Notices
VQ37HVR Mods and Support related to the 2009+ VHR engine

Possible V8 for new 370Z... with source

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #161  
Endgame's Avatar
Endgame
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

Do we really need a twin turbo?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 09:24 AM
  #162  
C6Zhombre's Avatar
C6Zhombre
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Default

Originally Posted by bimmertech
i heard GM is working with nissan and is going to put an LS3 in it. it'll be the 620Z.
.

hey, don't stop the dream with the ls3....go for the gusto! LS7 baby...... 700Z!

3100lbs + all aluminum LS7 = eye popping acceleration

heck, even the fuel economy is still there. I get pretty close to 29mpg highway cruising
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 09:25 AM
  #163  
daryl.blas's Avatar
daryl.blas
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default Umm...

Really, that things almost as bad as the Rx8's OMGOSH...
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 11:10 AM
  #164  
Dr. Venture's Avatar
Dr. Venture
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

never said TT, just T. And i forgot about the Rotary, why dont they just throw in a rotary airplane engine and top off the Z with crazy RPM's TT's and extra Rotor's to call it a nice light very powerful Z....?

And a well designed V8? Be specific if you please? On what's causing the loss of weight? Aluminum block, heads, piping? Take away the V portion of the 6. Make it an inline 6, save some space, and add a big turbo instead of a twin coming off one sided exhaust ports instead of 2 sided. And i believe the weight issue will be saved in a 6 much more than that of a v8. The V kills the concept of space and TT issues...when one T's all you need in a well designed motor. Some examples would be the new BMW's, or the Volvo's both inline and pretty powerful.

Last edited by Dr. Venture; Jul 7, 2008 at 11:17 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #165  
xDIEGOx's Avatar
xDIEGOx
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,026
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Endgame
Do we really need a twin turbo?
YES!!!



But yes I'd rather have a turbo V6 then a n/a V8. Oh the possibilities...
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #166  
SnakeBitten's Avatar
SnakeBitten
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by xDIEGOx
YES!!!



But yes I'd rather have a turbo V6 then a n/a V8. Oh the possibilities...
Imagine the possibilities the extra V8 displacement would have with boost
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #167  
Endgame's Avatar
Endgame
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

And imagine that gas being sucked right down the fuel system!!! HOORAY GAS!!!!!

or lack thereof....
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #168  
bimmertech's Avatar
bimmertech
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: kansas city
Default

Originally Posted by Dr. Venture

And a well designed V8? Be specific if you please? On what's causing the loss of weight? Aluminum block, heads, piping? Take away the V portion of the 6. Make it an inline 6, save some space, and add a big turbo instead of a twin coming off one sided exhaust ports instead of 2 sided. And i believe the weight issue will be saved in a 6 much more than that of a v8. The V kills the concept of space and TT issues...when one T's all you need in a well designed motor. Some examples would be the new BMW's, or the Volvo's both inline and pretty powerful.
a well designed engine will be compact, lightweight, and have a good amount of displacement--see LS1's. they weigh as much as a VQ but can support twice the displacement. its when you start adding 4 cams, monster 4v heads, huge timing chains, variable cam sprockets, crazy intakes is where you start adding weight--something i am sure nissan would do . alum block, small 2v heads, 1 single cam in block to place weight lower in the chassis, less valvetrain, etc. that is how you make a well designed V8.

BMW and volvo both use twin turbos and the fact that an inline 6 adds too much weight to the front of the car makes it less desireable. also the single turbo will suffer from lag and driveability issues to make it a marketable solution to the USDM. not only that but even a single turbo OE application will add cast iron manifolds, extra piping, etc.. they all add weight.

from a modding perspective yes the TTV6 would be great, but i would much rather have more displacement to start with as you can make more power on pump gas. i am the type of person who would most likely change out all the OE turbo stuff anyways so i might as well start fresh.

Last edited by bimmertech; Jul 7, 2008 at 02:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 03:13 PM
  #169  
zsport1's Avatar
zsport1
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

V8 Z is not going to happen. So don't hold your breath.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 03:27 PM
  #170  
bimmertech's Avatar
bimmertech
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: kansas city
Default

Originally Posted by zsport1
V8 Z is not going to happen. So don't hold your breath.
thats what all the M3 guys said 4 years ago.....

i don't expect it or really care--especially if they put a VQ in the new 240 or whatever they are gonna call it.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #171  
Dr. Venture's Avatar
Dr. Venture
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3
From: Dirty Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by zsport1
V8 Z is not going to happen. So don't hold your breath.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #172  
DomZ's Avatar
DomZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by zsport1
V8 Z is not going to happen. So don't hold your breath.
+1
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #173  
Endgame's Avatar
Endgame
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

Originally Posted by bimmertech
thats what all the M3 guys said 4 years ago.....


i don't expect it or really care--especially if they put a VQ in the new 240 or whatever they are gonna call it.
Originally Posted by bimmertech
thats what all the M3 guys said 4 years ago......
And as soon as the V8 is dropped into the M3, there is talk they are taking it out in favor of a TT Inline 6 application. The next Gen M3 will not even have the V8. Too bad as it is a saawweettt V8.

Originally Posted by bimmertech
especially if they put a VQ in the new 240 or whatever they are gonna call it.
Where did you hear that??

Last edited by Endgame; Jul 7, 2008 at 04:01 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 04:04 PM
  #174  
zsport1's Avatar
zsport1
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Nissan has played with the V8 Z idea many times in the past with previous Z models. They never actually did it except with a couple of Z race cars. With the way gas prices are and how auto manufacturers are struggling to sell vehicles don't expect to see Nissan make a V8 Z Car.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #175  
bimmertech's Avatar
bimmertech
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: kansas city
Default

Originally Posted by Endgame
Where did you hear that??
i have read a couple articles that hinted on a 2.5VQ that would also be in the infinity version of the 240.



And as soon as the V8 is dropped into the M3, there is talk they are taking it out in favor of a TT Inline 6 application. The next Gen M3 will not even have the V8. Too bad as it is a saawweettt V8.
i won't say it won't happen, but i can't see them going back to the I6. i can see them TT'ing the V8 though. or putting a V10 in the 3 and a V12 in the M5.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #176  
SniperHunter's Avatar
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

A single turbo VQ37 would make me get the new Z, immediately. I'd try hard to forget the looks, if it's ugly, though.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 05:48 PM
  #177  
Endgame's Avatar
Endgame
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

Originally Posted by bimmertech
i have read a couple articles that hinted on a 2.5VQ that would also be in the infinity version of the 240.





i won't say it won't happen, but i can't see them going back to the I6. i can see them TT'ing the V8 though. or putting a V10 in the 3 and a V12 in the M5.

Originally Posted by bimmertech
i have read a couple articles that hinted on a 2.5VQ that would also be in the infinity version of the 240..
Hmm. That is interesting. I keep hearing so many things about that. Guess we will see. I like the idea of the 2.5VQ.... That bad boy should rev pretty high!

Originally Posted by bimmertech
i won't say it won't happen, but i can't see them going back to the I6. i can see them TT'ing the V8 though. or putting a V10 in the 3 and a V12 in the M5.
No BMW has stated they are going back to lighter weight cars. Dropping the huge, high HP engines. They specifically spoke of the inline 6 as the likely next M3 engine. They will just tune the heck out of it and probally drop about 420 HP out of it....

As you stated, however WHO KNOWS what they will do.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 08:15 PM
  #178  
300zx1985's Avatar
300zx1985
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

I think it looks awsome, and a 3.7 v8? sick..
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #179  
InZomniac's Avatar
InZomniac
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
From: Work
Default

Originally Posted by Endgame
Do we really need a twin turbo?

LOL Yes, yes we do....
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #180  
InZomniac's Avatar
InZomniac
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
From: Work
Default

Personally, I think I want to see more Supra info...


Bit costly though Toyota....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 PM.