Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

11:1 vs 8.8:1 Wiseco's on Boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2013, 03:32 PM
  #1  
mcarther101
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
mcarther101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,492
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default 11:1 vs 8.8:1 Wiseco's on Boost?

I read another thread, and Z1's post puts my mind to ease somewhat, but wanted to get some more feedback. I've never had a fully built motor, and am doing it out of maintenance requirements (failed piston rings). I will be an NA build (C8 cams, full bolt-ons), but in the future might be interest in boosting the car. I am going with 11:1 Wiseco pistons, and am curious what sort of power levels would be safe on a good 11:1 tune with either a supercharger or turbo setup? I'm expecting ~300whp NA on my DE somewhere around 7500rpm. Also, if I went FI, how much would I have to possibly lower the rev limit to account for any added stress? I'm just curious, not a boost expert.

Parts list:
Wiseco 11:1 Pistons
Piston Ring set
Wrist pins
Eagle Rods with caps
ACL Engine Bearings (Rods, Mains, Thrust)
ARP Head And Main Stud Kits
Ferrea Valve Seals
HR Headgasket
JWT Valve Spring/Shim kit
JWT C8 Cams
Rev-up oil-pump
--
JWT popcharger
Motordyne 5/16" plenum spacer
DC SS headers
Z1 60mm test pipes
Bassani 2 1/4" into 2 1/2" true dual exhaust w/ x-pipe, resonators, and mufflers
--
Osiris reflash

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
The only real valid comparison is what other Z's make on that dyno as well. Otherwise, I wouldn't sweat it. The dyno is a tool, it's not omnipotent.

For compression, the difference between 8.8 and 9, is indescernible.

Yes, you can use 11:1 on a S/C car, and even a moderate turbo setup. You're talking a modest increase vs stock...nothing earth shattering. It is not "too high" - the net result will all be in the assembly and tuning, just like it is with any setup. The higher the compression, with boost, the lower your margin for error as far as tuning, but the supercharger affords you a fairly easy setup to tune in the first place. His boost threshold and overall performance is going to be somewhat limited by virtue of where he lives and the weather there. More than a guys have boosted their stock HR engines, with alot more stress (and revs) vs what this setup would be (you can only rev the S/C setups but so high). So given that a stock HR compression is 11:1, a DE setup, with proper forged internals, balanced and blueprinted as any built motor should be, there is no reason 11:1 would not work well for this setup. If it were me, I'd also consider a proper water injection system as a 'part 2' to this build...once the engine is fully broker in, tuned, and running where you're happy. I think it would give a good safety margin and a good addition for your setup, and help combat the high AIT I'm sure you get.

Max - custom compression ratios can be done too (for example, can easily do stock compression, but forged), as a custom order. Lead times are the issue as they typically take 4-6 weeks or so to make (albeit cost is the same). They can do it faster too, for an added fee. All the piston manufacturers offer this.
Old 09-19-2013, 05:19 PM
  #2  
eltness350
The Untouchable
iTrader: (58)
 
eltness350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

when you start to get 12-12:5:1 comp is when you need to worry about higher octane fuel. might be better to use nitrous instead, nos loves high comp!
Old 09-19-2013, 05:54 PM
  #3  
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
iTrader: (1)
 
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I've been noticing that Sound Performance has been doing some big power Supra builds with high compression pistons, but all of those cars are running E85 instead of pump gas. They are also running custom spec pistons intended for forced induction; not NA off the shelf pistons. If you're using OTS Wiseco NA pistons, it would probably be prudent to keep the boost levels very modest.
Old 09-19-2013, 05:58 PM
  #4  
bealljk
350Z-holic
Moderator
iTrader: (13)
 
bealljk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Denver
Posts: 6,404
Received 1,301 Likes on 1,025 Posts
Default

I wouldnt worry about it too much with where you're at right now.

If you supercharger or turbo down the road, you wont have to reduce your rev limiter but you'll want to keep your boost a little lower, I'd stay around 6psi to 8psi which I estimate going to give you 425 to 450whp - which is about the limit of the OEM DE block…you may have a little cushion room based off your other engine modifications.

I think the key to your engine's longevity with the aforementioned parts list plus FI will be a quality tuning device (uprev or haltech) and a very tight tune done (or verified by) someone with a good amount of experience.
Old 09-20-2013, 05:07 AM
  #5  
graffkid732
New Member
iTrader: (44)
 
graffkid732's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,646
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
I've been noticing that Sound Performance has been doing some big power Supra builds with high compression pistons, but all of those cars are running E85 instead of pump gas. They are also running custom spec pistons intended for forced induction; not NA off the shelf pistons. If you're using OTS Wiseco NA pistons, it would probably be prudent to keep the boost levels very modest.
I was coming in here to share that as well ha!

The Supra guys are now doing the 10-10.5:1 compression pistons due to E85 and they are having great success with it.(Talking well over the 1000++whp/900wtq) If/when I have to rebuild I'll be going higher comp. myself, right now I have 9.5:1.

A Haltech should be good with its E85 capability and flex fuel.
Old 09-20-2013, 09:42 AM
  #6  
phunk2
Registered User
 
phunk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: chicago
Posts: 329
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

<-- 11:1 out of stock pistons and rods

Use E85 and the 11:1 wont hold you back at all.
Old 09-20-2013, 10:35 AM
  #7  
iideadeyeii
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
iideadeyeii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lawtown
Posts: 3,938
Received 456 Likes on 370 Posts
Default

I don't see any parts on your list that will get you to 300whp NA
Old 09-20-2013, 10:47 AM
  #8  
Classy
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Classy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 7,606
Received 615 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by iideadeyeii
I don't see any parts on your list that will get you to 300whp NA
What he said
Old 09-20-2013, 10:53 AM
  #9  
phunk2
Registered User
 
phunk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: chicago
Posts: 329
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

BTW it makes more sense to me to see you do a HR swap. They make 300rwhp with bolt-ons and can handle 500hp boosted no problem. If you can find a nice clean low miles example of a HR to swap in, it sounds like a better situation to me.
Old 09-20-2013, 12:24 PM
  #10  
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Resmarted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ur face
Posts: 3,493
Received 64 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

I would check with Wiseco to make sure that 11:1 piston can handle boost. If they made the piston thinner etc for an NA application you could get issues. It's not super likely that they did remove material for weight savings or something but it's still an important fact to check. Otherwise if you have some cams and E85 go for it.
Old 09-20-2013, 12:53 PM
  #11  
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Resmarted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ur face
Posts: 3,493
Received 64 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phunk2
BTW it makes more sense to me to see you do a HR swap. They make 300rwhp with bolt-ons and can handle 500hp boosted no problem. If you can find a nice clean low miles example of a HR to swap in, it sounds like a better situation to me.
You bring up a good idea, but I'd personally rather have a properly put together de any day. The limitations would be sooooo much higher.
Old 09-20-2013, 05:05 PM
  #12  
mcarther101
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
mcarther101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,492
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Cool, good to know it's a possibility in the future. I heard of the E85 idea, but just never paid attention to where it is while fueling up. Is it pretty common now-a-days?

Originally Posted by Resmarted
You bring up a good idea, but I'd personally rather have a properly put together de any day. The limitations would be sooooo much higher.
The HR is really not much better an engine than the DE once internals start getting modified IMO. I'd rather have a block that I know is properly built, and has high quality piston rings, rod bolts, valve seals, etc. The original 2002 DE has lots of problems I've come to learn from experience, and fortunately I am confident I now know most the limitations with this engine now. VQ35HR and even the VQ37VHR barely make much more power in NA form, and I'm fairly certain the .2 liters of displacement more is the only real reason the VQ37VHR puts out an extra 10 or so WHP over the VQ35HR. I doubt any *built* HR/VHR is even much more capable than a *built* DE in boosted form, they are all just so similarly designed engines.

As far as 300whp with the aforementioned parts list, I am just hopeful mostly, but 1cockyz got 300+whp NA with similar parts, and only stage 264 BC cams (I just need to clean up the intake side somewhat), although he did port the heads. I don't think it's that unrealistic honestly.

Last edited by mcarther101; 09-20-2013 at 05:06 PM.
Old 09-23-2013, 10:11 AM
  #13  
phunk2
Registered User
 
phunk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: chicago
Posts: 329
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

HR generation is vastly superior to the DE. As for the HR being worth a swap... for a built/boosted guy, nope.. its not worth it unless it came free/easy.

But for a NA guy... messing with a DE is a waste of time when a stock HR will always make more. Who wants 10g invested into a built NA DE when your neighbor with a 2008 350z with just I/H/E will pull away.
Old 09-23-2013, 12:26 PM
  #14  
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Resmarted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ur face
Posts: 3,493
Received 64 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phunk2
HR generation is vastly superior to the DE. As for the HR being worth a swap... for a built/boosted guy, nope.. its not worth it unless it came free/easy.

But for a NA guy... messing with a DE is a waste of time when a stock HR will always make more. Who wants 10g invested into a built NA DE when your neighbor with a 2008 350z with just I/H/E will pull away.

Last I checked though, we're in the FI section
Old 09-23-2013, 12:44 PM
  #15  
phunk2
Registered User
 
phunk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: chicago
Posts: 329
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Youre right... we should create a new section for multipurpose NA/Boost builds, and move this thread there.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
11-09-2020 10:27 AM
hulkout
Forced Induction
8
08-15-2019 02:01 AM
bcoffee20
Zs & Gs For Sale
5
11-19-2015 06:39 PM
codek
Intake Exhaust
11
09-28-2015 03:03 AM



Quick Reply: 11:1 vs 8.8:1 Wiseco's on Boost?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 PM.