Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

Cam Timing Tables

Old Oct 13, 2011 | 07:25 PM
  #1  
T_K's Avatar
T_K
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default Cam Timing Tables

Disclaimer: This is going to apply more to Revups and HR than to DE, and NA more so than boosted.

I know the general consensus regarding the cam timing tables is to let them be. I guess this is more of an academic inquiry if anything. The stock intake cam tables are pretty smooth, and seem to behave as expected based on any literature I've come across with regards to degreeing cams. The exhaust cam table doesn't look anything like that though.

Are there any conditional requirements for the intake cam advance i.e. not too much advance before a specific rpm due to oil pressure or anything like that?

IIRC the exhaust one isn't hydraulic, so I feel safer about that side.

HR max advance on intake seems to be 45 degrees and 30 degrees for the exhaust. The intake cam is pretty text book, but the exhaust cam gives the user a lot of flexibility in controlling the duration of overlap, or in the case of no overlap, the actual exhaust opening and closing periods. Has anyone actually messed with these at all, any results good or bad?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 03:57 AM
  #2  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

All I know is that intake cam advance is good for lower rpms and bad for higher rpms, but I'm still not entirely sure how boost changes things. Since I can't adjust my exhaust cams I never looked into that side much. I plan on some dyno time in a month or so where I'll play with intake timing a bit.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2011 | 12:32 AM
  #3  
karletto66's Avatar
karletto66
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Default

Usually i see in my HR maps Intake cams up of 2 points in high fuel schedule, exaust up of 5 points...
As a fast note and not accurate measures of course !

An idea : why not open a discussion where everyone that is able and want to partecipate can write infos/impressions/tests about Uprev mapping ?
I see that quite a lot of "normal" people now has Tuner version so may be is the moment to have a "community" of this kund !

We can "support" ourself !
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 05:37 PM
  #4  
T_K's Avatar
T_K
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by karletto66
Usually i see in my HR maps Intake cams up of 2 points in high fuel schedule, exaust up of 5 points...
As a fast note and not accurate measures of course !

An idea : why not open a discussion where everyone that is able and want to partecipate can write infos/impressions/tests about Uprev mapping ?
I see that quite a lot of "normal" people now has Tuner version so may be is the moment to have a "community" of this kund !

We can "support" ourself !
It's tough to justify changes without knowing what the effects are. Really a dyno would be necessary to make educated changes to cam timing. It also can't be done in real time.

MAF value is somewhat proportional to power output, so you can run a bunch of logs and compare values between different cam timings under the same load and RPM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Obadabot
Maintenance & Repair
16
Jun 18, 2023 11:31 PM
XM 1
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jul 10, 2022 07:44 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 AM.