who gets this kit, Jim W. has the final say on that. (installers and tuners that he trusts, I guess) I (We) are not allowed to just get a kit and send it out. We have to install and tune and check everything and go over it thoroughly before sending the car out.
I was just making a suggestion. I knew you wouldn't send out a kit <-note I said wouldn't and not couldn't

This is exactly my point. Come out and hype this kit that is a prototype, manipulate the consumers to bring there cars to you with what I believe are half truths and then take their money.

Get this great JWT kit in the hands of another 3rd party shop and lets get their thoughts. I am POSITIVE there are MORE capable shops than yours out there to install the kit and for you to say that "We have to install and tune and check everything and go over it thoroughly before sending the car out." like your shop is something special is a bunch of BS. Heck, I have done more complicated installs myself than the JWT kit and I have access to a mustang dyno and the R4 software needed to tune a split second box, so don't act like your shop is doing anything special.


Like I stated before on this forum and others. the JWT kit isn't really offering anything special in terms of your "no lag" hype.
Old 02-07-2006, 08:01 AM
  #102  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zland
There will be variations, that is my point. The point isnt if there are going to be vaiations but how you address them when they occur. In the case of our test, we strived to get the cars as stock as we could find and were there were variables we addressed them. For example, when installing a turbonetics kit, it did not come with a cat, the others could, does that mean we should not run cats on the others to make it even?

Even with variations such as aftermaket exhaust, it does not change the character of each kit. If you feel our test mislead the public, be more specific in how? I stand by my point that the comments we made about each kit is right on point and adding this exhaust or that one etc would not change anything. If you think the point of the article was only peak hp of a dyno, then you missed the entire goal of the article. In addition, I hope that most consumers look for more than that quality alone.
I think we have already established holes in your article. The fact that you openly admit that an exhaust does not change the character of each kit just makes me laugh. exhaut can absolutely change the character of a kit. Important things like how fast the turbos spool, boost pressure, EGTs, etc are all affected by exhaust on a turbo setup. A proper exhaust and tune are the two critical parts to a FI setup.
Old 02-07-2006, 09:17 AM
  #103  
ActionJackson
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
ActionJackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: California
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Nice try Zivman

I like how you dodged VRTs personal invitation to basically get you & your car over here to track both cars and do a comparison, and then turned it around on them that they couldn't release the kit and its their fault. Their shop & Performance Motorsports on the east coast are the only ones authorized by JWT to install the prototype kit right now, you knew this already, so saying what you just said knowing that just makes you look dumb. Not to mention your obviously lame attempt to dodge the invitation blaming 91 octane & carb as your reasons not to come over. Those things don't matter here with out of state plates

You wanted proof of the lag difference then go drive it yourself. You say you want to sing the praises of the JWT kit yet you make no effort to do so, nor do you take advantage of a company's personal invitation to do so.


Originally Posted by Zivman
I was just making a suggestion. I knew you wouldn't send out a kit <-note I said wouldn't and not couldn't

This is exactly my point. Come out and hype this kit that is a prototype, manipulate the consumers to bring there cars to you with what I believe are half truths and then take their money.

Get this great JWT kit in the hands of another 3rd party shop and lets get their thoughts. I am POSITIVE there are MORE capable shops than yours out there to install the kit and for you to say that "We have to install and tune and check everything and go over it thoroughly before sending the car out." like your shop is something special is a bunch of BS. Heck, I have done more complicated installs myself than the JWT kit and I have access to a mustang dyno and the R4 software needed to tune a split second box, so don't act like your shop is doing anything special.


Like I stated before on this forum and others. the JWT kit isn't really offering anything special in terms of your "no lag" hype.
Old 02-07-2006, 09:26 AM
  #104  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ActionJackson
I like how you dodged VRTs personal invitation to basically get you & your car over here to track both cars and do a comparison, and then turned it around on them that they couldn't release the kit and its their fault. Their shop & Performance Motorsports on the east coast are the only ones authorized by JWT to install the prototype kit right now, you knew this already, so saying what you just said knowing that just makes you look dumb. Not to mention your obviously lame attempt to dodge the invitation blaming 91 octane & carb as your reasons not to come over. Those things don't matter here with out of state plates

You wanted proof of the lag difference then go drive it yourself. You say you want to sing the praises of the JWT kit yet you make no effort to do so, nor do you take advantage of a company's personal invitation to do so.

I won't be going to Cali for many reasons. Self employed and don't have the time to be away from home along with a few other personal reasons. The 91 oct and Carb things were reasons why I personally don't like to go to cali.

I made the suggestion I could get a away for a day and a half to IL and meet up with a shop/owner there with a JWT setup. This is an effort on my part, sorry you don't see it as such.
Old 02-07-2006, 09:32 AM
  #105  
zman1910
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
zman1910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ActionJackson
You wanted proof of the lag difference then go drive it yourself. You say you want to sing the praises of the JWT kit yet you make no effort to do so, nor do you take advantage of a company's personal invitation to do so.
Your an idiot if your willing to travel great distances just to try out a kit and sing praises about it. The problem is they are talking it up as if its the best thing in the world but then refused to give any other info on it. Not just that but it is only available to two other shops.

I don't know anyone that has the time to just leave everything in order to put 2 cars on a track together. All it takes is a couple of dyno sheets to prove any differences...

The truth about the lag difference will come out when the kit is released to everyone else. Everything is simply speculation at this point and why should Zivman be the one to make the effort.....he's not selling the product..JWT and VRT are....so they should make the extra effort to convince him instead of just talking the kit up all the time...

Like I said before I am waiting patiently for the kit to be released to my trusted shops. Then I will make my decision. I refuse to make a decision based off of shops that JW has chosen pesonally. One cannot come to an honest conclusion like that...
Old 02-07-2006, 10:06 AM
  #106  
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
zland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oceanside Ca
Posts: 6,086
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
I think we have already established holes in your article. The fact that you openly admit that an exhaust does not change the character of each kit just makes me laugh. exhaut can absolutely change the character of a kit. Important things like how fast the turbos spool, boost pressure, EGTs, etc are all affected by exhaust on a turbo setup. A proper exhaust and tune are the two critical parts to a FI setup.
Regarding the article, we did openly state the mods thus for people like yourself that are knowledgeable, you can determine yourself what the data means. If you think an exhaust changes the total character of a kit, then that is your opinion.

I am all for discussing information however I feel your "know it all" personality is a bit insulting & argumentative. Do you intend to try to insult people or is it just something that comes out without trying? I prefer not to spend time trading insults with you sir. To me, the purpose of this forum is to share opinions and information without being negative. We can disagree and not be insulting.

If you know as much as you think you do, why do you need any information at all? It is easy to bash everyone and this is one reason why many people within the industry do not go online. They prefer not to get an argument with someone on the end of a keyboard.

I would love for you to present data to all of us on kits that you feel is accurate/worthy. Good luck on finding 6 kits that are installed in stock form. You might have to go buy 6 stock 350Z's and buy the kits and have them installed at one non-biased shop. In addition, you better run baseline dyno's on each car because there might be some variation among the cars. You might want to do testing on two types of dyno's because I am sure that some will feel the dyno you selected does not measure HP/TQ accurately.

I think you will find that all magazines test cars as they are given to them. I do not know of any magazine that has the budget to go buy cars to install and test them as they would like them set up.

Good luck in your efforts. In the mean time I will stay in California running 91 octane and trying to do my best to give the best possible information regarding aftermarket products for Z/G's in an imperfect world.

Last edited by zland; 02-07-2006 at 10:18 AM.
Old 02-07-2006, 10:09 AM
  #107  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zland
Regarding the article, the focus was on driving impressions and we did openly state the mods thus for people like yourself that are so smart, you can determine yourself what the data means. If you think an exhaust changes the total character of a kit, then that is your opinion.

I am all for discussing information however I feel your "know it all" personality is a bit insulting & arguementative. Do you intend to try to insult people or is it just something that comes out without trying? I prefer not to spend time trading insults with you sir. To me, the purpose of this forum is to share opinions and information without being negative. We can disagree and not be insulting.

If you know as much as you think you do, why do you need any information at all? It is easy to bash everyone and this is one reason why many people within the industry do not go online. They prefer not to get an an arguement with someone on the end of a keyboard.
I have plenty of info on the JWT kit. I have enough to make an informed decision on the setup. Thing is, not everyone is as an informed as I am. I have more experience with FI setup than most and this is why I find your article and the posts made by VRT so troublesome. To a person like me, I can look past all the hype and happy thoughts and find out what the details really are. Some guy coming to these forums asking about turbo lag and whether a SC is better than a turbo setup isn't as well informed about what a setup is all about. Reading all the stuff VRT puts out and your article isn't going to properly inform them of the details I feel one should know when they are deciding on spending 10-15K on a FI setup.

I would love for you to present data to all of us on kits that you feel is accurate/worthy. Good luck on finding 6 kits that are installed in stock form. You might have to go buy 6 stock 350Z's and buy the kits and have them installed at one non-biased shop. In addition, you better run baseline dyno's on each car because there might be some variation among the cars. You might want to do testing on two types of dyno's because i am sure that some will feel the dyno you selected does not measure HP/TQ accurately.

I think you will find that all magazines test cars as they are given to them. I do not know of any magazine that has the budget to go buy cars to install and test them as they would like them set up.

Good luck in your efforts. In the mean time I will stay in California running 91 octane and trying to do my best to give the best possible information regarding aftermarket products for Z/G's in an inperfect world.
Wouldn't need 6 test cars.

APS
GReddy
JWT

I don't consider the others as major players
Edit: Maybe the TS and HKS setups if and when they get released

Last edited by Zivman; 02-07-2006 at 10:24 AM.
Old 02-07-2006, 10:27 AM
  #108  
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bradenton/Sarasota
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Wouldn't need 6 test cars.

APS
GReddy
JWT

I don't consider the others as major players
Edit: Maybe the TS and HKS setups if and when they get released

the more I see your posts the more I realize you're nothing more than a sackriding, arrogant fool. Please go back to whatever board it is you're a god on and leave the rest of us be.
Old 02-07-2006, 10:36 AM
  #109  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chimmike
the more I see your posts the more I realize you're nothing more than a sackriding, arrogant fool. Please go back to whatever board it is you're a god on and leave the rest of us be.
You want me to explain my post.

First off, in terms of TT kits PE and SFR quality is not up to par with the rest of the setups I posted from the reasearch I did. Add to that, there is probably a 20:1 or higher relationship between any of the kits I listed to either of those two setups in terms of the numbers sold.

TN is a ST and I don't feel it's quality is up to par with an APS or JWT setup. I missed my chance to drive a TN setup. The local to me that had one installed, blew his car up. When I go to IL, if there is a TN owner there that would like to meet up I would be more than open to do so. And yes, I have had a brief chance to see the kit and its components.

Last edited by Zivman; 02-07-2006 at 10:38 AM.
Old 02-07-2006, 10:45 AM
  #110  
kcobean
iTrader: (2)
 
kcobean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern VA - USA
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Wouldn't need 6 test cars.

APS
GReddy
JWT

I don't consider the others as major players
Edit: Maybe the TS and HKS setups if and when they get released
Ziv,
Just out of curiousity, why do you rule out the S/T kits? I know a few guys running built motors and Turbonetics kits that are making similar power to what's in your signature. They might experience some lag vs. a TT kit, but I think they're still in the "major player" category.
Old 02-07-2006, 10:52 AM
  #111  
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
zland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oceanside Ca
Posts: 6,086
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kcobean
Ziv,
Just out of curiousity, why do you rule out the S/T kits? I know a few guys running built motors and Turbonetics kits that are making similar power to what's in your signature. They might experience some lag vs. a TT kit, but I think they're still in the "major player" category.
I have driven all 6 kits and I can say I would not rule out your car regardless of the kit I had in my car.
Old 02-07-2006, 10:55 AM
  #112  
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
taurran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You mean I'm not a player in the e-***** triathlon?
Old 02-07-2006, 11:01 AM
  #113  
kcobean
iTrader: (2)
 
kcobean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern VA - USA
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zland
I have driven all 6 kits and I can say I would not rule out your car regardless of the kit I had in my car.
Thank you Sir!
Old 02-07-2006, 11:02 AM
  #114  
kcobean
iTrader: (2)
 
kcobean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern VA - USA
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
You mean I'm not a player in the e-***** triathlon?
ROFL....Your car makes more power than mine!! Whip it out!!!
Old 02-07-2006, 11:12 AM
  #115  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kcobean
Ziv,
Just out of curiousity, why do you rule out the S/T kits? I know a few guys running built motors and Turbonetics kits that are making similar power to what's in your signature. They might experience some lag vs. a TT kit, but I think they're still in the "major player" category.
A more direct apples to apples comparison which doesn't include ST vs TT. I know this will start a onslaught of TN owner responses.

Also because of the quality

Edit:
To some it up, if I were in the market for a FI setup, I wouldn't be looking at the ST option from TN for my car.

Last edited by Zivman; 02-07-2006 at 11:30 AM.
Old 02-07-2006, 11:37 AM
  #116  
kcobean
iTrader: (2)
 
kcobean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern VA - USA
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
A more direct apples to apples comparison which doesn't include ST vs TT. I know this will start a onslaught of TN owner responses.

Also because of the quality

Edit:
To some it up, if I were in the market for a FI setup, I wouldn't be looking at the ST option from TN for my car.
Gotcha...Out of curiousity, from your brief look at the Tnetics kit, what about the quality did you feel was lacking? I have very little exposure to any of the TT kits, so I'm just curious from someone who has seen them and can make a comparison. I personally think the TN kit rocks (obviously). We hit boost a little later, but performance wise, I don't see a big difference in power curves.
Old 02-07-2006, 12:13 PM
  #117  
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bradenton/Sarasota
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kcobean
Gotcha...Out of curiousity, from your brief look at the Tnetics kit, what about the quality did you feel was lacking? .

I'd like to hear this too. I've seen many kits, and with the TN stuff in my garage, the parts quality/materials quality, and build quality are far from sub-par.............
Old 02-07-2006, 12:47 PM
  #118  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chimmike
I'd like to hear this too. I've seen many kits, and with the TN stuff in my garage, the parts quality/materials quality, and build quality are far from sub-par.............
I asked you, have you had a chance to look at the quality of an APS kit?

TN:
The brackets on the FMIC, the welds showing in the intake piping, I don't like the placment of the turbo, The band clamps used on the exhaust nor the way the exhaust piping runs. I don't like the fact that the kit is a base form has you tap an oil return rather than including a spacer or oil pan.I don't like the fact it relies on a reflash for their base kit - and yes I understand that you can run a separate EMS. I don't like that they don't have any sort of boost control beyond a spring pressure.

I am sure the quality is adequate, but from my point of view, not what I would want in a kit. I just think the fit and finish of the kit is lacking. I know the stage 1.5 will be much more respectable setup.

These are just my thoughts on the kit and what I took into consideration when I made my purchase.
Old 02-07-2006, 01:02 PM
  #119  
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bradenton/Sarasota
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

okay, so you don't like v-band clamps. That's fine though they're some of the simplest and most reliable ways of sealing exhaust without using welds or bolt on/gasket joints. The way the piping runs? well, last I saw, there isn't a TON of space in the engine bay......especially with the placement they chose. And they chose that placement for a reason....i don't know what it is, ask 'em!

brackets on the fmic: Haven't had any reports of breakage yet, have we? don't think so.....so what's the fuss?

welds showing on piping--------that's not a quality issue, that's a cosmetics issue. Ever try grinding down welded piping like that? Very labor intensive. Labor=time=costs extra. I think the black chroming more than makes up for some very nice looking welds (believe it or not, nice welds=show points).

oil return line: Okay, I can understand that gripe, and I'll give it to you. But then again, get the price of the TN kit and a JWT spacer is still less expensive than the other brand.

Reflash: It's been proven reliable and safe. It doesn't have to be tuneable as long as it's safe, does it? Also it's best for people who want to install it in their garage and not have to sweat bullets on the way to x shop to get tuned, but i'll give you this one I guess. I've dealt with the tuning thing before, lots of times, and I just like this setup due to it's simplicity.

boost control beyond external gate. Well, with all my internal gate experience, what more would you want? External gates are more consistent, always have been. Would you prever a super low boost spring and a built in increase in the management offering? I prefer the external gate, where it's set at a reasonable, but not dangerous setting, and the spring is interchangeable to whatever base setting you like. I don't see anything wrong with an external wastegate as boost control.

If you think stage 1.5 will be more respectable, why? There won't be any changes to the welds in the piping, etc. It just adds unichip, injectors, and some other stuff. I'd say, take a look at the pics of Taurran's car. The quality is far above "adequate".

plus their customer service is excellent, as is the warranty.

Though, I figure you're an APS owner, which is fine. I just can't justify paying APS ST money for ST when I can (yes, I can) get a greddy setup minus EMS for the same money. Just wouldn't make sense to me to spend a few hundred more and get the Greddy setup....if I were going for incredible power possibilities.
Old 02-07-2006, 01:13 PM
  #120  
kcobean
iTrader: (2)
 
kcobean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern VA - USA
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Fair enough Ziv. I don't think the things you've pointed out are really "quality issues" per se, but I can see how they would factor into your decision, and we'll see over time if any of them prove to be problematic for the large and growing TN user base. I suspect they won't, but only time will tell.

Thanks!

Last edited by kcobean; 02-07-2006 at 01:15 PM.


Quick Reply: ~Turbo Systems~



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:44 PM.