Notices
Buying/Leasing 350Z/370Z Purchasing Info

I'm a 66 year old Boxster S owner considering a 350Z

Old Sep 16, 2008 | 04:12 AM
  #61  
El PreZidente's Avatar
El PreZidente
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default

I can't really comment on the reliability since I pretty much just bought the car, but I had an '03 a few years back, which I liked a lot, but which had some problems that got in the way of really enjoying the car.

I did a lot of research on the '07+ before I picked mine up ('08 Enthusiast), and there really don't seem to be any, as compared to the earlier years. Perhaps the clutch slave cylinder, and from what I have read, the power steering can be overwhelmed on tight/short courses like most Autocross courses. For general day-to-day driving I don't think either of these are a problem, but might require modifications that will bump you out of the Stock classes at Autocross.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 04:48 AM
  #62  
IB Systems's Avatar
IB Systems
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

get a Nismo and then the handling will be just as good if not better!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 05:14 AM
  #63  
primo79's Avatar
primo79
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
From: O-Town
Default

^^^^+1
btw when i grow older I wanna b like u young at heart!!!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 05:34 AM
  #64  
MikeyG's Avatar
MikeyG
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by Spike100
^^ Why worry about 2006 models since you have a full manufacturer's warranty?

--Spike
Because their fix (engine replacement) is luck of the draw if it works. Also a lot of engines took quite a while before they start to consume. If a replacement takes a while to consume and you are now out of warrenty, then have fun with the $8000 bill for the new engine.

ps. I just started another oil consumption test on my 06 and this would be my second engine replacement.

I would go for 07-08 for the HR engine. Little better performace stock. Also if you are not going to mod and are going to do autox or track days, I would go with the nismo.

I use my 06Z as a daily driver 3 seasons and love it. Only porsche I have driven is an 07 Carerra 4S so I can't comment on the difference in driving experience between the 2.

Welcome to the forum
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 06:58 AM
  #65  
Concave's Avatar
Concave
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: You
Default

How can you say no to this?

Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 07:02 AM
  #66  
jmark's Avatar
jmark
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,932
Likes: 2
From: Greer, S.C.
Default

Originally Posted by IB Systems
get a Nismo and then the handling will be just as good if not better!
Word.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOP-r...eature=related
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 07:34 AM
  #67  
SpoilsofWar's Avatar
SpoilsofWar
Registered User
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 1
From: Way North, New York
Default

Haha..... Boxter.

Is there any performance marketed car out there that offers less bang for the buck?

My car with everything I've done to it probably ended up costing about the same or maybe slightly more then a Boxter S all said, but on the track it will make the Porsche driver remember that he's driving the girly Porsche real quick

+1 to the Nismo. Buy it, redeem your manhood.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 07:37 AM
  #68  
Demon Z's Avatar
Demon Z
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: miles away
Default

Cool vid. But I drove a Nismo Z last year and I didn't think the ride was harsh at all, like the dude in that video suggests. It is a sports car, though. What do people expect? A floaty, disconnected ride?

Edit: Welcome to the forum, OP. Good thing you're >20 years old.

Last edited by Demon Z; Sep 16, 2008 at 08:00 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #69  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by dennisafrompa
...BUT please continue. I really do like this car...looking for personal reviews.

Once again, I do not wish this to be a Boxster/350Z comparo...just tell me how you use your car i.e. daily driver, track, autox etc. and how it holds up.

For me it will be used all three ways, as I did the Boxster.

It will be the coupe version too.
I use my car as you do with yours....except i DRIFT mainly and AUTO'X quite often....

I love the Z for its ability to do both well.... pics..

hope you get one and enjoy it...

- J
Attached Thumbnails I'm a 66 year old Boxster S owner considering a 350Z-dsc_0551-large-.jpg   I'm a 66 year old Boxster S owner considering a 350Z-cover.jpg   I'm a 66 year old Boxster S owner considering a 350Z-cimg0121.jpg   I'm a 66 year old Boxster S owner considering a 350Z-cimg0079.jpg   I'm a 66 year old Boxster S owner considering a 350Z-img_4500.jpg  

Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 07:58 AM
  #70  
Old Chuck's Avatar
Old Chuck
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Florida, SC
Default Dennis, I too am concerned

About the 987 and 997. I have been on Pete's board for some time as well as looking here because like you, I do not want to end up with large repair bill and do not want to give cash to a company that will not stand behind and own up to a known design problem. You deserve more. I do love the 987S and it is enough to meet my needs such as great handling and five second or less 0-60 but for the money the Z is hard to beat. I keep coming back to the best bang for the buck which is the Z. May wait till the 2010 comes out to see if the reports are correct in the weight coming down to around 3100 and the HP increase with the 3.7. From what I have found is that the reliability in later model Z's have been good. I would and will look seriously at the Z. Love all porsches but really concerned that the engine would fail and the constant worry would make ownership less then ideal....
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 08:05 AM
  #71  
Concave's Avatar
Concave
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: You
Default

Originally Posted by SpoilsofWar
Haha..... Boxter.

Is there any performance marketed car out there that offers less bang for the buck?

My car with everything I've done to it probably ended up costing about the same or maybe slightly more then a Boxter S all said, but on the track it will make the Porsche driver remember that he's driving the girly Porsche real quick

+1 to the Nismo. Buy it, redeem your manhood.
lol no offense but you sound like a civic kid who says the exact same thing.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #72  
Kushtech's Avatar
Kushtech
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: newport beach, california
Default

why not just wait a couple more weeks and get the 370z
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 08:27 AM
  #73  
konaforever's Avatar
konaforever
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Kushtech
why not just wait a couple more weeks and get the 370z
Couple of weeks? It'll be out in the showroom, but it won't be available to be bought till sometime next year.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #74  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Boxters are cool cars, just unrealiable. I pass them in my NISMO 350Z at road courses all the time. The Z can handle very good, especially the NISMO.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 09:00 AM
  #75  
lemansz20's Avatar
lemansz20
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: miami,FL.
Default

Originally Posted by 3fittyBiH
"it ain't a Boxter"??? Are you trying to say that Boxster is better than the Z?? Please man, Z is better then the Boxster in every category. I have no respect for those froggy looking machines. You should buy yourself a real Porsche. No offense. But to answer your question, you should get an 05, its the one with least problems, or an 07+ if u can afford it. Try not to crash it ; )
YOU are an idiot sir, you have obviously no knowledge of cars what so ever. The Z is a great car, but so is the boxster. To say the boxster is not a porsche is just dumb, most knowlegdable people know that a mid engined car is WAY more balanced then front or rear. The boxsters quality is 10 times what the Z is, sorry but your comparing plastic interior to leather interiors. Theirs alot more to a car then just how fast it goes, dont try and compare porsche quality to a Z. I have had both a Z and a carrera s, and in NO way does the Z compare, sorry guys.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 09:17 AM
  #76  
jmark's Avatar
jmark
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,932
Likes: 2
From: Greer, S.C.
Default

Originally Posted by Demon Z
Cool vid. But I drove a Nismo Z last year and I didn't think the ride was harsh at all, like the dude in that video suggests. It is a sports car, though. What do people expect? A floaty, disconnected ride?

Edit: Welcome to the forum, OP. Good thing you're >20 years old.
I agree. The ride is great for the handling limits the car has.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #77  
j.arnaldo's Avatar
j.arnaldo
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
From: puerto rico
Thumbs up

Hey, dennis, I was thinking...Could you actually afford a super upgrade to a
GT-R?!!! THAT would be flamboyant AND G-R-E-A-T, at the same time!!!
(I wish I COULD!!!)

Last edited by j.arnaldo; Sep 16, 2008 at 10:15 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #78  
HDPDZO6's Avatar
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by SpoilsofWar
Haha..... Boxter.

Is there any performance marketed car out there that offers less bang for the buck?

My car with everything I've done to it probably ended up costing about the same or maybe slightly more then a Boxter S all said, but on the track it will make the Porsche driver remember that he's driving the girly Porsche real quick

+1 to the Nismo. Buy it, redeem your manhood.
Ricer logic... Comparing modded to stock.

You fail.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #79  
Blu_Blur's Avatar
Blu_Blur
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,261
Likes: 3
From: Cypress, TX (Houston)
Default

Originally Posted by Old Chuck
About the 987 and 997. I have been on Pete's board for some time as well as looking here because like you, I do not want to end up with large repair bill and do not want to give cash to a company that will not stand behind and own up to a known design problem. You deserve more. I do love the 987S and it is enough to meet my needs such as great handling and five second or less 0-60 but for the money the Z is hard to beat. I keep coming back to the best bang for the buck which is the Z. May wait till the 2010 comes out to see if the reports are correct in the weight coming down to around 3100 and the HP increase with the 3.7. From what I have found is that the reliability in later model Z's have been good. I would and will look seriously at the Z. Love all porsches but really concerned that the engine would fail and the constant worry would make ownership less then ideal....
Ofcourse not all cars are the same but: 2004 6MT VQ35DE Z, JUST recently passed 80,000 miles, 30,000+ of those miles turbocharged (current set-up at 400 bhp/ 380 tq), no tire feathering, no oil consumption, no mechanical problems. Has been a completely worry-free and totally reliable car (knocks on wood).

It was the 03's that really had the problems. Most of the 04's were fine.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #80  
HDPDZO6's Avatar
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Blu_Blur
Ofcourse not all cars are the same but: 2004 6MT VQ35DE Z, JUST recently passed 80,000 miles, 30,000+ of those miles turbocharged (current set-up at 400 bhp/ 380 tq), no tire feathering, no oil consumption, no mechanical problems. Has been a completely worry-free and totally reliable car (knocks on wood).

It was the 03's that really had the problems. Most of the 04's were fine.
My '04 only had 3 issues.

-Tire feathering (changing rims/tires solved that)
-Annoying rattle where drivers side windshield meets dashboard area
-Being a rock magnet on the freeway (not the car's fault)

Other than that, was a great car.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 AM.