Notices
South West Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico

Any Springs Fol want to drive to MAC this Thursday (21st)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 09:41 AM
  #41  
Starchecker's Avatar
Starchecker
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
I talked to Bill about this guy, 350Z JWT TT Kit. He did stick with the JWT EMS. Bill & Nick weren't fans of it. I'm sure he'll be back with a UTEC soon. LOL
Did they tell you how the numbers came out?

Do Bill and Nick just not like the system as a whole, or just not think it can handle the altitude? Most people at sea level seem to be doing fine with it.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 10:10 AM
  #42  
Dave 90TT's Avatar
Dave 90TT
Thread Starter
350Z 2+2
Premier Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Default

I don't have a copy of the new chart; I could get Nick to email it to me, but really, it's more or less the same as the old one,, just not as much drop off at the top end, and it hits harder lower as well.

I talked to Bill about the guy with the JWT Z and no UTEC. Apparently, it worked fine, but down about 20-30 ft/lbs across the entire curve from mine. That could be due to a number of things, since I've got a couple of other supporting mods, and I don't know what the other guy had, so it could be the UTEC, or not. However, I certainly feel safer with the UTEC, and am more than happy with it. I'd buy it again in a heartbeat.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #43  
Starchecker's Avatar
Starchecker
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
I don't have a copy of the new chart; I could get Nick to email it to me, but really, it's more or less the same as the old one,, just not as much drop off at the top end, and it hits harder lower as well.

I talked to Bill about the guy with the JWT Z and no UTEC. Apparently, it worked fine, but down about 20-30 ft/lbs across the entire curve from mine. That could be due to a number of things, since I've got a couple of other supporting mods, and I don't know what the other guy had, so it could be the UTEC, or not. However, I certainly feel safer with the UTEC, and am more than happy with it. I'd buy it again in a heartbeat.
Thanks for the Utec info. Yeah the first chart was at 200 ft lbs at about 2100 RPM which was very disappointing to me, I thought maybe the altitude really hurt the JWT kits smaller turbos, but 300 ft-lbs at 2000 on the new chart is flat out insane, and holding all the way to 6500, that's what I'm talkin' about!

Is it tough to get any traction with that much torque down low?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Obadabot
Maintenance & Repair
16
Jun 18, 2023 11:31 PM
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
hajwoj
Autocross/Road
27
Nov 1, 2015 05:25 PM
EnjukuRacing
Engine
0
Sep 30, 2015 06:55 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:31 PM.