MREV V2 Independent Dyno Tested on Bone Stock 287HP Motor (Wired 24/7's 05 Touring)
#46
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ssgohan434
the wait is killer! Do you remember if you dynoed higher with the mrev++ and spacer than just the mrev++?
But, maybe there were greater gains in other parts of the curve.
#48
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow if the mrev-2 accounted for close to 8-9 whp... it may be the ideal mod, no?
it doesn't even need strut bar spacers as the upper plenum and strut bar area remains completely stock
it doesn't even need strut bar spacers as the upper plenum and strut bar area remains completely stock
#53
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: N cal
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all these MREV+++ and v2 stuff is getting me real confused. May i suggest making a new name? Im already lost on the Mrev+ now we have a ++ out.
i just want to make it easy for slow people like me. What does the newest penlum (which is the mrev v2 right?) + spacer making vs the plain ol spacer. As far as i've been reading its the new mrev v2 making most of the power and the spacer just adds about 3hp peak. Am i correct?
i just want to make it easy for slow people like me. What does the newest penlum (which is the mrev v2 right?) + spacer making vs the plain ol spacer. As far as i've been reading its the new mrev v2 making most of the power and the spacer just adds about 3hp peak. Am i correct?
#57
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: California
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by abcdang
i wonder if we can get the mrev2 and just the isothermal gasket, without the coolant bypass or copper TB stuff, that might be the best bang for the buck