Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

lower boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #1  
dave3529's Avatar
dave3529
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: ct
Default lower boost?

i've searched and searched but don't see anything about it, so my question is has anyone lower the boost to 5, 6, or 6.5 lbs of boost on the aps st, or turbonetics kit for reliability purposes? i would think that that be a lot safer and still make 320 - 350 whp correct?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 09:01 PM
  #2  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by dave3529
i've searched and searched but don't see anything about it, so my question is has anyone lower the boost to 5, 6, or 6.5 lbs of boost on the aps st, or turbonetics kit for reliability purposes? i would think that that be a lot safer and still make 320 - 350 whp correct?
You would have to swap in a lower PSI spring or actuator onto either kit so that the base boost pressure is 5 PSI. Then use a boost controller to raise it to the pressure setting you want..
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #3  
dave3529's Avatar
dave3529
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: ct
Default

yes, i am aware of that i'm just wondering would it be more safe then the stock turbo kits, and yes i would get it tuned to 5 or 6 psi. and would it still have good gains over stock NA.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 09:32 PM
  #4  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by dave3529
yes, i am aware of that i'm just wondering would it be more safe then the stock turbo kits, and yes i would get it tuned to 5 or 6 psi. and would it still have good gains over stock NA.
Well anytime you are making lower HP you are putting less additional stress on the motor. It doesn't really matter if its 50 or 150 extra WHP when you add that much power it creates additional strain on parts that weren't designed with that kind of power in mind. While 5-6 PSI and less HP will create less additional stress I doubt in the long run it will make a huge difference in longevity.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 09:48 PM
  #5  
dave3529's Avatar
dave3529
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: ct
Default

well basically its looks to me from these forums thats not to common to snap a rod with the turbonetics kit if left at 8 psi and maintaned properly, but still happens once in a while, so I was thinking that the turbonetics kit is right on the egde with the vq's limits so if i basically detuned it to only 5 or 6 psi, i should be very safe and still make the car somewhat faster. If i could get 320whp and tq I would be more then happy. and this setup in my mind will have more poetentical then the superchargers down the road if i built the block and be safer since it only 5 or 6 psi compared to the 7 , 8 , 9 psi that the supercharges use. but please correct me if i'm wrong because thats why i'm running my possible plans by u guys
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #6  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by dave3529
well basically its looks to me from these forums thats not to common to snap a rod with the turbonetics kit if left at 8 psi and maintaned properly, but still happens once in a while, so I was thinking that the turbonetics kit is right on the egde with the vq's limits so if i basically detuned it to only 5 or 6 psi, i should be very safe and still make the car somewhat faster. If i could get 320whp and tq I would be more then happy. and this setup in my mind will have more poetentical then the superchargers down the road if i built the block and be safer since it only 5 or 6 psi compared to the 7 , 8 , 9 psi that the supercharges use. but please correct me if i'm wrong because thats why i'm running my possible plans by u guys
Thats true... lowering the boost pressure and power output should reduce the chance of engine failure.. But as everyone knows theres no such thing as a sure thing when it comes to boosting a motor like the VQ. Your plan is sound though..
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 03:30 AM
  #7  
vantage350z's Avatar
vantage350z
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
You would have to swap in a lower PSI spring or actuator onto either kit so that the base boost pressure is 5 PSI. Then use a boost controller to raise it to the pressure setting you want..
thats exactly what I did.. now were using the utec to control the boost. no more boost creep.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 05:37 AM
  #8  
chimmike's Avatar
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton/Sarasota
Default

problem is, with the reflash if you put it at 5-6psi, you're going to run horribly rich under boost. Massively, black-smoke kinda rich.

Also, at 5-6psi, the turbo is probably going to be surging as it's not in the efficiency band yet.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 08:26 AM
  #9  
dave3529's Avatar
dave3529
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: ct
Default

well how did it work out / perform for u vantage 350z?
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #10  
DJ SMITTY's Avatar
DJ SMITTY
Sponsor
CIN Motorsports
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

Or you could get "lucky" like me and only make 355-360 to the wheels at 8psi...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
codek
Intake Exhaust
11
Sep 28, 2015 03:03 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 PM.