M3 guys hating again
12-11-2003, 04:58 PM
#81
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL.... your mom needs to spend more money on your education ...
Originally posted by M-Phibian
Nice, informative post. From you've posted, every single track time has the M3 faster than the Porsche, but the straight line times has the Porsche faster. Also, IIRC the EVO article had the M3 as faster.
Looking at the M3's times below, I believe it was probably an SMG car that ran those slower times. SMG is faster than a 6-speed from a roll, but the 6-speed is faster from a stop. Also, those are the by far the *fastest* C2 times I've ever seen. It was great C2, with a great driver, on a great day.
Every article I've seen with the 6-speed M3 versus a 6-speed C2 has the running M3 faster, but yes, the are very close.
Car and Driver ran a M3 0-60 at 4.5 and the 1/4 mile in 13.1. A poster on M3 Forums has ran his stock M3 in the 1/4 mile at 12.72 @ 107 mph. He has time slips and two videos to prove it.
The cars are close enough that they will be driver and condition dependant, but the M3 still seems to win much more often than Porsche does.
This is just the opposite of what that moron ricer-boy said about the Porsche beating the M3 around a track or in a straight line every time. That's what he gets for not learning more about cars before he speaks I guess.
Nice, informative post. From you've posted, every single track time has the M3 faster than the Porsche, but the straight line times has the Porsche faster. Also, IIRC the EVO article had the M3 as faster.
Looking at the M3's times below, I believe it was probably an SMG car that ran those slower times. SMG is faster than a 6-speed from a roll, but the 6-speed is faster from a stop. Also, those are the by far the *fastest* C2 times I've ever seen. It was great C2, with a great driver, on a great day.
Every article I've seen with the 6-speed M3 versus a 6-speed C2 has the running M3 faster, but yes, the are very close.
Car and Driver ran a M3 0-60 at 4.5 and the 1/4 mile in 13.1. A poster on M3 Forums has ran his stock M3 in the 1/4 mile at 12.72 @ 107 mph. He has time slips and two videos to prove it.
The cars are close enough that they will be driver and condition dependant, but the M3 still seems to win much more often than Porsche does.
This is just the opposite of what that moron ricer-boy said about the Porsche beating the M3 around a track or in a straight line every time. That's what he gets for not learning more about cars before he speaks I guess.
12-11-2003, 05:03 PM
#83
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay, look...I appreciate that you like both cars...but they are *not* close enough to be a driver's race. The M3 is an entire second faster in the 1/4 mile than a 350Z with driver's being equal. Do you know how much that is? If you really beat a E46 M3, than he wasn't racing. Your statement is about as stupid as me saying that a M3 versus a Z06 or a Cobra is a driver's race. It isn't. And it would be stupid for me to say so. Those cars are a *lot* faster than mine, just like a E46 M3 is *lot* faster than a stock 350Z. Now if you say a SRT-4 or a 330Ci is a driver's race than you'd be correct.
Now as much as I like the 350Z, please stay away from fantasy land when discussing it's performance capabilities. It does your argument no good whatsoever.
Now as much as I like the 350Z, please stay away from fantasy land when discussing it's performance capabilities. It does your argument no good whatsoever.
Originally posted by TXSTYLE
Actually........I don't give a rat's ***** what mags say, stats, etc. I've seen waaaay too many discrepencies by magazine editors/drivers. And allot of them are Fat ***** anyway. I've lost to and beaten E46 M3's (from a start and on the highway). It's a complete DRIVERS RACE whether you wish to acknowledge it or not. Maybe you haven't come across a 350Z owner who can drive...
At any rate...."It's all good!" They are both GREAT cars and serve their functions well to their drivers.
Actually........I don't give a rat's ***** what mags say, stats, etc. I've seen waaaay too many discrepencies by magazine editors/drivers.
And allot of them are Fat ***** anyway. I've lost to and beaten E46 M3's (from a start and on the highway). It's a complete DRIVERS RACE whether you wish to acknowledge it or not. Maybe you haven't come across a 350Z owner who can drive...At any rate...."It's all good!" They are both GREAT cars and serve their functions well to their drivers.
Last edited by M-Phibian; 12-11-2003 at 05:05 PM.
12-11-2003, 05:05 PM
#84
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You make yourself look more like a moron with every single post. What are you, 15 or 16?
Originally posted by topdaytrader
LOL.... your mom needs to spend more money on your education ...
LOL.... your mom needs to spend more money on your education ...
12-11-2003, 05:14 PM
#85
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The GYM!
Posts: 9,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yet another TROLLMEISTER fouled up yet another thread...
You know individuals like you are truly L O S T when you attempt to tell others what they have witnessed with their OWN eyes and which you were NOT present.
The BEST you could say would be, "I haven't PERSONALLY seen a 350Z that could beat me or even hang......But that's just me."
Ahhhhhh....Modesty is very unbecoming of you Young Grasshopper...
You know individuals like you are truly L O S T when you attempt to tell others what they have witnessed with their OWN eyes and which you were NOT present.
The BEST you could say would be, "I haven't PERSONALLY seen a 350Z that could beat me or even hang......But that's just me."
Ahhhhhh....Modesty is very unbecoming of you Young Grasshopper...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post