Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Powerlab 35R kit will not make 500 HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2010, 09:01 PM
  #61  
Mr_pharmD
Registered User
iTrader: (48)
 
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: KaLi
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

dont mustang dyno read lower then the DD?

I wonder if the hi compression stock block is making a big difference compared to a built low compression motor. qqqqball showed his DD at 21psi making only 430whp with crazy tq. I'm hoping I'm wrong but it seems like low whp is due to the turbo (out of efficiency) and lo compression. If so, I too will be pissed once I get it tuned next month on pump gas.


Originally Posted by binder
450 on a DD would be roughly 508 on a mustang dyno so that's not the same at all.

you have a gt35r kit on your stock block making 420? how do you know how much more you have left in it if you never pushed it?

once you start breaking 450 dd (500 dj/mustang) a single pump fuel system begins to be a problem. apparently not the case here although it was the case on mine.
Mr_pharmD is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 09:12 PM
  #62  
tig488
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
tig488's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: bama
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
What about the possibility of an obstruction at or in the intercooler???
maybe a rag stuck in there?
tig488 is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 09:14 PM
  #63  
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
iTrader: (1)
 
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by binder
what could be causing random high intake temps? unless when it was re-assembled there was something clogging the intake or another aspect of the kit damaged.
Which is why asked about an obstruction at the intercooler. It's strange that they are experiencing high AIT's with 3" intercooler piping and an intercooler core that large.
RudeG_v2.0 is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 12:38 AM
  #64  
marra23
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
marra23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: S.Africa
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I might be on a gt37r but still it's the same plumping, no flow issues here. Initially i had difficulty (PCV valve, boost leaks, MBC, Utec, cam phasing) making power but nothing related to the kit.

Last edited by marra23; 05-19-2010 at 12:55 AM.
marra23 is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 02:12 AM
  #65  
The Fallen
Registered User
 
The Fallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It sounds like you are over spinning the turbo to make the boost you want. A friend of mine had a car that was leaking boost everywhere and on 18psi on his sentra the IATs would rise EXTREMELY fast. If you have any leaks or a damaged blade or blockage your turbo would be spinning much faster than it should be just to maintain the boost number you are making which would explain the fast rise in heat. Once he fixed all the leaks(one of them being the compressor cover itself..leaking where it meets the center section) once he fixed everything the turbo was then making a REAL 18psi and the IATs were where they were supposed to be and didnt rise much.
The Fallen is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 05:25 AM
  #66  
qqqqball
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
qqqqball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
what numbers were u making on 17psi? I would run meth but the powerlab takes up a lot of useable space that I have no room to run the tank near the motor.
it was like 430rwhp and 545rwtrq,
qqqqball is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 05:28 AM
  #67  
qqqqball
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
qqqqball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
dont mustang dyno read lower then the DD?

I wonder if the hi compression stock block is making a big difference compared to a built low compression motor. qqqqball showed his DD at 21psi making only 430whp with crazy tq. I'm hoping I'm wrong but it seems like low whp is due to the turbo (out of efficiency) and lo compression. If so, I too will be pissed once I get it tuned next month on pump gas.
do your self a favor and buy the larger hotside before you install, http://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchant...egory_Code=GTH it will just barely fit, but you will need to put a heat blanket on it
qqqqball is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:00 AM
  #68  
Mr_pharmD
Registered User
iTrader: (48)
 
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: KaLi
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

will this cause more lag and then ill have to also change my flange to the dp?

Last edited by Mr_pharmD; 05-19-2010 at 07:01 AM.
Mr_pharmD is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:07 AM
  #69  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

lag vs top end power is always a compromise....
str8dum1 is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:13 AM
  #70  
Boosted Performance
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Boosted Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
lag vs top end power is always a compromise....
This is what people fail to relize. You can not have both quick spool and crazy top end.

On a side note, these flanges are awesome if you want to swap turbine housings all day:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg

There is not limit to what turbo you can bolt up to it. Well, I guess the T6 is out of the questions..but who would use that on a VQ anyway.
Boosted Performance is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:28 AM
  #71  
thom000001
Registered User
 
thom000001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Quicker spool and top-end power is why this was made



And give it another 2 years and someone will be running a T6.

Tom

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
This is what people fail to relize. You can not have both quick spool and crazy top end.

On a side note, these flanges are awesome if you want to swap turbine housings all day:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg

There is not limit to what turbo you can bolt up to it. Well, I guess the T6 is out of the questions..but who would use that on a VQ anyway.

Last edited by thom000001; 05-19-2010 at 07:30 AM.
thom000001 is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:50 AM
  #72  
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona -InP-
Posts: 14,613
Received 215 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zmedic16
oh boy. why we must keep throwing the race gas out there. i think the point st8dum1 is trying to make is where is the 93 octane 500+whp dd runs. or is it possible
i would think the limting factor is how much fuel you pump/flow at lower octane and/or size of injector the ems can handle woudl be the limmiting factor on that..i dont know how is that have anything to do with what boost you run or not being able to make more than 13psi.

Originally Posted by MrPharmD
I would run meth but the powerlab takes up a lot of useable space that I have no room to run the tank near the motor
i would always focus 1st on the piping of the turbo kit htan worrying about accessories such as the space for a custom tank.... but id say you got room around the FMIC between bumper to do somethign cool and stealthy. Or put it in the trunk

Last edited by IIQuickSilverII; 05-19-2010 at 07:52 AM.
IIQuickSilverII is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:53 AM
  #73  
meatbag
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
meatbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thom000001
Quicker spool and top-end power is why this was made



And give it another 2 years and someone will be running a T6.

Tom
T6 flange turbo would be pretty hard.

We built a turbo system for a G35 that put a GT4294R in roughly the same spot that the Powerlab kit has the turbo and we ended up using one of the new Tial stainless steel back housing to make the packaging work without redoing the front end of the car.
meatbag is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 08:11 AM
  #74  
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona -InP-
Posts: 14,613
Received 215 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

get your facts straight

Originally Posted by str8dum1
interesting.... that 630ish # that Intense made on their PL kit was super strung out, as in no wastegate control, boost spike to 29psi. I think the best the Performance Factory every made on their DJ with a race gas PL kit was ~600 and I bet at 18psi or more.
this is how it went(not actual uncontrolled spike btw)
Originally Posted by IntenseFab
They plugged their Boost control solenoid in line and commanded 2 bar of boost (29.4 psi) and proceeded to go on to the next dyno run. To our amazement it hit 2 bar, shooting towards redline it bleed off to 21 psi because the turbo was maxing out. In only 6 full pulls they made 653WHP / 608TQ on our G35


looks pretty clean at peak ...0 smoothing

Last edited by IIQuickSilverII; 05-19-2010 at 04:56 PM.
IIQuickSilverII is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 08:34 AM
  #75  
thom000001
Registered User
 
thom000001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Seems a little lagy for a "small" turbo, but holds up suprising well up top..

80mph = 4500rpm = 400rwhp
90mph = 5100rpm = 500rwhp
100mph = 5700rpm = 620rwhp
110mph = 6275rpm = 600rwhp
120mph = 6845rpm = 575rwhp

Still a relatively small powerband (trust me, I know lol)......but would have thought it would fall on its face more.....granted doubtfull you'd want to drive with boost controlled that way.

Tom

Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
this is how it went(not actual uncontrolled spike btw)



looks pretty clean at peak ...0 smoothing
thom000001 is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 09:14 AM
  #76  
qqqqball
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
qqqqball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
will this cause more lag and then ill have to also change my flange to the dp?
flange is the same size, but you will have more lag
qqqqball is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 09:47 AM
  #77  
james12345pt
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
james12345pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: asheville, nc
Posts: 215
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
Dude, I was under the same impression when I pulled the trigger and purchased the powerlab ST from intense that I could ez get 550whp to the wheel on pump gas. 1 thing I dont understand is why can't u boost past 13psi on pump gas? If intense is able to run 29psi on race gas why cant u run 20psi under pump and just pull more timing?
We have attempted to boost to ~18 psi but actually see a decrease in hp at these levels and see AITs going above 170+ degrees. The torque continues to go up at these levels but Hal at Injected feels that the temps are too high. At this point, I don't want the risk the health of the engine to achieve higher torque numbers especially at the cost of topend hp. I spoke with Injected this morning and they are planning on posting they findings including dynos, datalogs and other info soon. They are in the process of packing up and heading to zdayz so it will be a few days until they are able to post this info.
james12345pt is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 09:55 AM
  #78  
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona -InP-
Posts: 14,613
Received 215 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by qqqqball
do your self a favor and buy the larger hotside before you install, http://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchant...egory_Code=GTH it will just barely fit, but you will need to put a heat blanket on it
maybe i am confused in what yoaure tryign to say..but FYI the turbos have been and are off-the-shelf garrett turbos. They are not batardized gt35rs turbos like APS. Heck it ships from garrett in garrett's packing
The 650s who was on the same gt35R using a .82 turbine housing and an E compressor cover, Stage 1 single turbo kit 3'' downpipe, 3'' exhaust, and ProEFI ECU


Originally Posted by thom000001
Seems a little lagy for a "small" turbo, but holds up suprising well up top...
actually you are correct and there is an explanation. From the orginal thread:

Originally Posted by IntenseFab
The lack of midrange is from having variable cam timing disabled
remember this was earlier in the proefi testing, it was up to jason.

in any case, this is older news, the numbers ha been replicated anyways, and higher whp and psi has been achived at more than the issues on the thread... I hope op gets things solved soon.
IIQuickSilverII is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 10:11 AM
  #79  
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
binder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
dont mustang dyno read lower then the DD?

:
mustang is still an inertia based roller, correct? i'm fairly certain all all dynos that a dynodynamics reads the lowest accross the board.
binder is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 10:20 AM
  #80  
thom000001
Registered User
 
thom000001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

<<<<< = Genius!!!!!!! jk lol

Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
maybe i am confused in what yoaure tryign to say..but FYI the turbos have been and are off-the-shelf garrett turbos. They are not batardized gt35rs turbos like APS. Heck it ships from garrett in garrett's packing
The 650s who was on the same gt35R using a .82 turbine housing and an E compressor cover, Stage 1 single turbo kit 3'' downpipe, 3'' exhaust, and ProEFI ECU



actually you are correct and there is an explanation. From the orginal thread:



remember this was earlier in the proefi testing, it was up to jason.

in any case, this is older news, the numbers ha been replicated anyways, and higher whp and psi has been achived at more than the issues on the thread... I hope op gets things solved soon.
thom000001 is offline  


Quick Reply: Powerlab 35R kit will not make 500 HP



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:25 PM.