Sound Performance hits 1017rwhp!!
09-09-2008, 02:57 PM
#44
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DanielW
Exactly.... depending on calibration. Its well known that you can fudge numbers on a mustang dyno. Not implying that this went on at all here by any means btw.
09-10-2008, 05:35 AM
#48
Originally Posted by thawk408
I know charles' intake mani is sick and I would love to hae one, but I would really like to see a comparison with the stock intake. Possible?
).
Last edited by rcdash; 09-10-2008 at 05:42 AM.
09-10-2008, 07:06 AM
#50
Sponsor
Sound Performance
Sound Performance
Is anyone else revving their motors this high?? It seems that most of the dynos that I see, people let off before 7K?? Even with big cams?? What's up with that?
Lar
Lar
09-10-2008, 07:08 AM
#51
Originally Posted by SoundPerformance
Is anyone else revving their motors this high?? It seems that most of the dynos that I see, people let off before 7K?? Even with big cams?? What's up with that?
Lar
Lar
Edit: From what I have seen no one has really been able to continue to make power up that high.
09-10-2008, 07:48 AM
#53
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SoundPerformance
Is anyone else revving their motors this high?? It seems that most of the dynos that I see, people let off before 7K?? Even with big cams?? What's up with that?
Lar
Lar
+1
09-10-2008, 07:55 AM
#54
New Member
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by SoundPerformance
Is anyone else revving their motors this high?? It seems that most of the dynos that I see, people let off before 7K?? Even with big cams?? What's up with that?
Lar
Lar
werd....well i can say i wont dissapoint you
Originally Posted by Kwame@z1
NA yes, FI no, as far as I am aware.
Edit: From what I have seen no one has really been able to continue to make power up that high.
Edit: From what I have seen no one has really been able to continue to make power up that high.
they didnt use the right turbos....few have tried it and few have build their heads up like what larry is using from headgames.....of course the ems and the tunning have a lot to do
Last edited by IIQuickSilverII; 09-10-2008 at 07:58 AM.
09-10-2008, 08:21 AM
#55
Sponsor
Sound Performance
Sound Performance
Well, I just spoke to Harry the owner of Precision turbo and they are sending me a new set of their billet wheel turbos which feature much improved aerodynamics over what we had. Harry thinks that we should decrease lag by at least 500 rpms if not more!! That will certainly increase the TQ numbers. These new turbos are only rated at 680 HP each as opposed to the 700 for what we are currently using...... They should still easily eclipse 1000 if not 1100!! I might have some 40 psi dyno results for you guys next week!!
Lar
Lar
09-10-2008, 10:04 AM
#58
Glad to see you are not having any coolant related problems. Any ideas why so many FI guys (> 400whp) are having these issues and you are not?
Is it poor bleeding technique or did you do any custom machining to the coolant passages? (like GTM), or just cheap coolant? I believe a few have still experienced this problem even when using Evans?
Any thoughts?
Is it poor bleeding technique or did you do any custom machining to the coolant passages? (like GTM), or just cheap coolant? I believe a few have still experienced this problem even when using Evans?
Any thoughts?
09-10-2008, 10:35 AM
#59
Sponsor
Sound Performance
Sound Performance
Originally Posted by rrmedicx
Glad to see you are not having any coolant related problems. Any ideas why so many FI guys (> 400whp) are having these issues and you are not?
Is it poor bleeding technique or did you do any custom machining to the coolant passages? (like GTM), or just cheap coolant? I believe a few have still experienced this problem even when using Evans?
Any thoughts?
Is it poor bleeding technique or did you do any custom machining to the coolant passages? (like GTM), or just cheap coolant? I believe a few have still experienced this problem even when using Evans?
Any thoughts?
Im not really sure.... knock on wood!!
Good head bolts, good head gasket, flat surfaces, proper torquing etc. Same way that we build any 1000K HP motor!
I really feel that the most important key to keeping HGs from leaking is the tune and precise timing control. Detonation at high HP levels can easily lift a head. Too many guys push the envelope on pump gas in my opinion. Octane is your friend when it comes to keeping a motor together!! Learned that many years ago with the 7M and 2J Toyota motors!!
09-10-2008, 11:10 AM
#60
So on that note I guess that u would be a Proponent of using Methanol if 110 octane is not easily available?
Originally Posted by SoundPerformance
Im not really sure.... knock on wood!!
Good head bolts, good head gasket, flat surfaces, proper torquing etc. Same way that we build any 1000K HP motor!
I really feel that the most important key to keeping HGs from leaking is the tune and precise timing control. Detonation at high HP levels can easily lift a head. Too many guys push the envelope on pump gas in my opinion. Octane is your friend when it comes to keeping a motor together!! Learned that many years ago with the 7M and 2J Toyota motors!!
Good head bolts, good head gasket, flat surfaces, proper torquing etc. Same way that we build any 1000K HP motor!
I really feel that the most important key to keeping HGs from leaking is the tune and precise timing control. Detonation at high HP levels can easily lift a head. Too many guys push the envelope on pump gas in my opinion. Octane is your friend when it comes to keeping a motor together!! Learned that many years ago with the 7M and 2J Toyota motors!!