anyone notice how much more TQ he makes in the first as opposed to the second

 

Yes. It made me scratch my head like wtf. John brought up a good point:

 

Yes, several people have commented on this. Would be interesting to hear from the OP on this topic as well.

 

As i said if its really his CAR!

 

if you had read the full post you would have understood that we had tire spin at 15 lbs but no tire spin at 13 lbs, we only had a 13 lb run at JBA so of course there was no tire spin. Also for those "scratching their heads" about the differance in torque, we used 2 different dynos not just different dyno shops hense the different numbers but, the bigger picture is that 2 completely different dynos, 2 completly different shops showed 500+ HP which is what was claimed from the very beginning. So sratch away lol

 

I need to find out what Sharif did to prevent my car from getting tire slip at 22psi

 

A dynodynamics reads LOWER than a dynojet. The only way it doesnt is if someone played with the settings. So please explain how you got a lower reading dyno to read higher than a dynojet without playing with the settings. Trust me I know how a dynodynamics works since my car was on a dynodynamics over 100 times so im not really looking for some bs let me dance around r0mey's question answer.

 

Y'all ladies still having this soap opera?

*lulZ @ the pics and the Tags: "scott crashed, scott doesn't tune, someone has an std"*

 

D@mn Romey...you get straight to the point dont you...Not like me who dances around the point

 

Isnt off topic more of your area of expertise? Ive seen you frequenting FI more did you get boost?

 

I'm done with the games and proving points to you! I got what I wanted (exactly) and I'm happy and now I have shown you a 500+ hp car built RA Have a nice day playing and arguing with yourselves

 

Actually nuclear stuff is, but that's not a common topic here.

I use the "New Posts" button. This makes the top of the list quite often.

No FI yet. I like to wait till the majority of mistakes are made on the motor before I delve in. Plus I have a wife, they are more expensive than most FI systems.

 

LOL i see what you did there

 

Will you play with me?

 

Who is playing games you are the one who CLAIMS to have made 60 ft/lb of trq more on a lower reading dynodynamics. And we are the ones playing games? I see Scott has taught you well. Just accuse everyone else of exactly what you do and then run for the hills.

 

Is it possible for you to get scott to post the dyno info with the same setup as your car is running with the 750-800 whp.info...

 

LOL. There is no need to get upset. I think Romey asked a very valid question that everyone was wondering. We just set up the bait for you to answer. You had no problem answering questions when you thought that your facts were in line. Why is it that once a valid point arises, you are now done playing games? It doesn't help your case, especially RA's if you do not tackle valid concerns head on. Dodging the issue is never the answer. People have more respect for those that are honest and handle issues head on especially when they are already on the pedestal of scrutiny.

 

bs, if you cant answer basic question then gtfo&diaf

 

 

Darren/Intense.....could you please send me a copy of that dyno you all did with 1000+ whp......I am going to post it as mine....and I dont want anyone asking me how is it possible to make that kind of power using 850bb....I will not respond