Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

eManage installed on my N/A Z

Old Jul 16, 2004 | 07:40 PM
  #21  
leemik's Avatar
leemik
!
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 4
From: ma
Default

Originally posted by ChrisMCagle
Well, when I did a base dyno I was about 232 hp and my A/F was right around 12.5ish. When I recently did my "after mods" dyno (with everything in my sig) I was only at 239 hp and my A/F was in the 14's! Everyone said that I was WAY lean and that if I got it back down to the 12.5 to 13 range, I would make up the missing hp (plus not detonate my engine).
I dunno who "everybody" is but for an N/A motor you are defintely not running "WAY lean." You are well into the 13's when you get on the throttle.. sure you are in the 14's but that's @ ~4000rpm or lower..or when the motor is not really working that hard..

check out this thread:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....highlight=dyno

--mike

Last edited by leemik; Jul 16, 2004 at 07:42 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 08:19 PM
  #22  
mchapman's Avatar
mchapman
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 1
Default

So is anyone else concerned about the potential for damage when you install it incorrectly and try to run the car? Like shown here.

Last edited by mchapman; Jul 16, 2004 at 08:23 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #23  
ChrisMCagle's Avatar
ChrisMCagle
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Massillon, OH
Default

Originally posted by leemik
I dunno who "everybody" is but for an N/A motor you are defintely not running "WAY lean." You are well into the 13's when you get on the throttle.. sure you are in the 14's but that's @ ~4000rpm or lower..or when the motor is not really working that hard..

check out this thread:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....highlight=dyno

--mike
Thanks for posting that link. It was a very informative read!

-Chris
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 09:29 PM
  #24  
phoenixZ33's Avatar
phoenixZ33
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, arizona
Default

So have you checked the A/F with a wideband to see what it's at? DynoJet A/F meters aren't the most accurate things in the world sometimes, all it takes is someone to run leaded fuel or Nitrous with it to drastically affect the readings. I find it very hard to believe a car would go from 12.5:1 to 14:1 with just a plenum and test pipes. I've seen many more cars with a lot more than that, not run lean. I dunno, I've done exhaust and intake on my car so I'll have to throw it on the dyno and see what it does A/F-wise.

Last edited by phoenixZ33; Jul 16, 2004 at 09:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2004 | 09:40 PM
  #25  
ChrisMCagle's Avatar
ChrisMCagle
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Massillon, OH
Default

Originally posted by phoenixZ33
So have you checked the A/F with a wideband to see what it's at? DynoJet A/F meters aren't the most accurate things in the world sometimes, all it takes is someone to run leaded fuel or Nitrous with it to drastically affect the readings. I find it very hard to believe a car would go from 12.5:1 to 14:1 with just a plenum and test pipes. I've seen many more cars with a lot more than that, not run lean. I dunno, I've done exhaust and intake on my car so I'll have to throw it on the dyno and see what it does A/F-wise.
No. The last dyno run was back in June (A/F posted above against my stock A/F from January).

-Chris
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 07:45 AM
  #26  
derek_i's Avatar
derek_i
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

For those considering an eManage, this is what I would recommend when installing. Remove the battery cover and plastic casing around it (by the windshield). Then unhook the ECU and pull the wiring harness up into the engine bay. From there it is easy to solder anything you need, then wrap it and pull it back through.

Just my .02, also good for wideband/O2 simulators/anything tapping the ECU...

-D
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 08:04 AM
  #27  
myz8a4re's Avatar
myz8a4re
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
From: bradenton florida
Default

thanx for that input derek, is the the plastic suround piece easy to remove as well?

-justin
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 08:14 AM
  #28  
ChrisMCagle's Avatar
ChrisMCagle
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Massillon, OH
Default

Originally posted by derek_i
For those considering an eManage, this is what I would recommend when installing. Remove the battery cover and plastic casing around it (by the windshield). Then unhook the ECU and pull the wiring harness up into the engine bay. From there it is easy to solder anything you need, then wrap it and pull it back through.

Just my .02, also good for wideband/O2 simulators/anything tapping the ECU...

-D
Naw. That's unnecessary IMHO. There is plenty of room under the dash to work. The problem is trying to find the wires in the harness itself. There's close to 200 wires in there and they are all pretty tight so trying to find the exact wire on the back of the harness is tough. I don't think it would be any easier pulling the ECU up through the firewall and in fact it would just cause more work for yourself.

-Chris
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 04:54 AM
  #29  
derek_i's Avatar
derek_i
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

The plastic pops right off.

Ask ACP what he thinks about this, he has done it both ways. My tuner pulled the harness into the engine bay in less than 2 minutes, then sat down on a stool and did the soldering.

ACP originally did his laying on his back upside down. Digging through all those wires in a cramped space with a hot soldering gun...

Just my opinion from seeing this done a number of times. Do it anyway you like...

-D
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 08:15 AM
  #30  
was wesman's Avatar
was wesman
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: 21 Boost St DFW,Tx
Default

So all of that work just for AF? Why not just use a much simpler tool to manipulate it, like the S-AFC II ?

I know the E-manage is cool with it's interface and all, but damn that's a lot of work.

--wes
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #31  
ChrisMCagle's Avatar
ChrisMCagle
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Massillon, OH
Default

Originally posted by was wesman
So all of that work just for AF? Why not just use a much simpler tool to manipulate it, like the S-AFC II ?

I know the E-manage is cool with it's interface and all, but damn that's a lot of work.

--wes
Mainly because the S-AFC II is about $100 more than the eManage and offers less options. Also, it was my understanding that you still had to go through the process of soldering wires into the ECU wiring harness with the S-AFC II. I would rather pay less, and have more functionality. If I have to work a little to achieve that... so be it.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 08:55 AM
  #32  
was wesman's Avatar
was wesman
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: 21 Boost St DFW,Tx
Default

Originally posted by ChrisMCagle
Mainly because the S-AFC II is about $100 more than the eManage and offers less options. Also, it was my understanding that you still had to go through the process of soldering wires into the ECU wiring harness with the S-AFC II. I would rather pay less, and have more functionality. If I have to work a little to achieve that... so be it.
You can get them used for about half what you paid for the E-manage. I suppose there is some soldering if you choose to, however there are far less wires to hook up. How many connections does the emanage require ?

At least if you decide to get a TT kit you'r eready to go

--wes
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 09:53 AM
  #33  
zxsaint's Avatar
zxsaint
Fairlady Stalker
Premier Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
Default

Also, if i'm not mistaken, the SAFC2 relies on altering sensor information to the ECU instead of actually mapping by modifying injector output like the greddy unit.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #34  
ChrisMCagle's Avatar
ChrisMCagle
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Massillon, OH
Default

Originally posted by was wesman
You can get them used for about half what you paid for the E-manage. I suppose there is some soldering if you choose to, however there are far less wires to hook up. How many connections does the emanage require ?

At least if you decide to get a TT kit you'r eready to go

--wes
Well, I supposed that buying a used device is an option, but I feel that something as important as a fuel management computer should either be installed new, not not installed at all. As for the number of wires, it depends on the options you want. The main unit requires 5 wires, but there is an RPM signal adapter that you have to use for the Nissan CAN system which is an additional 8 wires. The Injector harness requires 7 wires. That's all that I have installed on mine (20 wires). For the Turbo setups, you also need to install the Ignition harness which has 12 more wires. Since I don't need to worry about advancing or retarding my ignition, I didn't get that harness.

-Chris
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 12:13 AM
  #35  
SirZaLot's Avatar
SirZaLot
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: BBY
Default

How is HKS F-CON V PRO?? Is it a good unit?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 04:22 AM
  #36  
ACP's Avatar
ACP
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Default

Originally posted by derek_i
The plastic pops right off.

Ask ACP what he thinks about this, he has done it both ways. My tuner pulled the harness into the engine bay in less than 2 minutes, then sat down on a stool and did the soldering.

ACP originally did his laying on his back upside down. Digging through all those wires in a cramped space with a hot soldering gun...

Just my opinion from seeing this done a number of times. Do it anyway you like...

-D
Chris, what Derek is saying is so true
I have done it both ways, and never again would I do it laying on my back, looking up at the ECU wires.
Pulling the wiring harness out takes 10 minutes, and then it is laying right in front of you.
Here is a picture when mine was out
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 09:54 AM
  #37  
ChrisMCagle's Avatar
ChrisMCagle
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Massillon, OH
Default

Originally posted by ACP
Chris, what Derek is saying is so true
I have done it both ways, and never again would I do it laying on my back, looking up at the ECU wires.
Pulling the wiring harness out takes 10 minutes, and then it is laying right in front of you.
Here is a picture when mine was out
Well, it would be easier to work on it right there in front of you, but for me that wasn't the hard part. The hard part was trying to find the specific wires on the back of the wiring harness. With all the wires there, it's pretty hard to trace them back to the origin, at least for me it was.

-Chris
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #38  
jun14scr's Avatar
jun14scr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: richmond virginia
Default

hm. do you have to solder them or could u just used wire taps?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #39  
ChrisMCagle's Avatar
ChrisMCagle
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Massillon, OH
Default

Originally posted by jun14scr
hm. do you have to solder them or could u just used wire taps?
You must solder them. Wire taps do not give a good enough connection.

-Chris
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 05:03 PM
  #40  
ChrisMCagle's Avatar
ChrisMCagle
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Massillon, OH
Default

Originally posted by mchapman
So is anyone else concerned about the potential for damage when you install it incorrectly and try to run the car? Like shown here.
Ummmmmm... like shown where?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 PM.