Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Say hey to the Z35

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2013 | 04:11 PM
  #61  
pyshin's Avatar
pyshin
New Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 75
From: socal
Default

Name:  t8zvc.gif
Views: 20
Size:  1.08 MB

Insert Cheat Code Here (aka click here stuart)
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2013 | 06:03 PM
  #62  
MrRon's Avatar
MrRon
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Highland, CA
Default

They need to keep the V6 and make that turbo'd
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 07:39 AM
  #63  
stuartc323's Avatar
stuartc323
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Default


How i felt with that link

Name:  DNO3a.gif
Views: 18
Size:  1.54 MB
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 11:48 AM
  #64  
dragonfire6's Avatar
dragonfire6
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 256
Likes: 3
From: sunny fla
Default ...

Am I the only one ok with the idea of a turbo 4?? I love the VQ but always ventured into the "Forced Induction" forum just to dream about blow-off valves and boost controllers...

I think it would be nice to be turbo'd straight from the factory WITH a warranty in the same HP range as the Z currently has, right?!?!?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 11:55 AM
  #65  
Syner's Avatar
Syner
New Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 22,798
Likes: 829
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by dragonfire6
Am I the only one ok with the idea of a turbo 4?? I love the VQ but always ventured into the "Forced Induction" forum just to dream about blow-off valves and boost controllers...

I think it would be nice to be turbo'd straight from the factory WITH a warranty in the same HP range as the Z currently has, right?!?!?
Why the eff would you want to go FI 4 if you wouldn't gain anything over the current NA 6? Just to say you have a turbo?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 12:00 PM
  #66  
pyshin's Avatar
pyshin
New Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 75
From: socal
Default

Originally Posted by stuartc323
How i felt with that link[/IMG]
LMAO YES.

Originally Posted by dragonfire6
Am I the only one ok with the idea of a turbo 4?? I love the VQ but always ventured into the "Forced Induction" forum just to dream about blow-off valves and boost controllers...

I think it would be nice to be turbo'd straight from the factory WITH a warranty in the same HP range as the Z currently has, right?!?!?
I understand what you're trying to say but you do realize that most powertrain warranties from a manufacturer are null&void once aftermarket modifications are installed?

I'm not saying something as simple as a SRI (Short Ram Intake), but an in-line MBC (Manual Boost Controller) to raise boost would be more than enough reason for a dealer to not honor warranty because the car comes from factory with a stock setup and they could blame the additional boost easily causing problems if any arise.

Please correct me if I'm wrong but I've seen cases like this with a couple factory FI vehicles (WRX's*)

Last edited by pyshin; Aug 30, 2013 at 12:21 PM. Reason: Correction by l2iceman
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 12:05 PM
  #67  
l2iceman's Avatar
l2iceman
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, Canada
Default

The S2K was never offered with an FI engine from factory as a dealer option.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 12:05 PM
  #68  
dragonfire6's Avatar
dragonfire6
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 256
Likes: 3
From: sunny fla
Default

Originally Posted by Syner
Why the eff would you want to go FI 4 if you wouldn't gain anything over the current NA 6? Just to say you have a turbo?
If it has the close to the same torque output, I'd be ok with that... One of the main complaints in the FI forum is reliability so hopefully that wouldn't be an issue with an engine designed for a turbo... Also, it might be easier & cheaper to make power from that engine...

They should just throw a turbo on the V6 and make everyone happy!
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 12:17 PM
  #69  
Syner's Avatar
Syner
New Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 22,798
Likes: 829
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by dragonfire6
If it has the close to the same torque output, I'd be ok with that... One of the main complaints in the FI forum is reliability so hopefully that wouldn't be an issue with an engine designed for a turbo... Also, it might be easier & cheaper to make power from that engine...

They should just throw a turbo on the V6 and make everyone happy!
There is way more maintenance with FI. I would rather have a high output naturally aspirated engine. But that's just me
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 12:23 PM
  #70  
pyshin's Avatar
pyshin
New Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 75
From: socal
Default

Originally Posted by l2iceman
The S2K was never offered with an FI engine from factory as a dealer option.
I stand corrected (edited original post) but the rest of what I'm stating is true... Manufacturers and their respected dealerships are very strict about modifications to factory FI engines because they are more maintenance to begin with.

Last edited by pyshin; Aug 30, 2013 at 12:24 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 12:53 PM
  #71  
stuartc323's Avatar
stuartc323
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by dragonfire6
Am I the only one ok with the idea of a turbo 4?? I love the VQ but always ventured into the "Forced Induction" forum just to dream about blow-off valves and boost controllers...

I think it would be nice to be turbo'd straight from the factory WITH a warranty in the same HP range as the Z currently has, right?!?!?

No an engine that is turboed for a mass produced sports car will not be the same performance as one that costs wayyyy more. For two a N/A high output v6 would provide a better experience, and less maintenance, and be cheaper to produce.

Originally Posted by dragonfire6
If it has the close to the same torque output, I'd be ok with that... One of the main complaints in the FI forum is reliability so hopefully that wouldn't be an issue with an engine designed for a turbo... Also, it might be easier & cheaper to make power from that engine...

They should just throw a turbo on the V6 and make everyone happy!
The torque wont be as responsive as an N/A model. now if they decide to drop the GTR engine in the Z, and create a new engine for the GTR, than they will be in business.

Originally Posted by pyshin
I stand corrected (edited original post) but the rest of what I'm stating is true... Manufacturers and their respected dealerships are very strict about modifications to factory FI engines because they are more maintenance to begin with.

+1 ^
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #72  
dragonfire6's Avatar
dragonfire6
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 256
Likes: 3
From: sunny fla
Default ...

I get your points but I'm just saying, I wouldn't be opposed to the idea at all. I have always wanted a turbo but didn't want the hassle of an aftermarket kit.

I would think/hope/wish/dream that Nismo would jump on board and they would give the Z their own treatment.

***The Nismo Stage 1 Boost Package gives you 76hp and 62 ft-lbs of torque just by a ECU retune, Nismo exhaust and intake.***

A guy can dream, right?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 01:42 PM
  #73  
stuartc323's Avatar
stuartc323
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Default

That would be a great option, but not to be competitive as a Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, or even Hyundai right now. Turbo inline 4s are for Subarus, Mazda, and Mitsubishis and all those engines have a myriad of problems when your start modding
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 03:51 PM
  #74  
calidrew909's Avatar
calidrew909
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: ontario cali
Default

why not make it a v8 lul
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 03:53 PM
  #75  
stuartc323's Avatar
stuartc323
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Default

That would be so cleannnn ^
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2013 | 08:45 AM
  #76  
KonnyFace350z's Avatar
KonnyFace350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by calidrew909
why not make it a v8 lul

F**k yeah V8!!
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2013 | 01:43 PM
  #77  
gogriz91's Avatar
gogriz91
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Middle GA
Default

How about RB power? Update with modern engine management and a huge aftermarket parts bin already exists, that's what this anemic proposal needs. If the FRS/BRZ is any indicator, going low on the displacement will be a losing proposition.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2013 | 09:35 PM
  #78  
calidrew909's Avatar
calidrew909
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: ontario cali
Default

all i know is that my next car is going to be an evo X MR currently have an 07 6mt base 350z still owe 13000 and my monthly payments are 300 a month so i still got some time with the car
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2013 | 11:09 PM
  #79  
DarkCreep's Avatar
DarkCreep
New Member
10 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 762
Likes: 18
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

I like how there are so many people in this thread thinking that the article and concept came directly from Nissan, and not Motor Trend and their "insider", which could be the janitor.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2013 | 08:09 AM
  #80  
stuartc323's Avatar
stuartc323
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Default

LOL people cant read
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rev_Night
Wheels & Tires
30
Nov 7, 2020 06:00 PM
Jambo016
New Owners
27
Sep 16, 2016 01:08 PM
Depravity
Brakes & Suspension
14
Oct 1, 2015 04:49 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:37 PM.