Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

I applaud you MT drivers. I really do...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2007, 05:04 PM
  #201  
LeMans 05
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
LeMans 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
The 350Z automatics have clutches also.
Nope
Old 09-11-2007, 05:04 PM
  #202  
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
HDPDZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
Last time I checked, the auto Z had a torque converter.

Now, if you want to count the clutches that lock the transmission gears in the context of the current discussion, you certainly had some good stuff to smoke...
A clutch is a clutch. To pretend they don't exist in AT's is ignorant.
Old 09-11-2007, 05:08 PM
  #203  
JCSVT
Registered User
 
JCSVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The ATs do have clutches. A lot of them.

What the ATs don't have is a driver/mechanically operated clutch.

Last edited by JCSVT; 09-11-2007 at 05:13 PM.
Old 09-11-2007, 05:18 PM
  #204  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
A clutch is a clutch. To pretend they don't exist in AT's is ignorant.
I did a little research and couldn't find any clutch mechanism on an AT equipped Z. We may be arguing semantics here.

What is your definition of a clutch?

--Spike
Old 09-11-2007, 05:18 PM
  #205  
LeMans 05
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
LeMans 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JCSVT
The ATs do have clutches. A lot of them.

What the ATs don't have is a driver/mechanically operated clutch.
Yeah, but the highly important link between engine and transmission is a torque converter, not a clutch, right?
Old 09-11-2007, 05:22 PM
  #206  
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
HDPDZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JCSVT
What the ATs don't have is a driver/mechanically operated clutch.
Agree.
Old 09-11-2007, 05:28 PM
  #207  
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
HDPDZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
I did a little research and couldn't find any clutch mechanism on an AT equipped Z. We may be arguing semantics here.

What is your definition of a clutch?

--Spike
The clutches are part of the planetary gear set.
Old 09-11-2007, 05:30 PM
  #208  
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kolia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeMans 05
Yeah, but the highly important link between engine and transmission is a torque converter, not a clutch, right?
Yep.

And in the current context, it was clear to everybody involved the term clutch applied exclusively to that function...

Geeks will be geeks...
Old 09-11-2007, 05:39 PM
  #209  
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
HDPDZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
Yep.

And in the current context, it was clear to everybody involved the term clutch applied exclusively to that function...

Geeks will be geeks...
And in the current context, alot of you are incorrect. The major differences between AT/MT's are not clutches. Call me a geek if you want, but if you are going to argue, then be correct about your argument.
Old 09-11-2007, 05:51 PM
  #210  
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kolia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
And in the current context, alot of you are incorrect. The major differences between AT/MT's are not clutches. Call me a geek if you want, but if you are going to argue, then be correct about your argument.
The automotive industry classifies a transmission as being automatic or manual depending on what or who is in charge of decoupling the drive train from the engine. (Semi-automatic falls into the automatic category)

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....ht=bosch+kolia

The presence of a driver actuated clutch has everything to do with the difference of an MT and AT!
Old 09-11-2007, 05:55 PM
  #211  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
The clutches are part of the planetary gear set.
Yes… and I see where you are going with this. This is why the old AT vs. MT argument always degenerates into semantics and definitions.

Probably the most accurate post comes from LeMans 05
Originally Posted by LeMans 05
Yeah, but the highly important link between engine and transmission is a torque converter, not a clutch, right?
In an AT, the “clutch” (if you want to call it this) or clutches connect gears (or whatever you want to call this) to a torque converter, and the torque converter connects the transmission to the engine.

This is a different arrangement in cars with a manual transmission or a semi-automatic transmission, where the engine connects directly to the transmission using the selected gear.

--Spike
Old 09-11-2007, 06:00 PM
  #212  
LeMans 05
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
LeMans 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And a paddle-shifted automatic with a torque converter (Z) is vastly different than a paddle-shifted automatic with a true clutch (Ferrari, M3). Both are now inferior to the new dual-clutch systems (VW).
And while I have no argument that the auto is fast, shifts strong, etc., the point I've been trying to make is that you are not truly driving unless you have 3 pedals and a shifter that can go into any gear at any time, not just sequentially shift. There's no need to get defensive over your choice of an automatic. There are many valid reasons to buy one. Fowlman, for instance, must drive an automatic. However, to those who bought the automatic due to lack of skill or laziness, well, I hear Camrys are really nice.
Old 09-11-2007, 06:01 PM
  #213  
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kolia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Spike100, in many modern AT's torque converter are almost always locked. You can still get engine braking and play with the throttle to adjust the weight transfer.
Old 09-11-2007, 06:34 PM
  #214  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
Spike100, in many modern AT's torque converter are almost always locked. You can still get engine braking and play with the throttle to adjust the weight transfer.
Certainly that is true.

This MT vs. AT argument comes up frequently on the Forum, and it’s interesting that it never is resolved as the debaters stubbornly cling to their definitions.

If you agree that there are three basic categories (manual transmission, semi-automatic transmission and automatic transmission), there are definitions of these that should provide some insight as to the differences in these types of transmissions.

MT’s and semiautomatics are appropriately classified together since both use a clutch (often two clutches with semi-automatic transmissions), and both directly connect a selected gear to the car’s engine. The difference is a MT uses a clutch pedal to disengage the transmission from the engine and a gear shift to select a gear, while semi-automatic transmissions have no clutch pedal and use an electronically activated clutch (often two clutches) to disengage/engage the transmission along with paddles to select a gear.

An automatic transmission is much more complicated. An AT uses a torque converter to connect “gearing” to the engine, but the “guts” inside the torque converter are varied and often quite sophisticated. There might be a series of gears all with their own “clutch” mechanism, or a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

You can see why this argument is not easily resolved since definitions always bring the debate to a contest using definitions.

--Spike
Old 09-11-2007, 07:03 PM
  #215  
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Kolia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
Certainly that is true.

This MT vs. AT argument comes up frequently on the Forum, and it’s interesting that it never is resolved as the debaters stubbornly cling to their definitions.

If you agree that there are three basic categories (manual transmission, semi-automatic transmission and automatic transmission), there are definitions of these that should provide some insight as to the differences in these types of transmissions.

MT’s and semiautomatics are appropriately classified together since both use a clutch (often two clutches with semi-automatic transmissions), and both directly connect a selected gear to the car’s engine. The difference is a MT uses a clutch pedal to disengage the transmission from the engine and a gear shift to select a gear, while semi-automatic transmissions have no clutch pedal and use an electronically activated clutch (often two clutches) to disengage/engage the transmission along with paddles to select a gear.

An automatic transmission is much more complicated. An AT uses a torque converter to connect “gearing” to the engine, but the “guts” inside the torque converter are varied and often quite sophisticated. There might be a series of gears all with their own “clutch” mechanism, or a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

You can see why this argument is not easily resolved since definitions always bring the debate to a contest using definitions.

--Spike
Well, BOSCH and as far had I know, the whole industry, puts the semi-auto transmissions in the "auto" category. All of these have an "auto" mode anyways!

The only manual transmission is one where the operator needs to actuate a clutch manually in order to change gears.
Old 09-11-2007, 07:07 PM
  #216  
LeMans 05
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
LeMans 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

... and the only one that won't shift itself
Old 09-11-2007, 07:14 PM
  #217  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kolia
Well, BOSCH and as far had I know, the whole industry, puts the semi-auto transmissions in the "auto" category. All of these have an "auto" mode anyways!

The only manual transmission is one where the operator needs to actuate a clutch manually in order to change gears.
You're probably right. When you put a semi-automatic (consumer version vs. racing version) into 1st gear or reverse gear, it actually morphs into an AT mode using a pressure plate or torque converter so you can stand still without having the engine die as it idles down.

--Spike
Old 09-11-2007, 08:07 PM
  #218  
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
HDPDZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
This MT vs. AT argument comes up frequently on the Forum, and it’s interesting that it never is resolved as the debaters stubbornly cling to their definitions.
This debate often arises from the select group of individuals who insist on demeaning the owners of AT 350Z's. If maturity levels were a wee bit higher, these threads wouldn't exist.
Old 09-11-2007, 11:22 PM
  #219  
SiNzz
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
SiNzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The only automatic cars I've ever driven have been when I took drivers ed, and occasionally at work. Funnily enough, I've never actually commuted anywhere in an AT car When I was first learning to MT at 14, I assumed everyone already knew how to drive it. Turned out when I turned 16 only 1 other person I knew had learned. Thankgod for my mom teaching me, since she's been driving MT cars for over 30 years. If not for her I'd probably be stuck driving an auto corolla
Old 09-12-2007, 06:05 AM
  #220  
fowlman01
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
fowlman01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 16,155
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HDPD350Z
This debate often arises from the select group of individuals who insist on demeaning the owners of AT 350Z's. If maturity levels were a wee bit higher, these threads wouldn't exist.
Both transmissions have their place and I like 6MT's, I just can't daily drive a car with a clutch because I have a bad left knee. I get annoyed when someone thinks they have a bigger dick cuz they have a manual tranny and have never driven the 5AT. I have road raced my 5AT and it does quite well and I will also add I don't have smoking brakes like the 6MT guys do after a few laps. For some reason I can pull a similarly equipped Z with a 6MT coming out of the turns. I suppose it has something to do with the gearing of the 5AT. A comment like "the 5AT takes 1-2 seconds to shift" just shows the person has never driven one.


Quick Reply: I applaud you MT drivers. I really do...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 AM.