Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Longevity of full builds, the good the bad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 08:54 PM
  #301  
JustinTime's Avatar
JustinTime
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Orlando/Boynton Beach, FL
Default

You guys are making me second guess my mobile 1 15w-50. I might have to get a UOA, and switch back to royal purple 10w-40, and compare.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 09:15 PM
  #302  
skakemokid's Avatar
skakemokid
Registered User
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 460
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
Default

^From the oil reports on this forum, royal purple isn't a good choice either.
(Just from what i read) So take this as a grain of salt.
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-...-and-info.html
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2011 | 02:50 PM
  #303  
jerryd87's Avatar
jerryd87
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 10
From: NE ohio
Default

i know no one has posted here for a couple months but something i happened to notice when looking at vinny tens site is they use 1/2 inch h11 head studs not 1/2 arp 2000's. quick google search shows that 1/2 inch h11 headstud torque on other applications is 170 lbs alot more then the 90-95 lbs people torque l19's down to. not sure if you could do that on a vq thats been redrilled for the bigger studs but its food for thought. was reading through and noticed some people questioning why no real reports on vtr's stuff *shrug* they are quite a bit more epensive then everyone elses price though >.<

Last edited by jerryd87; Mar 30, 2011 at 03:04 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2011 | 09:01 PM
  #304  
jerryd87's Avatar
jerryd87
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 10
From: NE ohio
Default

i also notice that acl has bearings that include an extra .001 clearance for oil film did anyone that spun bearings use these? dosnt seem like theres very many bearing choices for the vq, the small blocks of old have several choice available for a reason. based on the diameter of the crank bearing surfaces the clearance on the bearings should be between .0018 and .0024. being as turbos impart much higher heat i would definitely go towards the loose side and since it seems above 550hp seems to run into problems i would prob run at a min .0022 clearance and mayby run .0026 however i cant find stock specs anywhere so i have no idea what .001 more then stock would be. granted the larger clearance requires a thicker oil.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 02:21 PM
  #305  
nomyth46's Avatar
nomyth46
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by scottfreeman80
I used mobil 1 15-50 on two (2) 4g63 engines. (Those are DSM engines for all you children) BOTH had spun bearings as cause of engine failure. Both were near complete losses...

Using castrol syntec 5-30 per factory specs. 32K on Z and feels like it's still brand new...

Just my 2 cents

you do know that castrol is owned by exxon/mobil........and the only thing thats different between mobil 1 and castrol syntec is the bottle

Last edited by nomyth46; Mar 31, 2011 at 02:22 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 02:35 PM
  #306  
DaveJackson's Avatar
DaveJackson
Master
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 69
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by nomyth46
you do know that castrol is owned by exxon/mobil........and the only thing thats different between mobil 1 and castrol syntec is the bottle
I have a bottle of Syntec with a nice and clear BP logo on the back and the quickest of internet searches confirms that not one single fact in your statement is accurate.
With such a condescending tone, too... For shame.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 03:27 PM
  #307  
tylerxfire's Avatar
tylerxfire
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 1
From: new york
Default

Originally Posted by nomyth46
you do know that castrol is owned by exxon/mobil........and the only thing thats different between mobil 1 and castrol syntec is the bottle
yeah keep telling yourself that when ur buying ur castrol
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #308  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

LOL

Reply
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 11:05 PM
  #309  
jerryd87's Avatar
jerryd87
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 10
From: NE ohio
Default

been doing some research lately mainly on supra and diesel forums(they seem to be the first ones to come up when its related to high boost and high hp =/) it seems that overheating problems are common on other platforms using high boost, even ones that do not have sleeves. heads lift and superheat the coolant with combustion gases, seems the main source of problems is arp head studs. according to what ive found even the l19 head studs are designed to stretch some when torqued down, high power levels allow further stretching and eventually the studs stretch enough to allow headlift. fix it seems is to use h11 tool steel head studs, same material used in piston wrist pins the only difference being that h11 does not stretch at all and is why the torque specs on them is higher. tensile strength is similar seems main difference is stretch vs non stretch designed in.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 04:28 AM
  #310  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by jerryd87
been doing some research lately mainly on supra and diesel forums(they seem to be the first ones to come up when its related to high boost and high hp =/) it seems that overheating problems are common on other platforms using high boost, even ones that do not have sleeves. heads lift and superheat the coolant with combustion gases, seems the main source of problems is arp head studs. according to what ive found even the l19 head studs are designed to stretch some when torqued down, high power levels allow further stretching and eventually the studs stretch enough to allow headlift. fix it seems is to use h11 tool steel head studs, same material used in piston wrist pins the only difference being that h11 does not stretch at all and is why the torque specs on them is higher. tensile strength is similar seems main difference is stretch vs non stretch designed in.
Sounds cool, but where can you get H11 head studs for the VQ? A quick search yielded little/nothing. I also have seen early bearing failure be a common problem on built VQ's, and head studs won't help in that area.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 08:27 AM
  #311  
graffkid732's Avatar
graffkid732
New Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,646
Likes: 11
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
Sounds cool, but where can you get H11 head studs for the VQ? A quick search yielded little/nothing. I also have seen early bearing failure be a common problem on built VQ's, and head studs won't help in that area.
Did a quick search just now. They are "ATS H11 Head Studs" So far only seen made for Diesel Trucks. I doubt they make any for a VQ if that's the case.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 08:48 AM
  #312  
Durdan's Avatar
Durdan
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

the L19 ARP studs are their upgraded strength studs and should be used for any VQ build. their standard off-the-shelf studs seem to stretch at higher hp levels. we had one lift the heads at 900wheelhp using standard ARPs, so we installed the L19s. 1000+ wheel, and it's still fine.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 09:14 AM
  #313  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Durdan
the L19 ARP studs are their upgraded strength studs and should be used for any VQ build. their standard off-the-shelf studs seem to stretch at higher hp levels. we had one lift the heads at 900wheelhp using standard ARPs, so we installed the L19s. 1000+ wheel, and it's still fine.
Thats pretty common knowledge, why didn't you use L19s the first time around?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 09:28 AM
  #314  
Durdan's Avatar
Durdan
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

from my understanding, they werent available at the time of the build and there were time crunches in place. i built the motor with the parts that were supplied to me.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 09:31 AM
  #315  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Durdan
from my understanding, they werent available at the time of the build and there were time crunches in place. i built the motor with the parts that were supplied to me.
not blaming you, but i think that regular DE L19s will work on an HR, since we can run OE HR headstuds as an upgrade for mild boost.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 09:32 AM
  #316  
Durdan's Avatar
Durdan
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

i have the part number somewhere, but i'm pretty sure they were DE L19s
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 09:51 AM
  #317  
jerryd87's Avatar
jerryd87
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 10
From: NE ohio
Default

according to arp the l19s are designed to stretch as well, h11 head studs are available from a1 technology's, also ill have to find the numbers but cosworth also offers h11 head studs but they are probably just rebranded a1 tech head studs just like there standard ones are just rebranded arp2000's. its not that people are having immediate failures with the arp studs, just driven hard over time they allow headlift and the suspected cause is that arp's are designed to stretch. the failures are with l19 head studs as well, seems in diesel applications l19s are the standard and h11 is the upgrade for big power, some supra guys seem to be running them as well. looking into my ecotec book(it would be the closest to our platform from other platforms, 4 bolts per cylinder, open deck) gm says arp for standard builds, arp l19 for 300-600hp, a1 h11 head studs for 600-900, and anything above that 1/2 inch h11 unibolts(which isnt possible on our platform).

i already mentioned about possibly using larger clearances bearings and thicker oil, however if these engines are overheating at high power it could be the cause for additional expansion causing the bearings to drag at 600hp if the engine is seeing temps of 240+ expansion would easily cut .001 inch off clearance(.0005 expansion on each side). to compare it only takes 10 ft lbs extra torque on main caps to reach this same reduction. under .001 clearance the bearings will drag and tear the bearings apart, i found this out on my first engine i built when the machine shop told me the wrong torque spec for small block chevy main caps, torqued it down and the rotating assembly wouldnt budge wih no heads on the engine. that was just a simple rebuild so i dint check clearances till it wouldnt budge, checked em after that and clearance was .0007, bought a rebuild book with specs in it and torque was 65 ft lbs. instead of the 75 ft lbs. they told me, nothing changed but the lighter torque put me at .0018 clearance. as you can imagine from that it dosnt take alot to cause the bearing to catch, if the clearances being used is tight then the slighest overheating will cause issues. thats why so many options are available for various small blocks and is why i suggested mayby using the .001 extra oil clearance bearings with thicker oil =/

im taking my engine down to hal in july/august when im home for r&r and i might have him install h11 headstuds just to see if it helps will just have to make sure we get torque right since they require higher torque due to no stretch. i will say though apparently the l19s have better rust protection

edit: cosworth ones claim to be h11 but are black like l19s and made by arp =/ http://thmotorsports.com/cosworth/co...PR7420-19-2001 all the h11 ive seen is silver
this shows em as silver so seems like they are just general pictures http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/p...ducts_id=19101

contacted a1 and the guy i talked to dint know if they made studs for the vq platform, which means they prob dont =/ so seems like only options would be cosworth or get all the vendors to purchase some from a1 since i cant see anyone wanting to spend over 1k on headstuds =( i will say the h11 on suburus and evos are about 100 bucks cheaper then arp l19's which i would say isnt a bad deal if they are stronger i did find one post saying l19 and h11 are the same thing however it is one post vs several that say different so take it for what you will =/

Last edited by jerryd87; Apr 5, 2011 at 02:44 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 03:07 PM
  #318  
zman1982's Avatar
zman1982
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 1
From: Lebanon, PA
Default

Damn, I've been away a long time...I can't believe this thread is still going!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 03:23 PM
  #319  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by jerryd87
according to arp the l19s are designed to stretch as well, h11 head studs are available from a1 technology's, also ill have to find the numbers but cosworth also offers h11 head studs but they are probably just rebranded a1 tech head studs just like there standard ones are just rebranded arp2000's. its not that people are having immediate failures with the arp studs, just driven hard over time they allow headlift and the suspected cause is that arp's are designed to stretch. the failures are with l19 head studs as well, seems in diesel applications l19s are the standard and h11 is the upgrade for big power, some supra guys seem to be running them as well. looking into my ecotec book(it would be the closest to our platform from other platforms, 4 bolts per cylinder, open deck) gm says arp for standard builds, arp l19 for 300-600hp, a1 h11 head studs for 600-900, and anything above that 1/2 inch h11 unibolts(which isnt possible on our platform).

i already mentioned about possibly using larger clearances bearings and thicker oil, however if these engines are overheating at high power it could be the cause for additional expansion causing the bearings to drag at 600hp if the engine is seeing temps of 240+ expansion would easily cut .001 inch off clearance(.0005 expansion on each side). to compare it only takes 10 ft lbs extra torque on main caps to reach this same reduction. under .001 clearance the bearings will drag and tear the bearings apart, i found this out on my first engine i built when the machine shop told me the wrong torque spec for small block chevy main caps, torqued it down and the rotating assembly wouldnt budge wih no heads on the engine. that was just a simple rebuild so i dint check clearances till it wouldnt budge, checked em after that and clearance was .0007, bought a rebuild book with specs in it and torque was 65 ft lbs. instead of the 75 ft lbs. they told me, nothing changed but the lighter torque put me at .0018 clearance. as you can imagine from that it dosnt take alot to cause the bearing to catch, if the clearances being used is tight then the slighest overheating will cause issues. thats why so many options are available for various small blocks and is why i suggested mayby using the .001 extra oil clearance bearings with thicker oil =/

im taking my engine down to hal in july/august when im home for r&r and i might have him install h11 headstuds just to see if it helps will just have to make sure we get torque right since they require higher torque due to no stretch. i will say though apparently the l19s have better rust protection

edit: cosworth ones claim to be h11 but are black like l19s and made by arp =/ http://thmotorsports.com/cosworth/co...PR7420-19-2001 all the h11 ive seen is silver
this shows em as silver so seems like they are just general pictures http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/p...ducts_id=19101

contacted a1 and the guy i talked to dint know if they made studs for the vq platform, which means they prob dont =/ so seems like only options would be cosworth or get all the vendors to purchase some from a1 since i cant see anyone wanting to spend over 1k on headstuds =( i will say the h11 on suburus and evos are about 100 bucks cheaper then arp l19's which i would say isnt a bad deal if they are stronger i did find one post saying l19 and h11 are the same thing however it is one post vs several that say different so take it for what you will =/
Good info
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2012 | 11:14 PM
  #320  
nathanwl2004's Avatar
nathanwl2004
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: charlotte ,nc
Default

Taint no such thing as a material that does stretch. Its called modulus of elasticity, lookk dat shiz up.
Originally Posted by jerryd87
according to arp the l19s are designed to stretch as well, h11 head studs are available from a1 technology's, also ill have to find the numbers but cosworth also offers h11 head studs but they are probably just rebranded a1 tech head studs just like there standard ones are just rebranded arp2000's. its not that people are having immediate failures with the arp studs, just driven hard over time they allow headlift and the suspected cause is that arp's are designed to stretch. the failures are with l19 head studs as well, seems in diesel applications l19s are the standard and h11 is the upgrade for big power, some supra guys seem to be running them as well. looking into my ecotec book(it would be the closest to our platform from other platforms, 4 bolts per cylinder, open deck) gm says arp for standard builds, arp l19 for 300-600hp, a1 h11 head studs for 600-900, and anything above that 1/2 inch h11 unibolts(which isnt possible on our platform).

i already mentioned about possibly using larger clearances bearings and thicker oil, however if these engines are overheating at high power it could be the cause for additional expansion causing the bearings to drag at 600hp if the engine is seeing temps of 240+ expansion would easily cut .001 inch off clearance(.0005 expansion on each side). to compare it only takes 10 ft lbs extra torque on main caps to reach this same reduction. under .001 clearance the bearings will drag and tear the bearings apart, i found this out on my first engine i built when the machine shop told me the wrong torque spec for small block chevy main caps, torqued it down and the rotating assembly wouldnt budge wih no heads on the engine. that was just a simple rebuild so i dint check clearances till it wouldnt budge, checked em after that and clearance was .0007, bought a rebuild book with specs in it and torque was 65 ft lbs. instead of the 75 ft lbs. they told me, nothing changed but the lighter torque put me at .0018 clearance. as you can imagine from that it dosnt take alot to cause the bearing to catch, if the clearances being used is tight then the slighest overheating will cause issues. thats why so many options are available for various small blocks and is why i suggested mayby using the .001 extra oil clearance bearings with thicker oil =/

im taking my engine down to hal in july/august when im home for r&r and i might have him install h11 headstuds just to see if it helps will just have to make sure we get torque right since they require higher torque due to no stretch. i will say though apparently the l19s have better rust protection

edit: cosworth ones claim to be h11 but are black like l19s and made by arp =/ http://thmotorsports.com/cosworth/co...PR7420-19-2001 all the h11 ive seen is silver
this shows em as silver so seems like they are just general pictures http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/p...ducts_id=19101

contacted a1 and the guy i talked to dint know if they made studs for the vq platform, which means they prob dont =/ so seems like only options would be cosworth or get all the vendors to purchase some from a1 since i cant see anyone wanting to spend over 1k on headstuds =( i will say the h11 on suburus and evos are about 100 bucks cheaper then arp l19's which i would say isnt a bad deal if they are stronger i did find one post saying l19 and h11 are the same thing however it is one post vs several that say different so take it for what you will =/
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:58 AM.