Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

what to add to a new Z?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2005 | 03:13 PM
  #1  
craniumdesigns's Avatar
craniumdesigns
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Hayward, CA
Default what to add to a new Z?

hey guys,

i'm getting an enthusiast model auto in about a month. what engine mods are best to add without having to go F/I. and i'm assuming N/A means naturally aspirated? I want power, but i dont want to kill the engine life by adding F/I. thanks!

-steve
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #2  
overZealous1's Avatar
overZealous1
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 1
From: tigard oregon
Default

hate to burst your bubble, but i feel f/i is the only way to go on this car. your will end up spending as much if not more trying to do a healthy n/a car and still be far below one with f/i. take a look at some used units from forum members if you want to save even more money. f/i turned my car into a beast!!
but you can always just do a n2o set up and call it a day too!
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #3  
mario60185's Avatar
mario60185
Chicago Realtor
Premier Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 938
Likes: 1
From: chicago
Default

the search buton is very valuable here. use that youll find everything
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 03:34 PM
  #4  
craniumdesigns's Avatar
craniumdesigns
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Hayward, CA
Default

hmmm. but doesnt F/I like cut ur engine life in half? whats healthier? turbo or SC? i dont know much about engine specifics. help me out. thanks.
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #5  
overZealous1's Avatar
overZealous1
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 1
From: tigard oregon
Default

there are alot of write ups and comparisons on most all the turbo and supercharger kits and pro's and cons with them too from forum members. it really depends on how you drive your car or the amount of power you are looking for. all kits can be tuned either for more power or less if desired. the supercharger kits don't make boost quite as quickly but more linear in thier power delivery. while the turbos will generate max boost typically around 3000-3500. all kits (that i know of) come with a blow off valve, so most all the time you are normally driving, you will not even be seeing boost as it is being vented. but when you need it, just hammer it. guess longevity depends on your driving style.
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 03:47 PM
  #6  
GTNPU Z's Avatar
GTNPU Z
VERTEX Army CEO
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,408
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

ANY mod that you will put in your car that will increase the factory HP/TQ specs will reduce the life of your engine because the added stress. It differs on the type of mod you do, how you take care of you car, & how you drive your car. You can actually have a properly tuned FI car last longer than an un-modded car. Modding your car is personal preference so don't get swayed to what you personally are not comfortable with. You have to ask yourself first what your power goal is for your car, what you intend to do with the car (i.e. autox, drag, spirited daily driver) & how much money you want to put into it. As soon as you establish that, then you can focus on what aftermarket parts are best for you. Good luck & happy modding!
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 04:01 PM
  #7  
craniumdesigns's Avatar
craniumdesigns
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Hayward, CA
Default

i'm mostly going for "spirited DD". i just want a fun, fast car to drive back and froth from work, and something that looks sick.
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 04:53 PM
  #8  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by overZealous1
hate to burst your bubble, but i feel f/i is the only way to go on this car. your will end up spending as much if not more trying to do a healthy n/a car and still be far below one with f/i. take a look at some used units from forum members if you want to save even more money. f/i turned my car into a beast!!
but you can always just do a n2o set up and call it a day too!
I disagree. $4-5k in N/A mods will get you close to 300whp that is completely linear and way more reliable than any FI setup.
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #9  
Landbarger's Avatar
Landbarger
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: VPI
Default

You've already got that ("Spirited DD")

Last edited by Landbarger; May 7, 2005 at 05:09 PM.
Reply
Old May 8, 2005 | 01:07 AM
  #10  
craniumdesigns's Avatar
craniumdesigns
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Hayward, CA
Default

true.
Reply
Old May 8, 2005 | 05:53 AM
  #11  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by Armitage
I disagree. $4-5k in N/A mods will get you close to 300whp that is completely linear and way more reliable than any FI setup.

$5K broken down (for me)

$1000 greddy evo2 exhaust
$517 Crawford plenum and strut bar
$230 UR crank pulley
$200 Injen Intake
$380 Labree Resonated Tests
$430 Topspeed Headers with jet hot coating
$245 bored throttlebody
with $3000 spent, I dyno'd at 256.9 rwhp which is not high or low and I figure is about a 20 rwhp gain at peak. About where one would expect it to be.

I have since had my ECU flashed
$600 ECU flash
$3600 spent and I have yet to redyno, but I would guess maybe 5 hp at peak gaind with the flash, so now I am at say 263 rwhp. This is figuring you do all your own installs. If you paid for installs, you would be well over $5K and NOWHERE NEAR 300whp
The remaining $1400, in my situation, might get you cams installed so add in 15 hp at peak, which i think is possible with all my intake and exhaust breathing mods. so now I am at 287 rwhp and my $5K was spent entirely on parts and having a shop install ONLY the cams. And I am still not at 300 rwhp

Now, on the other hand, you could spend $5200-5800 on the ST kit from aps and put down 350-380 rwhp.
Reply
Old May 8, 2005 | 08:24 AM
  #12  
craniumdesigns's Avatar
craniumdesigns
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Hayward, CA
Default

what's the ST kit?
Reply
Old May 8, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #13  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by craniumdesigns
what's the ST kit?
Single turbo
LINK

There is a group buy going on, on the 'other' board for this kit
Reply
Old May 8, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #14  
craniumdesigns's Avatar
craniumdesigns
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Hayward, CA
Default

SICK! money money money though. the Z's gonna cost me enough on its own though. haha. we'll see how i like the stock Z. considering im driving a 96 civic with barely over 100 whp, i'm sure the Z will be a huge difference.
Reply
Old May 8, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #15  
ReavTek's Avatar
ReavTek
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

I would spend $30 and get Corkey Bell's Maximum Boost. It's a very informative book on turbochargers and you will learn ALOT. It covers every single aspect of having a turbo car. Knowledge is power my friend. I read the book about 75% through and will be finishing it this summer. As for my car, I will be staying NA. Simply because I can do it a little at a time. I know it will probably cost close to the cost of a turbo setup anyways but the ability to do it in $250, $500, or even $1000 chunks is the main appeal to me. Also, the VQ35DE is not a boost friendly car. I would not trust it unless I ran a SC at stock boost or built the motor. The HKS supercharger setup seems like a very reliable unit that doesn't need fooling around with but you are limited power wise (made for stock Z, excess mods will **** it off).
Reply
Old May 8, 2005 | 12:35 PM
  #16  
nizmoz's Avatar
nizmoz
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Can you tell me about waht you did to your throttle body please? I haven't seen that mod widely discussed. Are you running 93 Octane? We have 91 in AZ, un ortunately. Did you go with AAM for the re-flash?

I have an N/A car with NISMO CAI, Cams, Headers and Cat Back Exhuast. I am doing Plenum and Cats next and think I will go Kinetix. Thoughts on Kinetix?

Thanks...
Reply
Old May 8, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #17  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by nizmoz
Can you tell me about waht you did to your throttle body please? I haven't seen that mod widely discussed. Are you running 93 Octane? We have 91 in AZ, un ortunately. Did you go with AAM for the re-flash?

I have an N/A car with NISMO CAI, Cams, Headers and Cat Back Exhuast. I am doing Plenum and Cats next and think I will go Kinetix. Thoughts on Kinetix?

Thanks...
The throttle body will do little more than increase throttle response. It is onlya 2mm bore, but they modify the throttle plate and shaft to reduce drag. The modified shaft is where the 'gains' come from, not really the bore.

Contact http://www.proflowdesign.com/ for more info if you are interested

I would only go kinetix if you are getting their new SSV plenum. I wouldn't trust their regular plastic plenum. IMO, you are better off with a crawford cast or spend the $ on kinetix new style plenum.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
apex locator
Autocross/Road
10
Jul 23, 2021 02:27 AM
codek
Intake Exhaust
11
Sep 28, 2015 03:03 AM
B Esquire
Autocross/Road
0
Sep 24, 2015 07:52 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:35 AM.