Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

no reason to buy a Walbro 255L anymore

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #61  
ashtrojan2008's Avatar
ashtrojan2008
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 358
Likes: 1
From: Alexandria, LA
Default

Originally Posted by binder
oh, so those are like 800 LPH pumps. would the walbro intake supply the surge tank fast enough for that thing to keep up?
that's the point of the sump, so you can get rid of the in tank single walbro. no feeder pump, the large pump draws right out of the sump.

ross
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 06:48 AM
  #62  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

supra guys just tap the bottom of their fuel tank, thats all we'd have to do. You'd keep the buckets, so your fuel level senders wouldnt be affected and you'd return the fuel back thru the bucket as well, just like it is now.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 06:58 AM
  #63  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

interesting.

sounds like a good setup. Wonder why nobody put effort into that? Couldn't they use the second tank top and make an adapter so you wouldn't have to tap the tank? That way it's a bolt in piece.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:03 AM
  #64  
midz350's Avatar
midz350
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 24
From: around.
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
supra guys just tap the bottom of their fuel tank, thats all we'd have to do. You'd keep the buckets, so your fuel level senders wouldnt be affected and you'd return the fuel back thru the bucket as well, just like it is now.
BUT, that would mean sucking the sludge and filth in the tank
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:04 AM
  #65  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

you could do that as well i think. Obviously someone like Phunk would have a better idea on how this could be done.

theres just little interest as a community to go with that kinda fuel system. twin pumps are enough for 99% of the cars on here.

just a FYI, the driver and passenger baskets use the exact same fuel float. SO you could make an easy triple pump setup by just using the stock basket with a 250LL and attach the fuel sender to that. That way you'd be pumping out of both sides of the tank.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 01:55 PM
  #66  
Chris@DW's Avatar
Chris@DW
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 3
From: Oklahoma City
Default

Should have some nice tech info about our new pump to post early next week. We've gathered some good data this week and should have some time over the weekend to put it together.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 03:42 PM
  #67  
Chris@DW's Avatar
Chris@DW
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 3
From: Oklahoma City
Default

Here's a bit from the first round...

Reply
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #68  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

Hmmm me likey... for those who are stock block FI and want to run E85 without twin pumps (me!)
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #69  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

DeatschWerks: How many different models/applications of your pump are you planning? please contact me at the number in my signature if you have any spare time, id like to see if you have one on the way that will be compatible with our twin pump assembly.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 02:28 AM
  #70  
midz350's Avatar
midz350
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 24
From: around.
Default

So, what is the WHP limit with this new pump in our cars?
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 08:14 AM
  #71  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

maybe 50 whp more. still in the 600 range
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2010 | 09:40 AM
  #72  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

flow chart now listed for the Jay racing pump
http://www.jayracing.com/index.php?m...oducts_id=2619

Last edited by str8dum1; Dec 20, 2010 at 09:42 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 12:40 PM
  #73  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Question

Originally Posted by phunk
DeatschWerks: How many different models/applications of your pump are you planning? please contact me at the number in my signature if you have any spare time, id like to see if you have one on the way that will be compatible with our twin pump assembly.
BUMP

Any update on this?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 01:00 PM
  #74  
Chris@DW's Avatar
Chris@DW
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 3
From: Oklahoma City
Default

Right now, the DW301 is going to be the workhorse.

I can see us possibly doing other fitments and lines in the future, but for now we want to focus on getting DW301 off the ground and established.

Thanks for the question.

-Chris
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 01:19 PM
  #75  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
BUMP

Any update on this?
Hello, Just wanted to let you know I got your voicemail!!

DW and I did get in touch last week. For now, there will not be a DW pump that is compatible with our twin pump. I believe they are considering the application that our twin pump requires, but havent moved on it yet. We will see what the future holds!
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 01:28 PM
  #76  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Bummer that we'll have to wait a while for that.

A CJM twin pump assembly upgraded with either a version of the DW301 or new Walbro 325lph pump would be an attractive option for those of us trying to push 700+whp on E85.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 01:34 PM
  #77  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Well, in terms of 700, I think you are no problem... I *think* you should be able to run just over 800rwhp on e85 with it as is
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 01:38 PM
  #78  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
Well, in terms of 700, I think you are no problem... I *think* you should be able to run just over 800rwhp on e85 with it as is
Cool! That's significantly more than I expected!
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #79  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

well, i suppose it depends on the dyno type. but I would be insanely shocked to see our twin pump as it stands run out before well into the high 700s rwhp on a dynojet... but without having done it, i cant say for sure.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 02:21 PM
  #80  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

ProEFI uses a Dynojet and I still plan on doing a C16 tune too. So I should be fine... for now.

Last edited by RudeG_v2.0; Dec 28, 2010 at 02:45 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:50 PM.