eManage installed on my N/A Z
Originally posted by ChrisMCagle
Well, when I did a base dyno I was about 232 hp and my A/F was right around 12.5ish. When I recently did my "after mods" dyno (with everything in my sig) I was only at 239 hp and my A/F was in the 14's! Everyone said that I was WAY lean and that if I got it back down to the 12.5 to 13 range, I would make up the missing hp (plus not detonate my engine).
Well, when I did a base dyno I was about 232 hp and my A/F was right around 12.5ish. When I recently did my "after mods" dyno (with everything in my sig) I was only at 239 hp and my A/F was in the 14's! Everyone said that I was WAY lean and that if I got it back down to the 12.5 to 13 range, I would make up the missing hp (plus not detonate my engine).
check out this thread:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....highlight=dyno
--mike
Last edited by leemik; Jul 16, 2004 at 07:42 PM.
Originally posted by leemik
I dunno who "everybody" is but for an N/A motor you are defintely not running "WAY lean." You are well into the 13's when you get on the throttle.. sure you are in the 14's but that's @ ~4000rpm or lower..or when the motor is not really working that hard..
check out this thread:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....highlight=dyno
--mike
I dunno who "everybody" is but for an N/A motor you are defintely not running "WAY lean." You are well into the 13's when you get on the throttle.. sure you are in the 14's but that's @ ~4000rpm or lower..or when the motor is not really working that hard..
check out this thread:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....highlight=dyno
--mike
-Chris
So have you checked the A/F with a wideband to see what it's at? DynoJet A/F meters aren't the most accurate things in the world sometimes, all it takes is someone to run leaded fuel or Nitrous with it to drastically affect the readings. I find it very hard to believe a car would go from 12.5:1 to 14:1 with just a plenum and test pipes. I've seen many more cars with a lot more than that, not run lean. I dunno, I've done exhaust and intake on my car so I'll have to throw it on the dyno and see what it does A/F-wise.
Last edited by phoenixZ33; Jul 16, 2004 at 09:31 PM.
Originally posted by phoenixZ33
So have you checked the A/F with a wideband to see what it's at? DynoJet A/F meters aren't the most accurate things in the world sometimes, all it takes is someone to run leaded fuel or Nitrous with it to drastically affect the readings. I find it very hard to believe a car would go from 12.5:1 to 14:1 with just a plenum and test pipes. I've seen many more cars with a lot more than that, not run lean. I dunno, I've done exhaust and intake on my car so I'll have to throw it on the dyno and see what it does A/F-wise.
So have you checked the A/F with a wideband to see what it's at? DynoJet A/F meters aren't the most accurate things in the world sometimes, all it takes is someone to run leaded fuel or Nitrous with it to drastically affect the readings. I find it very hard to believe a car would go from 12.5:1 to 14:1 with just a plenum and test pipes. I've seen many more cars with a lot more than that, not run lean. I dunno, I've done exhaust and intake on my car so I'll have to throw it on the dyno and see what it does A/F-wise.
-Chris
For those considering an eManage, this is what I would recommend when installing. Remove the battery cover and plastic casing around it (by the windshield). Then unhook the ECU and pull the wiring harness up into the engine bay. From there it is easy to solder anything you need, then wrap it and pull it back through.
Just my .02, also good for wideband/O2 simulators/anything tapping the ECU...
-D
Just my .02, also good for wideband/O2 simulators/anything tapping the ECU...
-D
Originally posted by derek_i
For those considering an eManage, this is what I would recommend when installing. Remove the battery cover and plastic casing around it (by the windshield). Then unhook the ECU and pull the wiring harness up into the engine bay. From there it is easy to solder anything you need, then wrap it and pull it back through.
Just my .02, also good for wideband/O2 simulators/anything tapping the ECU...
-D
For those considering an eManage, this is what I would recommend when installing. Remove the battery cover and plastic casing around it (by the windshield). Then unhook the ECU and pull the wiring harness up into the engine bay. From there it is easy to solder anything you need, then wrap it and pull it back through.
Just my .02, also good for wideband/O2 simulators/anything tapping the ECU...
-D
-Chris
The plastic pops right off.
Ask ACP what he thinks about this, he has done it both ways. My tuner pulled the harness into the engine bay in less than 2 minutes, then sat down on a stool and did the soldering.
ACP originally did his laying on his back upside down. Digging through all those wires in a cramped space with a hot soldering gun...
Just my opinion from seeing this done a number of times. Do it anyway you like...
-D
Ask ACP what he thinks about this, he has done it both ways. My tuner pulled the harness into the engine bay in less than 2 minutes, then sat down on a stool and did the soldering.
ACP originally did his laying on his back upside down. Digging through all those wires in a cramped space with a hot soldering gun...
Just my opinion from seeing this done a number of times. Do it anyway you like...
-D
So all of that work just for AF? Why not just use a much simpler tool to manipulate it, like the S-AFC II ?
I know the E-manage is cool with it's interface and all, but damn that's a lot of work.
--wes
I know the E-manage is cool with it's interface and all, but damn that's a lot of work.
--wes
Originally posted by was wesman
So all of that work just for AF? Why not just use a much simpler tool to manipulate it, like the S-AFC II ?
I know the E-manage is cool with it's interface and all, but damn that's a lot of work.
--wes
So all of that work just for AF? Why not just use a much simpler tool to manipulate it, like the S-AFC II ?
I know the E-manage is cool with it's interface and all, but damn that's a lot of work.
--wes
Originally posted by ChrisMCagle
Mainly because the S-AFC II is about $100 more than the eManage and offers less options. Also, it was my understanding that you still had to go through the process of soldering wires into the ECU wiring harness with the S-AFC II. I would rather pay less, and have more functionality. If I have to work a little to achieve that... so be it.
Mainly because the S-AFC II is about $100 more than the eManage and offers less options. Also, it was my understanding that you still had to go through the process of soldering wires into the ECU wiring harness with the S-AFC II. I would rather pay less, and have more functionality. If I have to work a little to achieve that... so be it.
At least if you decide to get a TT kit you'r eready to go
--wes
Originally posted by was wesman
You can get them used for about half what you paid for the E-manage. I suppose there is some soldering if you choose to, however there are far less wires to hook up. How many connections does the emanage require ?
At least if you decide to get a TT kit you'r eready to go
--wes
You can get them used for about half what you paid for the E-manage. I suppose there is some soldering if you choose to, however there are far less wires to hook up. How many connections does the emanage require ?
At least if you decide to get a TT kit you'r eready to go
--wes
-Chris
Originally posted by derek_i
The plastic pops right off.
Ask ACP what he thinks about this, he has done it both ways. My tuner pulled the harness into the engine bay in less than 2 minutes, then sat down on a stool and did the soldering.
ACP originally did his laying on his back upside down. Digging through all those wires in a cramped space with a hot soldering gun...
Just my opinion from seeing this done a number of times. Do it anyway you like...
-D
The plastic pops right off.
Ask ACP what he thinks about this, he has done it both ways. My tuner pulled the harness into the engine bay in less than 2 minutes, then sat down on a stool and did the soldering.
ACP originally did his laying on his back upside down. Digging through all those wires in a cramped space with a hot soldering gun...
Just my opinion from seeing this done a number of times. Do it anyway you like...
-D
I have done it both ways, and never again would I do it laying on my back, looking up at the ECU wires.
Pulling the wiring harness out takes 10 minutes, and then it is laying right in front of you.
Here is a picture when mine was out
Originally posted by ACP
Chris, what Derek is saying is so true
I have done it both ways, and never again would I do it laying on my back, looking up at the ECU wires.
Pulling the wiring harness out takes 10 minutes, and then it is laying right in front of you.
Here is a picture when mine was out
Chris, what Derek is saying is so true
I have done it both ways, and never again would I do it laying on my back, looking up at the ECU wires.
Pulling the wiring harness out takes 10 minutes, and then it is laying right in front of you.
Here is a picture when mine was out
-Chris
Originally posted by mchapman
So is anyone else concerned about the potential for damage when you install it incorrectly and try to run the car? Like shown here.
So is anyone else concerned about the potential for damage when you install it incorrectly and try to run the car? Like shown here.



