Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

catch can question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #1  
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Mr_pharmD
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 1
From: KaLi
Default catch can question

Okay, I need your input. Is a greddy catch can or any catch can going to catch all the oil if there was no baffle inside to collect the oil? Will it catch any oil or is it useless without the baffle?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 08:31 AM
  #2  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

I believe the amount of oil vapor filtered will vary depending on the amount of surface area that the oil has to condense upon. The more there is, the more oil will condense out.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #3  
GTM's Avatar
GTM
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

If there is no baffle, then it is just a pretty can in your engine bay

Steel wool FTW!

-George
GTM

Last edited by GTM; Jun 17, 2008 at 09:07 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #4  
SpoilsofWar's Avatar
SpoilsofWar
Registered User
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 1
From: Way North, New York
Default

I'd have to disagree with you slightly, George.. I use the homemade air/water seperator catch can method from the DIY section, and there is no baffle in it. It certainly does catch oil.

Now others have put steel wool or other material for oil vapor to condense on and have reported marginally more oil caught then before, but regardless, the lack of a baffle does not make your catch can "just a pretty can in your engine bay". At least not with the homemade version. That being said, I will probably try it out with some steel wool soon, to see if it makes a noticible difference.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 10:02 AM
  #5  
Spork's Avatar
Spork
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 27,592
Likes: 6
From: MN
Default

IMO, as long as there's a certain path that the air has to travel (not straight through), oil will be able to consense into the container.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #6  
GTM's Avatar
GTM
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by SpoilsofWar
I'd have to disagree with you slightly, George.. I use the homemade air/water seperator catch can method from the DIY section, and there is no baffle in it. It certainly does catch oil.

Now others have put steel wool or other material for oil vapor to condense on and have reported marginally more oil caught then before, but regardless, the lack of a baffle does not make your catch can "just a pretty can in your engine bay". At least not with the homemade version. That being said, I will probably try it out with some steel wool soon, to see if it makes a noticible difference.
I was referring to most of the catch cans on the market, the home-made version is far from pretty

Since the home made version is already a filter in itself, it will work better than the traditional after market can which is shinny aluminum with just 2 hoses going into it.

Hope that clears up what I meant

-George
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #7  
chromesilver6's Avatar
chromesilver6
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, Tn
Default

I have the Greedy can and installed a small piece of foam on the inside to help catch the oil. Works great and i change it every so often.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XM 1
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jul 10, 2022 07:44 AM
apex locator
Autocross/Road
10
Jul 23, 2021 02:27 AM
Sleeper_Z
Forced Induction
3
Sep 30, 2015 10:25 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 AM.