Notices
Shop Builds Temp moving posts for some clean up of this section.

Sound Performance hits 1017rwhp!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2008, 04:28 PM
  #21  
DanielW
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
DanielW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Concord, North Carolina
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not to be that guy, but.... why not do it on a dj or dd to avoid skepticism that is invariably gonna come up with mustang dyno results?


congrats anyway though. I'd like to see an overlay of this and the gt37r dyno
Old 09-08-2008, 04:35 PM
  #22  
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Nexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 13,654
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

good god that's sick!
Old 09-08-2008, 04:40 PM
  #23  
D350Z10
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
D350Z10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanielW
not to be that guy, but.... why not do it on a dj or dd to avoid skepticism that is invariably gonna come up with mustang dyno results?


congrats anyway though. I'd like to see an overlay of this and the gt37r dyno

Are you kidding??? Mustang dynos are very accurate if you know anything about dyno's. They are also generally low reading depending on calibration.
Old 09-08-2008, 05:08 PM
  #24  
SoundPerformance
Sponsor
Sound Performance
 
SoundPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bloomingdale, IL
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DanielW
not to be that guy, but.... why not do it on a dj or dd to avoid skepticism that is invariably gonna come up with mustang dyno results?


congrats anyway though. I'd like to see an overlay of this and the gt37r dyno
Um..... because we have a Mustang dyno in house!! Honestly I am not one to compare one dyno to another..... We will let our Z speak for itself when we get it on the track!!!


I am pretty sure that the GT37R car had a 4.2 stroker in it as opposed to our 3.5. 20% more displacement will generate a TON more torque!!! Our goal was to push the 3.5 as far as possible as we feel that 95% of people will use a 3.5!!
Old 09-08-2008, 05:11 PM
  #25  
SoundPerformance
Sponsor
Sound Performance
 
SoundPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bloomingdale, IL
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by turismo
Congrats on the numbers. Torque numbers seem kinda low though.
Put a pair of 67s on a 3.5 L and this is what you get!!! Remember that anyone else that has a turbo setup nearly as powerful as ours has a stroker motor!!
Old 09-08-2008, 05:22 PM
  #26  
Kwame
New Member
iTrader: (78)
 
Kwame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 5,219
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Congrats! Impressive numbers.
Old 09-08-2008, 05:24 PM
  #27  
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona -InP-
Posts: 14,613
Received 215 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

congrats larry and chris... car is bad ***....hope to see videos soon!!!....and 35 psi?
Old 09-08-2008, 06:17 PM
  #28  
Dynosty
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (27)
 
Dynosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Congrats guys Now it's time to get to the track!!! Are we ready to start Z drag events similar to the old 2J ones?

ps. were these numbers with DJ correction like the others?
Old 09-08-2008, 06:35 PM
  #29  
SoundPerformance
Sponsor
Sound Performance
 
SoundPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bloomingdale, IL
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
congrats larry and chris... car is bad ***....hope to see videos soon!!!....and 35 psi?

Why only 35??

If the turbos can make 40, she will see 40!!
Old 09-08-2008, 06:38 PM
  #30  
Dynosty
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (27)
 
Dynosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SoundPerformance
Why only 35??

If the turbos can make 40, she will see 40!!
I like how you think!!
Old 09-08-2008, 06:41 PM
  #31  
BornSlippyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
BornSlippyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Minnesota!
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Wow! Fantastic looking intake, Nice numbers.
Old 09-08-2008, 08:45 PM
  #32  
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
iTrader: (1)
 
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris@SP
Thanks again everyone.

Here are some pics of Charlies intake mani




Chris
First of all... Congrats on the new horsepower record!

^ I really like the design of Charlie's intake manifold. Does it have clearance for a strut tower brace?
Old 09-08-2008, 08:46 PM
  #33  
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
iTrader: (58)
 
Chef-J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 09-08-2008, 10:59 PM
  #34  
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
phunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
Does it have clearance for a strut tower brace?
The CJM intake manifold damn near hits the hood!

Only a Crawford or APS strut bar would fit it.

We might even produce an optional spacer for increased displacement for those who want to custom cowl their hood or use a Stillen hood.

As for mass production, aluminum casting is in the process as we speak. Completion is not yet set, but it wont be too long and availability will be good since all we have to do once its cast is the secondary machining processes. Pricing is expected to be competitive.

Lastly, CONGRATS on the power. Huge success! I cant wait to see 35-40psi!!!!! I hope that the prototype sheet metal plenum doesnt pop! The production parts have supports in the middle like the stock plenums.

Last edited by phunk; 09-08-2008 at 11:03 PM.
Old 09-09-2008, 07:58 AM
  #35  
DanielW
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
DanielW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Concord, North Carolina
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by D350Z10
Are you kidding??? Mustang dynos are very accurate if you know anything about dyno's. They are also generally low reading depending on calibration.

Exactly.... depending on calibration. Its well known that you can fudge numbers on a mustang dyno. Not implying that this went on at all here by any means btw.
Old 09-09-2008, 08:06 AM
  #36  
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
iTrader: (1)
 
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
The CJM intake manifold damn near hits the hood!

Only a Crawford or APS strut bar would fit it.

We might even produce an optional spacer for increased displacement for those who want to custom cowl their hood or use a Stillen hood.

As for mass production, aluminum casting is in the process as we speak. Completion is not yet set, but it wont be too long and availability will be good since all we have to do once its cast is the secondary machining processes. Pricing is expected to be competitive.

Lastly, CONGRATS on the power. Huge success! I cant wait to see 35-40psi!!!!! I hope that the prototype sheet metal plenum doesnt pop! The production parts have supports in the middle like the stock plenums.
Well then... Good thing the G doesn't come with a strut tower brace!
Old 09-09-2008, 09:09 AM
  #37  
JDSMotoring
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (15)
 
JDSMotoring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

WOW!!! thats a sick manifold
nice numbers on the buildup...cant wait to see what it does on the track
Old 09-09-2008, 09:13 AM
  #38  
DanielW
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
DanielW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Concord, North Carolina
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zpaaji
WOW!!! thats a sick manifold
nice numbers on the buildup...cant wait to see what it does on the track


+1 can't wait to see this thing take the six speed quarter mile record
Old 09-09-2008, 09:26 AM
  #39  
saberphx
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
saberphx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: america
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks awesome, vids??
Old 09-09-2008, 11:19 AM
  #40  
thom000001
Registered User
 
thom000001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My 04 G coupe stock on this same dyno did 232rwhp and 227rwtq

so the dyno reads right in line with the dynojet numbers for the same cars (actually probably reads a touch low)

I know Chris and Larry, they'll let numbers at the track show what the car has...the dyno is just a good tool to see how changes affect the setup and check for safe perameters.

Tom

Originally Posted by DanielW
Exactly.... depending on calibration. Its well known that you can fudge numbers on a mustang dyno. Not implying that this went on at all here by any means btw.


Quick Reply: Sound Performance hits 1017rwhp!!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:19 AM.