Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

Haltech Car won't start until removing key and replacing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2013, 08:20 PM
  #1  
ZEDCAR TT
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ZEDCAR TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Haltech Car won't start until removing key and replacing.

Hi Guys,

I've got the original Haltech Pro Harness and the car has been running fine for years. Suddenly on the highway the car stalled and wouldn't start. Got it towed home and checked CEL codes and had a P0340. Replaced the Bank 1 Cam angle sensor and the code has disappeared. Now when you try and start the car it will crank and crank and occasionally backfire. If you remove the key and reinsert it the car will then start. The car then drives perfectly fine.

It sounds like a NATS issue but I was reading somewhere that the Haltech disables NATS so I'm not sure. I have the NATS antenna on order so will be swapping it out regardless but was wondering if anyone else has had simular issues or has any ideas?

Thanks
Matt

Last edited by ZEDCAR TT; 01-08-2013 at 08:22 PM.
Old 01-09-2013, 12:37 AM
  #2  
MR RIZK
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
MR RIZK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Does the car have a aftermarket alarm?
Does the haltech miss counter keep increasing during crank? It should register ~1-2 on crank when it sync's
Is the NATS dash light illuminated?
My understanding is NATS is disabled with haltech. Easy check just get a key cut with no chip
If it happens each time try removing the haltech and do some tests for the next few days
Old 01-09-2013, 11:59 AM
  #3  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

NATS is technically not disabled, but you are bypassing it because the stock ECU isnt controlling fuel or timing.

Still sounds like a cam/crank sync issue. Did you replace the sensor with an OEM or aftermarket? I have similar issue but with different EMS.
Old 01-09-2013, 03:42 PM
  #4  
ZEDCAR TT
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ZEDCAR TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Guys.

There is no aftermarket alarm and the dash light isn't illuminated. I'll check the miss count tonight and see what registers. The cam sensor was replaced with a brand new OEM one.

It just seems funny that when it does start it will run great. Doesn't miss a beat even on full boost.

I was thinking of trying to start it without the Haltech but with 800cc injectors and BC2 cams I didn't think it would fire as it would be so rich.

Matt

Last edited by ZEDCAR TT; 01-09-2013 at 03:44 PM.
Old 01-10-2013, 03:40 AM
  #5  
MR RIZK
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
MR RIZK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Probably not related however when I was running my haltech harness ecu I had no issues when starting the car. I replaced the ecu with the full haltech standalone and had massive issues with the car starting when cold. Put it back to the harness ecu and all worked fine. Haltech was puzzled why it would fire/sync on the piggy back but not on the standalone. Long story short they worked out that one of the cam sensors was not working correctly however no CEL codes where being thrown. I replaced the sensors and no more issues.

All i'm saying is that it still could be a sensor as a long shot.

With the OEM ecu I could start and idle the car with 750cc injectors and JWT C2 cams. Yes it ran pretty rich and I had to slightly modulate the throttle to keep it idling but it will start. You could always lower the pressure on your FPR. Just measure the height of the FPR adjustment screw with a caliper so you will be able to set it back to the original position. Will it be exact who knows but will be pretty close.

Good luck. Let us know how u go.
Old 01-20-2013, 04:27 PM
  #6  
ZEDCAR TT
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ZEDCAR TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MR RIZK
Probably not related however when I was running my haltech harness ecu I had no issues when starting the car. I replaced the ecu with the full haltech standalone and had massive issues with the car starting when cold. Put it back to the harness ecu and all worked fine. Haltech was puzzled why it would fire/sync on the piggy back but not on the standalone. Long story short they worked out that one of the cam sensors was not working correctly however no CEL codes where being thrown. I replaced the sensors and no more issues.

All i'm saying is that it still could be a sensor as a long shot.

With the OEM ecu I could start and idle the car with 750cc injectors and JWT C2 cams. Yes it ran pretty rich and I had to slightly modulate the throttle to keep it idling but it will start. You could always lower the pressure on your FPR. Just measure the height of the FPR adjustment screw with a caliper so you will be able to set it back to the original position. Will it be exact who knows but will be pretty close.

Good luck. Let us know how u go.
Well found the problem after hours of checking wiring looms and grounds and all kind of *****. I was at a loss and put the brand new cam sensor from Nissan up against the original one that was in the car that failed. The new sensor was about 1mm longer than the old one. I put a washer on the bolt between the sensor and the head and it's starting perfectly. I didn't think it would work but hey I was suprised. I have no idea why the sensor seemed to be reading fine at higher RPM and would only have problems cranking! Thankyou Nissan and your sh1tty quality control LOL!
Old 01-21-2013, 02:58 AM
  #7  
MR RIZK
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
MR RIZK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Good find but to be honest surprised it made a difference.
Old 01-22-2013, 11:29 AM
  #8  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Sounds like your "new" cam sensor was too close to camshaft? what thickness washer did you use since 1mm is very small.


i sure hope thats the deal with my crank sync issue as well. Car runs perfect, just doesnt sync until after a couple tries.

just got my new Nissan OEM sensors in the mail the other day. Just need to swap them out now.

Last edited by str8dum1; 01-22-2013 at 11:32 AM.
Old 01-22-2013, 06:25 PM
  #9  
ZEDCAR TT
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ZEDCAR TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
Sounds like your "new" cam sensor was too close to camshaft? what thickness washer did you use since 1mm is very small.


i sure hope thats the deal with my crank sync issue as well. Car runs perfect, just doesnt sync until after a couple tries.

just got my new Nissan OEM sensors in the mail the other day. Just need to swap them out now.
Yeah I'd say your right. Dunno if it's something to do with the BC2 cams but I doubt it. I just grabbed the first washer I could find lol! I think I have more I can measure it with the vernier calipers if ya want.

I would of thought it was a coincidence if I hadn't of had the sensor out about 20 times before. Definately a strange one!
Old 01-23-2013, 10:50 AM
  #10  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

which side was it? passenger or driver?
Old 01-23-2013, 02:40 PM
  #11  
ZEDCAR TT
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ZEDCAR TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
which side was it? passenger or driver?
Drivers side for me as I'm in Australia and it's a RHD car

It's Bank 1 (23731-6J90B)

Now I've had a failure of one I'm going to replace the other side and the crank angle sensor. Be interesting to see if I have the same issue with Bank 2.
Old 02-18-2013, 03:28 AM
  #12  
MR RIZK
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
MR RIZK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Matt, as per above post I replaced some sensors in trying to find out what was going on. Lately i started having misfire issues at high rpms and has been steadily getting worse. I had no idea what it was. Remembering this post and knowing that i replaced the CAS sensor I thought I would check to see if the same issue existed. Guess what I have a smiley face on my sensor. The flywheel timing ring just touches the sensor. The depth of the score is 0.25mm and the difference in sensor heights is just under a 1mm.

Photo evidence below. Hopefully replacing the sensor with the correct height will fix my issues.

Hope this helps others.


Last edited by MR RIZK; 02-18-2013 at 03:32 AM.
Old 02-18-2013, 03:29 PM
  #13  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

ya, if you have hi rpm misfire (assuming tune and coils are spot on), thats usually a crank sensor issue. Luckily, you have obvious signs of contact which made diagnosing that much easier
Old 02-19-2013, 07:15 PM
  #14  
ZEDCAR TT
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ZEDCAR TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is going on with these sensors. Glad to see I'm not the only one! At least that proves I'm not smoking crack haha.
Old 02-27-2013, 01:47 AM
  #15  
MR RIZK
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
MR RIZK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Quick update. I installed my original sensor and the misfire code has gone. Will need to remove sensor to ensure there is no contact. Could be my imagination but the car seemed to drive better with the other sensor Might install the new one with a washer and see what it drives like.
Old 08-11-2013, 06:06 AM
  #16  
MR RIZK
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
MR RIZK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

lol.. looks like the BRZ has the same issue. Fix according to Subaru TSB is to shim the sensor.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...1&d=1375302652
Old 08-12-2013, 11:29 AM
  #17  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

hmm, wierd that too close causes issues. wonder if mine are too close giving me my poor cam sync during cranking.

Those subaru cam sensor shims are 125$ for the set. dang.
Old 08-12-2013, 05:03 PM
  #18  
MR RIZK
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
MR RIZK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

@str8dum1

What does your miss counter report during crank? I found that when i replaced the bank 1 sensor with a new one it was too close and the car didn't start. Took me a while to find a correct washer to get the miss counter between 2-3 on each start. The funny thing is that bank 1 log trace is not as smooth as bank 2. This was only after i replaced the sensor. If I apply pressure to the sensor with my hand while the car is running the log flattens out and the reading is also more accurate. This tells me that my shim is still not 100% the correct size. The car starts, runs fine and target timing under load seems ok just the logs show it is not perfect.

When I asked JWT if others have reported issues with the sensors their reply was below. Unlike the BRZ it is very hard for use to measure.

That said a stock sensor measures 37.4 mm and the factory tries to keep the air gap average at about 1mm from car to car. If you are saying that you installed a sensor that is .9mm longer than what you took out then there is definitely a problem with the replacement sensor, as the signal will no longer trigger if the gap is less than .5 mm

Keep in mind that the Haltech only syncs off crank and bank 1 where the oem ecu syncs from crank and both banks. (this is what haltech thinks is the case). I was chasing my tail as every time I put the oem ecu back in the car it started fine with no CEL codes with the new sensor. I'm not sure what the ProEFI does.

It is also worth to note that I don't believe the Haltech PNP will trigger a CEL for a failing/failed cam sensor. The reason I say this is when my sensor died and the car did not start there was no reported errors. When I plugged the OEM ecu back in on first crank it reported bank 1 sensor failure. I have asked Haltech to confirm this but will need to chase them.

PS: I have also heard that the VQ35 can start with no crank sensor in the Nissan Elgrand. I assume limp mode. Never tested on the Z though

Last edited by MR RIZK; 08-12-2013 at 05:14 PM.
Old 08-14-2013, 11:59 AM
  #19  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

ya the proefi only uses the bank 1 cam sensor. My cam2 was very noisy and when I pulled my valve covers was definitely further away from the cam than cam1. As best as I could tell with a feeler gauge, i moved the cam2 sensor in closer. Now my cam2 log is still noisy but near as much.

1mm air gap is super small. Without the motor out of the car its really hard to measure. I can only get numbers relative to each other.

That said, i dont think my cam1 is less than 1mm away. That said, once the car starts once, it will restart and sync with no issues.

Car started 100% on the stock ecu as well. Its definitely the aftermarket sync strategies which are inferior.

I've bought 2 pairs of sensors and all measure the same as fair as i can remember with my digital calipers

Last edited by str8dum1; 08-14-2013 at 12:01 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aarrgghh
Forced Induction
15
05-01-2022 11:04 AM
lolwatbro
Maintenance & Repair
9
10-09-2021 04:58 AM
RWDBajan
Maintenance & Repair
22
09-17-2015 04:52 PM
RyansZ33
Maintenance & Repair
8
09-15-2015 05:54 AM
ThreeFiveZero Z
Competition Items - Archive
3
09-12-2015 04:33 PM



Quick Reply: Haltech Car won't start until removing key and replacing.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:38 PM.