Notices
Maintenance & Repair 350Z up keep and diagnosing/fixing problems

Tire FEATHERING: FYI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 04:53 PM
  #2701  
lew f's Avatar
lew f
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Big Canoe, Georgia
Default

Originally posted by scorpion
Anyone on this site familar with the new RE040 design? On zcar.com there is a photo posted that shows the new design. The outer tread blocks have been modified to eliminate the edge that feathers. Has anyone here had their tires replaced with the new design? How many miles?
Had mine replaced for the second time today and the design looks the same. I suspect I'll be back at the delaership in another 6,000 miles or so...
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 05:02 PM
  #2702  
HJSILVERMAN's Avatar
HJSILVERMAN
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: NEW JERSEY
Default

Originally posted by robf
I took my car (VIN xxxxx410) into the dealer with New TSB in hand. They told me that even though they new I had the problem they would have to have a tech run the tests to document the problem before they could authorize/order the tires. I said ok, I'll dropit if off tomorrow.

They called me back today to tell me that they talked to their Service Manager and he said that it (the TSB) was not effective yet. there would be a recall next month with Nissan sending me a letter (I think the one attached today that would be he said he thought it would be May 14th. I said, ok, schedule me for May 14th. So I am scheduled, but who knows.

Just wanted to add my 2-cents. Anyone have a different story?
I had a completely different experience. I got a call from NNA; I had called them about 2 months ago to let them know that after going through the tire swap and alignment, that the tires were feathering again. Anyway, they wanted to let me know about the new TSB, and wanted to know if I had scheduled the car in. I indicated that I had not, and that it was difficult to do since the Z is my daily driver. They offered to coordinate a free loaner so that I could bring the car in. Considering I have an early 2003 with 23,000 on the original tires, I thought that was pretty good!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 06:20 PM
  #2703  
hwj's Avatar
hwj
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: New London, Pennsylvania
Default

Hello everyone, I haven't been on in a few weeks and just caught up with the latest posts on this thread.

Has anyone posted a survey on this topic that asks specifically
which models of ours are effected by this problem?

I own a Perf model and suddenly noticed a few pages back that someone with an Enthus. model has the same issue/problem.

To date my replacement tires and correcting alignment are holding up with no feathering so far. Just aligned again last week [after the October alignment it drifted a bit to the right on a level roadway; it was a bit off spec]and still OK after about 5000 miles on the new tires.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #2704  
robf's Avatar
robf
Charter Member #70
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Oak Hill VA
Default

RE: kidZney

I also went ahead and took my car in today. Thye said they wil provide new tires, but that they are backordered - probably due to the demand caused by the Z.

This is niot the dealer that I bought the car from (2 far away to visit regulary), but have done a good job for me so far. I really haven't had any issues except the Blose (2nd replacement is much better, but still sucks) and the tire feathering. Oh yea, I did have the problem with not being able to fill up the car - happened once). I would gladly pay a reasonable charge for a fix if there really was one. I would like to get the Nismo-S Tune if I thought it would fix the problem. Some have said it does and some have said it does not.

Thanks for th reply...

Rob
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 02:32 AM
  #2705  
pulpz2's Avatar
pulpz2
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Dayton OH
Default

Picked the Z up from the dealer yesterday. The alignment appears to be correct this time. It feels much better. The "jitter" appears to be gone.

The new settings are:

_______Actual__Before__Specified__Range

LToe_____0.10___-0.01_____0.20____0.11
RToe_____0.10___0.04_____0.20____0.11
TotalToe__0.20____0.03_____0.19____0.21

The service advisor took the car over to Firsetone personally and made sure the alignment was correct. Btw, a Hunter series 211 alignment machine was used. I'm not sure if it was calibrated properly - with this, you pretty much have to take their word for it.

I have to say again. I'm very happy with feel in the steering. There is no jittering or slight loss of crisp feel of the road. The alignment appears to be correct and now it is wait and see if the tires continue to feather.

QUOTE]Originally posted by pulpz2
Yes, this is baically how it feels. However, the effect is not as pronounced as one would expect to feel on a rutted highway. It is subtle, and if someone else were to drive the car they would very likely not notice it. For example, my wife drives the car about once a week. She has not noticed it but if I were to point it out to her she would.

Btw, TSB (tire swap, etc.) alignment specs are as follows:

Left Front
_______Actual__Before__Specified__Range
Camber_-0.60___-0.60____-1.90____-0.40
Caster___8.10___8.10_____0.60____17.10
Toe_____0.03___-0.07_____0.02____0.06
SAI____________________12.20____13.70
Included Angle___________10.30___13.30
Turning Angle Diff.________-8.00____-4.00

Right Front
______Actual_ Before__Specified__ Range
Camber__-0.70_-0.80____-1.90____-0.40
Caster___8.90__8.90_____0.60____17.10
Toe_____0.04__-0.03_____0.02____0.06
SAI___________________12.20___13.70
Included Angle ________10.30____13.30
Turning Angle Diff._______-8.00____-4.00

Front
____________Actual Before Specified Range
Cross Camber 0.10 0.10 -0.80 0.80
Cross Caster -0.70 -0.70 -0.80 0.80
Total Toe 0.07 -0.10 0.03 0.12



Left Rear Toe changed from -0.20 to 0.02
Right Rear Toe changed from -0.08 to 0.04
Specified was 0.02

The dealership did not do the alignment. They sent it across the street to Firestone. I do not know if they used a Hunter Series 611 machine. I will call today and findout.
[/QUOTE]
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 06:15 AM
  #2706  
HulkSmash's Avatar
HulkSmash
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Bedford, TX
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by robf
[B]RE: kidZney


I really haven't had any issues except the Blose (2nd replacement is much better, but still sucks) and the tire feathering. Oh yea, I did have the problem with not being able to fill up the car - happened once).
Thanks for th reply...

Rob, what was your problem with the Bose? I've seen others talk of this here, but other than the sound being a little muddy (is that it?) it's good enough until I can get my Alpine in there. Is it the head unit or the amp that's the problem? I also had the thing happen where I couldn't fill up the gas tank. Went to about 3/4 full, then wouldn't take a drop more. Hasn't happened again, tho.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 08:14 AM
  #2707  
msims's Avatar
msims
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Hesperia, CA
Default

Originally posted by HulkSmash
Oh yea, I did have the problem with not being able to fill up the car - happened once).
Thanks for th reply...
I thought it was just me until I read this. I cannot fill up the gas tank for the life of me. It stops at about 90%. Anyone know of a thread on this problem?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 09:05 AM
  #2708  
fuzzwart's Avatar
fuzzwart
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally posted by msims
[B]
I thought it was just me until I read this. I cannot fill up the gas tank for the life of me. It stops at about 90%. Anyone know of a thread on this problem?
There was mention of the problem long ago, but it faded away. Coincidentally, mine is being looked at as we speak for this problem.

I think that I will start a new thread on this to get feedback.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 10:00 AM
  #2709  
broohaha's Avatar
broohaha
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Exclamation

Went to my local dealership to resolve my 'pull right' issue (ntb 03046). I had the tech test drive with me, and he immediately noticed the tire roar I had. (He didn't even know about the other TSB referenced above, and assumed the pull right was due to irregular tire wear.)

Where I'm going with this: They've acknowledged that I have the feathering issues, but my tires are not in horrible shape (yet.) I've opted to have this documented in the dealership system, have the new suspension compression rod installed per 03046, and run the tires out or until the noise gets too bad.

I'm at 8700 mi, and I saw the new TSB sheet taped at the dealership. Thought some of you might be interested. Handwritten on the sheet:
0-12K - OK
12-15K - GRT
> 15K - Call CA

Asked my friendly Nissan service clerk about what it meant. According to him, all feathering issues (regardless of milege) are being handled with the new tires. However, I'm guessing that they are reserving the right at a later point to constrict their support.

Supposedly, GRT meant that Nissan might do it out of the goodness of their heart. Call CA meant you would have to deal with Nissan North America.

Anyone have thoughts on how they can drop coverage based on milege? (given that their extending the warrantee by 24 mos?)

Also, how does Nissan plan on dealing with everyone after the second round of tires being destroyed? (Is this a one time offering?) If a car has 100K lifetime, we're supposed to go through this 9 times?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 02:06 PM
  #2710  
robf's Avatar
robf
Charter Member #70
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Oak Hill VA
Default

Re: HulkSmash

The orginal issue was overboosted base onn the "premium" (Nissan's term) system and problems with the volume going crazy because of the audiopilot. It was impossible to listen to the radio and CDs weren't much better. They replaced the head unit (I think) 1st and it got rid on the overboosted base, but there was no definition at all to the mid-range and resetting the base/treble had no effect). I think they replaced the amp(?) this last time, and while the base is not great the mid-range is much better and you can even listen to the radio. CDs are much better.

Do a search on Bose and I am sure you will find much more information.

Rob
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 09:12 AM
  #2711  
HulkSmash's Avatar
HulkSmash
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Bedford, TX
Default

Originally posted by robf
Re: HulkSmash

The orginal issue was overboosted base onn the "premium" (Nissan's term) system and problems with the volume going crazy because of the audiopilot. It was impossible to listen to the radio and CDs weren't much better. They replaced the head unit (I think) 1st and it got rid on the overboosted base, but there was no definition at all to the mid-range and resetting the base/treble had no effect). I think they replaced the amp(?) this last time, and while the base is not great the mid-range is much better and you can even listen to the radio. CDs are much better.

Do a search on Bose and I am sure you will find much more information.

Rob
Thanx, Rob, it does sound like my system lacks midrange also, hence the 'muddy' quality. I've just been turning the bass down to a 0 or -1 and have the treble at +5... Maybe I'll get that Alpine sooner than planned..... We need the good sounds to cover the tire roar!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 01:02 PM
  #2712  
dnguyent's Avatar
dnguyent
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

I just picked up my car with the new front tires. The tread design is the same.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #2713  
lew f's Avatar
lew f
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Big Canoe, Georgia
Default

Originally posted by dnguyent
I just picked up my car with the new front tires. The tread design is the same.
Mine also
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2004 | 09:51 PM
  #2714  
aznkukuboi's Avatar
aznkukuboi
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: **** off
Default

is the tsb fixing any of the 03 z's?

hope it fixes it
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 08:29 AM
  #2715  
ChinaClipper's Avatar
ChinaClipper
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 970
Likes: 2
From: Rockwall, Texas
Default

Originally posted by aznkukuboi
is the tsb fixing any of the 03 z's?

hope it fixes it
If Nissan dealers won't mail their customers notices to bring their cars in until the end of the month, as per the announcement, aren't you being premature in asking this question? After all, if the feathering does not develop until 5-7K miles, one has to get the TSB done followed by piling on the miles to see if TF-ing reappears. Patience!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 09:37 PM
  #2716  
aznkukuboi's Avatar
aznkukuboi
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: **** off
Default

haha

we'll see
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 04:32 AM
  #2717  
hwj's Avatar
hwj
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: New London, Pennsylvania
Default

As I said a few days ago. The TSB done in October has worked so far, and its been about 5000 miles over the past 6 months.
I also have a very good relationship [I think so anyway] with my dealer, so I'm of the opinion that they'll take notice of my complaints/warranty work and really make sure my Z is fixed properly before they release it back to me.

ChinaClipper's correct, there's no way to know until the mileage is put on the car.

I should dig out my alignment sheet from last week and post that up for everyone else's interest as well.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #2718  
aznkukuboi's Avatar
aznkukuboi
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: **** off
Default

hurry up guyz and drive 6k miles and tell us how it went!
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 10:08 AM
  #2719  
kbsig106's Avatar
kbsig106
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Default Case closed

I won my BBB hearing vs. Nissan. The off-set usage was higher than I wanted, but at this point I really don't care. I expect the car will be turned in w/in the next 30 days since I've been driving on Nissan milage since 4/16.

PM me if you want further info. I'm not sure what I can share based on the settlement agreement, but as long as you have your documents together and bury the NNA rep - you should be good to go.

Nissan produced ZERO documents to support their case in terms of my car and the related problem. Not sure if this is the case across the board - but it is good to know.


Good luck guys!!!

Now the hard part for me is deciding what car to buy now. I'm down to two:

2004 Acura TSX
2004 Subaru WRX

Bang for the buck - the TSX is far better in features. Any suggestions?

Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 11:10 AM
  #2720  
pulpz2's Avatar
pulpz2
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Dayton OH
Default Re: Case closed

Originally posted by kbsig106
I won my BBB hearing vs. Nissan. The off-set usage was higher than I wanted, but at this point I really don't care. I expect the car will be turned in w/in the next 30 days since I've been driving on Nissan milage since 4/16.

PM me if you want further info. I'm not sure what I can share based on the settlement agreement, but as long as you have your documents together and bury the NNA rep - you should be good to go.

Nissan produced ZERO documents to support their case in terms of my car and the related problem. Not sure if this is the case across the board - but it is good to know.


Good luck guys!!!

Now the hard part for me is deciding what car to buy now. I'm down to two:

2004 Acura TSX
2004 Subaru WRX

Bang for the buck - the TSX is far better in features. Any suggestions?


Definetly WRX sti. Keep it real man - stay away from front wheel drive. You cant tell me you won't miss the Z.

Did the off-set usage get you anything more than an outright sale of the car?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 PM.