Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Turbonetics Single Turbo Kit..Pics/Videos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2005, 10:02 AM
  #961  
alpine
New Member
 
alpine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Fernando
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by MIAPLAYA
I did not change nor do I plan to change my thermostat but I am thinking of going to some one step colder NGK Iridiums. I'm going to talk to Turbonetics and see what they think...
This could be interesting because APS initially was going to go with "stock type" plugs and then they decided One Step Colder was needed.

I would guess that since Turbonetics is going with Higher PSI, you would need at least one step colder, and depending on you overall driving style, you could potentially go with 2 steps.

Let us know what they come up with, and perhaps any insight as to why to stay/go with different plugs.

I did find a fairly decent article some time ago on this particular subject, check it out if you like:

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/64378/


thanks
Old 02-15-2005, 11:35 AM
  #962  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by alpine
This could be interesting because APS initially was going to go with "stock type" plugs and then they decided One Step Colder was needed.

I would guess that since Turbonetics is going with Higher PSI, you would need at least one step colder, and depending on you overall driving style, you could potentially go with 2 steps.

Let us know what they come up with, and perhaps any insight as to why to stay/go with different plugs.

I did find a fairly decent article some time ago on this particular subject, check it out if you like:

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/64378/


thanks
Well I think some of it is going to do with the A/Fs with stock plugs. I know that initially Turbonetics was seeing A/Fs of 9.5:1 to 10:1 on my car but that was with the initial tune. Running that rich you would not need plugs. Even at the final A/F of 11:1 -11.5:1 it still might not need it. I'll see what Brad and Jahme say.
Old 02-15-2005, 11:51 AM
  #963  
kcobean
iTrader: (2)
 
kcobean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern VA - USA
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I know I asked this once before, but the answer was kinda muddy, so at the risk of being a pain, I'd like to ask this again.....

How is it safe to run this system at 8 PSI with stock internals when it's considered by most to be unsafe to run the GReddy TT over 5.6 PSI without doing internals? Is it because the reflash is able to retard timing, where the TT kit out of the box is not? I'm just trying to understand the differences that would permit such a difference in boost levels. To the novice eye, it looks like the Turbonetics kit is running what is considered on other kits to be dangerously high boost levels.

Thanks for any clarification!
Old 02-15-2005, 11:56 AM
  #964  
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by kcobean
I know I asked this once before, but the answer was kinda muddy, so at the risk of being a pain, I'd like to ask this again.....

How is it safe to run this system at 8 PSI with stock internals when it's considered by most to be unsafe to run the GReddy TT over 5.6 PSI without doing internals? Is it because the reflash is able to retard timing, where the TT kit out of the box is not? I'm just trying to understand the differences that would permit such a difference in boost levels. To the novice eye, it looks like the Turbonetics kit is running what is considered on other kits to be dangerously high boost levels.

Thanks for any clarification!
Two different size turbo's, same psi doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be flowing the same CFMs as another turbo running the same psi.
Old 02-15-2005, 01:02 PM
  #965  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by nis350ztt
Two different size turbo's, same psi doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be flowing the same CFMs as another turbo running the same psi.
Exactly. And you are correct on another point this kit retards the timing for the 8 PSI its running where as the Greddy does not. gq has been running his at close to 8 PSI but has his timing retarded.
Old 02-15-2005, 06:47 PM
  #966  
7 eleven
Registered User
 
7 eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Silverdale, WA
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If all tuning is equal and there is not detonation, power is what breaks parts not the amount of boost. The lack of timing retard on the out of the box Greddy can not be fixed by internals without drasticly lowering the compresstion ratio. You have to retard the timing to run any boost above 5.6psi at a 10.3:1 compression ratio safely.

The Turbonetics kit does not make the same power as the twin setups do at the same amount of boost. For example: the Turbonetics kit makes between 365whp and 390whp at 8psi. While the twin setups make between 400whp and 435whp at the same boost level. So the single setup runs higher boost due to the lower stress from lower power levels.

The Stillen stage 3 kit runs 7-8 psi and makes between 340whp and 360whp. With Stock internals, 400whp has been proven to be a sustainable goal. It doesn't matter how much boost is used to reach that, to a point.

Gary

Last edited by 7 eleven; 02-15-2005 at 06:53 PM.
Old 02-15-2005, 06:59 PM
  #967  
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by 7 eleven
If all tuning is equal and there is not detonation, power is what breaks parts not the amount of boost. The lack of timing retard on the out of the box Greddy can not be fixed by internals without drasticly lowering the compresstion ratio. You have to retard the timing to run any boost above 5.6psi at a 10.3:1 compression ratio safely.

The Turbonetics kit does not make the same power as the twin setups do at the same amount of boost. For example: the Turbonetics kit makes between 365whp and 390whp at 8psi. While the twin setups make between 400whp and 435whp at the same boost level. So the single setup runs higher boost due to the lower stress from lower power levels.

The Stillen stage 3 kit runs 7-8 psi and makes between 340whp and 360whp. With Stock internals, 400whp has been proven to be a sustainable goal. It doesn't matter how much boost is used to reach that, to a point.

Gary
As long as you have a shielded crank and cam angle sensor wire.
Old 02-15-2005, 07:04 PM
  #968  
7 eleven
Registered User
 
7 eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Silverdale, WA
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by nis350ztt
As long as you have a shielded crank and cam angle sensor wire.
I'm still waiting for the jury on that one. I'm glad APS errored on the safe side of things, but I'm not signing off on it yet. I'm sure time will tell.
Gary
Old 02-15-2005, 07:18 PM
  #969  
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by 7 eleven
I'm still waiting for the jury on that one. I'm glad APS errored on the safe side of things, but I'm not signing off on it yet. I'm sure time will tell.
Gary
Agreed. I've thought about it though, and I can't think of any other solution. If Nissan is making the rods out of the same material, and some motors are lasting in one part of the country and some aren't in the same part of the country, then it has nothing to do with altitude or the rods (assuming the tuning is fine and everything is a-ok).

Also agree about time will tell. AFAIK, the highest rwhp 350Z has been 505 by Tuan @ GRD Performance with the APS kit (which had a shielded crank and cam angle sensor wire). That will definately add to the stories to come about whether or not the C&CAS wire is to blame for the blown motors.
Old 02-15-2005, 07:38 PM
  #970  
7 eleven
Registered User
 
7 eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Silverdale, WA
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by nis350ztt
Agreed. I've thought about it though, and I can't think of any other solution. If Nissan is making the rods out of the same material, and some motors are lasting in one part of the country and some aren't in the same part of the country, then it has nothing to do with altitude or the rods (assuming the tuning is fine and everything is a-ok).

Also agree about time will tell. AFAIK, the highest rwhp 350Z has been 505 by Tuan @ GRD Performance with the APS kit (which had a shielded crank and cam angle sensor wire). That will definately add to the stories to come about whether or not the C&CAS wire is to blame for the blown motors.
o


Then of course there is Charles with 467+whp without one and he beat the living hell out his on the street for a period of time not just a dyno pass or two. So I know his tune was good. We'll see how it pans out.

Ok sorry for the hijack.

Gary
Old 02-15-2005, 07:48 PM
  #971  
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by 7 eleven
o


Then of course there is Charles with 467+whp without one and he beat the living hell out his on the street for a period of time not just a dyno pass or two. So I know his tune was good. We'll see how it pans out.

Ok sorry for the hijack.

Gary
Yeah.

Back on topic.
Old 02-15-2005, 08:10 PM
  #972  
ihatethatbobbarker
Registered User
 
ihatethatbobbarker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by nis350ztt
Agreed. I've thought about it though, and I can't think of any other solution. If Nissan is making the rods out of the same material, and some motors are lasting in one part of the country and some aren't in the same part of the country, then it has nothing to do with altitude or the rods (assuming the tuning is fine and everything is a-ok).

Also agree about time will tell. AFAIK, the highest rwhp 350Z has been 505 by Tuan @ GRD Performance with the APS kit (which had a shielded crank and cam angle sensor wire). That will definately add to the stories to come about whether or not the C&CAS wire is to blame for the blown motors.

505 on stock internals?!?!
Old 02-15-2005, 08:17 PM
  #973  
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by ihatethatbobbarker
505 on stock internals?!?!
Yep. 93 octane.

zero2prove is his member name.
Old 02-15-2005, 08:19 PM
  #974  
ihatethatbobbarker
Registered User
 
ihatethatbobbarker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

whoah that kicks ***.
Old 02-16-2005, 05:49 AM
  #975  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by ihatethatbobbarker
whoah that kicks ***.
Hopefully it doesn't kick rods too....
Old 02-16-2005, 06:48 AM
  #976  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Update time everyone: I talked to Brad this morning. Looks like all systems are go for this week. Most likely getting it Friday but could be as early as tomorrow. They put about 400 miles on my car the last week or so. Both hard driven miles and tame driving. Brad even mentioned he did a rush hour traffic test to see how it would do and it ran great! Car idles better then it did stock and pulls like no tomorrow. He mentioned that even in rush hour the car never ran hot/overheated or anything of the sort. He did say that I'm going to want to installl that diff soon as the car has so much power that in second if you drop the gas you're not getting traction till 6th. Especially with all this rain he said it could get squirrly due to the amount of power its making. Thank God I have my diff install guy on hold for this Sat to do the install. Also going on saturday are my gauges, Blitz Radaitor hose, SPC camber arms, SPC toe bolts, alignment, and the Nismo diff cover. Might go ahead and switch tires this weekend too to some BFG KDW2s. WE'll see. Guess I'll be calling in sick next week. Is it bad if I already plan to sleep in my car for the week?
Old 02-16-2005, 07:59 AM
  #977  
thrifiddytt
Registered User
 
thrifiddytt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: us
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by MIAPLAYA
Thank God I have my diff install guy on hold for this Sat to do the install. Also going on saturday are my gauges, Blitz Radaitor hose, SPC camber arms, SPC toe bolts, alignment, and the Nismo diff cover. Might go ahead and switch tires this weekend too to some BFG KDW2s. WE'll see. Guess I'll be calling in sick next week. Is it bad if I already plan to sleep in my car for the week?
don't forget about your redline oil. Nismo oil is way too clunky. Go with 75w90 with a friction mod, it's still kinda up in the air between 75w90 and 75w90ns, but the ns is very grabby. breakin period sucks, damn eights
Old 02-16-2005, 08:36 AM
  #978  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by thrifiddytt
don't forget about your redline oil. Nismo oil is way too clunky. Go with 75w90 with a friction mod, it's still kinda up in the air between 75w90 and 75w90ns, but the ns is very grabby. breakin period sucks, damn eights
Thanks for reminding me. I was going to try to get a hold of some Royal Purple but I think the Redline is much more easy to get a hold of. So do I need to change the fluid immediately after break in?
Old 02-16-2005, 08:39 AM
  #979  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh yeah and how many bottles of Redline do I need? Also what Friction modifier did you use with the Redline 75-90?
Old 02-16-2005, 09:08 AM
  #980  
thrifiddytt
Registered User
 
thrifiddytt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: us
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by MIAPLAYA
Oh yeah and how many bottles of Redline do I need? Also what Friction modifier did you use with the Redline 75-90?
here's what you'll need and I didn't bother with the Nismo oil for the very first install (lots of complaints about sound):
4 quarts of Redline 75w90 (or 75w90ns) with a friction modifier
I'll get the part number for you when I get home tonight. It seems to be a little quieter with the 75w90. And don't forget the infamous mod on the ecu for the best traction


Quick Reply: Turbonetics Single Turbo Kit..Pics/Videos



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:15 AM.