Notices
Northern California San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento, San Jose, Pleasanton, etc.

So I'm thinking of getting a truck...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2007 | 11:53 PM
  #1  
GTNPU Z's Avatar
GTNPU Z
Thread Starter
VERTEX Army CEO
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default So I'm thinking of getting a truck...

I've always been looking for another vehicle that I can load & take to the snow. Plus I think I need to retire the Pimp Van since it's starting to fall apart on me now. Was thinking of getting a black Toyota Tacoma 4x4 & fixing it up just like this (minus the stickers of course & maybe a slightly less aggressive front bumper):









Here's one Andy posted a while back that looks pretty sweet but I want it to be A LOT more aggressive looking like the ones above:



Anyone local have a Tacoma 4x4? How do you like it? Is it really as durable as what I've been reading? Pros? Cons? Likes? Dislikes?
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 11:56 PM
  #2  
gregtotheb's Avatar
gregtotheb
Registered User
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

i had an 05 taco double cab, long bed. lifted with wheels and tires. i put 52,000 miles in one year, not problems whatsoever. i was thinking about getting the camburg suspension as well, but decided to trade because of mileage. thats about the only con i can think of was after the lift i was only averaging 14 -16mpg.
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 11:58 PM
  #3  
GTNPU Z's Avatar
GTNPU Z
Thread Starter
VERTEX Army CEO
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by gregtotheb
i had an 05 double cab, long bed. lifted with wheels and tires. i put 52,000 miles in one year, not problems whatsoever. i was thinking about getting the camburg suspension as well, but decided to trade because of mileage. thats about the only con i can think of was after the lift i was only averaging 14 -16mpg.
Yike! Hmm...perhaps I should wait at for at least the gas to drop down a bit
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:00 AM
  #4  
gregtotheb's Avatar
gregtotheb
Registered User
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
Yike! Hmm...perhaps I should wait at for at least the gas to drop down a bit
i guess it wouldnt be that bad, it seems like your only gonna be using it for recreation. btw driving a lifted truck was the best, you could see everything so much better, and you could climb curbs to evade traffic. i called it "urban off-roading."
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #5  
gregtotheb's Avatar
gregtotheb
Registered User
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

lemme see if i can find some old pics.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:06 AM
  #6  
JDMFairladyZ33's Avatar
JDMFairladyZ33
New Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,481
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, TX
Default

I love trucks. The new Tundras and Titans are sick. As for gas mileage well yea you're going to be spending more at the pump but I don't think miles/per gallion is going to be too far off. I'm getting around 17-18 miles/gallon mixed driving on my Z. A buddy fo mine has a Tundra and he's not too far off. He pays more because his tank is larger but he doesnt have to pay for premium.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:07 AM
  #7  
GTNPU Z's Avatar
GTNPU Z
Thread Starter
VERTEX Army CEO
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by gregtotheb
i guess it wouldnt be that bad, it seems like your only gonna be using it for recreation. btw driving a lifted truck was the best, you could see everything so much better, and you could climb curbs to evade traffic. i called it "urban off-roading."
Hahaha...yeah. I always go to snow trips during winter & end up renting a truck all the time since nobody I know has one I can use (definitely adds up). I think it'll be a fun alternative if I have one of those days I'm tired of riding low. Sometimes I just want to run over everything & not worry about curbing/bending a rim .
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:12 AM
  #8  
JDMFairladyZ33's Avatar
JDMFairladyZ33
New Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,481
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by GTNPU Z
Hahaha...yeah. I always go to snow trips during winter & end up renting a truck all the time since nobody I know has one I can use (definitely adds up). I think it'll be a fun alternative if I have one of those days I'm tired of riding low. Sometimes I just want to run over everything & not worry about curbing/bending a rim .

+1 There are time in traffic I just want to hop the medium like all the other trucks and not worry about anything.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:18 AM
  #9  
gregtotheb's Avatar
gregtotheb
Registered User
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

here is right after i got the body lift and wheels+tires

Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:21 AM
  #10  
GTNPU Z's Avatar
GTNPU Z
Thread Starter
VERTEX Army CEO
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by JDMFairladyZ33
I love trucks. The new Tundras and Titans are sick. As for gas mileage well yea you're going to be spending more at the pump but I don't think miles/per gallion is going to be too far off. I'm getting around 17-18 miles/gallon mixed driving on my Z. A buddy fo mine has a Tundra and he's not too far off. He pays more because his tank is larger but he doesnt have to pay for premium.
True...totally forgot these guys don't have to fill up with premium.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:22 AM
  #11  
GTNPU Z's Avatar
GTNPU Z
Thread Starter
VERTEX Army CEO
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by gregtotheb
here is right after i got the body lift and wheels+tires

Nice! What size setup are those? 33?

Edit: Crap! Didn't realize is 1:30AM already....gtg work early tomorrow so I guess I'll have to call it a night guys . Thanks for chiming in.

BTW...guess I really started looking into this after watching a few recent episodes TRUCKS on SPIKE

Last edited by GTNPU Z; May 30, 2007 at 12:26 AM.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:23 AM
  #12  
gregtotheb's Avatar
gregtotheb
Registered User
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

they were 16's on 285x75 cooper tires. you would have to do some fab work to the front fenders to fit 33's.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #13  
JDMFairladyZ33's Avatar
JDMFairladyZ33
New Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,481
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gregtotheb
they were 16's on 285x75 cooper tires. you would have to do some fab work to the front fenders to fit 33's.

Yeah +1 I can't think of a truck off the top of my head that can clear 33s in the front without a lift and/or front fender mods.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:29 AM
  #14  
GTNPU Z's Avatar
GTNPU Z
Thread Starter
VERTEX Army CEO
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by gregtotheb
they were 16's on 285x75 cooper tires. you would have to do some fab work to the front fenders to fit 33's.
Yeah, I figured that'll be the case. I want the same stance as the ones pictured above on the Camburg truck.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:32 AM
  #15  
gregtotheb's Avatar
gregtotheb
Registered User
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

this is the camburg 05+ on some nitto mud grapplers and american racing teflon mojaves.




freakin' awesome! called for a quote from camburg one time about 5k/w installation.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:45 AM
  #16  
JDMFairladyZ33's Avatar
JDMFairladyZ33
New Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,481
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, TX
Default

That is a tight truck but sadly it'll probably still high center more than a standard cab or a jeep.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:50 AM
  #17  
iStan's Avatar
iStan
ZR
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas
Default

I loved my tundra. When I was looking at the Z, i was still thinking about a Tacoma and lifting it right the first time.
Camburgs are a great setup. Also look into Donahoes. They are probably both going to be around 2.5-3" lifts.
If you're looking for a "easily" lifted truck, stay away from the Tundras. Not too much other there for it.
Long Travel FTW.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 05:37 AM
  #18  
dmoffitt's Avatar
dmoffitt
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, NY
Default

I am leasing an '07 F150 for 3xx/mo as a tow vehicle / just-in-case-there-is-too-much-snow-for-my-e30 winter ride ... never liked American car mfgrs but it's not bad really, esp. for the cash.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 05:59 AM
  #19  
Paul350Z's Avatar
Paul350Z
Living in 350Z
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,704
Likes: 2
From: Riverside CA
Default

I kept mine in the family and went with an Xterra SUV - sweet ride so far and it's taken me in and out of places that I would have never thought possible. We do desert runs here every months climbing canyons and following goat (donkey) trails up to old mines, Army forts, and cattle ranches from the 1800's. Lots of fun.

32" tires are stock, the 2-3" lift was $210 - and about $2000 for the skid plates, slider bars, and steel front bumper. Tires to follow eventually. Why buy a truck for looks? I'd rather see you buy a truck to fit a particular need other than looking good/tough/aggressive. We call them mall crawlers - guys who spend thousands and thousands to put an 8" lift, 35" tires, and dual shocks on the corner and never take them off road.



The truck/SUV equal to ricers.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 06:05 AM
  #20  
SirSpeedyZ's Avatar
SirSpeedyZ
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 7,844
Likes: 10
From: Columbia, SC
Default

man that is sweet
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:23 AM.