Jzurita's Build "Nightmare that became a dream" 590whp 93 octane
Performance Sacktory Goat Siting!!!!!!
Apparently, one of the PF fanboys had just "finished".
Last edited by RudeG_v2.0; Oct 26, 2009 at 06:47 PM.
Quadcam stated:
"Here's something odd about Vinny's analysis.......He said that the motor was running on 2 cylinders and that the front 4 weren't even spinning due to the snapped crank."
Did Vinny actually say this, or was this a misinterpretation of what was said???
If he did say this (I don't know if he did or not), just pause for a moment and think about that... The cams are connected to the front of the crank. If the the front of the crank is not turning, the cams would not be turning. If the cams are not turning, the back 2 cylinders could not run.
Perhaps Vinny said something else. Does anyone have any clarification on this?
"Here's something odd about Vinny's analysis.......He said that the motor was running on 2 cylinders and that the front 4 weren't even spinning due to the snapped crank."
Did Vinny actually say this, or was this a misinterpretation of what was said???
If he did say this (I don't know if he did or not), just pause for a moment and think about that... The cams are connected to the front of the crank. If the the front of the crank is not turning, the cams would not be turning. If the cams are not turning, the back 2 cylinders could not run.
Perhaps Vinny said something else. Does anyone have any clarification on this?
Last edited by ttg35fort; Oct 26, 2009 at 09:00 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: new york
Quadcam stated:
"Here's something odd about Vinny's analysis.......He said that the motor was running on 2 cylinders and that the front 4 weren't even spinning due to the snapped crank."
Did Vinny actually say this, or was this a misinterpretation of what was said???
If he did say this (I don't know if he did or not), just pause for a moment and think about that... The cams are connected to the front of the crank. If the the front of the crank is not turning, the cams would not be turning. If the cams are not turning, the back 2 cylinders could not run.
Perhaps Vinny said something else. Does anyone have any clarification on this?
"Here's something odd about Vinny's analysis.......He said that the motor was running on 2 cylinders and that the front 4 weren't even spinning due to the snapped crank."
Did Vinny actually say this, or was this a misinterpretation of what was said???
If he did say this (I don't know if he did or not), just pause for a moment and think about that... The cams are connected to the front of the crank. If the the front of the crank is not turning, the cams would not be turning. If the cams are not turning, the back 2 cylinders could not run.
Perhaps Vinny said something else. Does anyone have any clarification on this?
the video was long so JZ edited the video as far as running vinny didn't mean driving the car the engine was still able to crank when turning the key. hope this helps.
So that means the back two pistons were moving only when being cranked by the starter, but the cams were not moving and the back two cylinders were not running.
That makes much more sense.
Last edited by ttg35fort; Oct 26, 2009 at 09:30 PM.
Nice goat. Fortunately, I haven't had any interactions with the goats.
I'm goat free. 
It does make you wonder what was going on when this pic was taken?!?!?!?!?
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
Mani Shuaata 
..................................
Paas di duchi pan di lef haan side
BTW: The "NavGolf" award board needs to vote on the 2009 winner...We dont want to go into 2010 without a winner....
Also, we need a winner of the VRT Scumbagrey award for 2009 for the scummmmyest Shop. This year is going to be a tough pick...lots of possible winners
.................................. Paas di duchi pan di lef haan sideBTW: The "NavGolf" award board needs to vote on the 2009 winner...We dont want to go into 2010 without a winner....
Also, we need a winner of the VRT Scumbagrey award for 2009 for the scummmmyest Shop. This year is going to be a tough pick...lots of possible winners
Last edited by XKR; Oct 27, 2009 at 02:18 PM.
or Manish Wata if you want to get dirty with it
Mani Shuaata .................................. Paas di duchi pan di lef haan side
BTW: The "NavGolf" award board needs to vote on the 2009 winner...We dont want to go into 2010 without a winner....
Also, we need a winner of the VRT Scumbagrey award for 2009 for the scummmmyest Shop. This year is going to be a tough pick...lots of possible winners
.................................. Paas di duchi pan di lef haan sideBTW: The "NavGolf" award board needs to vote on the 2009 winner...We dont want to go into 2010 without a winner....
Also, we need a winner of the VRT Scumbagrey award for 2009 for the scummmmyest Shop. This year is going to be a tough pick...lots of possible winners
https://my350z.com/forum/media-share...on-my-z33.html
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
I'd like to nominate Old School for one of the categories.............
https://my350z.com/forum/media-share...on-my-z33.html
https://my350z.com/forum/media-share...on-my-z33.html
I am afraid to ask
...but I will..which one1) VRT Scumbagrey award ( Shops that like to rape customers )
2) NavGolf Award ( Nutswinger)
he was a long time SGP Supporter... worse than Robert K.. however he is talking about getting a new tune and what not and makes no mention of SGP so maybe he moved on to a new shop
I think some people owe Taurran an applogy after reading this thread. Wasn't he one of the first to alert everyone to JT's business ethics? There was a guy from out of state that also couldn't get a hold of JT while his car was there being built at JT's shop who was bashed to no end when he started gettigng concerned about his car and JT's business practices.
There were a lot of warning signs that JT wasn't operting his shop in a reputable fasion. All but a few suppliers wouldn't even do business with him in the end. Just goes to show you that the shop fan boys don't allways create an environment conducive to having the truth told. Many people won't post the truth for fear of being on the receiving end of what amounts to a character assasination by internet.
I think he started out with good intentions as all business ventures do but somewhere along the way took the wrong path and started screwing people. I hope Coach makes a full recovery and it happens soon enough.
One thing I have learned through opening businesses is that you should never take on a partner, and you must be 100% completely involved in all aspects of your business. This is a really hard way to learn that lesson.
There were a lot of warning signs that JT wasn't operting his shop in a reputable fasion. All but a few suppliers wouldn't even do business with him in the end. Just goes to show you that the shop fan boys don't allways create an environment conducive to having the truth told. Many people won't post the truth for fear of being on the receiving end of what amounts to a character assasination by internet.
I think he started out with good intentions as all business ventures do but somewhere along the way took the wrong path and started screwing people. I hope Coach makes a full recovery and it happens soon enough.
One thing I have learned through opening businesses is that you should never take on a partner, and you must be 100% completely involved in all aspects of your business. This is a really hard way to learn that lesson.
Last edited by JETPILOT; Nov 6, 2009 at 09:37 PM.