Im willing to bet that either that 13.1@109 350z isn't stock or that it was run in perfect conditions (-DA).You can come to that conclusion from just looking at the 1/4 times on this site or friends trap speeds. The majority are trapping 104-105 bone stock and then a big spike to 109 lol. Your not gaining 4 mph without help.Its the same argument about the 10 sec z06s records that was run in (-2500 DA) with 128mph traps (ranger, furman) at MIR.

 

WHO CARES?!?! Quit measuring dicks. This is the most childish crap I have ever seen.

 

They still happen and I won't ignore a 12 second slip from a 370Z if the DA is negative either. Just how it works in the drag racing world...records are held by great drivers who run at great tracks with great weather.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0xZs...eature=channel

 

Yes because multiple times showing all splits, times and MPH that add up perfectly is not proof at all....hmm, looks more to me that you have nothing else to focus on so you keep trying push an arguement that makes no sense. My times are valid, use half your brain and check them out. There is no reason to be making up times on a car when Im only claiming times that the car is supposed to run. If I were claiming I ran high 12's or something of the sort, I could see calling BS then, but fact is Im claiming normal times and providing the numbers and splits to back them up. Thats more than enough proof!

 

Just clarifying to those that might think those runs are Normal. The majority of tracks are not coming close to (-2500 DA). So when you are comparing times you have to bring that into the discussion. Their are people that think a z06 is a 10 sec car in which it isn't, only in non normal air(-2500 DA).I think ranger ran a 11.0 in a stock zr1 with 760 DA (MIR). Yet i don't think anyone will say that a z06 is faster then a zr1.

 

In the TIMESLIP world, it isn't enough. Go read what is required to have valid times posted on this site. You need to post an actual timeslip. It isn't that hard to take a picture of your timeslip so what is the problem?

 

Mine is bigger...

 

Mine is smaller than 370z folks.

 

timesplits lol....
Simply put, there are two sides of the argument and both are easy to understand. No one is arguing that the 370 should be a faster car than the 350. It has more power and weighs the same, plus its geared more aggressively. The fact of the matter is that no one has really pushed the car to see just how fast it can be on a track with the right conditions. Right now people are speculating just how fast this car can be. Stock for stock, it may be marginally quicker than the HR 350 and i'm sure it is. Until then, STFU. Whats the point in bench racing? Oh, and to the stupid Phuq that said the Veyron is slower than a yugo or something, look up the times, there are timeSLIPS for both.

 

I don't see anything. Did I miss it?

 

I don't see anything. Did I miss it?

 

I don't see anything. Did I miss it?

 

^^ I know right...still waiting on it.

 

LOL. I will get my first social security check before seeing time slips from the magazine racers.

 

+1

Although, I think a 370 engine & transmission in a 350 would be a winner

 

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AWYBoTCWSok&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AWYBoTCWSok&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Same guy also ran a 13.3. Says its his first time ever at a drag strip.

So who knows. Let the dick measuring continue.

 

Why? The 370 body is an upgrade from the 350! While the 350 is very solid, the whole purpose of the 370 was to improve upon it. It's lighter, the suspension and handling is better. Unless the body styling of the 350 is just your personal preference there would be no other reason to want that engine in the 350 body.

 

The only thing I really wish the 370 still had from the 350 was the heavier clutch. The new clutch in the 370 is so light and soft I don't like it at all. It's what made me go AT over MT.

 

+1, you would have a great looking car with a nice motor and Rev matching. Sounds like a winner to me.

 

That's news to me. The 350z is lighter than the 370z as per C&D shows. My NISMO with all the body work and extra reinforcement, big wheels, etc weighed 3350. And handling only better than the normal 350z not the NISMO. But the NISMO 370z will be bad a$$ :P

Car and driver
0-60 4.6 sec
1/4 13.1 @108
3368 lbs
Auto tranny