Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Exhaust backpreasure vs. boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #1  
cwylie's Avatar
cwylie
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default Exhaust backpreasure vs. boost

So help me out here. Exhaust backpressure is exactly that. So why would a freer flowing exhaust cause a supercharger produce higher pressures at the same RPM. I would think it would be the other way around. The higher the backpressure in the exhaust would cause higher cylinder pressures because the exhaust could not escape as freely. Just trying to figure this one out.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 04:58 PM
  #2  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Cylinder pressures containing spent combustion byproducts devoid of oxygen do not produce power.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 05:50 PM
  #3  
cwylie's Avatar
cwylie
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

Correct but if your just talking about flow like a air pump which any piston engine is. It would make sense for the boost to be higher with a more restrictive exhaust.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
Ahsmo's Avatar
Ahsmo
Imakecopies
Premier Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default

I am not totally sure that what you are saying about a free flowing exhaust is correct.

But if it is I would guess that with less back pressure, intake temperatures are lower. As a result, the compressor runs more efficiently. Somewhat like putting an intercooler into a system. The compressor has to do less work to produce the same amount of work. However, I really do not see this being the case.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 06:21 PM
  #5  
djtimodj's Avatar
djtimodj
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 908
Likes: 5
From: UK
Default

Superchargers run the same power at a lower boost pressure with a free flowing exhaust. With stock exhaust 350whp at 10 psi. With a good true dual you can make 350whp @ 9psi for example. Hope that helps.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 06:52 PM
  #6  
cwylie's Avatar
cwylie
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

I am running a 3.12 pully on my G. I am only seeing about 7.5 psi at 6500 rpm. I was told it was because I am still running the stock cats. I had heard that before but was just trying to get the resoning behind it.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 06:55 AM
  #7  
QuadCam's Avatar
QuadCam
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 4
From: Vero Beach, Florida
Default

when comparing a supercharged car with a stock (catted equipped exhaust) to a big, free flowing dual exhaust with headers..........

the stock setup with show higher manifold pressure! essentialy, the air flow is the same in both motors due to the constant relationship of compressor speed to enginne speed.

this is a great example of why quoting boost pressure is not a very relative marker for engine airflow or power. intake pressure is not related to total airflow! this is how you can make more power with less boost on a supercharged car by improving the pumping efficiency of the total system. by making the exhaust system more effective and efficient, the engine can move more air through its cylinders - resulting in a lower reading of manifold pressure ("boost".)

on turbo cars, it's very hard to know what is really going on since the compressor wheel speed isn't in a proportionate relationship to engine speed. I think a couple companies have come out with rpm pickups for turbo speed now....this is very valuable in understanding what is happening with the turbo.

there's plenty of info on this out there if you are really interested........but to answer the original question...............a more restrictive exhaust setup (ie...stock cats, mufflers, piping) with result in HIGHER "boost" readings.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #8  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by QuadCam
when comparing a supercharged car with a stock (catted equipped exhaust) to a big, free flowing dual exhaust with headers..........

the stock setup with show higher manifold pressure! essentialy, the air flow is the same in both motors due to the constant relationship of compressor speed to enginne speed.

this is a great example of why quoting boost pressure is not a very relative marker for engine airflow or power. intake pressure is not related to total airflow! this is how you can make more power with less boost on a supercharged car by improving the pumping efficiency of the total system. by making the exhaust system more effective and efficient, the engine can move more air through its cylinders - resulting in a lower reading of manifold pressure ("boost".)

on turbo cars, it's very hard to know what is really going on since the compressor wheel speed isn't in a proportionate relationship to engine speed. I think a couple companies have come out with rpm pickups for turbo speed now....this is very valuable in understanding what is happening with the turbo.

there's plenty of info on this out there if you are really interested........but to answer the original question...............a more restrictive exhaust setup (ie...stock cats, mufflers, piping) with result in HIGHER "boost" readings.
Hi QuadCam:

Makes sense: Same turbine speed + more air flow = lower pressure. I should have thought about that (but I didn't). Thank you for the clarification.

I'll delete my post since it is inaccurate. Glad you're checking!

Last edited by ttg35fort; Feb 8, 2009 at 09:40 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 11:22 AM
  #9  
cwylie's Avatar
cwylie
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

OK that is what I was thinking. So I think I have a boost leak. What boost have people been seeing with the vortech and the 3.12 pulley.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 06:36 AM
  #10  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

When I added cats to my setup, boost pressure (no bc, internal WG springs) was 8 psi. It was 9.3 psi before that (no cats). Back to no cats. Expensive experiment.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 08:14 AM
  #11  
350Z400rwhp's Avatar
350Z400rwhp
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
Default

Originally Posted by cwylie
OK that is what I was thinking. So I think I have a boost leak. What boost have people been seeing with the vortech and the 3.12 pulley.
I hit 10 psi with the 3.12, no cats and a stock exhaust. I was missing one of the bolts in the intercooler during tuning that I later found missing but boost didn't seem to change much but now I need a retune I'm sure.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #12  
QuadCam's Avatar
QuadCam
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 4
From: Vero Beach, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
When I added cats to my setup, boost pressure (no bc, internal WG springs) was 8 psi. It was 9.3 psi before that (no cats). Back to no cats. Expensive experiment.
determining actual airflow on a turbo car is harder than with a belt driven blower. you have no idea what your impeller speed is for a given setup to produce a certain boost reading in your manifold.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
sales@czp
Engine
33
Sep 23, 2019 03:30 PM
Justin100
Intake Exhaust
26
Nov 29, 2015 03:58 PM
Li1ag
Exhaust
1
Sep 28, 2015 02:07 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 PM.