Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Powerlab 35R kit will not make 500 HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 12:53 PM
  #441  
go-fast's Avatar
go-fast
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: under the hood
Default

Originally Posted by midz350
Dude.. you wanted a 500whp on a pump gas and
you achieved that (you achieved the same number that PL advertise which is 500whp DJ ) . So, what are you crying about??
i take it all back.....there is hope for you
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 12:58 PM
  #442  
midz350's Avatar
midz350
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 24
From: around.
Default

Originally Posted by go-fast
because you +1000 a quote from tt35fort that was one of the most off base post's in this thread.......only two reasons you would do that and to be honest i gave you the credit of typing the nicer one.....was i wrong?


Originally Posted by go-fast
EDIT: sorry +10000 (use commas next time)
sorry, will do
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 01:01 PM
  #443  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by binder
You just posted you made over 500hp on a DJ which is what intense uses and what intense based their statements on. They can't tell you what it will make on every single dyno in the world. They don't have them. They built it and tested it on their DJ platform and it shows DJ right on the dyno sheets. How is that not clear as a bell to you?

if you wanted more on a different dyno that is your own adjenda and has nothing to do with the fact that they said you can get 500hp on a DJ with sae correction. You proved that statement true yourself.
Originally Posted by binder
Intense....i'm glad someone else sees how simple it is.

I mean, ya, it's a bummer the guys goal was 500whp on a DD. great fine and dandy but every manufacturer can't test every turbo on every car on every dyno. Hell, even car to car could range 5-10% different numbers with the exact same parts, kit, dyno. Maybe one had a tight motor from factory and one a loose one. Who knows.

Either way, 500hp on an SAE corrected DJ is what the results were shown. I can read so i understand that. Not sure why it's so hard for others.
+1! Thank you for the common sense objectivity!


I hope Raj doesn't accuse you of being part of our "pack" now.

Last edited by RudeG_v2.0; Jun 10, 2010 at 01:04 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 01:09 PM
  #444  
go-fast's Avatar
go-fast
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: under the hood
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
+1! Thank you for the common sense objectivity!


I hope Raj doesn't accuse you of being part of our "pack" now.
fyi i just found out that were dating
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #445  
iStan's Avatar
iStan
ZR
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas
Default

Holy posty moley. Cliffs pleaes.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 01:23 PM
  #446  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
+1! Thank you for the common sense objectivity!


I hope Raj doesn't accuse you of being part of our "pack" now.
You make it sound like that's a bad thing? LOL. No worries. He doesn't live in AZ. phew!

Cliff notes are that the PowerLab kit standard turbo appears to be near its pump gas limit of around 500 DJ (near the choke point). The OP has some leads on how to make a little extra that he desires and everyone's happy now that everything is cut and dried.

Last edited by rcdash; Jun 10, 2010 at 01:25 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #447  
Elperuano's Avatar
Elperuano
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: Davie
Default

this thread is epicly ****!
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #448  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
+1! Thank you for the common sense objectivity!


I hope Raj doesn't accuse you of being part of our "pack" now.
only if it's a wolfpack
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #449  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by binder
only if it's a wolfpack


Oh no, don't tell me u r consorting with the enemy. Not this year!
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 02:27 PM
  #450  
Vas_Z33's Avatar
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 25
From: westchester NY
Default

Originally Posted by binder
only if it's a wolfpack , roaming the desert in search of hookers and cocaine ( the hangover )
edited
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 02:56 PM
  #451  
james12345pt's Avatar
james12345pt
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 7
From: asheville, nc
Default Drama

I can't help but love all the drama! At this point, I am speaking with IP about the use of a simple meth injection kit and some minor retuning to hopefully achieve the 100 whp mark that I was shooting for over my stock block setup. It would have been nice if Intense/powerlab would step up and try to contact me and offer some sort of resolution but I don't ever see that happening. It seem that Intense/fanboys speak of all these builds who are able to achieve these big numbers with the gt35r kit but have no bought any proof of this to the table, they then argue that I was foolish to have such high expectations of the kit but in private conversation at time of purchase told me a completely opposite story, they also use the 653 whp number in there advertising to lead the customer into believing the kit was capable of achieve over 600whp on race gas but now state that They advise tuners not to run this setup because it is too dangerous to the engine/ turbo/ etc.
I has been emotional at times and let my temper get the best of me and once again I do hope I have not offined anyone. I would like to thank everyone who has attempted to help with my problem and possible solution. I am keeping my fingers crossed. I am going to close this thread at this time because I don't find it to be productive to continue it until Powerlab, myself, other members of the forum can come forward with a clear effective solution to product safe, cost effective power on 93 oct with the Powerlab GT35R Kit. Thanks, James

Last edited by james12345pt; Jun 10, 2010 at 03:23 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 02:58 PM
  #452  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
You are closely associated with RudeG, perhaps more of his doing than yours, so don't take it personally as the post referenced both of you. The fact is that he instigated much of the drama out of thin air. Let's not do the same thing here - ok?
O'RLY SAINT RAJ?

Your very first post in this thread on page 11 was nothing more than a quick pat on the back for the OP as you quickly proceeded to instigate drama by referring to the "AZ mob squad" and by singling me out to "warn" everybody about me.

https://my350z.com/forum/8404259-post209.html

Before you made that garbage drama post, I contributed to the technical discussion by asking several questions and by offering some things to consider/check out in an effort to help troubleshoot the problems concerning the high backpressure and high AIT's. Others, including the OP, commented that I made good points.

I became frustrated with the OP when he continued to leave out/omit pertinent information and when he continued comments/jabs/insinuations that attacked the integrity of people I know very well.

You asked in a prior post if/why I'm personally vested. As I have mentioned on this forum before, I was present at Intense during much of the R&D on both the PowerLab kit and ProEFI. I personally witnessed the Intense G perform as they claim. I was there during the dynos and was sitting on the trunk of the car during some of those dynos. I was also present at the track when the Intense G made 11 second passes with the 37R turbo. I was present as they went above and beyond most other manufacturers to back up their performance claims with dynos and videos.

So I get offended when people challenge the integrity of Intense or PowerLab and insinuate deception about something I have personally witnessed and have first hand knowledge about. After having informed this community multiple times in prior posts/threads about what I witnessed, I consider continued jabs at Intense/PowerLab as an indirect challenge and attack on MY integrity too (a LEO who investigates, writes reports, and testifies to the TRUTH on felonies and matters much more serious than the attempts to discredit and smear a company/people over the OP's trivial trumped up drama about being 50whp short of his goal). I won't tolerate someone wrongfully calling someone else a liar about something I witnessed. And I will not remain silent or be diplomatic to those who crap on the honor of me or my friends whose integrity I have witnessed countless times in the years I have known them. If that's too "dramatic" for you, so be it.

Last edited by RudeG_v2.0; Jun 10, 2010 at 03:09 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #453  
Elperuano's Avatar
Elperuano
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: Davie
Default

IBTL!
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 03:12 PM
  #454  
iStan's Avatar
iStan
ZR
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas
Default

Confused. The kit makes 500whp on the dyno, but not on the dyno the OP wanted to use? So... it does make 500whp...
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 03:23 PM
  #455  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by iStan
Confused. The kit makes 500whp on the dyno, but not on the dyno the OP wanted to use? So... it does make 500whp...
Yep. The OP made over 500whp on a DJ on pump gas. But he is fixated on DD numbers and is accusing Intense/PowerLab of false advertising because he was foolish enough to assume that the advertised 653whp DJ dyno was achieved on pump gas.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #456  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
I consider continued jabs at Intense/PowerLab as an indirect challenge and attack on MY integrity too ... And I will not remain silent or be diplomatic to those who crap on the honor of me or my friends whose integrity I have witnessed countless times in the years I have known them. If that's too "dramatic" for you, so be it.
Ok, well that about sums it up then. Un/fortunately, the TOU of this forum require you to remain diplomatic.

It seems you are perceiving insults to your honor and are responding accordingly... because a customer is dissatisfied with a product's performance?

You may be insulted / dishonored / whatever, but that doesn't mean folks don't have a right to post for fear of sleighting you. Loyalty to your friends is commendable, but there's a thin line between that and fanaticism / zealotry.

Last edited by rcdash; Jun 10, 2010 at 03:37 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #457  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
Ok, well that about sums it up then. Un/fortunately, the TOU of this forum require you to remain diplomatic.

It seems you are perceiving insults to your honor and are responding accordingly... because a customer is dissatisfied with a product's performance?

You may be insulted / dishonored / whatever, but that doesn't mean folks don't have a right to post for fear of sleighting you.
Can you ever respond to one of my posts without twisting and spinning it?

I'm not insulted because he is dissatisfied with his PowerLab kit. I am insulted by the continued comments by him and others that questioned/attacked the validity of the 653whp dyno and other performance claims, as well as by the insinuations and accusations of deception or shadiness by Intense/PowerLab. He and others essentially called us liars.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #458  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by james12345pt
they also use the 653 whp number in there advertising to lead the customer into believing the kit was capable of achieve over 600whp on race gas
Well, first they have to say it's too dangerous because if they didn't hten people would go after them when they blew their engines. It's a liability. Another thing you'll learn in the car world real fast. They were taking the kit beyond what the safety limits are therefore yes it will work but no it's not safe. When things like that are done the lifespace of the turbo are greatly reduced. Not an issue for a shop trying to put up a number but someone on the street it is a big issue.

about the 653hp. Converted to DD numbers that is 574hp.

With the same kit and a lower compression motor you were wanting to gain 100hp? No offense but that is unrealistic unless you have a monster turbo setup to begin with. Built engines don't produce power. Truthfully you will lose power with lower compression. The forced induction is the power so if you have a kit that is doing a good number on a stock block and working at about 80% of it's life then you aren't going to gain more than 20% of an increase when you use a low compression built block. The math just isn't there.

Now a kit that you're using maybe 50% of potential of the turbo would be able to produce significant gains with a built engine since there is so much left in the turbo.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 03:53 PM
  #459  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
...TOU of this forum require you to remain diplomatic.
really..and you are diplomatic?... you are clever in your "insinuations", and when you get a response, you quickly cry foul "insult", a mob is against me, blah blah blah thats all...doesnt make you any less of a troll.
Baiting (what you do) is liek instigating, so its the same TOU violation... but its jsut how it gets interpreted... the mod that stepped in here forgot to be against such "insinuations" more than 10 pages ago.



Also... LOL again, wtf?


Originally Posted by james12345
It would have been nice if Intense/powerlab would step up and try to contact me and offer some sort of resolution but I don't ever see that happening.
what Kind of resolution are you looking for...i am still not sure what are you looking for ...a free upgrade because you couldn't figure out the 653whp number was on race gas?, which was posted all along in the 653whp thread.
For all the troll threat title, an your "i-cant'-read" insinuations, or other not "sound" comments such as "they ran it at dangerous boost levels", you also insinuated the piping was wrong...what are you expecting to get?

Originally Posted by james12345
It seem that Intense/fanboys speak of all these builds who are able to achieve these big numbers with the gt35r kit but have no bought any proof of this to the table, they then argue that I was foolish to have such high expectations of the kit but in private conversation at time of purchase told me a completely opposite story
who told you you can make 580whp on a DJ..cause that is what your ~500+whpDD goal is.... also, when reading past posts when you were still on stock block from you, you just mention you are looking for a conservative power of over 500whp, no mention that you wanted it on a DD specifically... on yah,
you also mentioned that the kit fitted tightly, you had strup headers and a couple things were hard to fit, which then you got suggested to use a hammer to make room..

Originally Posted by james12345
they also use the 653 whp number in there advertising to lead the customer into believing the kit was capable of achieve over 600whp on race gas but now state that They advise tuners not to run this setup because it is too dangerous to the engine/ turbo/ etc.
please...stop it...find me WHERE THIS WAS SAID.....
See, i am suppose to act nice here, despite fact you continue to post misinformation or and make false accusations...you already said "Intense now proclaims that if you use race gas and dangerous boost levels"...but if i correct you, i guess i am attacking you

let me help you... intensesales said he doesn't recommend running much more than 500whp on pump because there was no sense to push with such unreliable fuel(here we get 91)...which btw its already beyond what you can do with tires for the street anyways. Do you feel mislead that you cant reach more than 600whp on race gas...u haven't even tried it.


This is bad moderation here, it meas you cant say whatever dump shlt you can, instigate all you want, bait all you want, misinform all you want as long as its not a direct insult... ...yet somehow, a direct quote on a sig get a moderator to act....that double standard is OVBIOUS

Last edited by IIQuickSilverII; Jun 10, 2010 at 03:58 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 03:55 PM
  #460  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
Can you ever respond to one of my posts without twisting and spinning it?

I'm not insulted because he is dissatisfied with his PowerLab kit. I am insulted by the continued comments by him and others that questioned/attacked the validity of the 653whp dyno and other performance claims, as well as by the insinuations and accusations of deception or shadiness by Intense/PowerLab. He and others essentially called us liars.
Ok, got it. Thanks for the clarification.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:51 AM.