Sound Performance 350z Twin Turbo kit update!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 10, 2007 | 08:59 PM

#121

Chris@SP

Thread Starter

Sponsor
Sound Performance

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 301

Likes: 0

From: Bensenville, IL

Just buttoning up a few things, and we had a bunch of cars that had to get done last week.

I'm waiting on a couple of little odds and ends pieces that will be at the shop tomorrow! I have charlies dual billet fuel pump hanger ready to get dropped in tomorrow as well. I am pushing to get it on the dyno by Tuesday or Wed of this week

Numbers to come!

Chris

Jun 10, 2007 | 09:08 PM

#122

leeboyNY

Kimchi Eater

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 1,414

Likes: 1

From: Korea & SF

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA

Ever high center the car? I have an exhaust brace in a similar location (actually a bit higher then that on the drivers side) that has scrapped on speed bumps before. Not saying this kit isn't great as I think it is but there is definitely a risk of scraping that resevoir. Perhaps a splash/debris guard for it. LOL never thought I would be asking for a skid plate on a car...

I think you forgot that K-member frame covers up that oil reservoir. That k-member frame needs to be snapped in half in order to scrape the reservoir.. But if that k-member frame is snapped in half.. Engine would have sustained major damage or get T-boned in a huge accident.... so damaging the reservoir wouldn't be the first thing in owner's mind...

BTW, APS ST oil return system needs to be corrected just like that.. I sketched that setup on blank papers before I moved on the the TT setup...

I see that SP went with Mocal oil pump... I hope that's not as leaky prone as the APS's Weldon 9200 pump...

Last edited by leeboyNY; Jun 10, 2007 at 09:13 PM.

Jun 13, 2007 | 11:02 AM

#123

mjedens

Registered User

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 433

Likes: 0

From: Chattanooga, TN

subscribing!

Jun 16, 2007 | 10:15 AM

#124

centxdsm

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 12

Likes: 0

From: next door

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris@SP

Numbers to come!

Chris

Get on it Chris!

Jun 16, 2007 | 11:07 AM

#125

CodeRed30

Registered User

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 33

Likes: 0

From: Arizona

This might seem like a stupid question, but in comparison to your 1000whp Supras, is the Z going to have a little more kick in the midrange or any less lag?

Jun 16, 2007 | 12:14 PM

#126

Shabib67

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 143

Likes: 0

From: Fairfax, VA

^It defintley should its .5l more displacement than a supra. Even .1l displacement more than the stroked supra engines which are 3.4l. Plus the 350z has way way better flowing heads than the supra.

Jul 3, 2007 | 07:01 PM

#127

rrmedicx

Registered User

iTrader: (54)

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 1,731

Likes: 4

From: NY

Anything new fellas? I've been patiently waiting to get my kit...

Jul 3, 2007 | 10:01 PM

#128

SoundPerformance

Sponsor
Sound Performance

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 541

Likes: 1

From: Bloomingdale, IL

Quote:

Originally Posted by rrmedicx

Anything new fellas? I've been patiently waiting to get my kit...

So far she made 529 RWHP. That is about as far as I want to push the stock bottom end. I am sure that we could make alot more on the dyno but what is the point?

We are pulling the motor back out next week and going to jig up the kit so that we can begin selling them. Then we can put in the good motr, heads, cams, and go for 4 figures

Jul 4, 2007 | 08:08 AM

#129

rrmedicx

Registered User

iTrader: (54)

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 1,731

Likes: 4

From: NY

Any possible video clips of the dyno run? Is there any possibility of running any sort of independent cat-back exhaust? It doesn't seem that way? Your exhaust is 3" to the tail? Right

Jul 4, 2007 | 08:57 AM

#130

eltness350

The Untouchable

iTrader: (58)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 1,960

Likes: 0

From: Milwaukee

what psi did u make the 529rwhp with?? good to hear the block handled it on the dyno...

Jul 4, 2007 | 09:08 AM

#131

doug

New Member

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 16,838

Likes: 35

From: Apex, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by eltness350

what psi did u make the 529rwhp with?? good to hear the block handled it on the dyno...

13 PSI https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/282235-sp-tt-kit-puts-down-529rwhp-at-13psi-on-stock-motor.html

Mar 17, 2008 | 03:35 AM

#132

BBS

Banned

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 272

Likes: 0

From: Maryland

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoundPerformance

The core we chose is the same core we use in our 1500+ HP supras. The core is rated to flow 1775 HP. We chose this primarily due to its size and HP capability. I thought long and hard about this... as a vertical flowing IC would certainly fit the piping layout better. However I could not find one that would equal the HP potential of this core. The Air intake temps that we see in our supra with this core are ridiculously low....... Amazingly it fits in the Z's nose quite well!!

Larry

SP

Lar you have been holding out. If i knew what you were doing i would have sold my Supra sooner

What are your thoughts on two GT3076's or two 50 trims. Stock VQ heads flow more than 2JZ heads huh interesting