Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Another MRC MasterPiece!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:10 PM
  #101  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Well I guess its easy to say that since you've never talked to the man or seen his work in person. Maybe its because I've been playing with Nissan's my whole life but I think any Nissan head who has been around for a while will tell you jim Wolf knows some ****. But then I guess not. You obviously are more then qualifed to dicredit his research, work, and credentials. So why don't you go ahead and tell us what your "research" has turned up that proves Jim Wolf knows less then everyone thinks he knows. I'm sure we're all dying to hear it.
most of what I have been told revolves around tuning on past setups for the Z32.

From what I can gather, JW is smart enough to surround himself with people that are knowledgable. In the end, just my opinions and just what I had found out asking about JW. I don't plan on running his kit, or any of his parts so it really doesn't affect me.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:13 PM
  #102  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
FYI the turbos in the APS kit are also Garrett turbos, specifically designed for APS. Im sure Garrett may have shared some of the desighn with the JWT kit. Not that JWT has anything to do with my comments..But IMO JWT used the fuel system they did, to get the carb approval and keep costs down, the second of which they did not succeed considering the JWT kit retail is in the $7900 range last I heard, and half as complete as the APS system. I think JWT used their fuel solution as a cost effective solution, whereas APS does not care to keep costs down, but to "over engineer" their systems.
Case in point, pick up any pipe from and APs kit, and compare the inside finish and welds to that of the TN, or Greddy for that matter..You will see that APS grinds all of its weld smooth, and finishes every sinle pipe flawlessly.This acomplishes 2 things.
1) to reduce any restriction in airflow
2) to keep and pieces of excess welds or debris from being in the pipe where it should not be.

Now, show me one TN owner that has successfully run their stock TN fuel system over 450whp for over 30,000 hard miles...You can not..I assure you.
'


Now tell me where Turbonetics claimed to do that? You can not. The Stage 1 kit was not designed for that so I wouldn't expect it to do that. When the other kits are released I'll be happy to show it can be done. BTW show me one APS ST kit running at 450 WHP for amount of mileage. You can not.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:14 PM
  #103  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Funny, so why is this chart stating APS fuel pressure at the rail is 58 PSI?


APS Constant Differential Pressure
Fuel Rail Pressure

Injector Orifice Pressure Difference

Fuel Rail Pressure

Injector Orifice Pressure Difference
0 psi

58 psi

2 psi


60 psi

4 psi

62 psi

6 psi

64 psi

8 psi

66 psi

10 psi

68 psi

FYI thats from the APS website..


Looks to me like the base pressure is 58 and it goes up with boost as it should with an rising rate FPR installed.

This post only proves one thing, APS does their homework, whereas this information would not be posted on TN website for the public to see...The TN fuel solution is at best, HALF A S S E D from my standards...A return style fuel system is a bare minimum for anyone boosting a VQ35 motor..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #104  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
most of what I have been told revolves around tuning on past setups for the Z32.

From what I can gather, JW is smart enough to surround himself with people that are knowledgable. In the end, just my opinions and just what I had found out asking about JW. I don't plan on running his kit, or any of his parts so it really doesn't affect me.
No it may not affect you but publicly stating you have research proving that Jim Wolf is not a credible as people think he is is a bold statement and does affect him. Again I'd like to see this "research" you have put together that says jim Wolf doesn't know what everyone including Garrett seems to think he does. Or was that all heresay?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:17 PM
  #105  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
'


Now tell me where Turbonetics claimed to do that? You can not. The Stage 1 kit was not designed for that so I wouldn't expect it to do that. When the other kits are released I'll be happy to show it can be done. BTW show me one APS ST kit running at 450 WHP for amount of mileage. You can not.
You mean the stage 2 set up with the EXACT SAME TECHOLOGY APS HAS EMPLOYED FOR OVER 2 YEARS ON THE MARKET????
I can show you an APS twin at 10 psi of boost that made over 460 to the wheels for 35000 miles until he hit a tree, and he is using the same fuel system and engine management as the APS single FYI..The same engine management TN copied on their stage 2 kits.. Cause it works..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:18 PM
  #106  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
No it may not affect you but publicly stating you have research proving that Jim Wolf is not a credible as people think he is is a bold statement and does affect him. Again I'd like to see this "research" you have put together that says jim Wolf doesn't know what everyone including Garrett seems to think he does. Or was that all heresay?
FYI, Garrett is in the market of selling turos, be it to JWT, APS or Joey bagadonuts..$$$$$ Talks, remember..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:18 PM
  #107  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
This post only proves one thing, APS does their homework, whereas this information would not be posted on TN website for the public to see...The TN fuel solution is at best, HALF A S S E D from my standards...A return style fuel system is a bare minimum for anyone boosting a VQ35 motor..
Well luckily your standards are not those of a qualified mechanical engineer. So far you have told me

Turbonetics parts are made in Mexico?
The intake piping is not aluminum?
The Turbonetics kit runs extremely high fuel pressure?
The exhaust piping is not Stainless? (BTW I've seent he pipe welded on, its stainless)
The fuel system is maxed at 7 PSI?
The car runs 13:1 AFR?
The fuel system will not allow more power over 8 PSI?

Yup you are more then qualified to judge a design and more so set design parameters in an engineering practice
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:20 PM
  #108  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
No it may not affect you but publicly stating you have research proving that Jim Wolf is not a credible as people think he is is a bold statement and does affect him. Again I'd like to see this "research" you have put together that says jim Wolf doesn't know what everyone including Garrett seems to think he does. Or was that all heresay?
Now you are on the defense of JW and TN. Don't spread yourself too thin.

I didn't say: HERE IS MY PROOF!!! what I said was
Originally Posted by Zivman
In the end, just my opinions and just what I had found out asking about JW.
Besides, most informed car enthusiasts can look at his fuel system and know that's not the way it should be done
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
The Stage 1 kit was not designed for that so I wouldn't expect it to do that.
And I love all this talk about stage 1, stage 2, stage 3 etc. I am holding out for stage infinity - mia, any word on when such a stage will be released

Last edited by Zivman; Sep 18, 2006 at 03:22 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #109  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
You mean the stage 2 set up with the EXACT SAME TECHOLOGY APS HAS EMPLOYED FOR OVER 2 YEARS ON THE MARKET????
I can show you an APS twin at 10 psi of boost that made over 460 to the wheels for 35000 miles until he hit a tree, and he is using the same fuel system and engine management as the APS single FYI..The same engine management TN copied on their stage 2 kits.. Cause it works..
Um actullay no Turbonetics is using nothing even close to resembling APS fuel system or management. The APS kit uses the oldest version of Unichip still available. the Stage 2 kit uses the Unichip Q which is fairly new (about 1 year old if that). And the fuel system is 100% different. But how would you even know that since its not released and unless you made a trip to Turbonetics recently and they showed you I don't think theres anyway for you to even guess at whats in it. And again: SHOW ME ONE APS ST MAKING 450RWHP FOR THAT AMOUNT OF MILES
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:22 PM
  #110  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #111  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Well luckily your standards are not those of a qualified mechanical engineer. So far you have told me

Turbonetics parts are made in Mexico?
The intake piping is not aluminum?
The Turbonetics kit runs extremely high fuel pressure?
The exhaust piping is not Stainless? (BTW I've seent he pipe welded on, its stainless)
The fuel system is maxed at 7 PSI?
The car runs 13:1 AFR?
The fuel system will not allow more power over 8 PSI?

Yup you are more then qualified to judge a design and more so set design parameters in an engineering practice
#1, never said the TN runs an extemely high fuel pressure, but a higher one, to compensate for it being undersized in the injector department...
#2 I have datalogged several TN cars where the stock injecotrs were maxed out past industry standards at 7 psi and 100% duty cycle at 8-9 psi..
#3 Not every car runs 13.1, but the one I saw bend a rod did...Car simply ran out of fuel up top..(we did not do the install)
#4 the stock TN fuel system and ECM is a ticking time bomb imo...An RPM based tune of a bosted car is simply stupid...The ecu can no account for more boost,denser aircharge,air density ect...

Please read all my posts before makjing your ignorant comments fool..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #112  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
The APS kit uses the oldest version of Unichip still available. the Stage 2 kit uses the Unichip Q which is fairly new (about 1 year old if that). [/b]
The Q is basically the same as the classic, but with more bells and whistles
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #113  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Now you are on the defense of JW and TN. Don't spread yourself too thin.

I didn't say: HERE IS MY PROOF!!! what I said was Besides, most informed car enthusiasts can look at his fuel system and know that's not the way it should be done


And I love all this talk about stage 1, stage 2, stage 3 etc. I am holding out for stage infinity - mai, and word on when such a stage will be released
Not defeding JWT products but interested when people claim to have "research" indicating a looked up to member of the Nissan community is for lack of a better term not as smart as we think he is. You made the claim. Not me. If you can't back it up with facts you probably should have kept it to yourself. Oh and it appears that several APS owners have asked about upgrade or "stage" kits from APS but they aren't planning on doing it at least for the ST kit. So I guess its not just Turbonetics owners who see that not everyone needs a kit capable of 600 HP. Some people don't want to pay for parts they dont need when they are only planning to make 365-380 RWHP so why not provide them with different paths to take to meet their goals. The customers asked for it so Turbonetics is doing it. But then again I guess APS doesn't exactly have a reputation for their customer service now do they?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:29 PM
  #114  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
#1, never said the TN runs an extemely high fuel pressure, but a higher one, to compensate for it being undersized in the injector department...
#2 I have datalogged several TN cars where the stock injecotrs were maxed out past industry standards at 7 psi and 100% duty cycle at 8-9 psi..
#3 Not every car runs 13.1, but the one I saw bend a rod did...Car simply ran out of fuel up top..(we did not do the install)
#4 the stock TN fuel system and ECM is a ticking time bomb imo...An RPM based tune of a bosted car is simply stupid...The ecu can no account for more boost,denser aircharge,air density ect...

Please read all my posts before makjing your ignorant comments fool..
You call my comments ignorant and me a fool? You are the one who just claimed tha above. Aluminum piping is steel with chrome? Made in Mexico Perhaps you should read your own comments. I have datalogged mine car and Turbonetics has datalogged at least 6 others that are running in the 8X% duty cycle range at 8.5 PSI. If the Turbonetics system is a ticking time bomb then I guess I must just have a really long fuse along with taurran, peking, Turbonetics, soldsnake, chimmike, G3.5T, and every other Turbonetics owner with no issues.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:29 PM
  #115  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Um actullay no Turbonetics is using nothing even close to resembling APS fuel system or management. The APS kit uses the oldest version of Unichip still available. the Stage 2 kit uses the Unichip Q which is fairly new (about 1 year old if that). And the fuel system is 100% different. But how would you even know that since its not released and unless you made a trip to Turbonetics recently and they showed you I don't think theres anyway for you to even guess at whats in it. And again: SHOW ME ONE APS ST MAKING 450RWHP FOR THAT AMOUNT OF MILES
You mean the Unichip Q that has had numerous software issues and has not been released yet as a result??
I have no doubt that the Uni Q will be superior to the old Unichip, and once it is bug free, I am sure APS will make the transformation also..My point being is , TN used a half a s s ed reflash for over 2 years while APS was using Unichip technology, which may not be the best, but far superior to that of a base TN kit...Now TN sees this ans decides to jump on the Unichip bandwagon, cause it works well and is cost effective... Technology once again proved by APS for over 15 years.. Now, Obviously you work for TN as I see you resorting to the same "know it all" tactics on every forum out there, something someone who is not collecting a check from a company would never do, unless your just on someones jock and trying to get brownie points..
PS, when is the relase of the stage 2-3-4-5-...????
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #116  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Not defeding JWT products but interested when people claim to have "research" indicating a looked up to member of the Nissan community is for lack of a better term not as smart as we think he is. You made the claim. Not me. If you can't back it up with facts you probably should have kept it to yourself. Oh and it appears that several APS owners have asked about upgrade or "stage" kits from APS but they aren't planning on doing it at least for the ST kit. So I guess its not just Turbonetics owners who see that not everyone needs a kit capable of 600 HP. Some people don't want to pay for parts they dont need when they are only planning to make 365-380 RWHP so why not provide them with different paths to take to meet their goals. The customers asked for it so Turbonetics is doing it. But then again I guess APS doesn't exactly have a reputation for their customer service now do they?
IMHO, it seems to me TN releases these 'stages' to, at least in some part, correct issues and shortcomings in the orginal kit.

Basically, what more than one shop told me is that JW couldn't tune a car to roll down hill in neutral - but then again, as you pointed out, no shop I have talked to is qualified enough to make such a statement, so I will let people find out their own info and decide for themself
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #117  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
The Q is basically the same as the classic, but with more bells and whistles
Um, no. The Q is a lot different then the original Unichip. Have you personally used it or seen it used or is this from more of your "research"? Of course the principle is the same (I would say any EMS has the same principles) but the software, tables, capabilities, and as you mentioned "belts and whistles" are vastly more advanced. I guess waiting for an EMS that suits your needs beyond the bolt on turn key 365-380 WHP capability is a crime now.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #118  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
IMHO, it seems to me TN releases these 'stages' to, at least in some part, correct issues and shortcomings in the orginal kit.

Basically, what more than one shop told me is that JW couldn't tune a car to roll down hill in neutral - but then again, as you pointed out, no shop I have talked to is qualified enough to make such a statement, so I will let people find out their own info and decide for themself
And if that isn't good enough for you, please read my sig and ignore my posts all together.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:35 PM
  #119  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
You mean the Unichip Q that has had numerous software issues and has not been released yet as a result??
I have no doubt that the Uni Q will be superior to the old Unichip, and once it is bug free, I am sure APS will make the transformation also..My point being is , TN used a half a s s ed reflash for over 2 years while APS was using Unichip technology, which may not be the best, but far superior to that of a base TN kit...Now TN sees this ans decides to jump on the Unichip bandwagon, cause it works well and is cost effective... Technology once again proved by APS for over 15 years.. Now, Obviously you work for TN as I see you resorting to the same "know it all" tactics on every forum out there, something someone who is not collecting a check from a company would never do, unless your just on someones jock and trying to get brownie points..
PS, when is the relase of the stage 2-3-4-5-...????
Thats funny since your fellow APS dealer Japtrix and Westpak have been installing Unichip Qs on APS cars for a while. Are you going to start hating on them now because you werent the first? And how exactly is a copy cat to use an EMS someone else is using. APS wasn't the first company in the world to use it and Turbonetics won't be the last. Turbonetics evaluated several EMS companies before deciding on the Unichip Q. Thats what we call "research". I would suggesst you do the same since your info appears to be flawed. I'm still laughing about the Mexico and Steel with chrome plating comments.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 03:35 PM
  #120  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Not defeding JWT products but interested when people claim to have "research" indicating a looked up to member of the Nissan community is for lack of a better term not as smart as we think he is. You made the claim. Not me. If you can't back it up with facts you probably should have kept it to yourself. Oh and it appears that several APS owners have asked about upgrade or "stage" kits from APS but they aren't planning on doing it at least for the ST kit. So I guess its not just Turbonetics owners who see that not everyone needs a kit capable of 600 HP. Some people don't want to pay for parts they dont need when they are only planning to make 365-380 RWHP so why not provide them with different paths to take to meet their goals. The customers asked for it so Turbonetics is doing it. But then again I guess APS doesn't exactly have a reputation for their customer service now do they?
You remind me of some punk gangster who resorts to saying "do you know who I know" and starts ripping off names, like you did by bringing JWT into theis debate..What was your point of bringing JWT into this debate??To name drop to increase your credibility??
Now you resort to bashing APS' customer service???Really, if you work for TN this is making TN look foolish byhaving a troll like you on the borads discrediting every other manufacturer out there...Do you sit home and look for post where someone makes one negative comment about a TN kit then resort to causing a war??
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:11 AM.