UPDATED!! GT MOTORSPORTS Sets the bar! VQ35DE 855RWHP @ 22 PSI
Thread Starter
Sponsor
GT Motorsports
GT Motorsports
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 1
From: California
Originally Posted by thawk408
So, to fix the power dropping off is all dependent on timing?
So increasing timing ALONE will not make the car make power all the way to redline, but it does explain why the top end on this run is lower than usual.
sam
Thread Starter
Sponsor
GT Motorsports
GT Motorsports
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 1
From: California
Originally Posted by sentry65
I'm guessing adding in more timing up really high will help, but not enough to fully flatten the torque curve. With a stroked engine it's going to be harder to maintain the torque at 8000 rpms compared to the 3.5 liter engine. If you continued the 20psi run, it looks like at 8000 rpms it'd be at around 350-400 tq which is a huge drop from 742 tq @ 5100 rpms
Not only that, but I'd be willing to be the APS extreme turbos are at their most efficient around the 4000-6000rpm range, so it's going to be a fighting battle to keep the tq flat from 6000-8000 rpms. I think the turbos would have to be switched to something bigger to really flatten up the top end...
Not only that, but I'd be willing to be the APS extreme turbos are at their most efficient around the 4000-6000rpm range, so it's going to be a fighting battle to keep the tq flat from 6000-8000 rpms. I think the turbos would have to be switched to something bigger to really flatten up the top end...
sam
Originally Posted by Sam@GTM
We weren't refering to the TQ curve as that will fall regardless, it will never be flat to redline, but rather we were talking about making the hp curve increase all the way to redline with further modification and tuning.
sam
sam
Originally Posted by cj350
any numbers on someone elses dyno?? nice numbers by the way
1) Come on you don't trust us?
1) No time
3) Our dyno cannot be tampered with or "adjusted" to read any different. On a Dynojet it is what it is. You can either choose STD corretion or SAE correction, thats it!. Which is why a Dynojet is the best when comparing power over the internet. No AIT correction, elevation correction, etc. that can lead to a false dyno reading as see on other dynometers such as but not limited to: dynapacks, dyno dynamics dynos, etc.
Last edited by GTM; Feb 19, 2007 at 04:41 AM.
Originally Posted by Gadfly
Wow looks like a bad *** car you built there, congrats! What fuel were you running for the 800rwhp pulls?
Originally Posted by Sam@GTM
sentry65,
Just wanted to thank you for posting the graphs to compare the diffrent kits, and your questions are very valid, your a smart cookie
sam
Just wanted to thank you for posting the graphs to compare the diffrent kits, and your questions are very valid, your a smart cookie
sam
keep up the good work!
I'm probably going to go with the 4.24 stroker kit sometime down the road when I build the engine
Originally Posted by turismo
George, do you think its possible to bore it out even more? What about 4.5 or higher? I just want to know, can it be done. Hell might as well round it up to 5.0 