Notices
Audio & Video 350Z Mobile entertainment and other electronics

OEM Navigation "System Start Up" Message

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 03:08 PM
  #1  
nyguy4u's Avatar
nyguy4u
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Lake George, NY
Default OEM Navigation "System Start Up" Message

Is there any way to disable the need to always hit "I agree" when starting your Z? It really becomes a nuisance.

Also, while on the OEM Nav subject, will the DVD-ROM drive behind the drivers seat also play regular DVD's?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #2  
Spike100's Avatar
Spike100
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 204
From: Edina, Minnesota
Default

^^ No and No.

--Spike
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #3  
DelayedZ's Avatar
DelayedZ
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 1
From: LBI, NJ
Default

Yes, kptechnologies sells a bypass that automatically hits ok, and no you can't play regular dvd's.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #4  
shkr's Avatar
shkr
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

I believe KPTechnologies has something that'll do this. It's listed as "Navigation OK Bypass"

http://www.kptechnologies.com/
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 06:33 PM
  #5  
Spike100's Avatar
Spike100
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 204
From: Edina, Minnesota
Default

Interesting... Does the patch work with all OEM Clarion DVD Navigation software versions?

--Spike
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #6  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

The KPtechnologies unit will also allow you to program the navi system while moving!
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #7  
ny garbage_juice's Avatar
ny garbage_juice
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,251
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
Default

lazy a$$ motherfckers lol
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #8  
Spike100's Avatar
Spike100
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 204
From: Edina, Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
The KPtechnologies unit will also allow you to program the navi system while moving!
Does your company carry good product liability insurance?

I wonder if bypassing/defeating a manufacturer's safety feature may place you (and possibly the user) at risk.

--Spike
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #9  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Programming navigation units while moving is perfectly legal.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 05:59 PM
  #10  
Spike100's Avatar
Spike100
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 204
From: Edina, Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
Programming navigation units while moving is perfectly legal.
Yes, it is legal, but legal and liable are not the same. For example, in Minnesota we can still hold a cell phone and talk into it while driving. But if you are involved in an accident, the first thing checked is your cell phone record. If your cell phone was in use during the crash, you are “cooked.”

Garmin has a “safe” feature that you can defeat. But, doing this exposes you to significant liability in the case of an accident.

I’m pointing this out so that members here are aware that defeating a safety feature can result in significant liability and exposure.

--Spike
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 06:04 PM
  #11  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

So then, after you are "cooked" are you going to sue the maker of the cell phone?

To answer your question, we currently carry no product liability insurance at all. We feel that a company structured like ours (LLC) that is barely profitable on paper has no need for such insurance. If someone does decide to sue they will quickly learn that the company has nothing to sue for.

Last edited by KPierson; Apr 14, 2008 at 06:08 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #12  
Spike100's Avatar
Spike100
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 204
From: Edina, Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
So then, after you are "cooked" are you going to sue the maker of the cell phone?
Cell phones are a very different case than aftermarket offerings designed to bypass safety features on devices. And... you know that.

--Spike
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #13  
Spike100's Avatar
Spike100
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 204
From: Edina, Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
So then, after you are "cooked" are you going to sue the maker of the cell phone?

To answer your question, we currently carry no product liability insurance at all. We feel that a company structured like ours (LLC) that is barely profitable on paper has no need for such insurance. If someone does decide to sue they will quickly learn that the company has nothing to sue for.
I notice you did an EDIT, adding the following to your original message: “To answer your question, we currently carry no product liability insurance at all. We feel that a company structured like ours (LLC) that is barely profitable on paper has no need for such insurance. If someone does decide to sue they will quickly learn that the company has nothing to sue for.”
Are you really saying your company isn’t worth anything?! Does that attitude extend to your products?

--Spike
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 02:24 AM
  #14  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
Cell phones are a very different case than aftermarket offerings designed to bypass safety features on devices. And... you know that.

--Spike
When driving a distraction is a distraction, especially when dealing with liability. In several states it is illegal to talk on a cell phone while driving, proving that certain groups of people have identified cell phones as having significant potential to cause accidents.

To my knowledge there are no states that have banned front forward video devices as long as they are used solely for GPS based navigation or the operation of integrated onboard systems, like A/C or radio controls.

I do realize there is some liability present, but there is a certain degree of liability with anything you do.

Last edited by KPierson; Apr 15, 2008 at 02:33 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 02:32 AM
  #15  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
Are you really saying your company isn’t worth anything?! Does that attitude extend to your products?

--Spike
That's not what I said at all. I said on PAPER our company isn't worth enough for someone to spend the time and money to sue for product liability. With an LLC structure there is a layer of protection between business assets and personal assets. To keep our products priced as low as possible we have very limited overhead, meaning we have very limited business assets.

We've been in business for almost 5 years, and we've grown every year so obviously we're doing something right.

Do some research on our company on the internet and you'll struggle to find any negative comments about any one of our products or customer service. All of are products are designed and manufactured in the USA using high end components to survive the harsh environment found in automobiles. We offer "no questions asked" warranties on all our products and stellar customer service from pre-sale to post installation.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 05:29 PM
  #16  
Spike100's Avatar
Spike100
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 204
From: Edina, Minnesota
Default

Kevin,

I am very familiar with LLC’s. In fact that is how I structured my software company so that I protect my personal assets in case a client decides to bring a suit against the company. Unfortunately, it really has little to do with product liability and doesn’t always protect the owners or its officers in egregious cases.

I should also mention that your products enjoy very favorable reviews for both price and features. You provide exceptional devices that perform as advertized. That is exactly why I question your statement: “We feel that a company structured like ours (LLC) that is barely profitable on paper has no need for such insurance.”

Your statement is true: “To my knowledge there are no states that have banned front forward video devices as long as they are used solely for GPS based navigation or the operation of integrated onboard systems, like A/C or radio controls.”

But, I would add that when one major manufacturer decides to add a safety feature, it becomes an issue when an aftermarket supplier decides to defeat this. Automobile companies have already seen this problem and dealt with it by establishing standards for viewing angle, “safe mode” operation, etc.

Personally I dislike these efforts to “protect us from ourselves.” One glaring example is the “safe mode” operation where you are unable to reset your route without stopping the car when you hit something like a detour. A device with good application software allows the driver to do this safely. Taking the argument to another level: What about the case when you have a passenger onboard who runs the GPS (and of course, makes operation totally safe)?

You and I are on the same page for this point. I think your product is very legitimate and useful. I was only pointing out the fact that abusing this can possibly place the user in harm’s way.

--Spike
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 11:41 PM
  #17  
Bary626's Avatar
Bary626
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
So then, after you are "cooked" are you going to sue the maker of the cell phone?

To answer your question, we currently carry no product liability insurance at all. We feel that a company structured like ours (LLC) that is barely profitable on paper has no need for such insurance. If someone does decide to sue they will quickly learn that the company has nothing to sue for.


I hear ya!

It's about time in the USA people take responsibility for their actions.
Meaning: if the low-lifes want to view their phones & Navs. they get what they deserve!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
Jan 2, 2022 12:58 PM
Justin100
Intake Exhaust
26
Nov 29, 2015 03:58 PM
350Z Project X
Suspension
9
Oct 10, 2015 09:23 AM
nanotech
Exhaust
6
Oct 2, 2015 05:02 AM
codek
Intake Exhaust
11
Sep 28, 2015 03:03 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:15 PM.