Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Another MRC MasterPiece!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #121  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
IMHO, it seems to me TN releases these 'stages' to, at least in some part, correct issues and shortcomings in the orginal kit.

Basically, what more than one shop told me is that JW couldn't tune a car to roll down hill in neutral - but then again, as you pointed out, no shop I have talked to is qualified enough to make such a statement, so I will let people find out their own info and decide for themself
I will agree that Clark Steppler at JWT does most of the tuning but how does the take away from what Jim Wolf knows about turbo kit design?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #122  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Um, no. The Q is a lot different then the original Unichip. Have you personally used it or seen it used or is this from more of your "research"? Of course the principle is the same (I would say any EMS has the same principles) but the software, tables, capabilities, and as you mentioned "belts and whistles" are vastly more advanced. I guess waiting for an EMS that suits your needs beyond the bolt on turn key 365-380 WHP capability is a crime now.
I am in the process of moving onto a more advanced EMS. I discussed the Q with more than one tuner. To sum up what I was told, I was advised that it would do little more for me than my current unichip EMS.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #123  
tig488's Avatar
tig488
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 0
From: bama
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
No, Im just sick of the TN cronies comming onto my APS thread and bashing calling it a turd..The members that have had problems are mostly self installs and I can assure you, something was done incorectly.Even in Tig's case, he said he put a EBC in and it made the boost problem better..A bad turbo would not get better simply by adding a EBC, which tells me the following.
1) he has an incorrectly installed wastegate actuator
can it be installed wrong? i have the forge billet actuator.
2) he has an icorrectly installed BCS on the Unichip
no longer working, disconnected, ebc instead
3) the unichip BCS values need to be tuned properly
see above
4) the tension on the wastegate is incorrect
hows this, i have the 9-15psi spring, tightened all the way down.
5) he has a manifold leak under boost..(wondering if he has a spacer or Kinetix plenum)
pressure tested, held 20 psi for 10 minutes, no leaks anywhere in the intake side.
6) his BOV is opening under boost and needs to be set..
tried 3 bovs, APS, Turbo XS, now Greddy. adjusted each accordingly.
There really is no other explanation for him not making and holding boost...
im not the only one.

replaced crossover pipe, no more flex pipe cracking, dropped exhaust at downpipe, bought new turbo, rechecked all charge piping connections, nothing really worked. wired the wastegate puck shut, i made 19psi instantly then i let off.

tonight im putting on the 14-18psi spring, hell maybe even the 19-25psi spring. since i had an extra turbo/dp, thats at the shop getting a custom open dump, ext wg setup welded on, all i gotta do is pick it up and slap it on.

it that doesnt work im going with a bigger turbine housing. at nopi this weekend, since i had an extra turbine housing, i let them look it over, they feel the housing is too small for the VQ. who knows. ive measured it, and its a low A/R. maybe that was APS' intention, fast low end boost with no lag and fall off a little to be safe.

myself along with many others, and the garrett techs at nopi, think the wastegate is opening and the excessive exhaust backpressure in the housing wont let it shut properly.

ive made it my mission in life to solve this problem. dont care what it takes.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #124  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
I will agree that Clark Steppler at JWT does most of the tuning but how does the take away from what Jim Wolf knows about turbo kit design?
You tell me who was in charge of the design?

oil pan spacer rather than replacement oil pan:


the awkward and sharp angles the piping takes out of the FMIC



Replacement of the washer resevoir with a smaller one - how do you go about filling it? - I would assume your retain the stock filler?
also in this pic, your impact beam is bent?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #125  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
You remind me of some punk gangster who resorts to saying "do you know who I know" and starts ripping off names, like you did by bringing JWT into theis debate..What was your point of bringing JWT into this debate??To name drop to increase your credibility??
Now you resort to bashing APS' customer service???Really, if you work for TN this is making TN look foolish byhaving a troll like you on the borads discrediting every other manufacturer out there...Do you sit home and look for post where someone makes one negative comment about a TN kit then resort to causing a war??
I don't work for Turbonetics so let me ease your mind about that. I'm not bashing APS customer service as I think several board members have done that quite sufficiently. I don't think its a secret there are greater then 15 owners on here that are fair less then pleased in that avenue. I mentioned Jim Wolf because you seemed to be re-inforcing the point that a turbo system must have a return fuel system. It appears several companies disagree. Jim Wolf is one of them and I just happen to have spoken with him on the subject. I have also spoken with the Engineers at Turbonetics. But people I haven't spoken to that seem to think its not necessary include HKS, Vortech, Greddy, Power Enterprise, etc.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:41 PM
  #126  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Thats funny since your fellow APS dealer Japtrix and Westpak have been installing Unichip Qs on APS cars for a while. Are you going to start hating on them now because you werent the first? And how exactly is a copy cat to use an EMS someone else is using. APS wasn't the first company in the world to use it and Turbonetics won't be the last. Turbonetics evaluated several EMS companies before deciding on the Unichip Q. Thats what we call "research". I would suggesst you do the same since your info appears to be flawed. I'm still laughing about the Mexico and Steel with chrome plating comments.
FYI Westpack is Japtrix... And perhaps they are using it as a prototype, but to my knowledge the Q has not been released in full to the public, although this may have changed since last we spoke with Jack Friedman of Unichip North America..
Also FYI Turbonetics is owned by Kelly Aerospace, who manufactures aircraft parts as well and subcontracts several Mexican based Aerospace companies to manufacture their parts..Cheap labor
I doubt TN engineeres and manufactures turbines and housing at their Claifornia plant..They may do a final assembly and balancing, but the wheels are manufacutred elsewhere, no doubt..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:42 PM
  #127  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
I am in the process of moving onto a more advanced EMS. I discussed the Q with more than one tuner. To sum up what I was told, I was advised that it would do little more for me than my current unichip EMS.
You have been told some incorrect data then. I will let you do some more "research" on the subject but suffice to say there are some rather unique features that the unichip you are currently running does not provide that are added with the Unichip Q. i've taken the liberty of getting you on the right track . see the attachment
Attached Thumbnails Another MRC MasterPiece!-thursday-july-06-2006-2-.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:43 PM
  #128  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
You tell me who was in charge of the design?

oil pan spacer rather than replacement oil pan:
[

the awkward and sharp angles the piping takes out of the FMIC



Replacement of the washer resevoir with a smaller one - how do you go about filling it? - I would assume your retain the stock filler?
also in this pic, your impact beam is bent?
I don't know who was in charge nor do I care. If the system works then it works. Can you please tell me what the temp drop was by adding just the APS oil pan? Now can you tell me the delta between that and just a pan spacer?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:45 PM
  #129  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
FYI Westpack is Japtrix... And perhaps they are using it as a prototype, but to my knowledge the Q has not been released in full to the public, although this may have changed since last we spoke with Jack Friedman of Unichip North America..
Also FYI Turbonetics is owned by Kelly Aerospace, who manufactures aircraft parts as well and subcontracts several Mexican based Aerospace companies to manufacture their parts..Cheap labor
I doubt TN engineeres and manufactures turbines and housing at their Claifornia plant..They may do a final assembly and balancing, but the wheels are manufacutred elsewhere, no doubt..
Wrong again. The castings, machining, assembling, and balancing are done in California. Again speaking without knowledge of the topic. Have you been to their facility? Honywell owns Garrett and has several plants in Mexico. Does that mean Garrett parts are made in Mexico to?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:45 PM
  #130  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
I don't know who was in charge nor do I care. If the system works then it works. Can you please tell me what the temp drop was by adding just the APS oil pan? Now can you tell me the delta between that and just a pan spacer?
1) baffles in the oil pan
2) cooling fins in the oil pan
3) one less mating surface to potentally leak over a spacer..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:46 PM
  #131  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Wrong again. The castings, machining, assembling, and balancing are done in California. Again speaking without knowledge of the topic. Have you been to their facility? Honywell owns Garrett and has several plants in Mexico. Does that mean Garrett parts are made in Mexico to?
Actually, most turbines are made in mexico and overseas, if the TN turbos were made 100% in the USA, they would cost tenfold..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #132  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
1) baffles in the oil pan
2) cooling fins in the oil pan
3) one less mating surface to potentally leak over a spacer..
Again can you tell me the delta between oil temps with a pan spacer and oil temps with an APS pan? Without it the cooling fins are meaningless. And if you are smart enough to use Permatex properlly (a 15 year old could easily) there should be no leaks. Nissan saw fit to use it all over the motor and it doesn't seem to have an issue there.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #133  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Actually, I need to catch a flight in the morning..Ill be back in 10 days I would once again like to thank Miaplaya for acting as the resident TN bully and ruining yet another perfectly good APS thread..Really good for TN reputation there pal..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:50 PM
  #134  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Again can you tell me the delta between oil temps with a pan spacer and oil temps with an APS pan? Without it the cooling fins are meaningless. And if you are smart enough to use Permatex properlly (a 15 year old could easily) there should be no leaks. Nissan saw fit to use it all over the motor and it doesn't seem to have an issue there.
Grasping at straws man...The proper way is an oil pan, not a stupid spacer with a hole tapped in it.. Engineering 101 pal..Oh wait, JWT made it so it must be the end all solution to our woes..
Fore petes sake, even Greddy and PE make a pan not a spacer..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:50 PM
  #135  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
Actually, most turbines are made in mexico and overseas, if the TN turbos were made 100% in the USA, they would cost tenfold..
Are we going to continue with this argument? So by your statement there you are telling me that it doesn't really matter where turbo parts are made. Because according to you Garrett may very well be using turbine wheels from Mexico themselves. So if thats the case why were you making the huge stink about Turbonetics parts supposedly coming from Mexico? Not that it really matter cause they don't. I have been to Turbonetics and know where the castings come from. Have you?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:51 PM
  #136  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
Grasping at straws man...The proper way is an oil pan, not a stupid spacer with a hole tapped in it.. Engineering 101 pal..Oh wait, JWT made it so it must be the end all solution to our woes..
And what experience do you have as an engineer? Please share the info with the board so that we know exactly what makes it better. From an "engineering" perspective that is.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:52 PM
  #137  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
Actually, I need to catch a flight in the morning..Ill be back in 10 days I would once again like to thank Miaplaya for acting as the resident TN bully and ruining yet another perfectly good APS thread..Really good for TN reputation there pal..
Actually it was you who initially posted incorrect information about Turbonetics. I have been trying to correct that since the beginning. Unfortunately you appear to be grossly misinformed about that company and since I have some information about it I am attempting to remedy that.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #138  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
Grasping at straws man...The proper way is an oil pan, not a stupid spacer with a hole tapped in it.. Engineering 101 pal..Oh wait, JWT made it so it must be the end all solution to our woes..
Fore petes sake, even Greddy and PE make a pan not a spacer..
The best way is tapping the upper pan, allowing gravity to assist in circulation of oil rather than returning it to a standing pool. The higher, the better.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 04:18 PM
  #139  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

I'm not sure if this has been pointed out, as I have not been following this thread, but the one that started this whole debate with the APS ST "turd" comment, is an APS ST owner...

The Turbonetics ST kit was only brought up after MRC started slamming it after assuming that beastie owned a Turbonetics kit.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #140  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
I'm not sure if this has been pointed out, as I have not been following this thread, but the one that started this whole debate with the APS ST "turd" comment, is an APS ST owner...

The Turbonetics ST kit was only brought up after MRC started slamming it after assuming that beastie owned a Turbonetics kit.
yeah thats funny.. and he is ditching it for a Greddy TT.. interesting eh
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 AM.