Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

MREV+ Dyno Tested On The 287 HP Engine!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2006 | 10:45 AM
  #441  
bilinghm's Avatar
bilinghm
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by OCG35Coupe
In other words, someone post pictures, and a blueprint of what has been done so you can copy it..
O.K. so you think I'm a thief. I don't think I am alone in being confused as to the developmental process of this part. It started out as one thing, the highly touted Mrev+, and was replaced by another (++) without any comparison of the product/performance between. Is the later manifold actually better than the first? Where is a back to back dyno of the + versus the ++?

Does a ++ version even exist, or is this just "marketing"? Until we get an expaination of what each product is, who knows? Drink the coolaid if you want. I prefer facts.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #442  
350Zenophile's Avatar
350Zenophile
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,350
Likes: 4
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by bosssho
Being in sales myself, and respecting leg work and R&D as much as I do, I can't agree w/the above statement enough...for $122 (at least for all the non rev up people w/good lower plenums to core) this is a no brainer.
Yes! I'm in marketing as well and while I can respect intellectual property, I don't think any additional sales will come from withholding information that will be posted soon after sale 1 anyway (and possibly with malice). In fact, it may have the opposite effect, as it creates an us vs. them situation with his core customer base as we start to see Motordyne as just another company vs. a passionate individual.

The sharing of information is at the core of many successful businesses right now and is in effect the ultimate advertising. Motordyne has met or exceeded the quality and customer service of it's competitors, but what has really set them apart IMO is the scientific methodology of their progress and development which up until now has been shared.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #443  
bosssho's Avatar
bosssho
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: North East, MA
Default

Originally Posted by bilinghm

Does a ++ version even exist, or is this just "marketing"? Until we get an expaination of what each product is, who knows? Drink the coolaid if you want. I prefer facts.
Bill, yes it does. It has been pretty detailed on here and G35Driver.com...The MREV V2 or MREV++ gets two additional intake ports hogged out for better air flow. Tony said there was no reason to do the other two b/c it was not giving positive gains.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #444  
FOO_G's Avatar
FOO_G
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by Wired 24/7
NOPE! 287hp
sorry.THought I seen that posted some where else.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 11:57 AM
  #445  
bosssho's Avatar
bosssho
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: North East, MA
Default

Originally Posted by 350Zenophile
But what has really set them apart IMO is the scientific methodology of their progress and development which up until now has been shared.
I heard Tony was a rocket Scientist so that's why you are used to the methodologies we are getting so far...
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #446  
FOO_G's Avatar
FOO_G
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by bilinghm
O.K. so you think I'm a thief. I don't think I am alone in being confused as to the developmental process of this part. It started out as one thing, the highly touted Mrev+, and was replaced by another (++) without any comparison of the product/performance between. Is the later manifold actually better than the first? Where is a back to back dyno of the + versus the ++?

Does a ++ version even exist, or is this just "marketing"? Until we get an expaination of what each product is, who knows? Drink the coolaid if you want. I prefer facts.
I think a measure of skepticism is healthy. I agree on the point of how do we know if it is real or counterfiet. Eventually these will end up in the my350 or g35driver marketplace or some unscrupulous peson will conterfiet them like they did with teh tein springs.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #447  
FOO_G's Avatar
FOO_G
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by FOO_G
I think a measure of skepticism is healthy. I agree on the point of how do we know if it is real or counterfiet. Eventually these will end up in the my350 or g35driver marketplace or some unscrupulous peson will conterfiet them like they did with teh tein springs.

That said though I do not know Tony and would not even recognize him i a photo or on the street but based on his participation I have the utmost confidence that he is credible.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #448  
OCG35Coupe's Avatar
OCG35Coupe
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Orange County CA
Default

Originally Posted by FOO_G
I think a measure of skepticism is healthy. I agree on the point of how do we know if it is real or counterfiet. Eventually these will end up in the my350 or g35driver marketplace or some unscrupulous peson will conterfiet them like they did with teh tein springs.
If your smart enough to know that this can be easily counterfieted. Then you should also be smart enough to know not to buy a MREV off of ebay or the marketplace.

$122 for me is a no-brainer.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #449  
bilinghm's Avatar
bilinghm
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by bosssho
Bill, yes it does. It has been pretty detailed on here and G35Driver.com...The MREV V2 or MREV++ gets two additional intake ports hogged out for better air flow. Tony said there was no reason to do the other two b/c it was not giving positive gains.
But the question is, did the ++ make significant gains over the +? Is all of the extra porting work (I take your word for this) worth the effort?

The original post of this thread claimed very nice gains (seems like about 11 HP) and the recently posted dynos also seem to have produced a very comparable gain with the ++. Is the ++ a better manifold?

So many variables have been introduced that its pretty hard to do an objective evaluation.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #450  
FOO_G's Avatar
FOO_G
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by OCG35Coupe
If your smart enough to know that this can be easily counterfieted. Then you should also be smart enough to know not to buy a MREV off of ebay or the marketplace.

$122 for me is a no-brainer.
Some of us worry about our fellow man you know.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:39 PM
  #451  
bosssho's Avatar
bosssho
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: North East, MA
Default

Originally Posted by bilinghm
But the question is, did the ++ make significant gains over the +? Is all of the extra porting work (I take your word for this) worth the effort?

The original post of this thread claimed very nice gains (seems like about 11 HP) and the recently posted dynos also seem to have produced a very comparable gain with the ++. Is the ++ a better manifold?

So many variables have been introduced that its pretty hard to do an objective evaluation.

What I have been saying to people is this...I am a drag racer so every C-hair of power counts b/c it equals 10ths and mph in the 1/4 mi...but if you are not a drag racer, and you already got an MREV+...I would call it a day and be happy with your two ported intake collectors and save the money and time of install, etc. Does that make sense?

If however, you have not done the MREV+ and you do or don't race the amount of power just for Passing on the highway or whatever is a no brainer like OCG35Coupe said...it's just to cheap a mod to pass up. And yes, I believe you are correct in that it was like 11 HP better..not to mention the torque being better.

I honestly wish that when Tony gets some time...and it wouldn't take too long for him and the moderators here and at G35driver.com to get together and make a sticky on WTF all the differences are b/t the MREV+ and the MREV++ including all dynoed RWHP gains in incremental steps so that everyone can see them at their leisure.

The one thing, and Tony is working on this thorugh an awesome incentive mentioned earlier, that a lot of us need to know is...what is the gain with a Crawford V5 upper Plenum, and the MREV+ and MREV++ with the 5/16th spacer...that is the million dollar question...b/c if it works better than just the MREV++ itself that would be a big benefit for all of us non revup engine guys/girls, never mind the investment protection for what the Crawford Plenums cost us all.

I hope all of that makes sense.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:50 PM
  #452  
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Likes: 78
From: Dallas / Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by bosssho
I honestly wish that when Tony gets some time...and it wouldn't take too long for him and the moderators here and at G35driver.com to get together and make a sticky on WTF all the differences are b/t the MREV+ and the MREV++ including all dynoed RWHP gains in incremental steps so that everyone can see them at their leisure.
+1
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 04:02 PM
  #453  
anotheraznguy's Avatar
anotheraznguy
Registered User
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Tracy Ca
Default

so when is the groupbuy going to be out =)
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 04:16 PM
  #454  
Sk8fe's Avatar
Sk8fe
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Default

Tony,

If not obvious from my post back on page 20, I'm in...
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 05:31 PM
  #455  
GeoFX's Avatar
GeoFX
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by bosssho
Bill, yes it does. It has been pretty detailed on here and G35Driver.com...The MREV V2 or MREV++ gets two additional intake ports hogged out for better air flow. Tony said there was no reason to do the other two b/c it was not giving positive gains.
Uh...are you sure? I have MREV++ installed on my FX35. From personal observation and spoken conversation that's not true. Don't listen to speculation on the other site. Only ports 1 & 2 and other "areas" (excluding the other ports) are affected.

Last edited by GeoFX; May 3, 2006 at 06:04 PM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #456  
amG35's Avatar
amG35
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by bosssho
The one thing, and Tony is working on this thorugh an awesome incentive mentioned earlier, that a lot of us need to know is...what is the gain with a Crawford V5 upper Plenum, and the MREV+ and MREV++ with the 5/16th spacer...that is the million dollar question...b/c if it works better than just the MREV++ itself that would be a big benefit for all of us non revup engine guys/girls, never mind the investment protection for what the Crawford Plenums cost us all.

I hope all of that makes sense.
Amen. I have the Crawford plenum installed and the gains of the MREV-2 are of great interest. I unfortunately am unable to take advantage of Tony's awesome offer. I eagerly await someone taking Tony up on the offer and posting dynos of the Crawford/MREV-2 combo.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 07:05 PM
  #457  
bilinghm's Avatar
bilinghm
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by GeoFX
Uh...are you sure? I have MREV++ installed on my FX35. From personal observation and spoken conversation that's not true. Don't listen to speculation on the other site. Only ports 1 & 2 and other "areas" (excluding the other ports) are affected.
Interesting, which takes us back to the question, does the Mrev++ outperform the Mrev+?
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #458  
GeoFX's Avatar
GeoFX
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by bilinghm
Interesting, which takes us back to the question, does the Mrev++ outperform the Mrev+?
Don't know but I shaved off .25 secs off my 0-60 time in a heavy-a$$ FX35 AWD with it compared to stock.

Check here for details: http://www.infinitifx.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=9247

Last edited by GeoFX; May 3, 2006 at 07:21 PM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #459  
OCG35Coupe's Avatar
OCG35Coupe
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Orange County CA
Default

Originally Posted by GeoFX
Don't know but I shaved off .25 secs off my 0-60 time in a heavy-a$$ FX35 AWD with it compared to stock.
Oh, cmon. Its only about 1000 lbs heavier then a 350Z.
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 07:24 PM
  #460  
GeoFX's Avatar
GeoFX
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by OCG35Coupe
Oh, cmon. Its only about 1000 lbs heavier then a 350Z.
Uh...it's a little more than that. Last time I weighed my FX at the track it was 4600lbs. Have you weighed yours? Shaving off that much time in a heavier vehicle is a lot harder than on a Z and speaks to the power gains across the whole powerband with the MREV++ IMO.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 AM.