When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I wont be able to scan the dyno untill monday, so ill tell the numbers then. Its untuned on 86 octane, JWT S7 cams, 9.1 compression, ebay headers, test pipes, PIT exhaust, homemade shortram intake. I found a stock Z on a mustang dyno gets about 210-220 to the wheels ( According to Gruppe S ).
Since i cant scan it untill monday ill let you guys speculate at my dyno numbers with my super low compression.
I wont be able to scan the dyno untill monday, so ill tell the numbers then. Its untuned on 86 octane, JWT S7 cams, 9.1 compression, ebay headers, test pipes, PIT exhaust, homemade shortram intake. I found a stock Z on a mustang dyno gets about 210-220 to the wheels ( According to Gruppe S ).
Since i cant scan it untill monday ill let you guys speculate at my dyno numbers with my super low compression.
hahaha thats funny. Just a little FYI to keep you guys tied over. The dyno was kinda broke cause it wouldn't do a load test. Soooo the numbers are gonna be about 15whp'ish lower is what the dyno guy said. Oh one more thing is his car was also running pretty rich. sorry rocks i had to spill the beans on that.
If it was done in simulation mode . Wouldnt have been reading a little higher than in the load mode ? There is less load put on the motor in the simulation mode .
The load part of the dyno was messed up so it couldnt use the proper load setting for my car, so he calculated it by hand of what it would be at the proper load.
No offence at all intended . But your probably better off not even posting it . It will get picked apart because the dyno wasnt working right and a calculation was done to come up with the numbers .
02-03-2007, 01:59 PM
Dynoed my car (revup with cams)
YOU BASTARD
