Turbonetics g35 making insane power
Originally Posted by 98intrigue
Go to the track and trap 120mph...Then we will believe these Mustang dyno numbers are realistic. I bet you won't make 400whp on Jeremy's dyno when you come down.
I thought Mustang dyno's were supposed to read higher?
Originally Posted by zcon
not insane?:-)
No that's not insane it's preety weak if you ask me I put down 420+whp on the same dyno running 8 psi turboneticsSingle turbo must Suck
Man the **** up and get a twin or bigger single
Last edited by supra crazy; Apr 13, 2008 at 11:47 AM.
+1...
Originally Posted by taurran
I don't think it's improbable at all that he made the power he did. What's improbable is guessing he's making 430whp on a dynojet without actually running it on one.
Originally Posted by supra crazy
No that's not insane it's preety weak if you ask me I put down 420+whp on the same dyno running 8 psi Single turbo must Suck
The deal with mustang dynos is that one day they can be reading wildly low, and the next wildly high. It totally depends on the atmoshperic and load settings that the operator applies.
Originally Posted by SlideFox
Says who? 400 on a stock is do able, has been done OVER AND OVER AND OVER
Here is a dyno chart form a G35 with STOCK BLOCK making 405 @ 6 psi
See what I did.... I made a claim, and post a dyno to back it up.... you should try it
Some of the people that post in the FI section are as knowledgable as anyone in the industry.
so STFU until you know what your talking about
Here is a dyno chart form a G35 with STOCK BLOCK making 405 @ 6 psi
See what I did.... I made a claim, and post a dyno to back it up.... you should try it
Some of the people that post in the FI section are as knowledgable as anyone in the industry.
so STFU until you know what your talking about
Originally Posted by zcon
a greddy tt kit with meth injection made 430 on 10.6 lbs on the same dyno.
Originally Posted by taurran
wat?
The deal with mustang dynos is that one day they can be reading wildly low, and the next wildly high. It totally depends on the atmoshperic and load settings that the operator applies.
The deal with mustang dynos is that one day they can be reading wildly low, and the next wildly high. It totally depends on the atmoshperic and load settings that the operator applies.
Last edited by supra crazy; Apr 13, 2008 at 12:22 PM.
Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
401 hp?
Its not that you cant make 400whp, you have to consider the size of the turbo, engine, and psi ....some kits make 400whp at 6-8 psi but look at the size of the turbo they use...now look at the flow charts of the hifi turbo u have.
Also in your post you mention why he is incorrect: he claimed with a exhaust leak too
That the gains 40whp on a tune(which if true, it makes you wonder on the previous tune) and then add another 10-20whp on top of that on a "rice" correction to approximate dynojet numbers? he already admitted its not his fault his shop told him so, so maybe incorrect advice...maybe he received an inflated number for "business purposes' who knows really 
as Tim said....the should have done a baseline
ID be nice to see the boost curve of the run too.
Its not that you cant make 400whp, you have to consider the size of the turbo, engine, and psi ....some kits make 400whp at 6-8 psi but look at the size of the turbo they use...now look at the flow charts of the hifi turbo u have.
Also in your post you mention why he is incorrect: he claimed with a exhaust leak too
That the gains 40whp on a tune(which if true, it makes you wonder on the previous tune) and then add another 10-20whp on top of that on a "rice" correction to approximate dynojet numbers? he already admitted its not his fault his shop told him so, so maybe incorrect advice...maybe he received an inflated number for "business purposes' who knows really as Tim said....the should have done a baselineID be nice to see the boost curve of the run too.
Originally Posted by George@GTM
So I'm thinking, we should make a forum rule that only Dynojet dynographs are valid and all others don't count?
What do you guys think, eh?
What do you guys think, eh?
worst case..at least do a baseline run on what ever dyno to check on the gains.... and dont assume dynojet till you see a dynojet
Last edited by IIQuickSilverII; Apr 14, 2008 at 11:00 AM.
this thread is so stupid it makes my head hurt. i left performance factory with a dyno of 380. this was running 11 degrees of timing. im now running somewere around 19. when we put the dyno on for the preliminary run it was 360 . given my "assumtion" that everyone seems to be so hung up on.
cliff notes: 380 on dyno jet
360 on mustang dyno
408 with meth and same psi on mustang dyno
take a look at the 20 whp diffrence from the time it was at pf to the time it sat on the mustang dyno.
so all you guys can go on "assuming" what your saying isnt ignorant.
cliff notes: 380 on dyno jet
360 on mustang dyno
408 with meth and same psi on mustang dyno
take a look at the 20 whp diffrence from the time it was at pf to the time it sat on the mustang dyno.
so all you guys can go on "assuming" what your saying isnt ignorant.
Originally Posted by zcon
this thread is so stupid it makes my head hurt. i left performance factory with a dyno of 380. this was running 11 degrees of timing. im now running somewere around 19. when we put the dyno on for the preliminary run it was 360 . given my "assumtion" that everyone seems to be so hung up on.
cliff notes: 380 on dyno jet
360 on mustang dyno
408 with meth and same psi on mustang dyno
take a look at the 20 whp diffrence from the time it was at pf to the time it sat on the mustang dyno.
so all you guys can go on "assuming" what your saying isnt ignorant.
cliff notes: 380 on dyno jet
360 on mustang dyno
408 with meth and same psi on mustang dyno
take a look at the 20 whp diffrence from the time it was at pf to the time it sat on the mustang dyno.
so all you guys can go on "assuming" what your saying isnt ignorant.
If you don't want people debating the validity of the assumption you should go run it on the Dynojet. I'm interested in seeing what it would make.
Last edited by taurran; Apr 13, 2008 at 06:02 PM.
Originally Posted by supra crazy
No that's not insane it's preety weak if you ask me I put down 420+whp on the same dyno running 8 psi turboneticsSingle turbo must Suck
Man the **** up and get a twin or bigger single
Man the **** up and get a twin or bigger single
Originally Posted by taurran
I'm not trying to talk trash, but the only one I see here assuming anything would be you. (that your car would make 430whp on DJ)
If you don't want people debating the validity of the assumption you should go run it on the Dynojet. I'm interesting in seeing what it would make.
If you don't want people debating the validity of the assumption you should go run it on the Dynojet. I'm interesting in seeing what it would make.
Originally Posted by Black Guy
Yea Craig, man up and get a bigger single.
Originally Posted by superchargedg
Man in the fi forum you better have a titanium shield around you as this is a harsh place to be.If you say you have this amount of power you best be able to prove it.Robertk has been thru the ringer for posting some totally bs rwhp #,s and now you are next.Oh well just another day in the fi forum.
Uncorrected number don't lie. And 6.5psi is manifold pressure (what the UTEC reads) not going off your bragging right a-pillar pod gauge pressure. 
[/end]
