MREV+ Dyno Tested On The 287 HP Engine!
Originally Posted by OCG35Coupe
In other words, someone post pictures, and a blueprint of what has been done so you can copy it..
Does a ++ version even exist, or is this just "marketing"? Until we get an expaination of what each product is, who knows? Drink the coolaid if you want.
Originally Posted by bosssho
Being in sales myself, and respecting leg work and R&D as much as I do, I can't agree w/the above statement enough...for $122 (at least for all the non rev up people w/good lower plenums to core) this is a no brainer.

The sharing of information is at the core of many successful businesses right now and is in effect the ultimate advertising. Motordyne has met or exceeded the quality and customer service of it's competitors, but what has really set them apart IMO is the scientific methodology of their progress and development which up until now has been shared.
Originally Posted by bilinghm
Does a ++ version even exist, or is this just "marketing"? Until we get an expaination of what each product is, who knows? Drink the coolaid if you want.
Originally Posted by 350Zenophile
But what has really set them apart IMO is the scientific methodology of their progress and development which up until now has been shared.
so that's why you are used to the methodologies we are getting so far...
Originally Posted by bilinghm
O.K. so you think I'm a thief. I don't think I am alone in being confused as to the developmental process of this part. It started out as one thing, the highly touted Mrev+, and was replaced by another (++) without any comparison of the product/performance between. Is the later manifold actually better than the first? Where is a back to back dyno of the + versus the ++?
Does a ++ version even exist, or is this just "marketing"? Until we get an expaination of what each product is, who knows? Drink the coolaid if you want.
I prefer facts.
Does a ++ version even exist, or is this just "marketing"? Until we get an expaination of what each product is, who knows? Drink the coolaid if you want.
Originally Posted by FOO_G
I think a measure of skepticism is healthy. I agree on the point of how do we know if it is real or counterfiet. Eventually these will end up in the my350 or g35driver marketplace or some unscrupulous peson will conterfiet them like they did with teh tein springs.
That said though I do not know Tony and would not even recognize him i a photo or on the street but based on his participation I have the utmost confidence that he is credible.
Originally Posted by FOO_G
I think a measure of skepticism is healthy. I agree on the point of how do we know if it is real or counterfiet. Eventually these will end up in the my350 or g35driver marketplace or some unscrupulous peson will conterfiet them like they did with teh tein springs.
$122 for me is a no-brainer.
Originally Posted by bosssho
Bill, yes it does. It has been pretty detailed on here and G35Driver.com...The MREV V2 or MREV++ gets two additional intake ports hogged out for better air flow. Tony said there was no reason to do the other two b/c it was not giving positive gains.
The original post of this thread claimed very nice gains (seems like about 11 HP) and the recently posted dynos also seem to have produced a very comparable gain with the ++. Is the ++ a better manifold?
So many variables have been introduced that its pretty hard to do an objective evaluation.
Originally Posted by OCG35Coupe
If your smart enough to know that this can be easily counterfieted. Then you should also be smart enough to know not to buy a MREV off of ebay or the marketplace.
$122 for me is a no-brainer.
$122 for me is a no-brainer.
Originally Posted by bilinghm
But the question is, did the ++ make significant gains over the +? Is all of the extra porting work (I take your word for this) worth the effort?
The original post of this thread claimed very nice gains (seems like about 11 HP) and the recently posted dynos also seem to have produced a very comparable gain with the ++. Is the ++ a better manifold?
So many variables have been introduced that its pretty hard to do an objective evaluation.
The original post of this thread claimed very nice gains (seems like about 11 HP) and the recently posted dynos also seem to have produced a very comparable gain with the ++. Is the ++ a better manifold?
So many variables have been introduced that its pretty hard to do an objective evaluation.
What I have been saying to people is this...I am a drag racer so every C-hair of power counts b/c it equals 10ths and mph in the 1/4 mi...but if you are not a drag racer, and you already got an MREV+...I would call it a day and be happy with your two ported intake collectors and save the money and time of install, etc. Does that make sense?
If however, you have not done the MREV+ and you do or don't race the amount of power just for Passing on the highway or whatever is a no brainer like OCG35Coupe said...it's just to cheap a mod to pass up. And yes, I believe you are correct in that it was like 11 HP better..not to mention the torque being better.
I honestly wish that when Tony gets some time...and it wouldn't take too long for him and the moderators here and at G35driver.com to get together and make a sticky on WTF all the differences are b/t the MREV+ and the MREV++ including all dynoed RWHP gains in incremental steps so that everyone can see them at their leisure.
The one thing, and Tony is working on this thorugh an awesome incentive mentioned earlier, that a lot of us need to know is...what is the gain with a Crawford V5 upper Plenum, and the MREV+ and MREV++ with the 5/16th spacer...that is the million dollar question...b/c if it works better than just the MREV++ itself that would be a big benefit for all of us non revup engine guys/girls, never mind the investment protection for what the Crawford Plenums cost us all.
I hope all of that makes sense.
Originally Posted by bosssho
I honestly wish that when Tony gets some time...and it wouldn't take too long for him and the moderators here and at G35driver.com to get together and make a sticky on WTF all the differences are b/t the MREV+ and the MREV++ including all dynoed RWHP gains in incremental steps so that everyone can see them at their leisure.
Originally Posted by bosssho
Bill, yes it does. It has been pretty detailed on here and G35Driver.com...The MREV V2 or MREV++ gets two additional intake ports hogged out for better air flow. Tony said there was no reason to do the other two b/c it was not giving positive gains.
Last edited by GeoFX; May 3, 2006 at 06:04 PM.
Originally Posted by bosssho
The one thing, and Tony is working on this thorugh an awesome incentive mentioned earlier, that a lot of us need to know is...what is the gain with a Crawford V5 upper Plenum, and the MREV+ and MREV++ with the 5/16th spacer...that is the million dollar question...b/c if it works better than just the MREV++ itself that would be a big benefit for all of us non revup engine guys/girls, never mind the investment protection for what the Crawford Plenums cost us all.
I hope all of that makes sense.
I hope all of that makes sense.

Originally Posted by GeoFX
Uh...are you sure? I have MREV++ installed on my FX35. From personal observation and spoken conversation that's not true. Don't listen to speculation on the other site. Only ports 1 & 2 and other "areas" (excluding the other ports) are affected.
Originally Posted by bilinghm
Interesting, which takes us back to the question, does the Mrev++ outperform the Mrev+?

Check here for details: http://www.infinitifx.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=9247
Last edited by GeoFX; May 3, 2006 at 07:21 PM.
Originally Posted by GeoFX
Don't know but I shaved off .25 secs off my 0-60 time in a heavy-a$$ FX35 AWD with it compared to stock. 

Originally Posted by OCG35Coupe
Oh, cmon. Its only about 1000 lbs heavier then a 350Z.





