Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

8========0 Chris'smax Motor Build (going Big) 0========8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 08:07 PM
  #61  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by chris'smax
Raj,
The way i understand it is that the line that comes from the collector to the oil sump pump was kinked. On this kit both turbo drain lines feed into a little collector which then goes to the oil sump pump. By kinking that line this caused a back up and resulted in the turbos not draining oil properly.

Jeremy checked the turbo's w/ the car running and he said oil was pouring out of the front and back sides of the turbos. The seals are done!
Gotcha - that sucks though! Oh well. I just had an episode of space shuttle like proportions with oil pouring out of both compressors, but replaced the PCV valve for $15, put a breather on the driver's side valve cover, cleaned out all the piping, and she's back to normal! Was hoping it was something simple like that for you... Maybe different turbo seal designs?

Good luck on the build - that kit was made for a built motor!
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #62  
h2kSPiG's Avatar
h2kSPiG
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

You are never satisfied huh Chris?

I just did some math and from what I can tell he will be having some kind of bottle neck with the dual 2.5" exhaust at 600hp (the one good set of numbers I could find didn't specify crank or wheel hp, so it might be worse), but he should still be able to get quite a bit of power and be able to upgrade it later when and if he wants.

Most people on here think that in order to go fast you have to throw the bank at the car and do it all at once. I know I can't afford that, and don't want to frankly. Do what you think you want to do at the pace you can afford it. You are helping me realize once again why I am not building or TTing the VQ in the 240.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #63  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by chris'smax
dude you fail because you are ignorant.
oooooo that hurt, lmao
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 08:51 PM
  #64  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
good stuff Chris!

I also don't get why everyone swings by the "you must run dual 3 inch to make power" vine...upgrade when you feel the existing stuff isn't doing what it should. No sense in upgrading something that has not yet proven to be a severe bottle neck
Because bigger is better

To bring on a happier tone... man I cooked a mean crawfish etoufee earlier, I'll have to make some at Zdayz next year
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 11:52 PM
  #65  
chris'smax's Avatar
chris'smax
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: On dicks
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
oooooo that hurt, lmao



Simple question, what facts are your assumptions based on? Legit question! Back up your facts.


I still don't see how the Z is unique to other cars. You have 800whp cars running a 4" exhaust but yet all of you claim i need 6" of exhaust area to make 600whp?????? I understand that bigger is better, but i like the exhaust(the way it looks and the way it sounds). Jeremy and i both agree that we can meet this goal on this exhaust. If you still disagree that is fine, i'll wait till the car is done to prove otherwise. If i am wrong i will concede. Fair enough?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 11:57 PM
  #66  
chris'smax's Avatar
chris'smax
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: On dicks
Default

Originally Posted by App6MT
Right and I fully understand that complete, it is not the weakest link. But having the largest down pipe is 100% optimal.

And if he's truly going for big, leaving them out just puts it in the weaksauce category

I understand that bigger is better regarding exhaust flow, but to what extenet is questionable. I am just not ready to switch exhaust yet plain and simple.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 12:00 AM
  #67  
chris'smax's Avatar
chris'smax
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: On dicks
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
+1, claiming to be going big but cutting corners where you shouldnt = fail.

if you want to go BIG, GO BIG.

Before you go making accusations lets just wait until we see what happens

Last edited by chris'smax; Jun 21, 2008 at 12:09 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 12:15 AM
  #68  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by chris'smax
If i wanted to go big maybe i would try and reach your badass 500whp levels lol!!!!
i never claimed i was "GOING BIG" nor did i ever make a big deal out of my build. if you want to play with fire go ahead. use your caveman brain for a second. you want to "GO BIG" while going big with ebay knock exhaust? the power you would free up with 3" inch duals would allow you to run less boost, and get the same results. Upping the boost without taking all precautions is stupid imho. If I wanted to "GO BIG" I wouldnt skimp on one of the more important aspects of turbo charging a car. I feel sorry for you car, 20psi with 2.5" inch ebay exhaust... good luck with all that.

oh yeah, instead of posing like i was "GOING BIG" and not have enough money to "GO BIG" properly, i went with a solid build with good power levels, until i have the money to "GO BIG" without having to resort to skimping on products that could, one compromise the potential of the car, two compromise the safety of the car.

in any case, good luck with your BIG build.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 01:32 AM
  #69  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

Chris.... I'm just gonna say we have a junior here

You better not be slow on the joke

/puipost
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 03:16 AM
  #70  
coachk's Avatar
coachk
Banned
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,472
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Here was my experience: When I had the APS 2.5 TP's and the Injen dual exhaust I made 385whp at 10psi on my stock motor. When I took the 2.5's and the Injen off and replaced them with the APS 3.5 tp's and Greddy evo tt exhaust(I expanded the bottle neck) I made 425whp at 10psi on the same stock motor. The only thing that was changed was the A/F from 11.2 to 11.8
Both tunes were done during the summer and for the most part all the conditions were the same.

Last edited by coachk; Jun 21, 2008 at 03:40 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 04:16 AM
  #71  
Shaq Diesel's Avatar
Shaq Diesel
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
i never claimed i was "GOING BIG" nor did i ever make a big deal out of my build. if you want to play with fire go ahead. use your caveman brain for a second. you want to "GO BIG" while going big with ebay knock exhaust? the power you would free up with 3" inch duals would allow you to run less boost, and get the same results. Upping the boost without taking all precautions is stupid imho. If I wanted to "GO BIG" I wouldnt skimp on one of the more important aspects of turbo charging a car. I feel sorry for you car, 20psi with 2.5" inch ebay exhaust... good luck with all that.

oh yeah, instead of posing like i was "GOING BIG" and not have enough money to "GO BIG" properly, i went with a solid build with good power levels, until i have the money to "GO BIG" without having to resort to skimping on products that could, one compromise the potential of the car, two compromise the safety of the car.

in any case, good luck with your BIG build.
Over time, if you do it piece meal or save up ad do it all at once, do you not end up at the same place?

Chris has a goal. His build is taking the approach of building the "front end" now and doing the "back end" when the funds allow it and he has the need for more power.

He has stated he knows he's leaving horsepower "on the table" but not getting a new exhaust, I fail to see the need to keep telling him "Hey, you're leaving horsepower on the table by not getting a new exhaust". Hell, he's starting at it already!

Who knows, maybe he'll be more than happy with the power that his new current system will give him. And that's really all that matters, building a car, in any way, shape or fashion, that makes the owner happy.

There is so much grief and anxiety when people start comparing themselves to a number or someone else. Do what makes you happy, not what will make some other group happy.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 05:29 AM
  #72  
Kwame's Avatar
Kwame
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 19
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
we will see what the exhaust will take, we have 520 on a stock exhaust with open dumps and test pipes, i dont think we will have a problem.
IMO, this is the only person whose opinion really matters.

Jeremy is the one who has built the motor, will be doing the installation and will be doing the tuning. Last time, I checked he has built more cars than the overwhelming majority of people posting in this thread. If he felt that there was no chance of Chris meeting his goals with the equipment he is using or if he felt that it would be putting too much of a strain on other components within Chris' setup then I am confident that he would have told him that outright.

To Chris, good luck! Enjoy and be safe.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 05:58 AM
  #73  
chris'smax's Avatar
chris'smax
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: On dicks
Default

Originally Posted by coachk
Here was my experience: When I had the APS 2.5 TP's and the Injen dual exhaust I made 385whp at 10psi on my stock motor. When I took the 2.5's and the Injen off and replaced them with the APS 3.5 tp's and Greddy evo tt exhaust(I expanded the bottle neck) I made 425whp at 10psi on the same stock motor. The only thing that was changed was the A/F from 11.2 to 11.8
Both tunes were done during the summer and for the most part all the conditions were the same.

Thanks coach, now that is valid evidence. Isn't the injen exhaust 2.25"?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 06:03 AM
  #74  
Jason333's Avatar
Jason333
hi
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

I don't think running a 2.5 is dangerous by any means (did i miss read that or was that insinuated?). I think a few months ago we were all laughing at the thought of someone using anything but L19+ head studs, and here we are a few months later looking at threads of people successfully doing big projects on stock ones.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 06:20 AM
  #75  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
i never claimed i was "GOING BIG" nor did i ever make a big deal out of my build. if you want to play with fire go ahead. use your caveman brain for a second. you want to "GO BIG" while going big with ebay knock exhaust? the power you would free up with 3" inch duals would allow you to run less boost, and get the same results. Upping the boost without taking all precautions is stupid imho. If I wanted to "GO BIG" I wouldnt skimp on one of the more important aspects of turbo charging a car. I feel sorry for you car, 20psi with 2.5" inch ebay exhaust... good luck with all that.

oh yeah, instead of posing like i was "GOING BIG" and not have enough money to "GO BIG" properly, i went with a solid build with good power levels, until i have the money to "GO BIG" without having to resort to skimping on products that could, one compromise the potential of the car, two compromise the safety of the car.

in any case, good luck with your BIG build.

I understand your point....you are not telling him that he MUST get 3"+ exhaust right now...you are saying that better results would arrive from a bigger setup...a point that has been proven many times. None of us know what Chris has in his bank account...and know one is saying that the 2.25 to 2.5" would cause any issues besides robbing him of power.


Originally Posted by coachk
Here was my experience: When I had the APS 2.5 TP's and the Injen dual exhaust I made 385whp at 10psi on my stock motor. When I took the 2.5's and the Injen off and replaced them with the APS 3.5 tp's and Greddy evo tt exhaust(I expanded the bottle neck) I made 425whp at 10psi on the same stock motor. The only thing that was changed was the A/F from 11.2 to 11.8
Both tunes were done during the summer and for the most part all the conditions were the same.
Now Coach has proven what Nexx his been trying to say.....that what Chris has is ok...but not the best setup for the HP he wants.


Originally Posted by Kwame@z1
IMO, this is the only person whose opinion really matters.

Jeremy is the one who has built the motor, will be doing the installation and will be doing the tuning. Last time, I checked he has built more cars than the overwhelming majority of people posting in this thread. If he felt that there was no chance of Chris meeting his goals with the equipment he is using or if he felt that it would be putting too much of a strain on other components within Chris' setup then I am confident that he would have told him that outright.

To Chris, good luck! Enjoy and be safe.

Well...does this mean that no one can give their opinion? Everyone on here knows Jeremy/PF...and no one is questioning his ability. Nexx gave his opinion and Coach gave the proof. Some of you may have forgotten that this site is to receive info and give opinions.

To be honest...if I was doing a built and was short on cash...I would also leave the exhaust for last and use what I have.
Good luck on your build Chris.....

Last edited by XKR; Jun 21, 2008 at 06:42 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 06:28 AM
  #76  
chris'smax's Avatar
chris'smax
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: On dicks
Default

Originally Posted by XKR
I understand your point....you are not telling him that he MUST get 3"+ exhaust right now...you are saying that better results would arrive from a bigger setup...a point that has been proven many times. None of us know what Chris has in his bank account...and know one is saying that the 2.25 to 2.5" would cause any issues besides robbing him of power.

Thank you Mike, this is what i am trying to get across. Like you said i know that running a 3" is optimal (obviously), but i think i can get to where i want to be w/o having to change exhaust.


As far as my budgeting is concerned, i always set a budget when doing stuff like this. If i went in to this project w/o one i would be flat broke lol . Honestly i wasn't even planning on doing this and just commited to it yesterday. Jeremy made me the proposition and provided prices that were beyond exceptional. It was sort of a deal that was to good to pass up. I just got engaged a couple of weeks and am about to buy a house, i can't go around just throwing money around unless it is needed
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 06:35 AM
  #77  
cbr900son's Avatar
cbr900son
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,804
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette LA
Default

Originally Posted by Jason333
I don't think running a 2.5 is dangerous by any means (did i miss read that or was that insinuated?). I think a few months ago we were all laughing at the thought of someone using anything but L19+ head studs, and here we are a few months later looking at threads of people successfully doing big projects on stock ones.
Bleh what do u know about turbo'd Z's! Anyway u and chris lunch today be there or i will have greg poor grape drank on u and that ***** sticky!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 06:37 AM
  #78  
chris'smax's Avatar
chris'smax
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: On dicks
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
i never claimed i was "GOING BIG" nor did i ever make a big deal out of my build. if you want to play with fire go ahead. use your caveman brain for a second. you want to "GO BIG" while going big with ebay knock exhaust? the power you would free up with 3" inch duals would allow you to run less boost, and get the same results. Upping the boost without taking all precautions is stupid imho. If I wanted to "GO BIG" I wouldnt skimp on one of the more important aspects of turbo charging a car. I feel sorry for you car, 20psi with 2.5" inch ebay exhaust... good luck with all that.

oh yeah, instead of posing like i was "GOING BIG" and not have enough money to "GO BIG" properly, i went with a solid build with good power levels, until i have the money to "GO BIG" without having to resort to skimping on products that could, one compromise the potential of the car, two compromise the safety of the car.

in any case, good luck with your BIG build.

But your leaving power on the table . I believe you cut corners didn't you? By buying a used motor(which i would NEVER do)? Did you buy that setup because you saved money? I would assume you did and therefore you should see where i am coming from as far as trying to save.


LMAO off at comprimise the safety of the car. How in the hell do you figure that? Do you honestly think it is going cause that much back pressure? and generate that much heat?? Come on man

Last edited by chris'smax; Jun 21, 2008 at 06:46 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 06:47 AM
  #79  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,256
Likes: 0
From: Texas, Arizona,Cayman Island
Default

Originally Posted by Jason333
I don't think running a 2.5 is dangerous by any means (did i miss read that or was that insinuated?). I think a few months ago we were all laughing at the thought of someone using anything but L19+ head studs, and here we are a few months later looking at threads of people successfully doing big projects on stock ones.
No one said it was dangerous...just that it was not the best size for 600+.Dyno charts have proven that point. The L19 vs Stock head stud issue is not written in stone as yet....but the 2.25+ vs 3.0+ is.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 06:50 AM
  #80  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

It's quite obvious that Chris is aware about it so why not just leave it be. If he doesn't feel the need to do it right now, why not just leave it at that.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 AM.