Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Turbonetics Single Turbo graphs inside (stock block, C16)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #101  
Audible Mayhem's Avatar
Audible Mayhem
Thread Starter
My350z
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 3
From: United States
Default

Originally Posted by VQ-TECH
Obviously audible mayhem did not know that ,other wise he would have never made such statement .

well said

i know everything the fcon does. i never once said anything bad about it. i dont know where this came from....
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:40 PM
  #104  
aj_350z's Avatar
aj_350z
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Naples, fl
Default

Originally Posted by 98MODMTR
qft...however, your input through the tranny last night certainly played a role as well.
yea. but it was my on fault i told jt to take out some fuel and add timing. that last run i said myself its going 10's or its going to blow up. it was a 50/50 chance and both were a win win situation.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #105  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

I just REALLY dislike the way that certain companies (HKS, A**) do business. I wouldn't pay money for an FCON for the non-user-tunable aspect of it alone. Buying an FCON is like signing a contract to that shop for tuning for the life of your car.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #106  
maximumsportZ's Avatar
maximumsportZ
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by aj_350z
yea. but it was my on fault i told jt to take out some fuel and add timing. that last run i said myself its going 10's or its going to blow up. it was a 50/50 chance and both were a win win situation.
You're a madman.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:46 PM
  #107  
VQ-TECH's Avatar
VQ-TECH
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
I just REALLY dislike the way that certain companies (HKS, A**) do business. I wouldn't pay money for an FCON for the non-user-tunable aspect of it alone. Buying an FCON is like signing a contract to that shop for tuning for the life of your car.
Why are you a tuner yourself ,is that what you do for living?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #108  
stormcrow's Avatar
stormcrow
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
just contridicting yourself to sell your new product isnt the way i think. some people are all about money. i wish someone would pay my bills and i would do this all for free. i LOVE racing cars, i love motors and engines!! NOTHING compares to going 130+ down a quarter mile track to me. its not for the money, i just speak the truth, actually, i think i talk people out of buying more stuff than i talk into, ANYone that knows me personally will attest to this....
i don't think he's ever contradicted himself... the FCON is in a league well above the UTEC and you can't blame anyone for moving towards the better way to do things... the problem, i see, lies in the fact that you seem to feel that everyone should/would/could do FI on a shoe-string budget and be ok... doc, there are always going to be different levels of budgets for FI... some people want to go on the cheap and use stock block, piggy backs, no return fuel system, no gauges, etc... but, we all know this is not the safest way to do it...

spending more money isn't always about bragging rights...it's sometimes about doing things the proper way... sharif does his best to keep his clients safe... he realizes the responsibility that he has to them when they put their car and money into his hands... sure, there's an innate risk in FI, but he's trying to lower that risk as much as possible... there's a big difference between the way you two operate and it's ok... he's conservative and you like pushing the limits... nothing wrong with either stance... i just feel that when it comes to a customer, the latter is not the best bet...

Last edited by stormcrow; Jun 17, 2007 at 04:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:49 PM
  #109  
Audible Mayhem's Avatar
Audible Mayhem
Thread Starter
My350z
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 3
From: United States
Default

always soo much drama in here....
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:49 PM
  #110  
abyss's Avatar
abyss
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,318
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Default

Gotta love when the nut huggers come out of nowhere and start shit in a thread....
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #111  
aj_350z's Avatar
aj_350z
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Naples, fl
Default

so anyway back to 510 ft/lbs torque on a stock motor. it goes boom when you keep leaning it out
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:51 PM
  #112  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
always soo much drama in here....

i know

the all missed the point... nobody saying the utec is better the whole point is saying that the utec is very good enough at the power levels most poeple make on build engines... and there is not real big gain with going with the fcon unless they are shooting for over 600, or just want baller status
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:52 PM
  #113  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

Originally Posted by abyss
Gotta love when the nut huggers come out of nowhere and start shit in a thread....
yah
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #114  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

I personally wouldn't want to spend 30k+ on an FI setup and make anywhere less than 650whp. If I did so I'd consider myself a failure.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #115  
maximumsportZ's Avatar
maximumsportZ
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by VQ-TECH
Why are you a tuner yourself ,is that what you do for living?
No he's just a really good smartass.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #116  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
I personally wouldn't want to spend 30k+ on an FI setup and make anywhere less than 700whp. If I did so I'd consider myself a failure.

i agree if the whole 30k is just on the Fi engien build part of the setup and not on other parts such as suspension n stuff...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #117  
Audible Mayhem's Avatar
Audible Mayhem
Thread Starter
My350z
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 3
From: United States
Default

not everyone can be a baller like you man!! the people that cant afford the high dollars EM shouldnt feel like their cars arent done properly, just said the utec works just fine . this all started cause someone said that "the utec isnt good over 13 psi like some people have said on here," i said yes it is and all of a sudden i hate FCON...


people have a great way of turning things into things that werent really said...

i wish more people would dwell on the good side of things and see the forward progression we are aiming for. we dont try to put up crazy unbelievable numbers on the dyno, we take it to the track and show people what it will do...



Originally Posted by stormcrow
i don't think he's ever contradicted himself... the FCON is in a league well above the UTEC and you can't blame anyone for moving towards the better way to do things... the problem, i see, lies in the fact that you seem to feel that everyone should/would/could do FI on a shoe-string budget and be ok... doc, there are always going to be different levels of budgets for FI... some people want to go on the cheap and use stock block, piggy backs, no return fuel system, no gauges, etc... but, we all know this is not the safest way to do it...

spending more money isn't always about bragging rights...it's sometimes about doing things the proper way... sharif does his best to keep his clients safe... he realized the responsibility that he has to them when they put their car and money into his hands... sure, there's an innate risk in FI, but he's trying to lower that risk as much as possible... there's a big difference between the way you two operate and it's ok... he's conservative and you like pushing the limits... nothing wrong with either stance... i just feel that when it comes to a customer, the latter is not the best bet...

Last edited by Audible Mayhem; Jun 17, 2007 at 05:00 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #118  
VQ-TECH's Avatar
VQ-TECH
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
I just REALLY dislike the way that certain companies (HKS, A**) do business. I wouldn't pay money for an FCON for the non-user-tunable aspect of it alone. Buying an FCON is like signing a contract to that shop for tuning for the life of your car.
Originally Posted by VQ-TECH
Why are you a tuner yourself ,is that
what you do for living?
???
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #119  
stormcrow's Avatar
stormcrow
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
I personally wouldn't want to spend 30k+ on an FI setup and make anywhere less than 700whp. If I did so I'd consider myself a failure.
i can't imagine spending that much, either... but, even with the FCON, i wouldn't think it would cost that much? i'm in for about 22k and with an azzload of stuff not motor related (painting whole car, painting other parts, interior work, etc.) included... but, i do think it's worth buying the safest route possible for longevity... i don't want to spend the 10k on motor and components again...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 05:05 PM
  #120  
stormcrow's Avatar
stormcrow
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
not everyone can be a baller like you man!! so the people that cant afford the high dollars EM shouldnt feel like their cars arent done properly. this all started cause someone said that the utec isnt good over 13 psi like some people have said on here, i said yes it is and all of a sudden i hate FCON...


people have a great way of turning things into things that werent really said...

i wish more people would dwell on the good side of things and see the forward progression we are aiming for. we dont try to put up crazy unbelievable numbers on the dyno, we take it to the track and show people what it will do...
baller? *lol* i wish, bro... as i stated before, i'm running the UTEC and i'm very happy with it... i'm putting down over 600whp on the DJ and the UTEC is doing fine... i've also heard through the grapevine that TurboXS will be upgrading the UTEC to challenge the FCON...

i'm not saying you hate the FCON... i'm just responding to what you're insinuating about sharif's feelings on the UTEC and why he pushes the FCON... i don't think it's fair the way you called him out on something such as that when it has no basis in truth...

and doc, i wish i knew what my car could do on the track...but, again, as i've stated before, i suck at TEH driving... maybe alberto or aj could get some good numbers from it...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 AM.