Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

Question for those who autocross 350Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2009 | 06:20 AM
  #1  
zcar_dad's Avatar
zcar_dad
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Default Question for those who autocross 350Z

Got front and rear adjustible camber arms for Christmas. My 2007 Z is not lowered. Any suggestions on how much negative camber and toe in to set for autocrossing? Thanks
Old 02-05-2009 | 06:43 AM
  #2  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

Try stock first and mod from there? It all depends on your total suspension setup I believe.
Old 02-05-2009 | 06:48 AM
  #3  
AznSky's Avatar
AznSky
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

I'm kind of interested too to see what ppl run as I'll probably be getting suspension sometime this year.
Old 02-05-2009 | 07:11 AM
  #4  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 28,801
Likes: 2,338
From: Sin City
Default

1.5 to 2 front and 2 rear. I would wait to install for when you get your suspension
Old 02-05-2009 | 12:05 PM
  #5  
zcar_dad's Avatar
zcar_dad
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Default

Originally Posted by terrasmak
1.5 to 2 front and 2 rear. I would wait to install for when you get your suspension
I have Hotchkiss sway bars with adjustible end links and Stillan chassis braces. Don't want to do coilovers just yet.
Old 02-05-2009 | 01:57 PM
  #6  
julian's Avatar
julian
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: redondo beach, ca
Default

put more negative in the front than the rear. -2.5 front, -1.5 rear. 0 toe in front. 0 or slight toe in in rear
Old 06-12-2009 | 07:44 PM
  #7  
Peak350's Avatar
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
From: DeLand, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by julian
put more negative in the front than the rear. -2.5 front, -1.5 rear. 0 toe in front. 0 or slight toe in in rear
You probably like a looser car (I do as well).

I have ~2.7 front, 2.0 rear, and am very happy with how it drives. With 2.2 front it doesn't feel like enough, with 3.2 it feels like too much.
Old 06-15-2009 | 08:59 AM
  #8  
ldstang50's Avatar
ldstang50
Registered User
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: ct
Default

What it ultimately comes down in tires. A grippier tire will cause more body thus meaning you need more negative camber. Size tire is also something to consider as with roll stiffness. Hotchkiss bars will help with roll, but you still have stock springs/shocks. If you auto-x, the control arms (I believe) will put you in SSM
Old 06-15-2009 | 09:45 AM
  #9  
guitarist's Avatar
guitarist
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

I'm pretty sure the 2009 rules allow control arms in BSP. But without a very expensive build up (like Peter Umino's old car) you're not going to be competitive in BSP either.

As for the OP's original question: I'd start at 2.0 negative camber in the front and 1.5 in the back and go from there based on tire temps, tire wear, and handling attributes. Test'n'tune, test'n'tune until the budget is gone or the setup is right.
Old 06-15-2009 | 06:47 PM
  #10  
Z1NONLY's Avatar
Z1NONLY
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 95
From: SW Fl
Default

My car ended up with -1.6 front and -2.2 rear, 1/8" toe out front and 1/8" toe in rear. (after my RSR Ti2000 springs)

I "run what I brung" at the track, but my car spends most of its time in the garage, so I wouldn't call it a DD.

That being said the weekend fun drives / occasional road trips / lots of autoX results in close-to-even tire wear.

The rear could use just a little less -camber though.

That's just a tire wear perspective though. I think another 1/2 degree of neg camber up front might make her a little faster, but I have yet to test that theory. (Too cheap/ lazy for A-arms.)

Last edited by Z1NONLY; 06-15-2009 at 07:07 PM.
Old 06-15-2009 | 07:21 PM
  #11  
Peak350's Avatar
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
From: DeLand, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by guitarist
I'm pretty sure the 2009 rules allow control arms in BSP. But without a very expensive build up (like Peter Umino's old car) you're not going to be competitive in BSP either.

As for the OP's original question: I'd start at 2.0 negative camber in the front and 1.5 in the back and go from there based on tire temps, tire wear, and handling attributes. Test'n'tune, test'n'tune until the budget is gone or the setup is right.
You can run control arms in BSP, and I think there is a street tire class pending for the Z (was talking about it yesterday with a local S2000 guy who runs regionals/nationals) so that could be fun.

Camber arms are allowed, however, only uppers, and you can't go with the SPL arms (legally, locally the guys I'm running said they don't care, they'll beat me regardless, but I still asked) because of the bushing material rules. You can't go to a different ratio of bushing material to metal than factory, which means for good arms, cusco more or less.


Edit, and to follow up, I still have understeer with -2.7 degrees of camber front, I set my front shocks stiffer to keep roll down, and stiffened the rear a ton and it helped, but I still think (looking at tire wear and handling characteristics, had no pyrometer) I might move to 3.2 for the next event.

Car could use sway bars though.

Last edited by Peak350; 06-15-2009 at 07:24 PM.
Old 06-17-2009 | 08:21 AM
  #12  
ldstang50's Avatar
ldstang50
Registered User
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: ct
Default

Thats good to know. I might do that for next season.
The z is excluded from the street tire class. The only z that is close to eligible is the vert. But the engine size is too large. Yet again, the z gets screwed.

http://scca.com/newsarticle.aspx?hub=3&news=3629
Old 06-17-2009 | 03:00 PM
  #13  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Originally Posted by Peak350
You can run control arms in BSP, and I think there is a street tire class pending for the Z (was talking about it yesterday with a local S2000 guy who runs regionals/nationals) so that could be fun.

Camber arms are allowed, however, only uppers, and you can't go with the SPL arms (legally, locally the guys I'm running said they don't care, they'll beat me regardless, but I still asked) because of the bushing material rules. You can't go to a different ratio of bushing material to metal than factory, which means for good arms, cusco more or less.


Edit, and to follow up, I still have understeer with -2.7 degrees of camber front, I set my front shocks stiffer to keep roll down, and stiffened the rear a ton and it helped, but I still think (looking at tire wear and handling characteristics, had no pyrometer) I might move to 3.2 for the next event.

Car could use sway bars though.
I can't believe you have all that camber nonsense with stock sway bars!
Old 06-17-2009 | 04:34 PM
  #14  
Peak350's Avatar
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
From: DeLand, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by scotts300
I can't believe you have all that camber nonsense with stock sway bars!
The transitional stability and roll was pretty well controlled. Shocks-springs-alignment- then sways. It's the way I was taught to set up a car.
Old 06-17-2009 | 09:18 PM
  #15  
PDX_Racer's Avatar
PDX_Racer
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 60
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by ldstang50
Thats good to know. I might do that for next season.
The z is excluded from the street tire class. The only z that is close to eligible is the vert. But the engine size is too large. Yet again, the z gets screwed.

http://scca.com/newsarticle.aspx?hub=3&news=3629
Don't be too certain about that restriction. There are other cars on the list of "allowed" cars that are faster in stock form than the Z.
Old 06-18-2009 | 06:36 AM
  #16  
guitarist's Avatar
guitarist
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

Originally Posted by PDX_Racer
Don't be too certain about that restriction. There are other cars on the list of "allowed" cars that are faster in stock form than the Z.
It seems pretty clear that they've ruled out the Z:

- Engine displacements up to 2.8-liters

Unless you're saying they will change the rules to let it in at some point in future. But that seems unlikely given the cars already in the class.
Old 06-18-2009 | 08:09 AM
  #17  
Peak350's Avatar
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
From: DeLand, Florida
Default

They should look into it. Local clubs have very popular street tire classes. A club I've been running with has a street mod street tire class that gets 1/3 of the days entries.
Old 06-18-2009 | 02:54 PM
  #18  
guitman32's Avatar
guitman32
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 108
From: South FL
Default

Originally Posted by Peak350
Edit, and to follow up, I still have understeer with -2.7 degrees of camber front, I set my front shocks stiffer to keep roll down, and stiffened the rear a ton and it helped, but I still think (looking at tire wear and handling characteristics, had no pyrometer) I might move to 3.2 for the next event.

Car could use sway bars though.
Yea it sounds like you need a rear bar to dial out that understeer. I would try dialing down the front shock stiffness also. And all this before paying for another alignment definitely (unless you set your camber yourself )
Old 06-18-2009 | 03:38 PM
  #19  
Peak350's Avatar
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
From: DeLand, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by guitman32
Yea it sounds like you need a rear bar to dial out that understeer. I would try dialing down the front shock stiffness also. And all this before paying for another alignment definitely (unless you set your camber yourself )
SPL arms use shims. The toe doesn't really get messed with (much) when you adjust, and the shims are measured.

My alignment was done at 3.2, I was thinking that was near 2.5 before I went in.
Old 06-18-2009 | 08:14 PM
  #20  
PDX_Racer's Avatar
PDX_Racer
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 60
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by guitarist
It seems pretty clear that they've ruled out the Z:

- Engine displacements up to 2.8-liters

Unless you're saying they will change the rules to let it in at some point in future. But that seems unlikely given the cars already in the class.
Why not? The S2000 is classed far faster than the Miata,


Quick Reply: Question for those who autocross 350Z



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 AM.