Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Another MRC MasterPiece!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #81  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Um have you ever logged FUEL PRESSURE on a properly installed Turbonetics equipped car? It runs less fuel pressure then the APS ST kit does I can tell you that. I see 53-55 PSI at idle personally. Again if you had done some research you would know that the modification to the stock fuel pressure regulator lowers the fuel pressure from the increase caused by adding a Walbro 255 lph. Without modifying the regulator and just installing my Walbro fuel pressure was at 75 PSI. After modifying the regulator its 53-55 PSI at idle and 48 PSI under boost. Which btw is about where it is stock. So explain to me again how the injectors are only flowing more because of increased fuel pressure BTW the Vortech kit DOES do that as its fuel management but with stock injectors instead. The Turbonetics kit however DOES NOT.

For one, saying that the fuel pressure under load drops doesn't help your case - in a safety and reliability standpoint. For two, at idle, APS setups run 52 lbs of fuel pressure.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #82  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Oh and just as an FYI even though Turbonetics does not do what you claim they do (BTW every point you have made so far about the Turbonetics appears to be without any form of research) the Jim Wolf kit does. There are greater then 15 JWT equipped cars making power into the 500s with 440cc injectors and no return system. Guess what they are doing...running fuel pressure at a 4:1 ratio. So are you now going to tell me that Jim Wolf doesn't know what he's doing either? And as for the AC line. Me and taurran are sitting fine at almost 2 years with the kit and I personally have 40k miles on my car with the kit and without a single AC line issue yet.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #83  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
For one, saying that the fuel pressure under load drops doesn't help your case - in a safety and reliability standpoint. For two, at idle, APS setups run 52 lbs of fuel pressure.
You sure about that. Peter says the APS kit runs at 58 PSI of fuel pressure.

Originally Posted by APS Website
The drop-in Quad Orifice Directional pattern injectors supplied in the APS Single or Twin Turbo Systems flow 500 cc at 4.0 Bar (58 psi) differential fuel pressure.
http://www.*************/350z/fuel/fuel.htm

And everyone should expect the pressure to drop some as there is no FPR in the Stage 1 kit. Clearly from the dynos and from my 40k miles with no issues its not necessary at the Stage 1 power levels.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #84  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Oh and just as an FYI even though Turbonetics does not do what you claim they do (BTW every point you have made so far about the Turbonetics appears to be without any form of research) the Jim Wolf kit does. There are greater then 15 JWT equipped cars making power into the 500s with 440cc injectors and no return system. Guess what they are doing...running fuel pressure at a 4:1 ratio. So are you now going to tell me that Jim Wolf doesn't know what he's doing either?
I know of more than one shop/source that will say that JW's fuel system is questionable at best.
Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports

Once again, any kit out there can make HP, the key is to make it safely and somewhat reliably.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #85  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
You sure about that. Peter says the APS kit runs at 58 PSI of fuel pressure.


Just an FYI, that is how they are rating the injectors.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:46 PM
  #86  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
I know of more than one shop/source that will say that JW's fuel system is questionable at best.
And how many of them are as qualified as Jim Wolf to make that statement? For that matter how many are even half as qualified?

Seems Garrett thinks Jim Wolf is pretty smart:
Originally Posted by Garrett webpage

Garrett Kit Manufacturers are experts in turbocharger kits and upgrade turbochargers for specific vehicle applications. They work directly with Garrett’s engineering team to develop and manufacture some of the finest, installation-ready turbo products available.
Davie, FL 33317
124 Eisenhower Court
Nicholasville, KY 40356

Ford, GM & Dodge Trucks

Gale Banks Engineering
546 Duggan Avenue
Azusa, CA 91702
626-969-9600
626-969-9468 (fax)
peter@galebanks.com
www.bankspower.com

Audi & Volkswagon

Audi Performance Racing
1027-B Opelika Road
Auburn, AL 36830
800-680-7921
334-502-5180 (fax)
flora@goapr.com
www.goapr.com

Honda

Edelbrock
2700 California Street
Torrance, CA 90503
310-781-2222
310-320-1187 (fax)
sales@edelbrock.com
www.edelbrock.com

Nissan / Infiniti

Jim Wolf Technology
212 Millar Avenue
El Cajon, CA 92020
619-442-0680
619-579-8160 (fax)
www.jimwolftechnology.com

Lingenfelter Performance Engineering
1557 Winchester Road
Decatur, IN 46733
260-724-2552
260-724-0422 (fax)
sales@lingenfelter.com
www.lingenfelter.com


HPA MOTORSPORTS

7561, 134A Street
Surrey
British Columbia V3W 7B3, Canada
604598-8520
604598-8760
mhorn@hpamotorsport.com
www.hpamotorsports.com

Are any of the shops you are referring to on that list?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #87  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Just an FYI, that is how they are rating the injectors.
Funny then that people are seeing that fuel pressure on their APS kits.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #88  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Just an FYI, that is how they are rating the injectors.
Funny, so why is this chart stating APS fuel pressure at the rail is 58 PSI?


APS Constant Differential Pressure
Fuel Rail Pressure

Injector Orifice Pressure Difference

Fuel Rail Pressure

Injector Orifice Pressure Difference
0 psi

58 psi

2 psi


60 psi

4 psi

62 psi

6 psi

64 psi

8 psi

66 psi

10 psi

68 psi

FYI thats from the APS website..


Looks to me like the base pressure is 58 and it goes up with boost as it should with an rising rate FPR installed.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #89  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Funny then that people are seeing that fuel pressure on their APS kits.
I too see 58 lbs of fuel pressure on my kit -> at 6 lbs of boost

Just curious if Garrett is in the aftermarket turbo KIT business? or the turbo business?

Also, what makes JW the be-all of intelligence in regards to the Z? It is well known some of the reasons his kit is delivered with this fuel system:
1.) attempt to get carb approval
2.) keep costs down

More to the point though, I would love to hear more about info in regards to MRCs 'concerns' with the TN setup.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #90  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Funny, so why is this chart stating APS fuel pressure at the rail is 58 PSI?


APS Constant Differential Pressure
Fuel Rail Pressure

Injector Orifice Pressure Difference

Fuel Rail Pressure

Injector Orifice Pressure Difference
0 psi

58 psi

2 psi


60 psi

4 psi

62 psi

6 psi

64 psi

8 psi

66 psi

10 psi

68 psi

FYI thats from the APS website..


Looks to me like the base pressure is 58 and it goes up with boost as it should with an rising rate FPR installed.
Oh shoot, you got me

guess my install was wrong, my tuner was wrong, my APS dealer was wrong, and my fuel pressure gauge is wrong.

With all this going wrong, I guess I should have bought a TN setup.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #91  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Oh shoot, you got me

guess my install was wrong, my tuner was wrong, my APS dealer was wrong, and my fuel pressure gauge is wrong.

With all this going wrong, I guess I should have bought a TN setup.
No but maybe you should know what you are saying is true before you say it.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #92  
Oleg's Avatar
Oleg
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
From: Room full of blood
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Oh and just as an FYI even though Turbonetics does not do what you claim they do (BTW every point you have made so far about the Turbonetics appears to be without any form of research) the Jim Wolf kit does. There are greater then 15 JWT equipped cars making power into the 500s with 440cc injectors and no return system. Guess what they are doing...running fuel pressure at a 4:1 ratio. So are you now going to tell me that Jim Wolf doesn't know what he's doing either? And as for the AC line. Me and taurran are sitting fine at almost 2 years with the kit and I personally have 40k miles on my car with the kit and without a single AC line issue yet.

I think that this is the post to which MRC will retalliate with the VRT's over-corrected dyno argument...
Gotta love the forums...
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #93  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
No but maybe you should know what you are saying is true before you say it.
Am I lying? Tuan, what should my fuel pressure be at idle? It should be around 52 lbs. Good that's what I am seeing
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #94  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
I too see 58 lbs of fuel pressure on my kit -> at 6 lbs of boost

Just curious if Garrett is in the aftermarket turbo KIT business? or the turbo business?

Also, what makes JW the be-all of intelligence in regards to the Z? It is well known some of the reasons his kit is delivered with this fuel system:
1.) attempt to get carb approval
2.) keep costs down

More to the point though, I would love to hear more about info in regards to MRCs 'concerns' with the TN setup.
Nothing makes JWT the end all be all of Z products. But when Garrett specifically calls them out to produce kits for Nissan cars I think that says something. I mean I guess it not a big deal that Jim Wolf helped Garrett design the GT28RS. I mean its not like Jim Wolf knows anything about turbos or turbo kits. He's only been at this for 20 years now. What could he possibly know
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #95  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by Oleg
I think that this is the post to which MRC will retalliate with the VRT's over-corrected dyno...
Gotta love the forums...

There might be another shop or two around that would back MRC up in that claim
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:00 PM
  #96  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Am I lying? Tuan, what should my fuel pressure be at idle? It should be around 52 lbs. Good that's what I am seeing
Funny then that the kit manufacturer says otherwise... guess Tuan knows more then Peter?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:01 PM
  #97  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
. What could he possibly know

honestly, less than people give him credit for from the research I have done.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:05 PM
  #98  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
honestly, less than people give him credit for from the research I have done.
Well I guess its easy to say that since you've never talked to the man or seen his work in person. Maybe its because I've been playing with Nissan's my whole life but I think any Nissan head who has been around for a while will tell you jim Wolf knows some ****. But then I guess not. You obviously are more then qualifed to dicredit his research, work, and credentials. So why don't you go ahead and tell us what your "research" has turned up that proves Jim Wolf knows less then everyone thinks he knows. I'm sure we're all dying to hear it.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:09 PM
  #99  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

What Ziv is saying is this: there is more than one way to skin a cat, but there is only one BEST way. I personally wouldn't feel comfortable with the JWT fuel kit if I were in the game for a new TT kit. First thing I'd do would be to upgrade the fuel system and ECM which would make it more much expensive than the APS, if I'm not mistaken. My two cents.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:10 PM
  #100  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Nothing makes JWT the end all be all of Z products. But when Garrett specifically calls them out to produce kits for Nissan cars I think that says something. I mean I guess it not a big deal that Jim Wolf helped Garrett design the GT28RS. I mean its not like Jim Wolf knows anything about turbos or turbo kits. He's only been at this for 20 years now. What could he possibly know
FYI the turbos in the APS kit are also Garrett turbos, specifically designed for APS. Im sure Garrett may have shared some of the desighn with the JWT kit. Not that JWT has anything to do with my comments..But IMO JWT used the fuel system they did, to get the carb approval and keep costs down, the second of which they did not succeed considering the JWT kit retail is in the $7900 range last I heard, and half as complete as the APS system. I think JWT used their fuel solution as a cost effective solution, whereas APS does not care to keep costs down, but to "over engineer" their systems.
Case in point, pick up any pipe from and APs kit, and compare the inside finish and welds to that of the TN, or Greddy for that matter..You will see that APS grinds all of its weld smooth, and finishes every sinle pipe flawlessly.This acomplishes 2 things.
1) to reduce any restriction in airflow
2) to keep and pieces of excess welds or debris from being in the pipe where it should not be.

Now, show me one TN owner that has successfully run their stock TN fuel system over 450whp for over 30,000 hard miles...You can not..I assure you.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 AM.