Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Powerlab 35R kit will not make 500 HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 01:59 PM
  #281  
mrg1981's Avatar
mrg1981
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 7
From: Mesa, Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by UMW350Z
I see you have a TT kit...not sure how you can compare your situation to those with the PL kit when your kit cost about the same and you can hit over 500 on pump on a DD.

Also, it is REDICULOUS to say 87 to 93 is the same leap as 93 to Q16 pricewise. I'm not paying $300 to get the performance I should be getting out of $60 every 300 miles. 10 tanks of gas and you might as well have upgraded to the TT.

Maybe I missed the taglines before...but did the website with the information about the PL kit just add on a lot of conditions to the power output of the kit?

Don't get me wrong, I'd rather this kit over a TN kit any day of the week, and it looks like it will put out more power than the TN could anyways, but it you really want big power, it looks like you are back to a TT kit. Does james risk buying the 37 and going for meth or spending the money selling the kit and installing the TT for the power he wants on regular pump? If you can easily change the turbo, maybe it is worth the shot.
I didn't compare it to my build. I actually run race gas for anything over 14 psi (about 500whp), btw. I didn't suggest that he run race gas all the time, and you know that isn't what I said. You are trying to twist things around. My very valid point is that he hasn't even tried doing a race gas tune to see what it does. He sounds like he wants a certain dyno number....great, throw race gas in, get your number, print your chart, done. He doesn't seem the least bit concerned about how the car is actually performing. If he were, he'd be worried about low trap speeds, etc (which is what I was upset about and it led to finding some issues on my car).

Just FYI, Q16 is the most expensive gas you could use for this and it doesn't even run $300/tank. Its about $225. He could go get 110 octane or even 100 octane (about 1/2 as much as Q16) to see if it improves his AIT, WHP, and efficiency of the turbos.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 02:17 PM
  #282  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

^^^+1...and If he runs meth...he could 1st start with 100% distiled water 4 starters too
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 03:28 PM
  #283  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

i say solid rocket boosters. I'm a genius, problem solved!
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 03:33 PM
  #284  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by go-fast
just from an outside point of view.....you feel advertising was deceptive



1. a kits max hp level is just that,no company i know of gives mid #'s for advertising.(personally i would have left something on the table just for situations like this)

2. you mention 500 whp as if it's weak and will not satisfy your needs.....i don't get that at all.your power exceeds the limits of street tires and to be developed by a v6 with a single gt35 shows me this is a quality kit.

3.you have achieved the whp #s you wanted (depending on dyno) so i really don't understand your gripe.

i agree your iat's are too high to grow past your current point and i think you need to focus on this simple fact.fix your iat and more power/longevity will follow.race gas is not the only way around barriers and your "turbo kit" is only a small part of the puzzle.

gl
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #285  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Question *cough* *cough*

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
So you think it's reasonable to expect ~600whp DJ on a single GT35R turbo with an E compressor housing that has been shown to max out at ~650whp DJ "all in" on C16 race gas? Do you realize that you're asking the turbo in this application to perform near and beyond 90% of it's max power on your motor with strictly pump gas???

Please show me links to competitors' production turbo kits that have the same ~650whp DJ max power capability that make ~600whp DJ (~550whp DD) "all day on 93" without the use of water/meth injection.
^^ BUMP for answers to this post... ^^

Last edited by RudeG_v2.0; Jun 7, 2010 at 04:09 PM.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 03:50 PM
  #286  
james12345pt's Avatar
james12345pt
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 7
From: asheville, nc
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
What would be an realistic power level for an gt37r turbo with this kit on 93 oct? Is it a direct bolt on? What are the exact specs(AR, Turbine, type of housing, etc, etc) of the gt37r turbo that has been used by Intense. Can an air filter be used? Finally, the GT35r has some sort of spout fitting on the output side of the compression housing; does the GT37r need this fitting or does the pipe from the FMIC go straight into it?
Can somebody provide this info to the thread?
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 04:12 PM
  #287  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

C'mon OP. I asked first.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #288  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

dont expect much more. its just not that much bigger of a turbo... same compressor with a lil bigger turbine. PL would need to tell you what exactly they mean by 37r..

For less money you could just get a new turbine housing for your GT35. get like a .8 or 1.06 A/R
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 04:26 PM
  #289  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
dont expect much more. its just not that much bigger of a turbo... same compressor with a lil bigger turbine. PL would need to tell you what exactly they mean by 37r..

For less money you could just get a new turbine housing for your GT35. get like a .8 or 1.06 A/R
That's incorrect. Per the Garrett website, the compressor and turbine are both larger.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 04:26 PM
  #290  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
Can somebody provide this info to the thread?
There are multiple versions of the GT37R posted on the Garret website, namely the GT3776, the GT3782 and the GT3788R. The GT3788R has the largest compressor, and will be the best suited for a single turbo application on a 3.5L motor.

Here is a the compressor map:



The efficiency of every motor will be different depending on the modifications, etc. Nonetheless, the GT3788R should be good for about 550-600 whp in a single turbo setup on a 3.5L motor on pump gas on something like a Mustang dyno. Probably higher on a DJ, and lower on a DD.

If the efficiency were the same as my first build, it would around 600 whp at 15.3 psi of boost and 64 lb/min at the choke line. It would probably need a bigger intercooler (and maybe a bar and plate IC) than I was running, which was a Greddy, because I don't think I was anywhere near the choke line and my IAT was probably lower. With the Greddy Intercooler, I'm thinking it would be down closer to 550 whp.

Last edited by ttg35fort; Jun 7, 2010 at 05:23 PM.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #291  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

so are they using a true 3788r? Thats never been advertised. It was said before that it was a bastardized gt3582 with a bigger turbine

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
That's incorrect. Per the Garrett website, the compressor and turbine are both larger.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 04:51 PM
  #292  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
so are they using a true 3788r? Thats never been advertised. It was said before that it was a bastardized gt3582 with a bigger turbine
It appears to me that the first two numbers in the turbo part number relate to the turbine size and the second two numbers relate to the compressor size.

I don't think the issue with the GT3582R turbo is the turbine, it's more likely the compressor. I think a larger compressor, say something like a GT3588R, would perform better than the GT3582 in a single turbo setup on a 3.5L motor.

I already stated this, but it bears worth repeating. To me, based on the compressor maps, it appears that the GT35 turbos are designed for a small displacement motor, like something in the 1.5L-2.5L range. Of course, in a twin turbo setup that is what you end up with on a 3.5L motor (each turbo is effectively handling 1/2 the displacement). More displacement requires a larger compressor.

Also, I keep suggesting that a higher trim value be used, but this is based on what I see in the compressor maps. Maybe I am taking too much liberty there because I really don't know if they will run into other issues by increasing the trim. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. I guess that is a good question for a Garrett engineer. If there are no issues, a higher trim value is definitely beneficial for larger displacement motors.

Last edited by ttg35fort; Jun 7, 2010 at 05:07 PM.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 05:04 PM
  #293  
UMW350Z's Avatar
UMW350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Piscataway, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by mrg1981
I didn't compare it to my build. I actually run race gas for anything over 14 psi (about 500whp), btw. I didn't suggest that he run race gas all the time, and you know that isn't what I said. You are trying to twist things around. My very valid point is that he hasn't even tried doing a race gas tune to see what it does. He sounds like he wants a certain dyno number....great, throw race gas in, get your number, print your chart, done. He doesn't seem the least bit concerned about how the car is actually performing. If he were, he'd be worried about low trap speeds, etc (which is what I was upset about and it led to finding some issues on my car).

Just FYI, Q16 is the most expensive gas you could use for this and it doesn't even run $300/tank. Its about $225. He could go get 110 octane or even 100 octane (about 1/2 as much as Q16) to see if it improves his AIT, WHP, and efficiency of the turbos.
I would think he would want to hit the number every time he went WOT, not dyno-queen, hit-it-and-quit-it number...at least that is what I would want. I guess people do carry around dyno printouts to meets though...
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #294  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

Forgot he actually emailed it to me years ago

I believe he made ~520whp on Sharif's dyno as well.
Attached Thumbnails Powerlab 35R kit will not make 500 HP-z33turbo.gif  
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 05:17 PM
  #295  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by ttg35fort
There are multiple versions of the GT37R posted on the Garret website, namely the GT3776R, the GT3782R and the GT3788R. The GT3788R has the largest compressor, and will be the best suited for a single turbo application on a 3.5L motor.

Here is a the compressor map:



The efficiency of every motor will be different depending on the modifications, etc. Nonetheless, the GT3788R should be good for about 550-600 whp in a single turbo setup on a 3.5L motor on pump gas on something like a Mustang dyno. Probably higher on a DJ, and lower on a DD.

If the efficiency were the same as my first build, it would around 600 whp at 15.3 psi of boost and 64 lb/min at the choke line. It would probably need a bigger intercooler (and maybe a bar and plate IC) than I was running, which was a Greddy, because I don't think I was anywhere near the choke line and my IAT was probably lower. With the Greddy Intercooler, I'm thinking it would be down closer to 550 whp.
The GT3776 and GT3782 turbos listed on the Garrett website are journal bearing turbos and thus don't have the "R" designation.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 05:23 PM
  #296  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
The GT3776 and GT3782 turbos listed on the Garrett website are journal bearing turbos and thus don't have the "R" designation.
You are correct. Brain fart on my part. I'll edit my post.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 05:33 PM
  #297  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by ttg35fort
It appears to me that the first two numbers in the turbo part number relate to the turbine size and the second two numbers relate to the compressor size.

I don't think the issue with the GT3582R turbo is the turbine, it's more likely the compressor. I think a larger compressor, say something like a GT3588R, would perform better than the GT3582 in a single turbo setup on a 3.5L motor.

I already stated this, but it bears worth repeating. To me, based on the compressor maps, it appears that the GT35 turbos are designed for a small displacement motor, like something in the 1.5L-2.5L range. Of course, in a twin turbo setup that is what you end up with on a 3.5L motor (each turbo is effectively handling 1/2 the displacement). More displacement requires a larger compressor.

Also, I keep suggesting that a higher trim value be used, but this is based on what I see in the compressor maps. Maybe I am taking too much liberty there because I really don't know if they will run into other issues by increasing the trim. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. I guess that is a good question for a Garrett engineer. If there are no issues, a higher trim value is definitely beneficial for larger displacement motors.
One thing I failed to consider.... back pressure. With a larger turbine, the GT37R will have less back pressure, which will help peak torque/hp in the higher rpm range. So, I would think that a GT3788R will perform better than the GT3588R in the higher rpm range, though will have slower spoolup (assuming the same A/R). A larger A/R on the turbine will help alleviate some of the backpressure on the GT35R. Maybe some of the issue is back pressure, as Rich eluded to.

Last edited by ttg35fort; Jun 7, 2010 at 05:37 PM.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #298  
james12345pt's Avatar
james12345pt
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 7
From: asheville, nc
Default

Wow, this thread has gone places that that I never expected it to go. My issue with the Gt35r Powerlab kit is the fact that I was unable to achieve the same numbers that in conversation with Performance Factory, Intense/Powerlab, and Injected Performance felt it would. Knowing what I do now, I would have look into another kit (such as an Greddy twin kit) , different turbo at time of purchase from Powerlab or different set up with my build . The technical info that has been posted on the thread has furthered my FI knowledge at this point but at time of purchase I relied heavily on the info provide by Intense/Powerlab on their website, threads and personal conversations to steer me in the direction of my final decision on purchasing this kit. At this point, I just want to get to my goal and am looking for solid data versus info based on race gas, dynos from different turbos, claims of somebody's buddy who achieved these numbers with this kit but have not come forward on this thread, etc, etc. Thank you to all the members of the forum who have sincerely tried to add information to this thread to come up with a final solution to help get me to the goal that I have set. At this point, I am looking for the most cost effective way to pull an extra safe ~40-50 whp out of this setup without going to any extremes like swapping to twins.

Last edited by james12345pt; Jun 7, 2010 at 05:55 PM.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 05:47 PM
  #299  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
Wow, this thread has gone places that that I never expected it to go. My issue with the Gt35r Powerlab kit is the fact that I was unable to achieve the same numbers that in conversation with Performance Factory, Intense/Powerlab, and Injected Performance felt it would. Knowing what I do now, I would have look into another kit, different turbo at time of purchase from Powerlab or different Compression pistons with my build. The technical info that has been posted on the thread has furthered my FI knowledge at this point but at time of purchase I relied heavily on the info provide by Intense/Powerlab on their website, threads and personnel conversations to steer me in the direction of my final decision on purchasing this kit. At this point, I just want to get to my goal and am looking for solid data verses info based on race gas, dynos from different turbos, claims of somebody's buddy who achieved these numbers with this kit but have not come forward on this thread, etc, etc.
I find the Garrett compressor maps to be an invaluable resource for turbo selection. Those are solid data. On round 2 of my build, that is where I started. Also, I developed a spreadsheet with the computations that I need, somewhat similar to what is available on the Squirrel website. If you want a copy, PM me your e-mail address and I'll send it to you. That is where I calculate pressure, air flow, fuel flow, etc. The formulas to calculate some of this are published on the Garrett website under their "Turbo Tech" section. Those are not the formulas that I used, but the end results should be fairly close. Indeed, the one time I stepped through Garrett's formulas, I ended up with the exact same turbo selection that I did using mine.

Last edited by ttg35fort; Jun 7, 2010 at 06:00 PM.
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 05:58 PM
  #300  
james12345pt's Avatar
james12345pt
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 7
From: asheville, nc
Default

Here is one option that I have considered, I have spoke with a person with an GT3782R who is willing to swap turbos because the 37 is too laggy on his car(not a 350z).



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:18 AM.