Performance Factory saves you guys money (stock block boosted cars)
05-29-2007, 10:08 AM
#101
Originally Posted by masterj26
I read that, but that is not what the thread is about now there is it? Read the first post of this thread. It clearly states what it is about.
its not what the first post is about.. the statement was made and i am following up on it.
05-29-2007, 10:10 AM
#102
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by doug
thats not my question
You keep going back to one example. Try reading the title of the thread again.
05-29-2007, 10:10 AM
#103
Originally Posted by taurran
I assure you he's been doing this longer than 1 year. Besides, most of the already established shops in this business won't try anything new because they're afraid of the possibilities.
This whole RFS debate is along the lines of the TT vs ST debate. It's the sheep that prefer to take the easy route and do what they're told vs the individuals who are willing to try something new and push the envelope in a different direction. I think it's great that Jeremy is willing to try things beyond the norm.
05-29-2007, 10:11 AM
#104
Originally Posted by taurran
Your question was a passive aggressive attempt at stating that I was being hypocritical. In fact, I'm not. When you're talking 550+whp then the RFS is certainly a good added measure of control.
You keep going back to one example. Try reading the title of the thread again.
You keep going back to one example. Try reading the title of the thread again.
if you trust this theory so much.. you should have no problem doing the same with your built motor right?
05-29-2007, 10:11 AM
#105
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by doug
thats not my question
05-29-2007, 10:12 AM
#107
Originally Posted by doug
he said he had a built car on 15 PSI with no return fuel.. so he said its possible.. wondering if you guys were doing the same
the thread clearly states that i am talking about stock blocks only, just added some evidence to back my theory...
just for fun, we will keep AJs car on a stock fuel system with a walbro. we will build his motor and keep the fuel system to push the limits again to add some more proof. when we reach the point where it wont keep up, we will just tell you that. again, not doing anything that hasnt been done on other cars previously, just being honest and sharing info...
05-29-2007, 10:14 AM
#110
Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
see i was just stating a fact that its possible PAST a stock block where i can tell you that its scienticially proven for stock blocks all day long....
the thread clearly states that i am talking about stock blocks only, just added some evidence to back my theory...
just for fun, we will keep AJs car on a stock fuel system with a walbro. we will build his motor and keep the fuel system to push the limits again to add some more proof. when we reach the point where it wont keep up, we will just tell you that. again, not doing anything that hasnt been done on other cars previously, just being honest and sharing info...
the thread clearly states that i am talking about stock blocks only, just added some evidence to back my theory...
just for fun, we will keep AJs car on a stock fuel system with a walbro. we will build his motor and keep the fuel system to push the limits again to add some more proof. when we reach the point where it wont keep up, we will just tell you that. again, not doing anything that hasnt been done on other cars previously, just being honest and sharing info...
05-29-2007, 10:15 AM
#112
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's okay doug. It appears you're incapable of forming any thought beyond reading literal statements.
I definitely trust Jeremy's theory. The fact that I'm running one on a car that should be groundbreaking when coming to single turbo builds is just an added level of control over the system. I never contended that fuel systems served absoultely no purpose. They provide a level of control, but aren't an absolute requirement.
I'm not sure who's running the 15psi car with no return fuel system, but I'm sure it'll be fine if it's making proper AFR's under load. I'm personally looking at breaking new grounds without nitpicking about fuel pressure/delivery, so the stage 1 RFS is going in.
I definitely trust Jeremy's theory. The fact that I'm running one on a car that should be groundbreaking when coming to single turbo builds is just an added level of control over the system. I never contended that fuel systems served absoultely no purpose. They provide a level of control, but aren't an absolute requirement.
I'm not sure who's running the 15psi car with no return fuel system, but I'm sure it'll be fine if it's making proper AFR's under load. I'm personally looking at breaking new grounds without nitpicking about fuel pressure/delivery, so the stage 1 RFS is going in.
05-29-2007, 10:17 AM
#113
Originally Posted by taurran
That's okay doug. It appears you're incapable of forming any thought beyond reading literal statements.
I definitely trust Jeremy's theory. The fact that I'm running one on a car that should be groundbreaking when coming to single turbo builds is just an added level of control over the system. I never contended that fuel systems served absoultely no purpose. They provide a level of control, but aren't an absolute requirement.
I'm not sure who's running the 15psi car with no return fuel system, but I'm sure it'll be fine if it's making proper AFR's under load. I'm personally looking at breaking new grounds without nitpicking about fuel pressure/delivery, so the stage 1 RFS is going in.
I definitely trust Jeremy's theory. The fact that I'm running one on a car that should be groundbreaking when coming to single turbo builds is just an added level of control over the system. I never contended that fuel systems served absoultely no purpose. They provide a level of control, but aren't an absolute requirement.
I'm not sure who's running the 15psi car with no return fuel system, but I'm sure it'll be fine if it's making proper AFR's under load. I'm personally looking at breaking new grounds without nitpicking about fuel pressure/delivery, so the stage 1 RFS is going in.
05-29-2007, 10:17 AM
#114
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by taurran
I'm not sure who's running the 15psi car with no return fuel system, but I'm sure it'll be fine if it's making proper AFR's under load. I'm personally looking at breaking new grounds without nitpicking about fuel pressure/delivery, so the stage 1 RFS is going in.
05-29-2007, 10:29 AM
#119
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Whorelando
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems like no one is just stating the obvious
can a car run without a RFS on a stock block at normal psi levels with ease?
Jeremey says yes everyone else is talking about built blocks and dutty wine which yea being half jamaican you are def gay if your doing the dutty wine as a guy LMAO. jk chris lol
but yea i dont see anything wrong with jeremys statement , and quiet honeslty everyone isnt answering it or repsonding to it directly. Stock block typicial PSI is a RFS nessasary thats what the discussion should be if there is any but jeremey has said its not and has cars running fine to prove it i guess thats what the whole thing is about.
Everyone knows on HIGH HP cars its a diff story but answer what the mans talking about not some next level crap.
can a car run without a RFS on a stock block at normal psi levels with ease?
Jeremey says yes everyone else is talking about built blocks and dutty wine which yea being half jamaican you are def gay if your doing the dutty wine as a guy LMAO. jk chris lol
but yea i dont see anything wrong with jeremys statement , and quiet honeslty everyone isnt answering it or repsonding to it directly. Stock block typicial PSI is a RFS nessasary thats what the discussion should be if there is any but jeremey has said its not and has cars running fine to prove it i guess thats what the whole thing is about.
Everyone knows on HIGH HP cars its a diff story but answer what the mans talking about not some next level crap.
